Proceed into the building entrance for an initial indoor CO ambient reading.
Subtract outdoor reading from any indoor reading to determine the magnitude
of any CO Record the results found at the entrance, just inside the building.
Determine if atmosphere is safe for continued testing. See action levels.
If action levels dictate a response follow Standard for Action Levels. If
conditions are deemed safe, proceed with customer interview.
Standard - Occupant Interview
An interview with the building occupant(s) is an essential component of
all CO testing. The occupants may describe when they have problems and/or
what they think might be causing it. A history of health symptoms and
possible CO occurrences may help to pinpoint any potential problems. CO
Analysts shall conduct an occupant interview as a part of every inspection.
Best Practices - Client Interview
Perform interview in an area safe from CO exposure.
Inquire about health problems.
Question occupants to see if they have experienced any specific CO poisoning
symptoms including: headaches, dizziness, nausea, confusion, rapid breathing,
fatigue, unconsciousness, disorientation, or flue like symptoms.
Ask if anyone else has shown signs of experiencing these symptoms.
If anyone appears to be experiencing symptoms, refer them to medical evaluation
(see action levels).
Ask about unusual moisture problems.
Ask about recent mechanical problems.
Ask if a vehicle has been in or out of the garage recently (if applicable).
Ask if oven or range was in use. Ask if the fireplace was in use (if applicable).
Ask if vent fans were in use.
Repeat customer health inquiries if a serious CO problem is found and
the occupants have not acknowledged any symptoms previously.
Reference action levels.
Standard - Building Inspection
A walk through inspection of the structure is necessary to ensure no
potential source of CO production is missed. Utilize a standardized recording
form to ensure no potential source is missed and document all findings
for future reference.
Best Practices - CO Recording Form
Use a standardized CO recording form when performing a CO inspection.
Include:
Company, technician, date and time of testing.
Client and physical location.
Interview information including health symptoms.
Smokers in the structure.
Is this an emergency situation or routine procedure
- inspection classification.
Listing of normal CO sources to be inspected and results
from testing those sources.
Location of all Combustion Appliance Zones.
Mechanical and passive ventilation within the structure.
Type of fuels in use.
Location and numbers of smoke and CO detectors.
Make, model numbers and type of detectors.
Attached or detached garage.
Potential exterior sources of CO production.
Type, model and serial numbers of combustion appliances.
Vent system condition for each appliance (if vented).
Weather conditions of the day.
Action taken.
Follow-up
Best Practices - Building Walk Through Inspection
Record all testing information.
Continually test for ambient CO levels while inspecting each zone.
Note any CO readings in attached garages.
Inspect for and record any CO sources near exterior (busy street, grills,
go-carts, shop with gasoline, power equipment, etc.)
Identify and inspect each Combustion Appliance Zone (CAZ) within the building
recording number and type of combustion appliances.
Inspect for and record in each CAZ: the number, type and location of exhaust
appliances (bathroom vent fans, dryers).
Standard - CO Detectors
Upon completion of a CO analysis, check all CO detectors to ensure proper
maintenance and operation.
Analysts should recommend CO detector installation in all CAZ's. Detectors
that provide warnings between 35 - 99 ppm are recommended - especially
if small children, elderly or persons with health problems occupy the
building. Detectors that maintain operation during power outages ( battery
powered or battery back-up) provide additional safety. Detectors should
have the capability of being mounted at eye level or higher. Digital detectors
can provide the earliest warning, but only when visually observed. Detectors
should meet current standards, UL2034 or IAS 6-96 (subject to change).
Installing digital detectors in working areas where they can be easily
observed is an excellent protection strategy.
Best Practices - CO Detectors
Follow detector manufacturer's recommendations for installation and maintenance.
If only one detector is installed, it should be mounted high in an area
of good airflow.
Install CO detectors in all combustion appliance zones (CAZs)
Areas containing unvented combustion appliances should have a digital
CO detector.
Standard - Client Education
CO Analysts shall work with the occupants requesting the analysis to
inform them about: the test results on their structure, potential sources
of CO, causes of CO production, how to minimize risk of CO poisoning,
proper maintenance of HVAC equipment and detector placement/maintenance.
Best Practices - Client Education
Thoroughly review the results of the CO analysis with the customer. Explain
to them you are going to discuss sources of CO, causes for its production
and then develop a protection strategy. Discuss with the customer all
potential sources of CO production. Include the following: outside sources
such as roads; automobiles in attached garages; other gasoline powered
equipment such as generators; indoor combustion appliances such as heating
systems, DHW heaters, kitchen ranges; gas or wood fired fireplaces; self
cleaning ovens; and unvented space heaters. Inform the occupants about
the causes of CO production. Include: normal by-product from internal
combustion engines, incomplete combustion, insufficient air, lack of maintenance,
improper equipment set-up and impingement restricting the combustion process.
Discuss strategies to minimize risk of CO build-up. Include: never warming
up car in garage, providing ventilation where fireplaces/unvented space
heaters are in use, vent use for kitchen range and annual servicing of
combustion appliances by trained professionals knowledgeable in the use
of CO testing equipment.
Develop in conjunction with the customer a protection strategy which shall
include: maintenance schedules for appliances including occupant performed
tasks such as filter changing, adequate CO detector coverage and maintenance
of detectors, operation of ventilation systems, and use/operation of fireplaces/unvented
space heaters.
Good sources of information about control methods are as follows:
1. ACGIH [1992]. Industrial ventilation--a manual of recommended practice.
21(st) ed.
Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
2. Burton DJ [1986]. Industrial ventilation--a self study companion.
Cincinnati, OH:
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
3. Alden JL, Kane JM [1982]. Design of industrial ventilation systems.
New York, NY:
Industrial Press, Inc.
4. Wadden RA, Scheff PA [1987]. Engineering design for control of workplace
hazards.
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
5. Plog BA [1988]. Fundamentals of industrial hygiene. Chicago, IL:
National Safety
Council.
What are the different types of carbon monoxide detectors and how
do they
work?
There are a number of different types and brands of carbon monoxide detectors
on the market today; They can be most easily characterized by whether
they operate on current or batteries. Underlying this, in most cases,
is the type of sensor employed in the detectors operation. Detectors using
current typically employ some type of solid-state sensor which purges
itself and resamples for CO on a periodic basis. This cycling of the sensor
is the source of its increased power demands. Detectors powered by batteries
typically use a passive sensor technology which reacts to the prolonged
exposure to carbon monoxide gas.
Are some types of detectors better than others? How do I select the best
detector for me?
Regardless of the type of sensor used all detectors sold on the market
today should conform to minimum sensitivity and alarm characteristics.
These characteristics have been defined and are verified by Underwriters
Laboratory in their standard for carbon monoxide detectors UL 2034. This
standard was most recently revised in June of 1995 and went into effect
in October of 1995. This revision specified additional requirements regarding
identification of detector type, low-level (nuisance) alarm sensitivity
and alarm silencing. Under no circumstances should one purchase a detector
that is not UL listed.
Each of the two types of detectors mentioned previously has advantages
and disadvantages. The proper detector for each application or installation
should be chosen based on the application requirements and the products
specifications. The following are the principle advantages and disadvantages
of the two different type detectors:
Characteristic Current
Battery Operated
Cost
$30-50
$30-50
Ease of Installation
More difficult- requires Less
difficult. Can be
outlet
near detector or placed
anywhere needed.
'hard
wiring'.
Maintenance No
maintenance required Requires periodic
during
life of product replacement
of
(5-10
years). Detector
battery/sensor module
sensor
becomes more every 2-3 years
at a
sensitive
with age. cost
of ~$20.
Reaction Time/Exposure Gives continuous
display Reaction time depends
Level Display
of CO levels updated on concentration
level
every
few minutes.
and duration of exposure. Display information is limited.
Reset Time
Will reset immediately Reset
time depends on
once
CO problem is exposure
concentration
corrected.
and
duration. May
require
removal of
sensor
pack. A silence
button,
however, is now
provided/required.
Where can I get further information concerning carbon monoxide
detectors?
Several manufacturers of carbon monoxide detectors offer toll free numbers
for additional information regarding their products.
These numbers are as follows:
Manufacturer Number
American Sensors 800-387-4219
Enzone 800-448-0535
First Alert 800-323-9005
Jameson 800-779-1719
Nighthawk 800-880-6788
Quantum 800-432-5599
Radio Shack Contact your local store
S-Tech 800-643-5377
Additional information with product ratings is contained in the July
1995 Consumer Reports issue on home safety products.
One word of note regarding the ratings in this issue- the products tested
have probably since be replaced by updated models conforming to the revised
UL 2034 standard which took effect in October 1995. Check with the manufacturer
for current information.
Grainger is probably the best provider of CO detectors in the Daytona
area.
|