`Words will never hurt me' goes the old schoolyard rhyme. They do of course, and, as CHRISTOPHER BANTICK reports, homosexual slurs are a favourite because they hurt most.THERE can be no greater...

(The Mercury (Tasmania, Australia))
 
 

`Words will never hurt me' goes the old schoolyard rhyme. They do of

course, and, as CHRISTOPHER BANTICK reports, homosexual slurs are

a favourite because they hurt most.THERE can be no greater...

EDITION: 1
 
 

`Words will never hurt me' goes the old schoolyard rhyme. They do

of course, and, as CHRISTOPHER BANTICK reports, homosexual slurs are

a favourite because they hurt most.THERE can be no greater schoolyard

insult than to call someone ``poofter'', ``faggot'' or any other homosexual

slur.

That's the opinion of David Plummer, associate professor in community

and public health at the University of New England.

Dr Plummer's research findings were submitted earlier this month

to a federal parliamentary enquiry into boys and education. His findings

square with research reported in The Mercury in April last year.

The federal enquiry, originally set up in early 2000 by the federal

schools minister David Kemp, received a disquieting submission last

April that said boys feared being called gay, and as a consequence

were reluctant to participate in English classes.

English is perceived as a feminised subject and for a boy to be seen

to be doing well at it immediately singles him out.

These deductions were part of the written submission by Dealkin University

academic, Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli, who said: ``One of the reasons

for falling literacy standards among boys was that many were scared

to participate in class for fear of being called a fag. Boys resist

reading and writing because they are so aware of the broader social

and classroom monitoring by their peers.''

Although Dr Plummer's findings this month reflect the April 2000

submissions to the parliamentary enquiry, there is one distinct difference.

He says: ``Homophobic words, like poofter and faggot, generally enter

boys' talk during mid-primary school. Initially these words do not

carry sexual connotations, but neither are they meaningless nor randomly

employed.''

What is abundantly plain from the submissions already before the

parliamentary enquiry is that to be called gay at school sets in train

circumstances that can have dire consequences on academic performance

and social progress.

The school pecking order can be brutal system of ranking individuals.

Children can be quickly marginalised by a name that has no basis in

fact but is used as an insult. Moreover, it is not just boys who use

the term gay or poofter with the intention of hurting someone.

Machismo is often the sole defining aspect of what makes boys acceptable

to girls. A girl who is associated with someone called a fag is likely

to come in for criticism herself. The school yard pariahs are boys

labelled gay. They seldom have friends and quickly become isolated.

In one sense, it is easy to see why boys call others poofters. It

is a subtle and effective form of bullying. It is all the more successful

if the victim responds with denial and in so doing increases the likelihood

of further comment. But there is another side as to why boys -- and

it is boys in the overwhelming majority who do this -- use sexuality

as a term of abuse.

Michael Carr-Greg, an adolescent psychologist at the Albert Road

Centre for Health in Melbourne, says boys who feel alienated by society

can be ``incredibly homophobic and threatened by anyone who is different.

They cover themselves in this kind of hyper-masculine contemporary

male identity, which is the black T-shirt, and the fairly loud, aggressive

rock music''.

But not all boys -- particularly not those in primary school -- who

use terms like faggot as a verbal assault fit into the profile Carr-

Gregg gives. Plummer discovered that it was enough for a boy to not

conform to the peer-group culture to be called a poofter. It had,

he said, ``nothing to do with sexual practice''.

Just how pervasive and varied homophobic terms of abuse can be in

the schoolyard is evident in Kidspeak: A Dictionary of Australian

Children's Words, Expressions and Games, by June Factor. This revealing

and important book published by Melbourne University Press late last

year, chronicles the schoolyard terms mainly primary-school children

use in every-day speech.

Under ``poofter'' and its derivatives, there are five separate entries.

All are highly derogatory. For ``fag'' or ``faggot'', there are also

five. None is complimentary. For ``gay'', another six entries show

the extent and variety of abusive terms used to single out individuals.

These are all expressions in daily currency in the playgrounds from

Hobart to Broome.

What the research submitted to the parliamentary enquiry has shown

is where homophobic terms are used more frequently. It is not in the

classroom, but the change rooms, toilet blocks and sports grounds

and secluded locations around the school.

No solutions as to how to deal with this have come forth. To reduce

homophobia amongst boys, individual school cultures will need to change

to reflect a greater tolerance in social attitudes to gays. This,

at least in the schoolyard, appears to be some way off.
 
 

Author not available, `Words will never hurt me' goes the old schoolyard rhyme. They do of course, and, as CHRISTOPHER BANTICK reports, homosexual slurs are a favourite because they hurt most.THERE can be no greater.... , The Mercury (Tasmania, Australia), 03-15-2001, pp 020.
 
 

RETURN TO SCOEY'S ZONE

BACK TO THE PRIDE LIST