Good Golly, Miss Molly
Pasadena Star-News, 8 June 1996
Since Marni Anderson's letter opened the topic, please allow me
to state my appreciation of Molly Ivin's columns, which run all
too infrequently in your pages.
I'm thankful that writers like Molly provide at least a token
balance against the plethora of right-wing bashers and trashers
dominating your pages. We NEED Molly and more like her to offset
columnists like Thomas Sowell, William Safire, Mona Charen, Robert
Novak and others. Liberal bias in the media? Quite the contrary,
I'd say there's a far-right foaming-at-the-mouth conservative
bias dominating your media.
By golly, Miss Molly, we NEED you and your down-home humor to
leaven a constant ad hominem barrage from the extreme right. Perhaps
you ARE a bit abrasive on those tender right-wing sensitivities;
most of us probably would not have called Newt Gingrich a "dope-smoking,
draft-dodging, dead-beat dad who divorced his sick wife and climbed
the greasy pole of politics by spreading fear, smear and sludge
through the land," but most probably would agree that that
kind of verbal effluvium belongs right back in the political camp
from which it emanated. You send it back so well, Molly! The Gingrichs
and Limbaughs of the land love to dish out that kind of venom,
but isn't it touching how quickly they develop an appreciation
of that disdained liberal word, "fairness", when they're
on the receiving end of their own bombast?
It would be nice if there were no need for such exchanges -- if
there were a bit more civility in the world. There is a Chinese
saying: "Strong and bitter words indicate a weak cause."
When we are attacked so constantly and bitterly in public (and
by "we", I mean democrats, liberals, moderates, and
moderate republicans and conservatives; in a word, the majority)
by a tiny right-wing minority, and then chastised for daring to
defend ourselves ... well, it just doesn't seem "fair",
does it?
*****
|