|
Examples |
| Equal steps | Step #6 of
the Solution model, (#17) asks: "What is wanted? Not
wanted?" Actually, step #6 in any model suggests model
#6: Purpose. Its step #6 suggests a principled approach when
answering that question. Again, each step in each model supports the
idea. Primary errors because of the models used are Denial
(model #17) and Blind acceptance (model
#6). The spiritual version of step #6 in model #18: Revelation describes a thought process of a "Period of settling down," in which one decides to give up or keep. Give up or keep what? Ideas, principles, behavior, standards, requirements—each model has a different term for what it is. The process is ultimately spiritual, with spiritual error the closed mind of Prejudice. |
| Will & Mind | The
Will format follows what instinctively seems the
right thing to do, which is automatic behavior. When automatic behavior,
(which could be called "willful" behavior) either learned or
unlearned, doesn't work, the Mind format should be used, which seeks
proof. The Mind format brings decision into the Process, and adds the element of proof, making a change of will possible. When proof is used, what seems the best thing to do is more likely to be the best thing to do. |
| First example | Generally,
choose the
stage in the model of most concern. For example, let's use #7, the Relationship
Model. Its step #4, Respect: Qualities are valued,
seems to be the most important now. In the model #18, #4 is Period of Sorting Out: What is
helpful? This last question is important. What is actually
helpful? One
wouldn't want to be respected what is not helpful.
For example, drinking, drugs, and milder non-helpful forms of self-persecution are very common.
Being respected for "keeping on drinking" isn't very
helpful, for example. Review of both models may be required. First, review the model that corresponds with step# 4—Model #4: Resources. Its objective is "Profit personally." Personal profit provides a benefit of real value, not the delusional forms of self-help, which have little value. Secondly, with an overall look at the Relationship Model, step #1 asks Who or what is attracted? Does the attraction begin on the basis of a positive spiritual value, or is it a perceived lack in the self or the other that might be corrected by the relationship. Filling a lack is neither respectful or helpful to one or the other, though it may appear so. Step #2 of the Relationship Model asks what the relationship seeks: Promise: Benefit is indicated. In a relationship, one conceives being "at one" within the relationship. What is the real benefit? Is it for value or a lacked value? This applies to the complete process of the Relationship Model. Its goal? A satisfying relationship, which creates value. In all models, each step follows the Process. |
| Second example |
Step #9 in the Process is Honesty. Step #9 in Model #8, Communications, is Message: Meaning is created.
What meaning is created by a dishonest message? Step # 10 in the Process is Tolerance. Step #10 in Model #8, Communications, is Means: A medium is available. Knowing what a medium can or cannot hold determines the content of a message. Each medium has certain limitations, and understanding the "tolerance" of a medium's capacity is essential to creating an honest message that the medium can carry. For example, a telephone conversation is different than face-to-face communications, or a mass media like the radio. Honest messages accommodate the media, and some don't fit. |
| More |
Hopefully, these two examples demonstrate both the relationship of a concern
to its appropriate model, the relationship of each model to each
other, and their relationship to the Process. If more explanation of the Labyrinth is needed, please express it in an e-mail—(linked at the bottom of each page). |
|
Back to The
Process
|
|
|
|
| Comments or questions? Please send an e-mail message. Thank you. |
Copyright
© Russ Bedord
|