The dilemma of whether to bid game in a major suit or no-trump
is not only limited to 4-4 eight card fits, as discussed last
week, but 5-3 fits as well. Kit Woolsey, in his book "Matchpoints,"
clearly sets a standard that makes the choice easier for the
declarer.
The same considerations employed to decide whether to bypass
a 4-4 fit and play in a no-trump contract are equally useful
in 5-3 decisions. The big difference is that ruffing can gain
tricks in either hand holding 4-4 fits, but only in the hand
short in trumps holding three cards in 5-3 fits. Another factor
is if the hand short in trumps also has a five-card suit such
as AK543, that can be established by the ruff of spot cards.
The hand that is short in trump almost always determines the
final decision. For example, holding 4-3-3-3 there may be no
advantage to play in a suit contract, as no ruffs are available.
Notice I said "may be," for the combined hands should
have extra strength plus adequate stoppers in all suits.
It should be obvious that holding a doubleton in one of the
three-card suits makes it more feasible to play in the major
rather than no-trump. That ruff in the short hand will give you
an extra trick.
Suppose you hold K5-A7632-Q73-J84 and partner opens 1NT. With
10 points you most definitely want to be in game. The only question
is should game be in hearts or no-trump. Who should decide where
game is to be played, you or partner?
Partner is short in the potential trump suit and should be
the one to place the contract. As a result you should transfer
to hearts (or show your five-card suit by whatever methods your
partnership uses) and then bid 3NT. Partner will bid four-hearts
holding three hearts and a doubleton.
Partner opens 1 spade and you hold A93-KQ5-AJ7-J1075. You
should be willing to bypass the 5-3 spade fit and bid game in
no-trump as your hand is balanced with extra strength and no
ruffing possibilities.
Once again pard opens 1 spade. This time you hold Q63-J4-AKJ-KJ1062
and respond 2 clubs. Pard now bids 2 hearts. That 2-heart bid
by partner makes it reasonable to assume as many tricks can be
made in no-trump as in spades. Therefore bypass the 5-3 spade
fit and play in no-trump. Had partner not bid hearts, you most
assuredly would want to play in the spade contract because of
your combined weakness in the heart suit.
The no-trump suit dilemma occurs frequently when you are holding
a long solid or semi-solid suit. Partner will have few trumps
therefore dummy will have no ruffs. Thus, timing becomes all-important.
With the 4-4 and 5-3 splits having aces at suit play will allow
you to keep control while trumping spot cards.
It's the opposite when holding a long suit. At no-trump the
combined hands must have aces in order to establish enough tricks
to fulfill the contract. Your hand is AKQJ842-97-7-A76 opposite
3-A64-AJ852-J953. The bidding proceeds 1 spade-2 diamonds-3 spades-3NT.
Woolsey says this is a reasonable gamble because your side suit
aces should allow the contract to be made. Actually both 3NT
and 4 spades take 10 tricks.
Change your clubs to KQ6. Without an ace, four-spades is the
more prudent contract.
There are certain 4-3 major suit fits that will make the extra
trick by playing in the major. First, it is critical that all
of the conditions regarding 4-4 and 5-3 fits discussed last week
are met. A suit such as AKJx opposite Qxx with a singleton or
doubleton in the hand with three trumps could play well at a
suit contract because the high honors in the four-card suit can
pull the outstanding trump.
If the singleton is in the four-card suit beware, as the defenders
will force you to ruff causing you to lose control of trump.
The only makeable contract holding AQ85-106-AJ98-Q52 opposite
KJ9-94-KQ532-KJ9 is four-spades. Change the hand to AQ85-10-AJ982-Q52
opposite KJ9-964-KQ53-KJ9 and though four-spades isn't the worst
contract in the world, five-diamonds is ice cold.
With weak holdings like Q10xx opposite Jxx the suit contract
must be avoided, as the defenders will draw your trump. This
type hand plays much better somewhere else.