DEFINING THE DEBATE

 Rick Gray, MRF Board Member, AMA Rep., ABATE member, BIKEPAC Esquire

  A friend of mine who owns a chopper shop in Lancaster said tome the o ther day, "Why do you guys waste so much time arguing about the helmet law when there are so many other important issues?" I told him, "We argue about the helmet law so that guys like you can sell aftermarket parts, and I can buy them. We argue about the helmet law so we don't have to argue about the other issues that go to the heart of whether we motorcycle. Why do you think the NRA argues about armor piercing bullets, because all their members want to put a hole in a tank?"

So we must be the extremists. As Barry Goldwater said, "Moderation in the pursuit of liberty is no virtue and extremism in the defense of freedom is no vice." Let's accept our role willingly. We are the shock troops. We must be at the forefront.

In accepting this role and our orientation, we must recognize that our movement is a small part of many struggling against what is increasingly becoming a conformist society with an increasingly repressive government in' place to enforce society's conformity. We should see that the logic of freedom of choice of which we speak in reference to helmets also applies to the right of women to make reproductive choices without governmental interference.'. It applies to people who choose to alter their reality without fear of arrest or imprisonment. Our choice of a "biker lifestyle" means, if we are serious about freedom, we must tolerate other alternative lifestyles from yuppie to gay even though we neither like or respect those alternatives. lf we complain of discrimination, we should not encourage or condone racism. We must, in our differences, recognize the rights of those inside and outside our movement to make their own choices involving themselves and to be different from us.

We can not afford to become myopic, believing our issues to be the only ones regarding freedom and oppression today. In my daily life I deal with the loss of freedom. The "War on Drugs" (better termed the "War on the bill of Rights") and politicians' other attacks on the way people live are acts of desperation from those in office who can not solve real problems. These politicians are dangerous because they are desperate due to their inability to solve society's problems. Their response is a more restrictive society and more police powers for the government. 

We must see the whole picture and understand where we, as lovers of freedom fit in. It is bigger than we as motorcyclists. Let's recognize it and make ourselves more effective by considering coalitions both formal and informal. Some will say this treads on dangerous ground, but I say not to raise it, and, where beneficial, form such coalitions, might well result in us being an ineffective vocal minority.

I am not advocating that we go out and adopt every cause fighting against governmental and societal limitations. I am saying that in explaining our positions to others who are not motorcyclists in terms of their own movement helps them to better understand that we are not a group of thug thrill seekers. It recruits them to our cause and encourages them to attempt to recruit us to theirs. It changes their orientation.

Let's recognize what our enemies have. This battle is not one that will be won or lost only in Colorado, or Oregon or Pennsylvania. It will not be won "out West" or "back East" or "out East" or "back West." It will be won or lost in Washington, D.C., shaped by what we do in the East and the West. Unfortunately, some states will not be able to resist the economic pressure of the Federal Highway Act.

Still to some degree we should blame ourselves for the federal blackmail found in that Act. How are we to blame? We argued for state's rights and spread ourselves thin in 50 states. We divided ourselves and they conquered. You know what I think of states' rights ... states rights suck! You know what I think of federal government rights ... federal government rights suck! I am for the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution. I believe in individual rights, not the rights of any government, federal or state to control me. In Pennsylvania we've had a helmet law since 1968, see what state's rights have done for us. If I'm wrongfully imprisoned is it any better that I am in a state rather than a federal prison? If my rights as an individual are being infringed upon, do I care what level of government is doing it?

We must in view of what is happening today, reevaluate our ideological bases and not be afraid to redirect. For example, I think that any state that deprives an individual of his or her right to ride, without a helmet should have federal highway funds withheld. and I don't care whether this infringes on the state's "right" to regulate me or not Extreme some would say, not me. Don't be afraid to be different. Don't be afraid to think and rethink. We must always be willing to re-evaluate.

 A.B.A.T.E. of PA.                P.O. Box 15226              Harrisburg, PA 17105‑5226