MOSTLY SUSPENSIONS
Page 37

Home | Page 40 | Page 39 | Page 38 | Page 37 | Page 36 | Page 34 | Page 35 | Page 33 | Page 32 | Page 31 | Page 22 | blank | Page 14 | Page 12 | Page 23 | Page 13 | Page 25 | Page 6 | Page 17 | Page 29 | Page 24 | Page 5 | Page 9 | Page 11 | Page 20 | Page 21 | Page 28 | Page 15 | Page 27 | Page 30 | Page 10 | Page 26 | Page 19 | Page 7 | Page 16 | Page 18 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 8 | Page 4

Spreadsheet for traction dyno testing with chocks:

TRACTION DYNO TESTING
WITH CHOCKS

The following is for rear wheel drive cars with beam rear axle:

To obtain maximum launch performance, the dynamic loading of the driving tires must be known. This knowledge can be obtained with onboard instrumentation, but many racers find this method too costly.

This is the third procedure I have presented whereby this information can be obtained in your shop and in a comparatively inexpensive manner. Pages 4, 5, and 6 describe a procedure similar to that which was employed in the automotive industry before the use of full chassis fixtures. Its advantages include the gathering of many data points and the ability to place the car at any point within the full launch range. In other words, a tether load could be imposed which would cause one front tire to have zero load. (This would be equivalent to the "lifting" of that tire during launch.) The car would, during this procedure, also squat or rise exactly as it would at the strip.

Its disadvantages, however, proved sufficiently large to discourage its use by many racers. First, a structurally sound location must be available for the attachment of the tether. If such a tether location is available, it is then necessary to find an equally sturdy attachment point for the other end of the tether.

These disadvantages forced me to seek a simpler method. I considered using gravity instead of a tether load. This resulted in the procedure of Page 36. I know engineering students visit this site, so I'm not going to remove Page 36. They might find it interesting. The small wheel scale changes and the necessity of finding a suitable road grade, however, cause me to discourage its use.

This third procedure brings the testing back into the shop, is quick and inexpensive, and requires a minimum of fabrication. Its disadvantages are that there is only one set of wheelscale readings and the car does not squat, rise, etc. during the test. The answers, however, provide everything needed to evaluate your present setup and any changes you might make.

First, it is necessary to scale the car. It is necessary to rescale the car before testing after any suspension change or adjustment.

As the page title indicates, this procedure involves the use of two chocks. I realize you don't normally work with wood, but I found that these chocks can be quickly made using 2x4's, half inch plywood, and lag screws. Cutting diagonally across the width of a 2x4, between lines spaced 6 and a sixteenths apart, yields a 30 degree angle. I recommend 30 degrees, but, if you end up with something else, you can input the value into the spreadsheet.

After scaling the car, the rear wheel scales are removed and replaced with the chocks. The tires are to bear entirely on the sloped surfaces of the chocks and are NOT to contact the shop floor. Obviously, the engine must not be allowed to rotate under the load. With an automatic, it is only necessary that the transmission shifter be placed in "Park." With a manual transmission, it will probably be necessary to engage 2 gears or use some other means to prevent engine rotation. Even with a fresh engine, air trapped in the cylinders will leak by the rings and the car will slowly "walk" down the chocks. With the chocks in place, note and record the front wheel scale readings for insertion into the spreadsheet.

As you've probably figured out, the purpose of the chocks is to provide a known torque for the driveshaft. From the scale readings and the other parameters supplied in the spreadsheet, it is then possible to calculate the equivalent weight transfer and the manner in which the driveshaft reaction torque is distributed by the chassis. An extrapolation then provides the tire loads when one of the front tires loses contact with the strip surface during launch.

The goal, of course, is to equalize the launch loads for the left rear and right rear tires. It is assumed that the user will follow the procedure, make an appropriate suspension adjustment, and then repeat the procedure. The number of adjustments and procedure repeats is determined by the user's adjustment skills and accuracy requirements.

Finally, don't concern yourself excessively with the angle accuracy of the chocks or the center of gravity height. What you're concerned with is the loading difference and that difference is going to be evident with less than "perfect" values for these parameters.


wheelbase =

front track =

rear track =

rear tire radius =

center of gravity height =

axle ratio =

chock angle (degrees) =

CORNER WEIGHTS:

left front =

right front =

left rear =

right rear =

LOADS WITH CHOCKS:

left front =

right front =

ANSWERS:

Launch Loads:

Left Front

Right Front

Left Rear

Right Rear

Enter supporting content here