To: The Honorable New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine John “Jack” Cunningham Grievance against NEW JERSEY’S OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS Theft of MY constitutional rights and due process under the law, by deception. Office of the Governor State House P.O. Box 1 Trenton, NJ 08625 Dear Honorable Governor Jon S. Corzine, I’m requesting that the State of New Jersey investigate my Ethics Complaints against New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics, their own Vice-Chairman Robert Correale, his political and legal supporters for a possible cover-up; and his Law Firm Maynard & Truland.   It’s been a five (5) year battle for me trying to receive my DUE PROCESS.   The NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT's Office of Attorney Ethics can not properly investigate my complaints due to a major Conflict of Interest.   They have already proven that they can not fairly judge one of their own Vice-Chairman.  Currently, there are no active court cases going on in the State of New Jersey over my Ethics Complaints against New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics, their Vice-Chairman Robert Correale and his Law Firm. Vice-Chairman Robert Correale and his law Firm, Maynard & Truland were able to use their tremendous influence and power to their advantage in both a New Jersey Supreme Court Office of Attorney Ethics investigation as well as a Civil case for Legal Malpractice.   My evidence is clear about their use of their tremendous influence around the State of New Jersey.  Former Governor James McGreevey personally thought enough about my evidence that he even supplied me with the phone number of the Director of New Jersey Supreme Court's Office of Attorney Ethics.  Governor McGreevey’s Attorney General Office also sent communications to Director Johnson asking that I receive DUE PROCESS for my ethics complaints.   Please read Governor McGreevey's letter to me at:  EVIDENCE: GOVERNOR JAMES McGREEVEY AND NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE    http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id11.html       On September 6, 2000, I hired the law firm Maynard & Truland, LLC of Morristown, NJ to represent me in a divorce case initiated by my former wife.  I was informed by the firm’s partner Joe Truland, Esq. that he had recently hired a divorce attorney.    (Custody of our two minor children was both their mother's and my concerns.) I signed the Maynard & Truland Contract and paid the accepted $750 retainer   http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id9.html .   Six days later, my $750 Retainer Check cleared my checking account.  Twenty-two (22) days later, due to the Gross Negligence of the Maynard & Truland divorce attorney Edward Busichio, I was placed in a divorce default for lack of activity on my Law Firm's part.   (My own Law Firm placed me in default, where I could actually lose custody of my two daughters.  I was extremely worried...  I'm sure most fathers or mothers would be extremely worried too!) At the time of the default, the Sussex County Superior Court and my former-wife's attorney didn't even know I had retained a Law Firm.   My Law Firm, which had cashed my $750 retainer-check weeks earlier, failed to send out the required document to the concerned parties.    (HOWEVER  IN  A  SWORN  CERTIFICATION  TO  NEW  JERSEY'S  SUPREME  COURT  OFFICE  OF  ATTORNEY  ETHICS,  ROBERT  CORREALE,  ESQ.  STATED  THE  PROPER  DOCUMENTS  WERE  PREPARED.   THIS  LIE  WAS  SO  IMPORTANT  TO  ROBERT  CORREALE  THAT  HE  LISTED  IT  AS  HIS  HISTORY  EVENT  6.    PRESS  HERE  TO  READ  THIS  PIECE  OF  PERJURY,  ALONG  WITH  HIS  OTHER  PERJURIOUS  STATEMENTS  TO  NEW  JERSEY'S  SUPREME  COURT.)    http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id3.html During those twenty-two (22) days leading up to the default, I phoned Maynard & Truland’s divorce attorney Edward Busichio a number of times reminding him of the approaching Default Deadline.  Each call, I spoke to the Maynard & Truland office manager and I requested a return phone call.  However, no calls were returned by Maynard & Truland.   This is all well-documented in both New Jersey Supreme Court and Superior Court filed letters and documents as well as in my Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) official medical records.   http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id5.html After I was placed in Divorce Default, in spite of my letters and phone calls to Partner Joe Truland and his divorce attorney Edward Busichio, the law firm did not start work on my case until sixty-nine (69) days after I signed their contract and paid them the $750 Retainer.  The evidence of this fact is found on three different formatted Maynard & Truland Invoices.  The first work the firm billed me for was 69 days (11/14/2000) after the contract was signed, which was, believe it or not, Default Removal.   http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id2.html The default was due to the Maynard and Truland divorce attorney's negligence for not filing the necessary papers to New Jersey's Superior Court.  Why the law firm was charging me, I was not sure.  I questioned these charges (At the over-charged rate) even in my first letter to New Jersey's Supreme Court Office of Attorney Ethics. Sometime after the Default and before the start-work-date (69 days into the contract ), the Maynard & Truland supervising partners, without my prior approval or my notification, switched my divorce case representation from their divorce attorney Edward Busichio to one of the law firm’s general practice attorney Robert Correale.    EVIDENCE:  MAYNARD & TRULAND SWITCH REPRESENTATION TO VICE-CHAIRMAN OF ATTORNEY ETHICS    http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id20.html What made this so secretive switch, so interesting is that Robert Correale was the Vice-Chairman of New Jersey’s Supreme Court Attorney Ethics.  I never did receive notice why this switch took place, so eventually through evidence, I started thinking that the switch was to use Vice-Chairman Robert Correale’s influence around the State of New Jersey, if I brought up ethics complaints against the Maynard & Truland law firm.    I was up against the reputation of a distinguished attorney and state government official, and the reputation of the New Jersey’s Supreme Court Office of Attorney Ethics.  SOME  OF  THE  ETHICS  PROBLEMS: New Jersey’s Supreme Court Attorney Ethics Vice-Chairman Robert Correale did the billing for Default Removal at an over-charged rate.  Although the Divorce Default was due to divorce attorney Edward Busichio’s gross negligence, the Vice-Chairman of Attorney Ethics felt that I should be charged at a $175 an hour rate.   The Maynard & Truland Contract states that the first 10 hours of attorney work was to be charged at the $150 per hour rate.   All work after the first ten hours were to be charged at the $175 rate.      Although I brought these two billing problems to Maynard & Truland partner Joe Truland and Robert Correale’s attention in writing, Robert Correale continued to over-charge me and never removed the charges for Default Removal.   The three different formatted invoices in conjunction with the Maynard & Truland Contract are all extremely clear.   In December 2000, I first started complaining about Maynard & Truland’s ethics problems to New Jersey’s Supreme Court Office of Attorney Ethics.    I wrote to their District X Ethics Committee that covers both Morris and Sussex Counties of New Jersey.  My letter and the evidence I attached to it, clearly highlighted the amount of pain I was under due to ongoing ethics violations.  However, I got no where, since Vice-Chairman Robert Correale was the Vice-Chairman of that same committee.   EVIDENCE: LETTER ONE TO NEW JERSEY'S OFFICE OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (CORREALE'S DISTRICT X )   http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id8.html A Conflict of Interest was never mentioned in their return letter to me.    They must have known that the Morris County New Jersey Law Firm, Maynard & Truland was the same law firm of their Vice-Chairman Robert Correale.  Two of my evidence letters that were attached to my complaint letter to District X Attorney Ethics were addressed to Robert Correale, himself.    EVIDENCE: LETTER TWO AFTER MAYNARD & TRULAND'S NEGLIGENT DEFAULT    http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id6.html One of my favorite ethics violations of Robert Correale was the day of Divorce Arbitration in Sussex County Superior Court on February 14, 2001.   Robert was a general-practice attorney and he gave me the impression that he had not served on too many divorce cases.     EVIDENCE: DIVORCE ARBITRATION STATEMENT     http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id4.html   The last time I received DUE PROCESS from the New Jersey Court Systems was March 11, 2003.   Maynard and Truland, LLC brought me to New Jersey Superior Court for a Civil Case for refusing to pay the remainder of their open bill of $1,600.  The Law Firm served their papers for this Superior Court Civil case to me in December 2002, a few days before Christmas.     Within days, I counter-claimed on the same docket for Legal Malpractice. Originally, the Maynard & Truland firm had a collections law firm representing them in their open bill collections case.  However, I sent the collections law firm some of my legal malpractice evidence I had against the Maynard & Truland firm. March 11, 2003 was the court date in New Jersey Superior Court in Sussex County.   Vice-Chairman of Attorney Ethics Robert Correale, Esq. was there representing himself and his Law Firm MAYNARD & TRULAND, LLC.   The collections law firm was no longer part of the case.        I had to represent myself PRO SE, because no attorney wanted to go against the local Vice-Chairman of Attorney Ethics without big money up front.          I was a nervous wreck that day, but Honorable Superior Court Judge Ronald Graves had much of my evidence before him.   My evidence is what beat Vice-Chairman Robert Correale, Esq. and his law firm.  He couldn't go against his own Law Firm's own contract, invoices, court documents; court filed letters and statements, my VA medical records, etc.  (He had supplied the court no evidence to prove me wrong.)      After Robert Correale’s objections, Judge Graves decided that my Malpractice Counter-claim warranted the New Jersey Superior Court Law Division for damages. That same day, in a Sussex County hallway, Robert Correale informed me that I should NOT bring my Ethics Claim through District X due to a CONFLICT OF INTEREST.  I informed him that I did not have a choice. The decision was NOT mine.     I asked Correale to please inform Trenton’s Office of Attorney Ethics about his Committee’s Conflict of Interest.         Sometime after Honorable Judge Ronald Graves made his decision that my Legal Malpractice complaints warranted the Law Division for damages;  strangely the court transcript went missing within Sussex County’s Superior Court before it could be typed.    EVIDENCE: SUPERIOR COURT HONORABLE RONALD GRAVES' COURT TRANSCRIPT GOES STRANGELY-MISSING     http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id18.html Since there was no record of Superior Court Judge Graves’ Law-Division-Merit-Decision, the Maynard & Truland attorneys were able to perjure themselves verbally in open court; as well as perjure themselves in official court documents.     EVIDENCE: MAYNARD & TRULAND ATTORNEY COMMITS PERJURY IN SUPERIOR COURT    http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id19.html Serving as PRO SE, my Legal Malpractice civil case against Maynard & Truland went all the way up to New Jersey’s Appellate Division in Trenton, but was thrown out for lack of merit since Honorable Judge Graves’ decision in my favor couldn’t be used.  The transcript was still lost within Sussex County Superior Court and was never found by the court stenographer. Also, since I could not use Honorable Superior Court Judge Ronald Graves civil court decision as an outside opinion on my Office of Attorney Ethics complaints against Correale and his Law Firm, I did not have much chance of  DUE PROCESS.  The New Jersey’s Supreme Court Director Johnson’s Office assigned the complaint case to Robert Correale’s own committee that he was Vice-Chairman of.   The Conflict of Interest was not admitted by the Office of Attorney Ethics until hundreds of my letters went out.    Both Governor  McGreevey and the New Jersey Attorney General office sent written correspondence and some of my evidence to Director Johnson.  Governor McGreevey even supplied me with Director Johnson’s direct phone line and I called him a couple of times, but Johnson never returned my phone calls.       After hundreds of my letters, the Office of Attorney Ethics finally switched the investigation from Correale’s District X to his neighbor in District XI.      District XI went through some minor motions. In early May 2003, MAYNARD & TRULAND  attorneys Edward Busichio, Robert Correale (Vice-Chairman of DISTRCT X) made sworn CERTIFICATIONS to District XI, Secretary Robert Stober.  James Maynard supplied a cover letter with his own type of certifications.  For unknown reasons, Joe Truland, Esq. (defendant and junior partner) did NOT supply a CERTIFICATION to District XI.   EVIDENCE:   MAYNARD & TRULAND'S OWN CERTIFICATIONS TO NEW JERSEY'S SUPREME COURT   http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id3.html Although these Supreme Court CERTIFICATIONS were sworn to, they were vague, misleading and at times, perjurious.  None of the Maynard & Truland attorneys attached any evidence to their sworn Certifications.    Their written words were stronger than their Law Firm's own Contract and Invoices, Court filed documents, letters, statements and Federal Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Records.    Instead of supplying evidence to their Certifications, Vice-Chairman Robert Correale was allowed to openly mock my military PTSD disability in his Certification.   EVIDENCE:  "HIDING IN THE BACK  OF  THE  COURTROOM"     http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id21.html        On the other hand, I had sent to the District XI Ethics Committee,  Maynard & Truland’s own contract, their own invoices, my Federal Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records, court filed documents, court filed statements, court filed letters, etc.   It was pretty much the same evidence that I sent the Honorable Sussex County Superior Court Judge Ronald Graves, which he determined my Legal Malpractice evidence warranted the Law Division for damages.    Since one of my ethics complaints is related to MAYNARD & TRULAND, LLC over-charging for the first ten hours of the CONTRACT, both District X Vice-Chairman Robert Correale and Senior Partner James Maynard addressed MAYNARD & TRULAND, LLC billing procedures.  Although both their interpretations were perjurious statements, their CERTIFICATIONS were accepted and NOT questioned by Secretary Robert Stober in spite of my sending a great deal of follow-up evidence.  However, they did supply me with needed communications. Prior to these CERTIFICATIONS, MAYNARD & TRULAND, LLC never addressed my letters of October, November and December 2000.   Also, Busichio’s CERTIFICATION was the first time I heard the reason for my DIVORCE DEFAULT was “A SURPRISE.”    EVIDENCE: CERTIFICATION OF EDWARD BUSICHIO TO NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY ETHICS     http://www.americans-working-together.com/attorney_ethics/id15.html       A professional divorce attorney admitting the reason why I fell into Divorce Default was a surprise to him.  His law firm did not start work until sixty-nine (69) days into the Contract.  Edward Busichio, Esq. has been lucky that the general-practice attorney, who replaced him on my representation in my divorce case, was a Vice-Chairman of New Jersey’s Supreme Court of Attorney Ethics. WHEN  VICE-CHAIRMAN  ROBERT  CORREALE  WAS TRYING  HIS  FELLOW    NEW  JERSEY  ATTORNEYS  FOR  ETHICS  VIOLATIONS...   WAS  HE  SO  LAX  WITH  FOLLOWING  SUPREME  COURT  GUIDELINES  FOR  TELLING  THE  TRUTH?  Isn’t five years too much to ask a PTSD Disabled Vet to battle for his DUE PROCESS?  Even in New Jersey, Deception should only go so far…  Like I already wrote, it has been a five (5) year battle.  But I won’t give up until I get my DUE PROCESS.  Theft of MY constitutional rights and due process under the law, by deception. Governor Corzine, you promised to fight corruption.  Please start with the top of New Jersey’s Office of Attorney Ethics.           Sincerely and Truthfully,          John “Jack” Cunningham          Email:   ProudCapMarine@earthlink.net    PLEASE  READ  JACK'S  LETTER  TO  GOVERNOR  JON  CORZINE     PLEASE  SIGN  JACK'S  PETITION     PRESS  HERE  TO  READ  THE  STATEMENT  OF  UNDISPUTED  FACTS   http://home.earthlink.net/~new_jersey_state_corruption/id1.html       Home

 

Grievance:   New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics

                       New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics,

                                 Vice-Chairman Robert Correale

                       New Jersey Superior Court

 

The Federal Department of Justice  - Civil Rights Division              

   

To Whom It May Concern:  

 

I’m requesting that the Department of Justice (DOJ) investigate each of the three separate roles that the above listed parts shared in this Disability Discrimination Complaint.

  

     You will read by my attached complaint form, my letters and my supporting evidence that starting in December 2000, and continuing to November 2004, I basically pleaded with the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics, their Vice-Chairman Robert Correale of District X and the New Jersey Superior Court to give me some reasonable Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Disability Considerations.   Although, the New Jersey Law Firm MAYNARD & TRULAND, LLC.  was the root of the initial problem; due to my PTSD Disability, the above listed three parts, as elements of the Government of New Jersey, were required to intercede on my behalf.  Under Title II ADA, I should have been receiving some type of federal considerations.  For these past four (4) years now, the State of New Jersey has discriminated against me by failing to make reasonable modifications to their regular New Jersey State policies, practices and procedures.

     Even though Attorney Ethics Vice-Chairman Robert Correale worked for Maynard & Truland, LLC  (CONFLICT Of INTEREST), as a State Official, he was still required to uphold the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Title II.  

       Please be advised that I have a great deal of additional evidence for you to review.

            Sincerely and Tuthfully

            John  “Jack” Cunningham

     

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information

Title II requires that State and local governments give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to benefit from all of their programs, services, and activities (e.g. public education, employment, transportation, recreation, health care, social services, courts, voting, and town meetings).

 

They (STATE  OFFICIALS) are required to make reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures where necessary to avoid discrimination, unless they can demonstrate that doing so would fundamentally alter the nature of the service, program, or activity being provided. 

 

 

Grievance:   New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics

                                          Director David E. Johnson

                                          Deputy Ethics Counsel John McGill, III

                                          District X Vice-Chairman Robert D. Correale

                                          District X Secretary Bonnie C. Frost

                                          District XI Secretary Robert L. Stober

                                          District XI Attorney Ethics Committee

                                          District X Fee Arbitration

 

I’m a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) veteran, who is rated 100% Permanent & Totally Disabled by the Federal Department of Veterans Affairs.  

 

      On September 8, 2000, I signed a CONTRACT with the law firm of MAYNARD & TRULAND of Morristown, NJ to represent me in a divorce case.  Since there were no assets involved, two minor children were the center of the case.

      In the opening Divorce Papers, based on the advice of her attorney, my former wife falsely accused me of child abuse against our two minors.  Having received the Divorce Papers late, due to a visit to my son in California, I was extremely concerned about losing Parenting Rights for these two children.   The catastrophic fear of falling into a DEFAULT was extremely terrifying.   From the day of the Contract Signing, the law firm’s Partner Joe Truland as well as his divorce attorney knew of my PTSD disability and my catastrophic fear of falling into default.  They both felt my fear was unfounded, since they were both professionals.

      Twenty-two (22) days later, in spite of numerous warning phone calls to the Law Firm from me, I was thrown into divorce default, due to my divorce attorney’s negligence for not filing any Superior Court Papers.   A week later, after receiving no return communications from the Law Firm, I wrote a complaint letter to my divorce attorney Edward Busichio and his supervisor, Law Firm Partner Joe Truland.   Although my letter, addressed to three members of the law firm, clearly highlighted their lack of activity, lack of communications and the exacerbation of my PTSD disability, I received no written responses or phone calls.  Instead, sometime during the next month, my representation was quietly switched from the Law Firm’s Divorce Attorney to general practice attorney Robert Correale, who was a New Jersey Attorney Ethics official. 

      Based on the Law Firm’s own Invoices, sixty-nine (69) days into the CONTRACT (over a month after the Default), New Jersey’s Attorney Ethics Vice-Chairman Robert Correale started Divorce Removal work and charged me for it at an over-charged rate.  I sent two more complaint letters to the law firm about their exacerbation of my disability, their lack of activity and communications, as well as their charging me for Divorce Default Removal at an over-charged rate.  Although Robert Correale was a sworn official of the State of New Jersey’s Office of Attorney Ethics, he kept the False Charges, at the Over-Charged rate on his Law Firm’s Invoices.   

       Also, for still unknown reasons, in spite of his State-Wide influence, for over two months, he was unable to remove me from Divorce Default.  I had to write a letter to the Sussex County Superior - Family Judge, before I was finally released on January 9, 2001 (Four months into the Law Firm’s Contract.)

      Still not notified that my representation was switched within Maynard & Truland, LLC., and not aware that the Law Firm had a representative on our local Attorney Ethics committee, in December 2000, I wrote our local committee in the hope to lessen the additional stress Maynard & Truland, LLC. was placing me under.  Although I supplied the committee with detailed Department of Veterans Affairs documentation about my disability, Attorney Ethics District X wrote me that due to state guidelines, they were unable to intercede.  District X’s letter did not mention the CONFLICT of INTEREST that existed between their own Vice-Chairman and my Ethics Complaint.    (It took over two years, and hundreds of my letters before the New Jersey’s Office of Attorney Ethics finally admitted to this major CONFLICT of INTEREST.) 

     Vice-Chairman Robert Correale’s open ethics violations continued.  On February 14, 2001, he came to Sussex County NJ Superior Court unprepared for Divorce Arbitration.  Although I was accepted into a VA  45 Day PTSD Stress Unit just the month before, I had to represent myself against my former wife’s attorney during Divorce Arbitration.  This is all well documented in my Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Records.

 

      In December 2002, Maynard & Truland, LLC. opened up a Civil Case against me in Sussex County NJ Superior Court for an open bill.  I counter-claimed for Legal Malpractice, and supplied the Sussex County Superior Court with Maynard & Truland’s own Contract, Invoices, Court-filed Documents, Court-filed Statements, etc.   On March 11, 2003, the Sussex County NJ Superior Court case was held before Honorable Ronald Graves.  I represented myself as PRO SE and New Jersey’s local Office of Attorney Ethics Vice-Chairman Robert Correale represented his own Law Firm.   After detailed review of my evidence, Judge Ronald Graves, against the objections of the local Vice-Chairman of Attorney Ethics, decided that my Legal Malpractice claim warranted the Law Division for damages.  (Please read the footnote at the end of this document.)

        At the time of Honorable Judge Graves decision, I was already a month and a half into a letter writing campaign, trying to get Trenton NJ’s Office of Attorney Ethics to investigate their District X Vice-Chairman Robert Correale, his Law Firm’s Ethics Violations and their Conflict of Interest.   After numerous letters, the Office of Attorney Ethics was still not acknowledging my letters, so I started Cc:ing New Jersey State Government Officials.  The day of Judge Ronald Graves’ decision, Vice-Chairman Robert Correale mentioned to me, my open Attorney Ethics complaints against him.  Since New Jersey State’s Office of Attorney Ethics Official John McGill was insisting that Correale’s own District X Ethics Committee review my ethics complaints against his Law Firm,  I asked Correale why his supervisors weren’t aware that there was a major Conflict of Interest.  Although he was a high ranking New Jersey State Ethics Official himself, he had no answer. 

      Starting in December 2000, my disability’s exacerbation was clear in all of my letters addressed to the Office of Attorney Ethics.   Finally, after the New Jersey State Office of Attorney Ethics received letters and documentation from Governor McGreevey and the New Jersey Attorney General’s office, they admitted to their Conflict of Interest.  April 8, 2003, my grievance against District X’s Vice-Chairman and his Law Firm was transferred to the nearby District XI Committee.

    In early May 2003, my original divorce attorney Edward Busichio and Vice-Chairman Robert Correale were required to send in sworn CERTIFICATIONS to the District XI

Attorney Ethics Committee, Secretary Robert Stober.  Law Firm Partner James Maynard supplied the cover letter, where he acknowledged my PTSD Disability and falsely explained his law firm’s billing process.  For unknown reasons, Maynard & Truland Partner Joe Truland, who was also a defendant in my complaints, was not required to file his own CERTIFICATION to the committee.    Although my original Divorce Attorney Edward Busichio’s Certification was extremely vague, he did admit that my falling into a Default, because of his not filing Court Papers, was “a Surprise” to him.

     Vice-Chairman Correale’s Certification was very detailed; however his details were clearly vague, perjurious and misleading.  Although his Certification to District XI Attorney Ethics did mention how he later substituted in my divorce case, he supplied no reason why his Law Firm’s Partners made the adjustment in my representation.  Correale’s supplied his own interpretation of his law firm’s billing process, but it clearly did not agree with his supervising partner James Maynard’s version.  Both attorneys’ billing explanations did NOT agree with the simple wording of their own Contract.  Even though Correale was the current Vice-Chairman of District X Attorney Ethics, his Certification clearly highlighted his Law Firm’s open contemptuous attitude for my PTSD Disability.  

        Vice-Chairman Robert Correale, his supervising partner James Maynard and my original divorce attorney Edward Busichio were not required to supply any supporting evidence with their Certifications.  On the other hand, I supplied even more evidence (Maynard & Truland’s own Contract, Invoices, Court-filed Documents, Court-filed Statements, etc.) to District XI, Secretary Robert Stober than I did Superior Court Judge Ronald Graves, who earlier determined that Maynard & Truland’s Ethics Violations warranted the Superior Court Law Division for damages.  I also supplied New Jersey Attorney Ethics District XI, Secretary Robert Stober with a detailed response to the Mayard & Truland Certifications, where I contradicted their statements with my supplied evidence.   Instead of receiving a response to my evidence, I received another notification of another delay in the New Jersey State Investigation because of State Guidelines.

        For months, I continued to write the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics in the hope of activating the investigation.  Each of my letters to New Jersey Attorney Ethics and State officials highlighted the exacerbation of my disability that their cover-up was causing me.

       On January 19, 2004, Attorney Ethics District XI, Secretary Robert L. Stober wrote that Vice-Chairman Robert Correale and his Law Firm were cleared of all charges and my claims against them were dropped.

 

Footnote:  Strangely, the Superior Court Transcript for Judge Graves’ decision was lost within Sussex County Superior Court, before it could be released to its own Law Division and the New Jersey Appellant Division.   Although I wrote statements to Sussex County Superior Court Honorable Judges Karen Russell and Ronald Graves as well as Appellant Division Judges, Judge Graves’ Court decision was not even mentioned in the final Appellant Court papers to me.   The Civil Case was then closed due to a lack of an Affidavit of Merit.  Please read my Title II Discrimination Case against New Jersey’s Superior Court System.  In spite of supplying detailed medical documentation and statements from medical professionals, I was given no Title II Disability Considerations, due to the fact I was representing myself PRO SE.   

Judge Graves missing Court Transcript was not even mentioned by the New Jersey Appellant Division in their NOVEMBER 2004 Court Papers that closed the civil case for lack of merit.

 

SHOULD  FAIR  AND  REASONABLE  COMMUNICATIONS  BEEN  TO MUCH  TO  ASK  THE  STATE  OF  NEW  JERSEY?   

AT  NO  TIME  DID  I  EXPECT  THE STATE  OF  NEW JERSEY  TO  BREAK  POLICIES AND  PROCEDURES.  

HOWEVER,  I  DID  EXPECT THEM TO ANSWER MY LETTERS WITH VALID EXPLANATIONS...   

 

IF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY WAS RECOGNIZING TITLE II ADA RESPONSIBILITIES, WHY DID IT TAKE  THREE (3) YEARS AND HUNDREDS OF MY LETTERS BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY ADMITTED TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY ETHICS VICE-CHAIRMAN ROBERT CORREALE ? 

 

Just below this is a copy of the first Letter that I sent  New Jersey's Office of Attorneys Ethics.   Vice-Chairman Robert Correale was the Vice-Chairman of this same DISTRICT X Committee and my own attorney at Maynard & Truland, LLC.      Please check the date on my letter.   December 21, 2000.  

Strangely, right after Maynard & Truland's Divorce Attorney's Negligence Edward Busichio caused me to fall into DIVORCE DEFAULT, the Law Firm's Partners switched my representation from Edward Busichio to their own local  representative on New Jersey's Attorneys Ethics, Vice-Chairman Robert Correale.  

However, the Law Firm never informed me why this switch in representation took place.  (I hired the Law Firm because of their Divorce Attorney.)   Robert Correale was a general-practice attorney.  I strongly believe that I was one of his first divorce cases, if not the first...   I never did get an answer to this question, or the questions I addressed in my letters to New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics about Correale's involvement in their Office.

 

It took hundreds of my letters spread over three years, before New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics admitted to Correale's major CONFLICT OF INTEREST.   He carefully didn't admit the Conflict of Interest until March 11, 2003.

 

Months later, New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics Vice-Chairman Robert Correale own CERTIFICATION to New Jersey Attorney Ethics was perjurious, vague, contemptuous and extremely misleading.  My evidence proves each above adjective.  Yet Vice-Chairman Correale’s CERTIFICATION  (With no supporting evidence)  was accepted over his Law Firm’s own CONTRACT and INVOICES.