SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA'S PROMULGATION OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULE

PETITION TO CONGRESS AND VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEYS’ USE OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULES AND VOID AB INITIO ORDERS .

"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …"– U.S. vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).

Therefore, simultaneous with the filing of Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does Members of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., U.S. Dist. Ct. E.D. VA (Richmond Division) No. 12-cv-663-JAB (see http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/lawofficesofisidororodriguez/), I petition for an investigation of attorney/judges appointed by the Obama Administration for their business conspiracy, constitutional tort, and interstate racketeering enterprise to deny citizens access to an impartial court and jury trial of malfeasance by use of unconstitutional court rules and void ab initio orders to usurp the legislative power of both Congress and the General Assembly of Virginia.

The issue concerns government employees’ misuse of office to abuse the authority delegated by Congress and the General Assembly to promulgate court rules. Thus, the petition does not conflict with “separation of power,” but rather underscores your duty to assure that delegated power has not been abused, in violation of constitutional limitations and prohibitions.

I request that you act forthwith on this petition given the evidence that I have been the target of retaliation by government employees for previously exercising my 1st Amendment right to petition for an investigation of government employees obstruction of my rights as a father in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204(See http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml).

"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny" (James Madison, Federalist No. 48, Feb. 1, 1788).

Press Release

R.I.C.O. Suit Against IRS/DOJ Employees/Attorneys and Judges for Conspiracy to Violate Internal Revenue Code and Deny Access to an Impartial Court/Jury Trial

The above R.I.C.O. conspiracy was begun in 2003, and is on going, in retaliation: (1) for petitioning Congress to investigate the D.O.J. and judges’ refusal to comply with their duty to secure a father’s right to international visitations under Treaty (see http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml); (2) for litigating on behalf of nonresident US/Colombian citizens (e.g., Martinez v. Lamagno and DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995); and, (3) for litigating to protect property rights in a choate VA Attorney's Lien on a client’s $17 Billion claim to sunken treasure troves in international waters off the coast of the Republic of Colombia (see Sea Search Armada v. Republic of Colombia, DC #1--cv-01083(JEB)).

Therefore, June 28, 2011, Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez filed, Irene Rodriguez et al v. Douglas Shulman and Sea Search Armada et al, Dist. Ct. DC #11-cv-01183(JEB), under the Internal Revenue Code, R.I.C.O., and Bivens, against an interstate criminal conspiracy by the oligarch of Sea Search Armada et al., Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys, government employees/attorneys and judges acting outside of their scope of authority by treason and misprision of the felony of treason (see http://home.earthlink.net/~treason), in violation of Art. IV § 4 of the U.S. Const., the Void Order Doctrine, and internal revenue laws.

Thus, the Press Release seeks to trigger an investigation by the media of a coup d’etat in Washington, D.C., to violate the rule of law of the Void Order Doctrine, separation of power and limitations/prohibitions under our constitutional system (see http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance).

Isidoro Rodriguez Dra. Irene Rodriguez
Member the Ct. of App for the Fed. Cir. Attorney Rep. of Colombia

THE LAW OFFICES OF ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW

Northern Virginia Office: South American Office:
7924 Peyton Forest Trail World Trade Center
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560 Calle 76 No. 54-11, Office 313
Telephone/telefax: 571.423.5066 Barranquilla, Colombia
Mobil: 703.470.1457 Telephone: 011.5753.605288
Email: isidoror@earthlink.net E-mail:irenerod@earthlink.net

Press Release June 28, 2011

Sea Search Armada v. Republic of Colombia, and Intervenor Isidoro Rodriguez v. Sea Search Armada, D.C. 00-cv-02083 (JEB)

The above intervener action was filed on April 15, 2011, to protect and enforce a Virginia Attorney's Lien on Sea Search Armada’s claim to treasure troves valued at $17 Billion sunk off the coast of the Republic of Colombia.

Related to the above, Irene Rodriguez et al v. Douglas Shulman and Sea Search Armada et al, Dist. Ct. DC #11-cv-01183(JEB)(June 28, 2011), was filed against an interstate criminal enterprise motivated by financial interest, cronyism, and/or animosity to the independence of Plaintiffs as attorneys by the oligarch of Sea Search Armada et al., their Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys, government employees/attorneys and federal/Virginia judges’ willful acts outside the scope of their respective minister-ial/judicial authority and jurisdiction by oppression under color of law.

In summary, the oligarch’s interstate criminal conspiracy began in 2003 to punish Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez in retaliation for: (1) litigating on behalf of nonresident US/Colombian citizens (e.g., Martinez v. Lamagno and DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995); (2) litigating to protect a Virginia Attorney’s property rights; and, (3) petitioning Congress to investigate DOJ attorneys and judges’ obstruction of a father’s rights under Treaty, 18 U.S.C. § 1204, and a Joint Custody Agreement (see ). In 2006 the conspiracy was compound-ed to deprive Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez of their right to self-employment by willful acts of treason and misprision of the felony of treason in violation of Art. IV § 4 of the U.S. Const., the Void Order Doctrine, Internal Revenue Code, the Racketeering Influenced and Corruption Organization Act ("R.I.C.O."), Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and rule of law of separation of power under our constitutional system (see , and ).

Therefore this Press Release is a public service seeking to trigger an investigat-ion by the media of the oligarch’s coup d’etat in Washington, D.C., depriving all citizens of the rights and limitation/prohibition pursuant to our constitutional system.

Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez

No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives. United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 (1882).

I took an oath 45 years ago as a Nam Vet, later a Carter/Reagan White House appointee, and an independent federal trial/appellate sole practitioner for more than three decades, to defend and protect the Constitution, the Republic, and its citizens from all enemies "foreign and domestic." Thus, consistent with this I refuse to allow malfesance by government employees and the courts to go unchallenged.

Query, if I with more than three decades experience as a federal civil trail/appellate litigator can be targeted and deprived of access to an impartial jury trial and court to stop the criminal obstruction of my rights as a father, stop violation of my Son's rights as a U.S. citizen, and stop government depriving me of my business, profession and right to employment-- what are either an inexperince attorney or layman to do to protect their rights and stop malfesance?

Thus, because of the evidence of malfeasance of the Federal Judicial Branch conspiring in criminal collusion with Beltway Lobbyist/Attorneys and government attorneys (i.e. Eric Holder) to obstruct my rights as a father I have filed Federal Criminal Complaints under RICO in VA, D.C., CO, NY, and PA. http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/