Prior to her death on July 15, 1929,and because he was the next in line Alice
Melinda Storey/Tracy Fielding appointed William James Storey (Sachem Tallfox) her choice to rule the Mohegan’s.
Alice Storey/Tracy Fielding was at that time known as the Princess (Sachem) of
the Mohegan’s, and is a direct descendant of Uncas, acknowledged leader of the Mohegan Indian Tribe during the "Pequot
War" of 1637, and thereafter. This title was affirmed as "Sachem for Life" by the Officers of Tribal Council of Mohegan Indians
and on November 18, 1933 Sachem Tallfox appointed his cousin John Hamilton as
his War Chief of land claims and this was recognized and supported by the Mohegan’s,
including Courtland Fowler, from 1933 through the 1960s.
In the late 1960s, War Chief Hamilton was authorized by the Council of Descendants
of Mohegan Indians to act on its behalf in matters pertaining to the relations between the Mohegan Indian Tribe and the State
of Connecticut. At that time, Fowler served on the Council under war chief John Hamilton.
In 1970, a faction of Mohegan’s became dissatisfied with the prospects of
the Mohegan Indian Tribe filing a land claim suit against the tribe’s neighbors so at an unofficial Council meeting
in May 1970, sought to elect a new leader of the Mohegan Tribe?
American native people now allowed to elect a Sachem to rule them?
How white of them!
War Chief Hamilton rejected the asserted authority of the Council to replace him
or his Sachem so he and his followers left the meeting.
The remaining Mohegan Indians and non Indians at the meeting elected Courtland
Fowler as their committee chairman.
The total number of people casting votes was fewer than 10 according to public
statements made by chairman Courtland Fowler.
Fewer than 10 people tried to overthrew the Sachems Constitutional government
and leadership tradition older than recorded history and leave the majority of Mohegan’s the Traditional American native
Mohegan’s out.
Despite this separation
however, from the 1970s until 1994, no Mohegan Indian was excluded from participation in traditional practices, events or
ceremonies by virtue of association with either the Storey/Hamilton or Fowler faction of Mohegan Indians.
War Chief Hamilton continued to pursue a land claim suit on behalf of the Mohegan
Tribe, and retained counsel for the purpose of prosecuting the land claim suit.
In 1977, "The Mohegan Tribe," acting through War Chief Hamilton, filed a land
claim suit in federal district court in Connecticut against the State of Connecticut, asserting that aboriginal and historic
claims and titles to over 2,000 acres in Montville, Connecticut had been extinguished in violation of the Non-Intercourse
Act.
War Chief Hamilton further filed a notice with the Bureau of Indian Affairs ("BIA")
seeking federal acknowledgment of "The Mohegan Tribe" in 1978. Both the land claim suit and the acknowledgment petition were
filed on behalf of the Mohegan Tribe by Attorney Jerome Griner, who had been retained by Hamilton under his authority as Chief
of Land claims.
From May 1970 through 1979, the Fowler faction continued to actively and publicly
oppose both the land claim suit and the federal acknowledgment petition. From 1979 to 1981, the Fowler faction organized an
entity called the "Mohegan Tribal Council" and adopted a constitution for its governance in 1980. At around this time, Attorney
Griner, counsel of record for the Mohegan Tribe in the land claim suit and the federal acknowledgment petition, ceased accepting
direction from Chief Hamilton and instead began to take direction from the Fowler faction, without notifying either the federal
court or the BIA of his change in clients.
Upon discovering that Attorney Griner had begun to serve the interests of the
Fowler faction in 1981, Hamilton discharged him and retained separate counsel from Attorney Robert Cohen. Although the State
raised the issue of the propriety of filings by two attorneys on behalf of "The Mohegan Tribe" in the land claim suit when
Cohen filed his appearance in 1981 and then later in 1989, the issue of authorization for the filings of Griner and Cohen
was never resolved by the district court.
The Fowler faction amended its constitution in 1984 and renamed itself the Mohegan
Tribe of Indians of Connecticut ("MTIC").
In 1985, Attorney Griner filed detailed documentation before the BIA in support
of the 1978 acknowledgment petition on behalf of "The Mohegan Tribe, petitioner." Griner submitted an MTIC membership roll
of 1,017 members, claiming that this roll relied on lists of Mohegan Indians prepared by the State of Connecticut. The BIA
then placed the petition under "active consideration."
Also in 1985, the State of Connecticut filed a formal opposition to federal acknowledgment
with the BIA, characterizing Hamilton and his followers and the Fowler group as two factions of a single, unitary Mohegan
Tribe. In support of this position, the State relied on a 1979 letter from a member of the Fowler faction stating that "‘they
do not have a tribal organization because they are going to organize to form a tribal group for the sole purpose of combating
War Chief John Hamilton.’"
In November 1989, the BIA announced its proposed decision that the United States
would not acknowledge the Mohegan Tribe, based on its finding that from 1941 to the date of the rejection, the Mohegan Tribe
did not demonstrate sufficient social community or sufficient political authority and influence as required under 25 CPR 83.7
(b) and (c). The BIA did not examine the files and records of Hamilton or the Council prior to issuing the proposed rejection.
In 1990, Cohen submitted a response to the BIA pointing out that the BIA had never examined these files, and in which he narrated
the internal leadership and external political and land claim efforts of Hamilton from 1941 until his death in 1988.
Because of the crossing of War Chief Hamilton and the crossing in 1986 of Sachem
Tallfox’s last living son Sachem Zeak, Clarence J Storey, another Mohegan
tribal faction started under the leadership of Eleanor Fortin The Secretary/driver
of War Chief John E Hamilton.
The Mohegan Tribe and Nation is an incorporated tribal organization representing
the interests of its membership, Native Americans of Mohegan ancestry, community and traditions, The Mohegan Tribe and Nation’s
membership consists of the living descendants of the aboriginal Mohegan Indian Tribe who are followers of the Mohegan land
claims leadership of Sachem Tallfox and his Chief John Hamilton.
MTIC issued new membership restrictions in 1990, which limited membership in the
Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut to lineal descendants of Francis Fielding and his wife Rachel Hoscott Fielding (1802
to 1860), or of Amy Cooper, whose children were adopted by William Fielding, a child of Rachel Hoscott Fielding and Francis
Fielding. NAM claims that "MTIC maintains that there were no other Mohegan Indians alive in the first half of the nineteenth
century with living descendants and that the families of any and all Mohegan Indians alive during 1802-1860 (other than the
family of Rachel Fielding) are ‘extinct.’" After adopting this restriction, MTIC removed approximately 118 people
from its membership roll whom it had previously determined to be Mohegan, and whom NAM claims were on the membership roll
originally submitted to the BIA in 1985. NAM claims that these 118 excluded people are Mohegan by standards known and employed
in Mohegan tradition prior to 1990. After the federal acknowledgment petition was rejected by the BIA in 1990, MTIC wrote
to certain followers of Hamilton who were also lineal descendants of Rachel Fielding or Amy Cooper and invited them to join
MTIC.
NAM has approximately 1000 members. Even though members of NAM can prove their
Mohegan ancestry, they cannot qualify for membership in MTIC because they are not lineal descendants of Rachel Fielding or
Amy Cooper.
In 1994, the BIA reversed its position as to the pending petition of "the Mohegan
Tribe," and published notice of intent to grant federal recognition to "The Mohegan Tribe of Indians of the State of Connecticut."
This was the final action on the original acknowledgment petition filed by Griner in 1978 on behalf of "‘The Mohegan
Indians”, of which Chief John E. Hamilton The BIA recognition decision expressly relied on Cohen’s 1990 submission
detailing Hamilton’s leadership and political activity, as well as, the activity of other members of NAM that had been
opposed by the Fowler faction, and NAM alleges that absent the leadership and activities of Hamilton and the Council, the
BIA would have had no basis for reversing its 1989 proposed rejection.
Upon receipt of federal recognition in 1994, MTIC negotiated and executed agreements
with the State of Connecticut and the Town of Montville, in which the parties agreed to seek federal legislation ratifying
those agreements. In the State Agreement, the parties agreed to seek enactment of federal legislation extinguishing all aboriginal
land claims in the State of Connecticut, and to ratify all conveyances of aboriginal or historic Mohegan title to the State
which might have violated the Non-Intercourse Act.
The parties also agreed that the State would transfer certain land to the United
States and that MTIC would acquire and transfer additional land to the United States, which would be held in trust for MTIC
as the reservation of the Mohegan Tribe.
During hearings on the proposed federal legislation, the BIA advised Congress
that this proposed legislation would extinguish all Mohegan land claims in the State of Connecticut. The Department of the
Interior also expressed uncertainty as to whether MTIC was the sole successor in interest of the aboriginal Mohegan Indian
Tribe in Connecticut. At the time the BIA gave this testimony, the BIA was aware that the 1993 acknowledgment petition filed
by Chief Fortin was then pending, and was aware of irregularities that undermined the claim that MTIC was the sole successor
in interest to the Mohegan Indian Tribe.
Notwithstanding this uncertainty as to MTIC’s status as sole successor of
the Mohegan Indian Tribe, the United States Congress enacted Public Law No. 103-377, the Mohegan Nation of Connecticut Land
Claims Settlement Act of 1994. The Settlement Act states that "The Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut is the successor
in interest to the aboriginal entity known as the Mohegan Indian Tribe." It extinguished any claim to land within the State
of Connecticut based upon aboriginal title by the Mohegan Tribe" and any other claim to land that the Mohegan Tribe may have
with respect to any public or private lands or natural resources in Connecticut, including any claim or right based on recognized
title. The 1994 Settlement Act further provides that any used in this the term ‘Mohegan Tribe’ means the Mohegan
Tribe of Indians of Connecticut, a tribe of American Indians recognized by the United States pursuant to [BIA acknowledgment
regulations]." The Act also provides that apon publication of the determination and the State Agreement in the Federal Register
pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, a transfer, waiver, release, relinquishment, or other commitment made by the Mohegan
Tribe in accordance with the terms of the State Agreement shall be in full force and effect."
To complicate matters further, in 1996, an unnamed "Third Attorney" entered an
appearance in the federal court land claim suit, using the case caption Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut v. Connecticut,
rather than Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut. The "Third Attorney" represented to the court that the land claims of the Mohegan
Tribe had not yet been extinguished pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Act. On December 30, 1996, under a stipulation
of dismissal filed by the Third Attorney for MTIC and the State of Connecticut, the land claims suit was dismissed. This stipulation
bore the caption Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut vs. State of Connecticut. Neither MTIC nor its counsel consulted
with any other Mohegan Indians who were not members of MTIC prior to dismissing the land claims action.
In December 1994, the Department of the Interior approved the Gaming Compact,
and published the approval at 59 Fed. Reg. 65,130 (Dec. 16, 1994). This was the "determination" referred to in the Settlement
Act. However, the State Agreement was not published in the Federal Register as required by the Settlement Act. The United
States has accepted title to the trust lands as described in the State Agreement, and MTIC Gaming Authority has entered into
management contracts and other agreements under which it has built and is operating the Mohegan Sun Casino.
On July 8, 1996, MTIC filed a lawsuit in New London Superior Court to prevent
any corporations from using the Mohegan name. On February 13, 2001, the Supreme Court of the State of Connecticut decided
that MTIC could not prohibit other descendents of the historic Mohegan tribe from using the Mohegan name. The appellate court
affirmed the trial court’s findings of fact that the incorporators of the Mohegan Tribe and Nation are Mohegan by virtue
of ancestry.
In 1999, NAM filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District
of Connecticut. The defendants in the complaint were MTIC, the State of Connecticut, and the Federal Government.
The complaint sought to remedy the legal wrong defendants have caused NAM, an
organization of Native Americans of Mohegan ancestry. The legal wrongs at issue are embodied in the enactment of federal legislation
that defendants intended would effect the extinguishment of NAM’s rights to pursue claims based on Mohegan aboriginal
right and historic title to real property situated in the State of Connecticut. This federal legislation was promoted and
its passage secured by the defendants, the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut and the State of Connecticut, with the
intention of vesting exclusively in the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut.
Chief among the Mohegan rights and benefits that the current-day faction, MTIC,
has sought to appropriate exclusively to itself, in violation of law and equity, are all fruits of a Mohegan Indian Tribe
Non-Intercourse Act suit and a Mohegan Indian Tribe petition for federal acknowledgement as a tribe.
NAM alleged that MTIC has been unjustly enriched through: (1) obtaining the valuable
and exclusive right under a certain "Tribal-State Compact Between the Mohegan Tribe and the State of Connecticut" to conduct
certain gaming activities; and (2) the derivative benefits from federal acknowledgement of for-profit casino gambling operations
conducted on the lands the United States accepted and now holds in trust for the benefit of Defendant Mohegan Tribe of Indians
of Connecticut, without sharing any such rights, proceeds and profits with NAM, with the intention of precluding NAM from
acquiring any such right on their own behalf. By federal legislation, the United States has sought to endorse and ratify this
exclusive misappropriation of tribal rights and benefits to one faction of the aboriginal and historic Mohegan Indian Tribe.
The NAM complaint asserted that the extinguishment of land claims in the Settlement
Act does not apply to any land claims of any tribe, band or group of Native Americans of Mohegan Ancestry except MTIC; that
MTIC is not the sole successor in interest to the claims of the aboriginal Mohegan Tribe; and that any purported relinquishment
of rights, including land claims, at the behest or consent of MTIC is null and void, and of no effect as to NAM.
NAM also sought an imposition of a constructive trust on the proceeds of the Gaming
Compact, which NAM claimed inures to the benefit of NAM as well as MTIC, and alleges that MTIC and the MTIC Gaming Authority
have been unjustly enriched by the proceeds of the Gaming Compact.
NAM also challenged that the 180 day statute of limitations in the Settlement
Act was unconstitutional because it deprived NAM of due process and violated the principle of separation of powers. NAM further
challenged the merits of the Settlement Act, and sought a declaratory judgment that the Act is unconstitutional, because it
denies NAM equal protection of the laws, is an uncompensated taking of property without the provision of just compensation
and is a taking of property not for public use.
NAM also claim a breach of trust by defendant United States for recognizing MTIC
as the sole successor in interest of the Mohegan Indian Tribe and the United States violated the trust obligation owed to
NAM and all individuals of Mohegan ancestry, community and traditions.
MTIC and the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, the State of Connecticut and the
United States of America moved to have the case dismissed on the grounds of the statue of limitations and sovereign immunity.
On February 12, 2002, Judge Judy Arterton dismissed the case brought by NAM against MTIC, the State of
Connecticut, and the Federal Government principally on the grounds of the statue of limitations and sovereign immunity
The moral of this story
is that no Traditional American native person was allowed to be recognized as Pequot/Mohegan Indian by the federal government,
HOW WHITE OF THEM !
AHO