To those who say they are “Social
Liberals but Economic Conservatives”:
When are we going to learn
from history? Many have no concept of what “social liberalism” is,
from common sense or an historical perspective. Why are some calling themselves
“social liberals” and making up definitions for words, which convey an out and out lie. How can I make such a statement? Simple, I am a liberal in
the truest definition of the word and these self-righteous falsifiers don’t meet the criteria at even the remotest level.
Liberalism is a political
theory based on the very principles “social liberals” abhor the most.
The first principle states
the autonomy of the individual is inviolate.
This means men and women are free to act...”as they think fit...without
asking leave, or depending on the Will of any other Man“(Locke, ) as long as those actions do not interfere with
the rights of another. In short keep your dirty filthy hands off my Bill of Rights!!!! Unless of course, you want to throw out the 16th (income tax) Amendment
which is NOT a right but another lie fostered by those, and their sadistic-minded
friends in government, who seek to steal Americans’ hard earned wealth.
The second principle of liberalism
expresses the idea of Limited government by law with the free consent of the governed. If you doubt me then let’s call
as witnesses all those who took the stand as Anti-Federalists during the debates prior to ratifying the Constitution of the
They hated the concept of big government. You might also like to read the writings
of Thomas Jefferson, who was the consummate liberal. Let me put it a little simpler. The War Between the States was over this principle; States rights lost that one, do
we have to fight another war and see if the outcome is the same? Big federal
government is what our Founding Fathers hated, which is why they included the 2nd Amendment in the Bill of Rights!
The third principle lies next
to the heart of all freedom loving people because we demand protection from arbitrary
authority. The elitists, who control you on the “left”,
understand what “arbitrary” means. “Arbitrary” generally
refers to any action that is determined by chance, whim, or impulse, and not by necessity, reason, or principle. More importantly it means not
limited by law; despotic. More to the point it means that it is time
to stop using children as an excuse for laws that violate the Constitution. If
the government meant to protect the children at Waco why did they ALL die? The government
did not prosecute one single member of the Davidians on any of the charges they used as an excuse to raid them. NOT ONE! The
charge against Randy Weaver of having a sawed-off shotgun was found to be untrue in a court of law and he was acquitted of
all crimes. Yet, Randy lost his wife and son to gunfire from government officials
(?)! His son was machine-gunned in the back while running for home and his wife
killed holding her newborn baby. Are we expected to accept the explanation of
a government sniper who shoots and kills a woman because he thinks (?) a baby is a firearm?
What kind of logic is this? If it were your wife would you believe this
excuse as being a perfectly good reason for her death? In a legal action the
government paid Randy Weaver millions but it will not bring his family back, will it?
Fourth is the principle that
states a true liberal believes in the natural
goodness of humans. I can hear social liberals reading this and saying,
“well, I believe that”. Do they? Do they believe that a family is capable of deciding for itself how their children should be schooled? Do they believe that we are capable of teaching our children the precepts of morality,
sex, family, and proper use of the environment better than the government? If
the professing social liberals say yes, are they lying again? We don’t
need more lies. We are more than capable of deciding how we should protect ourselves
and our children in the car, on roller skates, in a stroller, while playing, on a bike, or a myriad of other activities without
the government and its inane laws. The government has trouble getting the mail
delivered! It justifies spending over 200 billion dollars to help poor inner-city
children over the last thirty years and the results are in; instead of just over 15% who can’t read in the fourth grade
it is now over 40%! Doesn’t that mean that if we spend 300 billion more
dollars NONE will be able to read? Can anyone name one federal program that has worked?
No, we lost the war on poverty, because we still have the poor and how many trillions of dollars were spent? Teen pregnancy has increased with sex education and condom give-away programs. How many hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent on education to have S.A.T. test scores drop to
their lowest level in this nation’s history? Has bi-lingual education
helped the children? No, children are thrown into this curriculum to learn to
speak English and in six years most can’t speak English and lose ground
in their native language. All these programs sold to the American public
were “to help the children” and they have all failed! Who did they
help? Who besides politicians running for re-election and bureaucrats were helped or rewarded?
Now we get the portion of “true”
liberalism the “far left” hate the most. If they were genuinely “liberal”
they would be in favor of the economic principles of laissez-faire and the free
market. Laissez-faire is an economic doctrine that opposes governmental
regulation of, or governmental interference with commerce beyond the minimum necessary for a free-enterprise
system to operate according to its own economic laws. Do you think the
dupes in Congress have any idea what they have done to arguably the greatest economy the world has seen since the 3rd
kingdom of the Ancient Egyptian Empire? Do you “Centrists” understand
what compromising with the “left” has done? Do any of you “social
engineers” realize that the government’s regulatory cat-o’-nine tails has nearly broken the back of America’s
economy and free market system, a system so vibrant that coming out of the Industrial Revolution it was the envy of the world? Can you understand what the regulatory whip of the EPA, OSHA, and IRS has done
to the once free-functioning markets that have provided you with everything you
have? Are you one of the ones who sit and bemoan the cutting of the forests
by the logging industry, from your wood frame homes, on your wood framed chair, on your wood porch? Do you curse the gas and oil industry for their profits while you drive your automobile, on tires made
from fossil fuels, surrounded by plastics made possible because of fossil fuels? Should
I also mention how we are able to heat our homes, cook our food, and heat our swimming pools along with our waterbeds because
of the energy industry? Look down; even the soles and heels of our shoes are possible because of the hated energy industry. Name one thing that we do in a day that is NOT made possible because of the energy
industry! Then, taking imbecility to new heights, these same people vilify the farmers, ranchers and food producers while
feeding themselves and their sluggardly children with the fruits of the producers labor!
What are they doing, fattening their offspring for the slaughter? Do these people expect to escape the very chaos they
lust after, without knowing it?
Now that we can see what political
persuasion the “Left” doesn’t belong too, let us see where their
social activism and voting record has placed them in the political spectrum.
Everything they have
been active against in the last 40 years says they belong to the failed elite group known as Socialists. I don’t care what they call themselves, Centrist, Global Socialist, Socialist, National Socialist
or Communist. They are all basically the same.
The only difference between each is the degree of government extortion exerted over the economy, business, and individual
freedoms and the extent to which they think they are capable of extending the illegal use of governments’ official position
and power to enslave peoples.
Oh, before I forget to ask:
Why, are so many of the “Social Liberals” so sanctimonious in their vehement stance against those who call themselves
“skin heads”, “white supremacists”, “Aryan Nations”, “Neo-Nazis” or a host
of other cat calls? Don’t they know these cretins are their soul mates? That’s right, they are one in the same thing!
Where do you think the term “Nazi” comes from? A Nazi was a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. The Nazi party was founded in Germany
in 1919 and brought to power in 1933 under Adolf Hitler under a Centrist agenda.
NAZI is an acronym for Nationalsozialist meaning a member of NSDAP [National Socialist
German Workers’ Party]. That’s right, plebeians, there is no branch
in this philosophical family tree, no matter how much they try to divorce themselves from these people, their biases, regulatory
prejudices, and social chains PROVE they are still NAZI!!!
Socialists, et al stand for
everything Hitler, Stalin and a host of other despots tried in the last century and beyond.
“Oh,” you cry, “I would never be in favor of the militaristic
status of Nazi Germany!” Really? What do you think will happen if personal
firearms where to be outlawed in the U.S.? Does anyone think every armed citizen of this country would line up to turn in his or her weapons? No, many won’t! That means to “protect
the children” you would have to pay for the hiring of a larger police force and/or increase the military to police EVERY
household in this country. What do you think that is, if not militarism fashioned
by Nazism? What do you think the purpose of a U.N. security force is? Haven’t you been paying attention to what is happening to the populations in the rest of the world
where your benevolent Nazis have been deployed under the U.N. flag? Here at home
you have already started your militaristic buildup with the ATF’s, FBI’s and DEA’s war on drugs. What is the difference between taking the property of an innocent citizen accused of having drugs and what
Hitler did to those he didn’t like? Study the excuses used by your forefathers
in the Nazi party in order to justify taking the personal wealth and property of the Jews, Gypsies, Protestants, and others
in Nazi Germany and Europe. Then show me how the “new”
legalistic excuses for stealing are better when the results are the same.
You say, “I am against
any form of slavery and would never condone what Hitler did to ‘those’ people.
The peoples of Germany and Europe
brought it on themselves”. Really; are the Pollyanna beliefs of many
Americans any more realistic than those of the German people in 1933 or the European’s in 1939? Haven’t we given up almost as many freedoms as those in Germany
did prior to the start of World War II? Haven’t our freedoms been diminished
and regulated almost to the point of nonexistence because of the lies perpetuated by our government? Show me the difference!! Haven’t
we surrendered our rights as American citizens in the same manner as those in Germany
did under Hitler? Haven’t we capitulated, all for the sake of peace, safety and prosperity? Don’t believe me? Then why, in our ignorance, have we
swooned, like groupies, over the LAST leader of the Soviet Union and controller of the slave camps
in 1/3 of the world’s landmass, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev? Why
has he been supported like a demigod and called a “Centrist” capable of bringing peace to this world? Are you sure he is capable of bringing peace? Or did he give
up one post in hopes of a leadership position to try to exercise his murdering social philosophies on the world’s stage? What is the difference between Gorbachev and Stalin?
Time and circumstances is all that separate the two, their ideology remains constant. It very well could have been
Gorbachev who murdered millions of Russians; all that is needed is for him to have taken power as the general secretary of
the Communist Party 60 years earlier…
Yes, like the Nazis under Hitler,
“social liberals” have been able to get laws passed that further their thieving, murdering agenda of socialization. They have accomplished this with help from both sides of the aisle in Congress. They like Hitler have perverted the judiciary branch of government so that justice
in our court system is a mockery. As the Nazis did in 1933 they have politicized
the military so that they fear to uphold the rights of free men and women, while the Generals kowtow to the U.N. or cower
in their holes, waiting to do the “socialist’s” bidding. As
with Hitler’s propaganda machine, they too have enlisted the news media and film industry in their propaganda blitz
of lies. Like the Nazis in 1935 socialism has caused division, discontent and
distrust among the races of our country. True to their Nazi ancestors they have
succeeded in perverting our education system and are polluting the minds of our children with the most profane squalor imaginable. When they, through their political correctness, ban books, they are following the
same path as their Nazi lords who burned “subversive” books. Their
occult lies are destroying families and family traditions, (take a look at what is happening in Klamath
Falls, Oregon); true to their heritage they are using false science to justify
their perversion. Their abhorrent philosophy of socialism has disrupted and subverted
the Judeo/Christian teachings that made the country strong and vibrant. The states of Germany
suffered the same fate under their predecessors, the German Nazi Party. They
are trying, like Hitler, to stop the use of free speech by vilifying people as criminals who disagree with them (when do they
start the arrests and illegal incarcerations for speaking the truth?). Every
bit true to their evil history their hands drip with innocent blood. The
regime of cowardly murders under Hitler, which spawned them, called it “social cleansing”. Now we call it “abortion”. The means and excuses
are different but the results are the same; mountains of the innocent dead!!!
PROVE ME WRONG!!
The one thing they have NOT
accomplished, but I know is very dear to their heart, is the disarming of the American population. Because they are Nazis they will try, and may even get the law passed.
What are you “centrists” willing to sacrifice for this fight? Does anyone understand what another war for freedom would mean? Can you on the “left” comprehend the devastation that will come to our cities, our industries,
and our standard of living? I can not, nor will I, postulate on what the
outcome would be, but I can tell you on the “Left”, it will be a war that we will experience personally. All will suffer the chaos. All will see
the dead and dying not only on the evening news but also up close and in all its abomination.
There will be nothing sanitary or impersonal about this fight. You
on the “left” will live in fear for your life and your families’ well-being because you will not know who/or
where your mortal enemy is. This war will not be a war of facing armies like
that witnessed on TV, during Desert Storm. This will be guerrilla warfare with the terrors of the unknown haunting you for
the duration of the fighting. How much death and destruction are you on the “Left”
willing to take and inflict before you realize that freedom is FAR superior? We
do NOT want this fight, we would prefer to be let alone to live in peace and freedom but you won’t let us!! Why; because the philosophy of “Socialism” forces them on to the natural results of their actions. They want to be the slave masters and we refuse to be slaves. They won’t learn even when they are sick of the smell of death and destruction. It is their choice, they will decide when the fight begins, but they will NOT decide when it is finished! There will be an end to it but they will deplore how we get to that point. We know the price we will pay will be heavy, but we also know there is no substitute
Consider well, “social
liberalism” and listen! Those rumblings being heard are war drums. History has witnessed the ideology of socialism and in every instance has rejected
it. Learn quickly how ideals of socialism are driving people to hate and, worse
yet, to fight. The following passage is from “General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century” by Pierre
“To be governed is to
be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled,
checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom or the virtue to do
so. To be governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction, noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured,
numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished.”
were clearly understood by John Hay who said in 1872:
Evils of Tyranny are rarely seen but by him who resists it."
The days of peace are becoming
short, just as the days of fall shorten with the approaching of the winter solstice.
It is your time to listen, learn and change. Silence and further
compromise will only stir the flames of revolution.