Building a Mammoth Camera


by William Underwood

2001. The Bigger is better philosophy may not be true in all instances, certainly not when dealing with computer chips or cell phones, but "bigger is better" is everywhere around us. We supersize our burgers, our SUV's are bigger than ever, and a 19" TV is tiny - and cheap - by today's standards. So why not cameras? My first experience with large format cameras was a 4x5 Speed Graphic that I picked up about 4 years ago. That's when it all started.

(At Right: Photo of 12x20 with 8x10 camera behind it.)

1020

I'm not a wealthy man, not by any stretch. In fact, this large format photography has been a real strain on my finances. So when I wanted a 4x5 with some movements, I considered a kit camera, but instead found an old Graphic View with a 7-1/2" Ektar. It seemed awkward to carry into the field, but satisfied my desire for a while. But then one day in 1998, I took a large format photo seminar with Florida landscape photographer, Clyde Butcher. Now I HAD to have a bigger camera. A week after the class, in an amazing stroke of luck, I stumbled across an inexpensive Seneca 8x10 outfit complete with lens, an old tripod and half a dozen holders. Now this produced a negative I could see! But the bellows were dying, and I still had that urge to build a camera. I confess, I built an 8x10 Bender camera - and I liked it. I still like it!

I'm not getting any younger, in fact, I recently turned 50. With the clock ticking and so much left to do, I decided to accelerate my large format photographic evolution. 4x5 negatives seemed small and lacked the impact of my 8x10 shots. So by my own skewed logic, I rationalized that if 4x5 was good, and 8x10 was better, then 12x20 should be down right wonderful. But there were several obstacles to overcome, and they all concerned money. I could order a new Wisner - and live with it in my car or under a bridge, since there would be no money to pay the mortgage. An antique Banquet camera was another option; an old camera from long ago such as a Folmer & Schwing or Korona was definitely more feasible. The outfits usually come with a holder or two, and maybe even a lens, but still around two grand, and likely a lot more. Since my wife likes the comforts of electricity, a telephone, food, and such, I needed a cheaper alternative. As I gazed at my Bender 8x10, I imagined how one would look beefed up with a massive bellows and able to handle a giant film holder. I started making sketches.

Two Home-Made Projects, side by side. 

The Mammoth and the UnderWide 4x5.

Also: The tube for the Packard Shutter is visible in this shot, as is the flash sync cord for future 11x14 life size portraits.

 

Continue

If there is not a menu to the left (Frames), click HERE.

Send an E-Mail

©2001 by W. Underwood