It was a great joy to attend the Minnesota Annual Conference from June 2 to June 4, 2004. It was a spiritual and eye
opening experience to see how this connection of United Methodists works. I was left with a greater understanding of the Church.
I attended as a lay delegate from Riverview United Methodist Church in Brooklyn Park. I am also an Inquiring Candidate
for Ministry with my eye on becoming a local pastor.Upon arriving on the evening of Tuesday, June 2 I was able to make it
to the 7:30 p.m. worship service. After checking into my Bed and Breakfast I scurried over to the Ritchie auditorium on the
Saint Cloud State University campus. I ran into my mentor Rev. Bill Eaves from Anoka United Methodist, one of many "connections"
I would make.
The worship was lovely, and we all took communion. The retiring clergy were honored, and I stayed around to listen to
the speeches. It was also with great sadness that I learned of the death of Rev. Sue Zabel. I had known her when she was at
United Theological Seminary and had played guitar for her and she played flute. She was very talented and a wonderfully warm
person who was very helpful to me when I first attended United.
Wednesday morning was filled with Plenary, Laity, and worship. What I found most interesting was the Laity session in
which we were introduced to the Russian Conferences Superintendent from St. Petersburg, Russia. He gave a fascinating presentation
of one who lived during the Soviet Union and now more democratic Russia. In his conference there are approximately 11 churches
that worship between 8-80 people. A partnership was proposed with the Minnesota Annual Conference and the Russian Conference
to exchange resources and people to help their tiny churches grow. The main problem the Russian Conferences struggle with
is worship space (or the lack thereof). In Russian society, he explained, a building is very important as there is an emphasis
on the church being a "building" or place. It is hoped through this partnership that such buildings can be constructed.
We met in the afternoon for Conferencing groups as each person was assigned a conferencing group. The group I was assigned
to was of little interest to me as it was a very non-controversial item regarding the merging of a position. We were able
to attend other conference groups if we were interested in them, although if it was not the group you were assigned to you
would be given voice but no vote. I attended a group on a rather bizzare Action Item suggesting that the clergy be 100% responsible
for dependent health care, retired clergy be 100% responsible for any health care over and above Medicare, and that the clergy
be responsible for 50% of all utilities, as well as some issues with the Cafeteria Plan. Being that I am looking at becoming
clergy, this session interested me. The action item was recommended for rejection after some discussion. It seems to me that
Conferencing Groups can get a little out of hand as we set about amending and amending until I pointed out and another beside
me did that this was not really an item we were in favor of and we would save a lot of time to just reject it. It was rejected
22-0.
Being that we finished with our group early, I had the afternoon off from about three pm until worship that evening at
7:30. I found a really good sub shop. Also during this day, I made connections with Rev. Linda Kohlman (North UMC), Rev. Judy
Myers (Champlin UMC), Chatted with Kathi Mahle briefly, David Bard (he was my polity instructor), and kept running into 5
of the other polity students that were in my class this last term at United.
By far the highlight of the day and the Conference for me was the sermon by Vance P. Ross, the Associate General Secretary of
the General Board of Discipleship. He spoke at the Service of Reconciliation in which the church was acknowledging the sins
of racism. Many speakers spoke,and Rev. Ross spoke on connection. His emphasis on the first church as described in Acts and
how it differs from today's church was startling. I bought a copy of his address and have watched it a few times since. His
topic was starting the "Love Takeover." He also drove home the point that Christianity is not a solitary endeavor, and nowhere
in the Christ's teachings does it state that we are to go it alone. It was fantastic.
Thursday, June 3 brought more morning worship and an address from the Conference speaker who had been drawn at random
last year. Then we began more celebrations of ministries, Plenary sessions, and commissioning. We also took action on
many action items, most notably a Unity Resolution in which we agreed, in essence, to disagree on those more controversial
points.
An action item was passed that spoke against pre-emptive military strikes. This was a volitile item, yet eventually passed.
It basically states that it is immoral to start wars, and that as Christians starting a war is not what we are about. As the
conversation degenerated into what came close to flag waving and the more right wing might makes right arguments, the pastor
from Herrron UMC spoke eloquently that comparisons to World War II, etc. were not valid. This resolution does not talk about
reacting to something that has happened, but standing against reacting to something we think MIGHT happen. Pre-emptive
first strike, from what I can see, is not compatable with Christian teaching. It passed with what seemed close to a two thirds
majority.
The only excitement left was to read appointments, and a brief service which ended the conference.
What was most interesting to me was having just finished a class on United Methodist History and Polity, I actually got
to see a lot of this "in action." I made a connection with the pastor at the Lansboro Church who does concert series
there. I met Bruce Ruggles, my former pastor at Champlin UMC, as well as some retired clergy. All in all, it was a wonderful
experience.