The War Around Us
If you decide to go to war
HOME
A Republic, Not an Empire
Cambodia and Korea
Alternatives to Ethnic Cleansing
War is always about money
Welcome back from Iraq or Afghanistan!
Vietnam
Children at War
If you decide to go to war
Refugees
Our Army Self-destructs
The International Red Cross
Dresden

Why do you want to go?
 
If you have decided to go to war, you are probably convinced that your side is good and just, while our opponent is evil and unjust.  Be not deceived! After the war is over, should you survive, you may begin to understand that both sides were partially good and just, as well as partially evil and unjust.  Study the history of civilizations and its wars, and you will begin to understand that very little has changed in two thousand years.
 
"Therefore my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear and slow to speak and slow to anger" (James 2:19)
 
All of us who have gone to war have made that decision based on what we have seen on television, or read in the papers.  Unfortunately, the first has become a wasteland of carefully stage-managed sound bytes by pro-war propagandists.  The newspapers vary, and there is some hope of catching a glimmer of truth there, but you have to be very selective. 
 
The good news is that you can probably still find a financially struggling small-town paper, in which an overworked and grossly underpaid editor insists on providing his or her readers with the truth, so that they may be able to devise strategies for the upcoming crises in their lives. 
 
The bad news is, that that newspaper is most likely in it's rapid downhill slide, precisely because of that editor's insistence on providing their reader with the unvarnished truth.  The truth is not pretty or sexy, and it seldom fits in with the agendas of those who have advertising dollars to spend, and with those politicians who are in bed with the war promoters, like the "embedded" reporters who have fed us a series of half-truths and lies about our tragic Iraq adventure: 
 
Everyone who was able to spend half an hour a day surfing on the web before the war knew, as I did, beyond any possible shadow of a doubt, that Al Quaida, not Iraq, was responsible for the 9-11 massacre of our citizens in the World Trade Center.
 
Everyone knew, that not only did the genuinely evil Saddam Hussein have nothing to do with that tragedy, but that he hated Bin Laden's guts, and that Bin Laden felt the same about Saddam. Yet the majority of our citizens appears to believe that the two were close buddies, even today.  Such is the power of a lie, when it is skilfully propagated.
 
Although the Bush administration did, with lies and innuendo, connect Saddam and Bin Laden, the two hated each others' gut so passionately, that they would have tried to kill each other if they had come close enough to recognize the other's face.  In fact, before our war, Iraqi soldiers attempted to eliminate an El Quaida cell, which was terrorizing a small village in north-eastern Iraq, and they were stopped largely by our control of the air space over that area, near the Iranian border.
 
The evil machinations of those among our leaders who would gain from this war, have bogged down our formerly great nation in a war which has resulted in a tragic catastrophy:
 
They say it is almost as bad as Vietnam. I say it is much worse, and here are my qualifications: I have felt the air pressure from two enemy bullets, fired from a rifle only a scarce twenty feet away.
 
During one combat operation, I have seen a Chinese advisor to a main-force NVA unit running toward me with his hands up, and die, hit by fire from his unit, as well as my #748 Montagnard Regional Forces Company behind me.  I saw the surprise as he was hit several times, both by the Montagnards as well as the rear guard elements of the NVA unit, firing at this deserter from their side, from the far end of the jungle clearing. 
 
His body now perforated by many bullets, I saw the pain, then the fear in his face, as he realized that he would not survive. He fell less than two feet away, and, with the help of the Vietnamese commander, I read the unmailed letter he had so lovingly written to his family, encouraging them to hope for his safe return, only a few hours earlier.
 
I have seen the bullet-riddled and limp bodies of Vietcong "sappers" in the barbed wire entanglements of our defensive perimeter, their powerful explosive charges clutched in their bloodless hands. 
 
In the 4th U.S. Infantry Division, I have carried our wounded toward the safety of our helicopter pad at night, past a gauntlet of our shaken defenders, whose timid and squeaky, breaking voices betrayed their very real fears that there were still enemy soldiers within our lines, and that we might be part of that infiltrated attacking force.
 
I have walked through a minefield, in the footsteps of a captured female enemy soldier, from her appearance and behavior probably an important enemy political or military leader.  As I followed four feet behind her, I could tell from her excessive perspiration, that she was almost as uncertain as I was about the exact location of her mines.  I released her after our shared experience of terror, to fight against us, and me, another day. 
 
A few minutes later, as my six Vietnamese soldiers and I joined an American platoon for a search for a missing soldier in the"Iron Triangle" also known as "War Zone C", the most impenetrable enemy stronghold, we found his scalp nailed to a tree, and that was all we were able to find of him. 
 
Still, except during the infamous "Tet" offensive, we could walk the streets of any Vietnamese town with a population of at least 10,000 in groups of 3 or more, with relative safety, as long as we carried our M-16's at the ready position, and avoided looking like easy targets. 
 
At Trung Lap, an ARVN post at the edge of the "Iron Triangle", we were mortared every night, but mostly by the relatively light 60mm mortars, that were unable to penetrate the layer of sandbags and steel planking above our box spring matresses.  As advisors we did have a few perks, but, on the downside, we also had enemy soldiers among the troops we advised, but somehow these satisfied themselves with gathering information and did not overtly attack us.
 
In contrast, our soldiers in Iraq seem to be under attack wherever they go, and at any time.  If I had to choose whether to return to Vietnam when I left in August 1969, or fight in Iraq, I would joyfully jump at the chance to finish the job in Vietnam, and I would be horrified at the possibility of having to serve in that hornets' nest inside a snakepit, in which our soldiers are now struggling to survive.
 
How to survive in combat:
 
Most of us who survived Vietnam head when we arrived "in-country", that if you survive the first month or so, your odds are very good that you will survive the entire tour of duty.  I agree, although the time frame will vary among individuals. 
 
In addition to training the conscious mind, a lot of our actions are heavily influenced by our unconscious and less critical mind, that realm to which hypnotists direct their efforts.  Once you have repeated an action many times, it becomes almost instinctive, and you may barely be aware that you are about to move, duck, or take any multitude of evasive actions which end up saving your life.  For me it worked like this: In a millisecond, a familiar sound which had always been connected with some sort of danger found me leaping for cover, and seconds later a mortar shell explosion proved to my conscious mind that I had made the right choice.
 
Before a combat operation, prepare and think ahead:  You must analyze the terrain, the weather, the capabilities and limitations of your unit, and that of the enemy.  What kind of support can you count on? What additional support may you be able to get in time, if you make the effort? What conditions will dictate whether or not that help will be effective? 
 
The night before a combat operation, I would spend at least two or three hours visualizing the route we were going to take.  Which terrain features would favor the enemy, which would favor us?
 
During the actual mission, I would visualize what the enemy commander would do to counter my mission, depending on his known and suspected capabilities.
 
 
 
 

If you or someone dear to you is thinking about volunteering to fight in Iraq, click here to buy the new book: "What Every Person Should Know About War", by Chris Hedges. Chris has seen enough of war to qualify as an expert on the subject. When you see the amazon.com site, click on "books". Under books, type: "What every person"

Do stories in the newsmedia make you want to fight?
 
When war comes, the first casualty is the truth, said Senator Hiram Johnson in 1917.  In Phillip Knightly's book: "The First Casualty", he describes the role of war correspondents in the many wars of this world.
 
Even during the American Civil War, the majority of Northern corespondents measured up poorly to their important task. in fact, the majority were ignorant, dishonest, and unethical, and their dispatches were frequently inaccurate, often invented, partisan, and inflammatory.  Professor J. Cutler Andrews, in his: "The North Reports the Civil War", wrote: "Sensationalism and exaggeration, outright lies, puffery, slander, faked eye-witness accounts, and conjectures built on pure imagination cheapened much of what passed in the North for news".  The South did not much better, but seemed to have little effect on public opinion, since most of them had great difficulty in optaining paper, and hiring correspondents.

Buy "The First Casualty", by Phillip Knightly, at Amazon.com. Click on "books", type "First Casualty"

Avoid the influence of hate-propaganda.
 
Primarily the television networks, but also the major newspapers and magazines are almost always, probably about 99.99% of the time, guilty of spreading hate-propaganda during a war.  They do this consciously, as well as unconsciously.  Of course, as media which have instantaneous access to such a vast amount of information about an impending conflict, even the "unconscious" part is not a valid excuse for misleading an overwhelmingly gullible public.
 
Remember..... Ah, it's all coming  back now - those atrocity stories before the first "Gulf War", those tiny, innocent babies, allegedly ripped from their incubators in Kuweit?  A few months later, we knew that the story was all a bunch of crap, but we believed it, because we wanted to, and many still do. 
 
After all, Saddam was a thoroughly evil man, and that part was and is very true, and is solidly based on his heinous  crimes against the Iraqui people. Therefore, we were easily conditioned to believe all of those fake news stories.
 
Propaganda, by those professionals in that business, is black, grey, or white, and most of it is grey: Black propaganda is best defined as an outright lie, and there is not a shred of truth in any of it.  (My sincere apologies to my black friends: I didn't make this stuff up, I'm just reporting it.)
 
White propaganda is absolutely true, every word of it.  Neither of these variations is very popular these days, and for good reason.  Those governments who engage in atrocities work very hard to cover their tracks, and perform their horrible offenses against civilized society behind a powerful security screen.  Even if they are found out, their misdeeds are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to prove.  Usually, this only happens after the complete disintegration of their society, when all of their surviving records become available, and their former citizens feel relatively free to testify about these matters.
 
The propagandist who uses purely white propaganda tells you the absolute truth about his enemy, while he works very hard to conceal the equally evil atrocities of his own side.  White propaganda is certainly the most effective, but is limited by the ability of the target audience to believe these horrible stories, and there are many who are beginning to doubt the self-serving information broadcast by either side.
 
That leaves us with "gray" propaganda, my favorite.  At its best, it is a skilful and sophisticated blend of truth and fiction, so wonderfully intermingled, that noone is able to separate the two.  It is based on the easily provable atrocities and misdeeds of an enemy.  These stories bait the hook, and the complete and utter falsehoods, by which they reel you in, serve to  welcome you to a war, in which you will see more atrocities by our side than the enemy is capable of perpetrating in their wildest dreams. In Iraq, the enemy does not have one hundredth of the firepower we are capable of unleashing.
 
Once the general public has adopted a pro-war attitude, no amount of honest reporting of the other side of a story will cause them to change.  A sale has been made, and the general public becomes so thoroughly sold on an opinion, that the other side's argument is rejected out of hand.