Trains Magazine excerpt
In the January 1979 issue of Trains Magazine, W.A.
Gardner wrote of his experiences working for the Pennsy, helping put their
first E-7's into service ("A Reputation for Reliability"). In November
1980, Trains published Gardner's marvelous article about his days with
EMD, delivering and troubleshooting new locomotives. "Delivering EMD's
Locomotives" was 11 pages long and represents, in my opinion, the kind
of meaty article that, sadly, is rarely seen anymore. Gardner mentions
a couple of anecdotes about steam generators so I am excerpting them here:
Copyright 1980 / Kalmbach Publishing Company / fair use excerpts / A few paragraphs out of an 11 page article
-
MY NEXT ASSIGNMENT was an almost complete change of pace in all respects.
The railroad was the Southern, the location Chattanooga, Tenn. The locomotives
were F3's, not much different than F2's except for horsepower rating, and
like the three B&M F2 sets, were equipped for passenger service. Unlike
the B&M's, though, these Southern F3's had large steam generators in
all units and a gear ratio allowing higher speed; they did not have dynamic
brakes. Assigned to passenger runs in all directions out of Chattanooga,
to Cincinnati, Bristol, Tenn., Birmingham, and New Orleans, the F3's for
the most part displaced Ps-4Pacifics. Two units, usually an A-B combination,
were used on most trains, with an occasional A-B-B set if the train was
unusually long and heavy The cab units could not be used singly or with
just another A unit, though, because only the B units carried water-the
entire supply being in a large round tank in the front of the locomotive
where the cab was located on an A unit. Almost all of the men who had been
on the B&M with me were moved to the Southern, where we were joined
by others from various previous jobs and by several newly hired men. Those
of us from the B&M turned out to be the only ones with experience on
F units, so we got the training and orientation jobs at the start. We looked
the units over as they arrived and were put in service and were delighted
to find a new type, very substantial looking, relay in place of the one
that had given us transition problems on the B&M. It lived up to its
appearance, never giving us any trouble. With the exception of one or two
contactor coil burnouts and three governor failures, these F3's did an
excellent job the entire time we were on the Southern. Our old friend the
troublesome type relay was still with us in other applications, but fortunately
none of these were critical and when one failed it was merely an annoyance
until it could be replaced. Unfortunately, the same could not be said of
the steam generators. These were a new design that the manufacturer had
labeled type "OK." He could not have been more wrong in his choice. A set
of automatic controls, intended to make it possible to simply push the
start button and stand back and watch it run, was installed. These would
work for perhaps a half hour without giving trouble. The system was, complicated
and difficult to understand and, therefore, to troubleshoot, so the first
trouble usually led to overcompensation of something else that really was
all right, with a consequent failure there too. The end result could be
operating the steam generator manually, which was difficult at best, or,
at worst, a complete failure, which meant a substitute locomotive had to
be found quickly For the five or six weeks it took to analyze and correct
the boiler trouble, the "retired" Ps-4's remained quite busy We had had
the same steam generators on the B&M F2's, although in a smaller size,
and they had performed flawessly. Apparently what was a reasonably good,
if complicated, design had been overpowered by the increase in size plus
the necessity of producing them in large quantities quickly The plant had
built 50 units for Southern and 16 for the Santa Fe with no letup, and
the steam generator people just were not ready to go that far that fast.
-
Things got positively dull for awhile, but one incident livened things
up, at least for a few minutes. One of the other instructors had an assignment
out of Atlanta one afternoon, and when he arrived at Terminal Station and
boarded the locomotive, which was already on the train, he was surprised
to find no one else around. The engines were idling, but the steam generators
had not been fired up, or so he thought. What he subsequently found out,
to his dismay, was that he had arrived only seconds after the fireman and
the roa4 foreman, who, after several unsuccessful attempts to fire up the
steam generators, had gone off seeking assistance. The engineer was on
board, but he and the instructor never did see one another as they both
walked around the engine rooms-apparently on opposite sides. The instructor
knew the steam generators should be running since departure time was close,
so he went through all the proper procedures to start one of them. Not
knowing of the previous attempts, he did not realize that the bottom of
the firebox was full of sprayed-in fuel that had not ignited, apparently
because the men had neglected some small but vital step in the procedure.
The instructor did everything correctly, unfortunately, for the steam generator
lit and almost immediately thereafter exploded as the fire he had started
ignited the pool of fuel. The boiler's jacket blew off, the stack blew
up high enough to hit the roof of the trainshed, and black, oily smoke
rolled up the stairs into the passenger station. The instructor wound up
with a black face, but he wasn't hurt and the damage was not extensive,
for the train departed only a little late. But a valuable lesson had been
learned-never fire up a steam generator without first looking inside with
a flashlight (not a fusee) to make sure the inside is dry.
-
When the snow stopped and it turned cold, a new problem cropped up--frozen
controls on the steam generators. I got a good taste of this on a trip
from Scranton to Buffalo. We were about halfway there when the sun went
down, and the temperature with it. This was our first experience with the
new steam generators in cold weather, and it was not good. The automatic
controls were almost all mounted up high on the machine, close to the blast
of cold air that the engine and radiator fans were sucking in through the
side screens. Since they were actuated by steam pressure and water level
by means of small steam and water lines, it didn't take a strong current
of 10-below-zero air long to freeze them up. That was the end of automatic
control. Manual operation had to be resorted to, with the fireman taking
charge of the lead unit and I the rear one. This maneuver kept the steam
supply up where it belonged, but since we were not nearly as responsive
as the automatic controls were, we used a great deal more fuel and water-
particularly the latter. It became obvious we were not going to make Buffalo
on our water supply as planned, so a messsage for help was thrown off at
the next open office and we made an unscheduled stop for water at a little
town up the line, where a crew of men had been alerted to man the pumps.
That got us to Buffalo, but the same action was required on the return
trip. Scranton shops, of course, knew of our problem, and by the time we
got back the men there had made up some windshield sheet-metal plates to
cover the controls and were preparing to apply steam tracer lines to the
control piping. These were simply copper tubing wrapped around the pipes
to be protected, after which both were wrapped with insulating tape. Steam
was allowed to flow through the tracer lines all the time, keeping the
control lines warm enough so they would not freeze even when there was
no flow through them. Things settled down to normal after that, and of
course it never got cold enough again to really matter.
Return to Main Steam Generator Page