| Species list |
Hybrids list |
Tubers list |
Topics list |
Site index |
What's new |
Home page |
Sinningia amambayensis
Although this picture shows the same plant as above, the leaves look darker due to not very skillful photoshopping in an attempt to bring out the flowers.
Culture is easy, except for one peculiarity, at least in my conditions. The plants I have placed outdoors have all gone dormant in winter but not come back the next year. My indoor plants of this species are not deciduous, but retain their leaves all year.
Grooming S. amambayensis for show can be frustrating, because of its sticky leaves. It produces abundant pollen, the pollen drops on the leaves where it is almost impossible to remove completely, and judges sometimes mistake the pollen for mildew.
A picture shows one possible explanation for the leaf stickiness: S. amambayensis fighting back against its enemies.
At the 2006 Gesneriad Society convention in Rochester, New York, Carol Hamelink of Laurel, Maryland, exhibited a very nice plant of S. amambayensis, with four vigorous shoots. The judges marked it down for "quantity of bloom", leading to a post-convention discussion on the Gesneriphiles mailing list. Mauro Peixoto wrote that a stem of this plant normally has only two flowers open at any given time; the flowers at the next node up the stem open about the time that the previous two are falling. I went to check my own plant, which had seven sprawling stems (and therefore didn't look nearly as attractive as Carol's show plant), and sure enough each of the stems had only two flowers.
Even though the species does not usually have a large number of flowers open at one time, it does have a long blooming season, from late spring or early summer deep into winter. The bright green foliage and bright red flowers are very cheerful in December and January.
Sinningia amambayensis has an unusual fruit. There is lousy picture and a discussion.
A number of sinningia species have the following properties:
The species are
S. nordestina (anthers barely exserted) is similar, and S. valsuganensis might also qualify.
I call this group of species the Mamba Group. They are all in the Corytholoma clade. The nuclear DNA data have these three species quite close, and S. valsuganensis not far away, although S. nordestina is somewhat distant. However, the chloroplast DNA gives conflicting results, so it is unclear whether the Mamba Group is a taxonomic reality or just a product of convergent evolution.
I have done two crosses with S. amambayensis. The results looked a lot like S. amambayensis. Especially, they felt a lot like S. amambayensis: the same sticky leaves!
One cross was with S. sulcata, using pollen supplied by Jon Dixon. The resulting plants tended to have one primary stem, unlike the bushy amambayensis parent. The flowers were the same general shape as those of S. amambayensis, but the corolla lobes were a peachy color, both inside and out, which was a nice effect. The most distinctive feature was the pistil: the stigma extended waaaay beyond the corolla tube (see the picture below).
While the plants of the above cross were clearly different from the S. amambayensis seed parent, the same cannot be said with 100% certainty of the results of the other cross (which was actually done a year earlier). The flowers of S. amambayensis x nordestina (if that's what it truly is and not a selfing) are very similar to those of S. amambayensis, except for two main differences.  First, there are 3-4 flowers per axil, instead of the one (or, occasionally, two) in the case of S. amambayensis. Also, the style and stigma are very thick and "muscular" by comparison with that of the seed parent. Declaring this plant to be the True Cross (aside from the theological hazard) is also a little iffy because nothing about it reminds one of S. nordestina.
Could this be a selfing of S. amambayensis? The two main visible differences, the thickness and color of the style and the number of flowers per axil, certainly seem within the possible variation of the seed parent species. On the other hand, I have raised selfings of S. amambayensis and not seen plants like this. So unless further evidence disproves my hypothesis, I'm going to go with the identification of this plant as S. amambayensis x nordestina.
Here is a table which compares the three plants.
| Feature | S. amambayensis | ... x sulcata | ... x nordestina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Habit | Sprawls, branching at base | Main stem with small side branches along stem | Sprawls, branching at base |
| Flower color | Red-orange | Red-pink with peach-colored lobes | Red-orange |
| Flowers per axil | One (sometimes two) | One (sometimes two) | Three-four |
| Pistil | Thin style with stigma barely exserted | Even thinner style extending well beyond corolla tube | Robust dark-red style with stigma clear of corolla tube |
| Plant Description | |
|---|---|
| Attribute | Information |
| Growth | Indeterminate |
| Habit | Stems usually prostrate or creeping, flowers borne in leaf axils. |
| Leaves | Green, hairy, sticky |
| Dormancy | In my cultivation, if this species goes dormant, it often does not revive. Mine are evergreen. |
| Flowering | |
| Attribute | Information |
| Inflorescence | Axillary cyme, usually just one flower |
| Season | Blooms at intervals from spring through autumn |
| Flower | Red, tubular; buds are yellow. Anthers are exserted. |
| Horticultural Aspects | |
| Attribute | Information |
| Hardiness | None of mine which I put outdoors came back in the spring. |
| Recommended? | Yes. Long blooming season! |
| Botany | |
| Attribute | Information |
| Taxonomic group | The tall-or-sticky group of the Corytholoma clade. |
Chautems, 1992.
Etymology: Amambaya + -ensis ("resident of"). Sierra de Amambaya is in Paraguay.