 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Inside the Mind of George W. Bush
For this President, the essence of wisdom lies in knowing when not to change |
 |
"I've Gained Strength"
The President who reads history books like a user's manual talks about where he fits in himself |
 |
"Good Will Come Out Of This"
The First Lady talks to TIME about gay-marriage, stem-cell research and dealing with the criticism of her husband |
 |
Viewpoint: The Case For Bush
In a post-9/11 world, the President shows the political courage that wartime demands |
 |
Viewpoint: The Case Against Him
His war on terror may well have made things worse. He doesn't deserve another chance |
 |
TIME Poll
How closeand how unpredictableis the 2004 presidential contest? |
 |
Tales of the City, Revisited
Three years after 9/11, Manhattan looks shiny and clean for the G.O.P. convention. But what has become of its icons: its money, its people and, of course, Rudy? An update on a mending metropolis |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Indicates premium content |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
E-mail your letter to the editor
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
| The Case Against Him |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
His war on terror may well have made things worse. He doesn't deserve
another chance |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
By MICHAEL KINSLEY |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Posted Sunday, August 29, 2004
What do we know about George W. Bush that we didn't know four years
ago, when most of us voted for someone else? We ought to know a lot
more. Never has anyone become President of the United States less
pretested by life. And never has any President been tested so
dramatically so soon after taking office.
He was born at the intersection of two elitesthe Eastern Wasp
establishment and the Texas oiligarchy. He gimme'd his way through
America's top educational institutions. In his 40s, he was still a
kid, hanging around his father's White House with not much to do. A
decade later, without actually winning the most votes, he was
President himself. The average gas-station attendant struggled harder
to get where he or she is than did George W. Bush. Then came Sept.
11.
The heroic saga writes itself, with help from Shakespeare's Henry V
and the life story of Harry Truman. This small man, this wastrel
youth, finds himself leading his nation as it faces one of its
greatest challenges. And in the fire of great events, he finds the
fire of greatness within himself. Take it away, Peggy Noonan.
It's a swell story line, but it won't wash. Against a backdrop of
great events, even a mediocrity can seem great for a while. After
Sept. 11, there was certainly a great flurry of activity. War on
terrorism was declared. An actual war was started in Iraq and still
goes on. A Department of Homeland Security was founded. Various
American freedoms have been suspended. More than $100 billion has
been spent. At the rate things are going, the toll of American lives
lost responding to 9/11 may exceed the toll of 9/11 itself. The toll
of innocent foreigners is higher already.
But what has it all amounted to? As the most powerful nation in the
world, we have managed to track down and kill a few members of
al-Qaeda. No more airliners have been flown into skyscrapers in the
three years since 9/11, but then that was true in the three years
before 9/11 as well. Are we safer from terrorism than we were before?
The only honest answer is, Who knows?
You may approve or disapprove of the invasion and occupation of Iraq,
but it is clear beyond dispute that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
By turning the world in general and the young people of the Muslim
world in particular against us, the decision to respond to al-Qaeda
by toppling Saddam Hussein could have made future terrorism more
likely, not less.
Subtract the war on terror, including Iraq, and the Bush presidency
looks small indeed. Buying short-term prosperity by goosing the
economy with heavy borrowing is no trick at all, yet it's not clear
that Bush has pulled off even this (except the borrowing). His party
has controlled Congress for most of his term. Aside from the
traditional Republican wealth-friendly tax cut, can you name a single
major successful legislative initiative? O.K., prescription drugs for
seniors. Starting in 2006. If it works, which many experts doubt.
And what have these four years taught us about Bush as a person? Some
fortunate folks whose lives do not require struggle have used the
gift of ease to become better people: wiser than if they had had
bills and laundry cluttering their minds, kinder and gentlerin the
famous formulation of George Bush the Elderthan if they had needed
sharp elbows to get somewhere. Bush the Younger never seemed noble in
this way. But as we got to know him in 2000, the ease of his life had
seemed to make him affable, undogmatic and pleasantly underinvested
in anything as vulgar as an agenda. And then there was all that
amiable chatter about "compassionate conservatism." The forecast was
for a laconic, moderate presidency.
How wrong this was. Bush's obvious lack of interest in policy issues
makes him more dogmatic, not less so. Intellectual laziness stiffens
the backbone as much as ideological fervor does. Hand him his
position on an issue, and he can cross it off his list. Bush's
intellectual defenders compare him to Ronald Reagan, who was
simpleminded (they say) in the best sense. Reagan whittled down the
world's complexities into a few simple truths. But Reagan pondered
those complexities on his way to simplicity. He stopped thinking only
after a fair amount of thought. Bush's advisers deliver ideas to him
like a pizza. His stove has never been lit. And four years have not
illuminated the meaning of compassionate conservatism. It remains an
insult to conservatives and a mystery to everybody else. On every big
social issue that has arisen during his term (gay marriage, for
example, and stem-cell research), Bush has been steadfast in taking
the hard-conservative line.
The Wasp graciousness, the good-ole-boy affability, even the
obviously sincere religious conviction run about a quarter-inch deep.
In four years, this small man had two historic opportunities to reach
for greatness, to lead this country to a new and better place, and he
passed up both. The first was when the Democrats patriotically bowed
to a Supreme Court decision they believed to be wrong, if not
corrupt, so that the U.S. could avoid a further constitutional
crisis. What a moment for bipartisanship! Maybe put more than a token
Democrat in the Cabinet? Not a chance.
George W. Bush's second opportunity came on Sept. 11, 2001. Past
grievances suddenly seemed petty, current disagreements seemed
irrelevant, and, even among Bush's opponents, desperate hope replaced
sullen doubts that our nation's leader would be up to the task. Bush
got this gift from the oppositionthe suspension of dislike and
disbeliefwithout doing anything to deserve it. He could have asked
for and got anything he wanted in the weeks and months after 9/11. And he decided to invade Iraq.
For once, George W. Bush was tested. And he flunked.
Michael Kinsley is editorial and opinion editor of the Los Angeles
Times
|
 |