Phil's Little Blog on the Prairie
Home | About Me | Favorite Links | Phil's Bookshelf | Sermons | Contact Me

Welcome to my blog!

phil0a-sm.jpg

So, just what does the Lifespan Program Director of the Prairie Star District do? Good question! I hope this blog will give you some answers.
 
(For a list by topic of previous posts, visit the "Best of Log" section of my Favorite Links page. You can also Search the PLBOTP archives with PicoSearch.)
 
Here's my RSS Feed if you'd like to subscribe to PLBOTP.
 
Update on PSD Youth Ministry Report. The UUA has prepared a report based on our recent district-level Consultation on Ministry To and With Youth. You can download the report by clicking on the link below...

click here to download the Youth Ministry report

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

What's Your Rhetoric of Religious Involvement?
I'm still reading Penny Edgell's book Religion and Family in a Changing Society (reading it on the plane to Boston, actually, where I currently am for our annual Big Complex Meeting of UUA district staff). Something in the book's fourth chapter, "Styles of Religious Involvement," has really caught my attention.
 
Edgell suggest that there at two basic ways individuals approach religious involvement. The first reflects what Robert Wuthnow called a "spirituality of dwelling," which "includes a sense of the importance of caring for local communities of place and sees strong community institutions as an important locus of family life...." The second orientation is more of a "spirituality of seeking," which is "motivated by one's own religious identity and religious beliefs." According to Edgell, "this understanding promotes a critical view toward religious authority and a sense that religious institutions should be embraced if they are a good fit with one's own religious values and identity."
 
Edgell reshapes these spiritualities into "two different interpretive frameworks, or schemas, for understanding the meaning and purpose of religious involvement." I'd like to present them here, along with a few of questions. First, the Edgell's "rhetorics of religious involvement," then the questions.
 
Family-Oriented Rhetoric:
Being a church member is an important way to become established in a community.
People should attend religious services together as a family.
Churches and synagogues play an important role in the moral education of children.
Self-Oriented Rhetoric:
Going to religious services is something you should do if it meets your needs.
An individual should arrive at his or her own religious beliefs independently of any church or synagogue.
And my questions: What's your rhetoric of religious involvement? Why are you involved with a religious community? And what do you think is the rhetoric of religious involvement for the majority of Unitarian Universalists?
 
As you think about those questions, consider this: this isn't an either/or situation. One can use one or the other rhetorics, a combination of both, or neither one. What's more, gender and social class play a role in determining which rhetoric or rhetorics one uses. I'll say more about that next week.
|
7:43 pm pst

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

An Interesting Book from a Woman I Nearly Dated
 
I’ve started reading a brand new book from Princeton University Press entitled Religion and Family in a Changing Society. The author, Penny Edgell, is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Minnesota. (Fun fact: a few years back I actually talked with Professor Edgell one Saturday night after briefly instant messaging her via an internet dating service’s online chat room. We arranged to talk again the next day, but she wasn’t home when I called—repeatedly. I’m not sure, but I think she was brushing me off. Oh well.) I’ve read only the first chapter so far (which is available online), but I’ve already found plenty to think about, like the role of congregations in family life, the reason for the decline of mainstream Protestants, and a surprising fact about the different reasons why men and women attend church.
 
First, the role of congregations in shaping family life. Edgell says that
most Americans do not encounter religious discourse about what is good, moral, and appropriate in family life solely, or even primarily, through news coverage or base their understandings on the pronouncements of religious elites and activists. People encounter religious ideas about the good family in the sermons and parenting workshops and adult education forums in their local congregations.
What this tells me is that while it is meet and right and our bounden duty for the UUA to support civil marriage for gays and lesbians, it’s ultimately the local congregation that defines family for its friends and members. Bill Sinkford can make all the public statements he wants, but what really brings progressive families to our congregations are the statements and actions of local clergy and lay leaders.
 
Next, some insight into the decline of mainline Protestant denominations:
In a case study of one mainline Protestant church…. [Penny Long] Marler asks whether the current generation of dual-earner parents will bother to stay with the church once their children are grown, and she raises the question of whether the mainline Protestant decline in membership since the 1960s may be linked to an inability to form a better response to changes in women's roles, work, and family. She also argues that the focus on two-parent families with children stems from a nostalgia for the 1950s and leads to the exclusion of the increasing numbers of single parents, long-term singles, and childless couples in our society.
 
Leaders of mainline Protestant and Catholic traditions share Marler's concerns and trace the problem to the historical development that Margaret Bendroth described in her book Growing Up Protestant. From the 1960s on, mainline Protestant denominations have poured energy into developing new ministries around more valued "public" outreach--peace, justice, and poverty ministries. A focus on family ministry is often seen as directly competing with more "public" forms of outreach for members' time, money, and effort. And this, some argue, has contributed to the decline of mainline Protestantism. Religious leaders and sympathetic academics from these traditions have called for members and leaders of mainstream religious groups to rejoin the public dialogue on family issues, which has largely been ceded to evangelical Protestants, who see the family as a central focus of mission, not a distraction from more important goals or activities.
As I’ve said before, the best way for spiritual progressives to regain our moral influence is by supporting families within our congregations and without. This means making family issues central to our social justice work, things like living wage, universal healthcare, affordable childcare, etc. We don’t have to forsake our social justice commitments in order to support families, but we do need to reprioritize them.
 
Finally, a truly surprising insight (here's how the blurb on the back of the book puts it):
Edgell shows that mothers and fathers seek involvement in congregations for different reasons. Men tend to think of congregations as social support structures, and to get involved as a means of participating in the lives of their children. Women, by contrast, are more often motivated by the quest for religious experience, and can adapt more readily to pluralist ideas about family structure. This, Edgell concludes, may explain the attraction of men to more conservative congregations, and women to nontraditional religious groups.
If this is true, what does is say about the kinds of programs and support for families we need to offer in our congregations? Conservative churches and parachurch groups like Promise Keepers go out of their way to appeal to men (Willow Creek, for example, has a ministry for men who like to repair cars--they fix them up for those who need affordable and reliable transportation, like single parents trying to make ends meet). What would a liberal religious ministry to fathers look like? Answering this question could be the key to keeping our boys interested in attending church, too.
 
I'm looking forward to reading the rest of Edgell's book, especially the part on family ministry. If the rest of the book is anywhere near as informative as the first chapter, I'm sure I'll find plenty to report on in future posts. As for the date that never happened, I ended up meeting my wife Julia through the same online dating service. And the happy result is the beautiful baby boy I'm holding in the picture at the top of this page! 
|
9:20 am pst

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Never Threaten to Trade Your Kids in for Golden Retrievers
I did something on Sunday that I shouldn't have: I preached the sermon at my son's dedication service at Faith Mennonite Church in Minneapolis, where my wife is a member. I was warned about this in seminary, too. Don't officiate a religious ceremony involving a close family member. Ministers shouldn’t solemnize thier children’s marriages, or do the graveside ceremony at their parent’s memorial service, or, it seems, preach at their child’s dedication. Why? Because it’s pretty emotionally draining.
 
But I survived, in spite of choking up during the closing paragraph. Truth is, doing the service really made me see that what I want for Henry David is what I want for all of us: to feel at home in the universe. This is, I believe, the center of what we should be doing in our lifespan faith development programs. It’s not something foreign to us, either. As Ralph Waldo Emerson said in his essay “Nature,” “Why should not we also enjoy an original relation to the universe?” It’s really what the Unitarian faith is all about.
 
At the risk of overposting (which is, I guess, the bloggy equivalent of oversharing in a small group), I’d like to offer here the sermon I gave on Sunday in it’s entirety. (By the way, Patrick, one of the co-pastors at Faith, opened the service with the “Generation to Generation” reading by Antoine de Saint-Exupery from the UU hymnal, and we also sang Peter Mayer’s “Blue Boat Home” from the new UU hymnal supplement.)
Four years ago, I found myself going north from Hyde Park on Chicago’s Lake Shore Drive at about seven o’clock in the evening, heading for an office in a building near the Hancock Center to visit my therapist. I was in my last year of theological school, in the midst of searching for a job that might take me anywhere in the United States, and I was still dealing with the emotional fallout of a divorce that had been finalized just that summer after a long separation. And as I was driving past all of those beautiful tall buildings, all brightly lit against the mid-November night sky, I thought to myself, If fortune tellers really were capable of seeing the future, we’d probably respond to them the way the Trojans did to Cassandra—no one would believe them. So if a fortune teller had told me eight years ago (when I was still living in Bloomington, Indiana) that in four years I’d be heading north on Chicago’s Lake Shore Drive for an appointment with a therapist, I would have said, “Yeah, right.”
 
And if I had happened to have stopped by a fortune teller’s on the way home from that therapy session in November four years ago—and believe me, I really don’t visit fortune tellers, this is just a thought experiment—and if that fortune teller would have said to me, “You will be preaching in a small church in Minneapolis at your son’s dedication…his name will be Henry David and he has beautiful red hair…the name of the church is Faith…I see an m…not Methodist, not Mormon…yes, I see it clearly now—Mennonite. And you’ve promised ‘to bring your child up in the nurture of the Lord and the faith community, preparing him to trust God and choose the way of Jesus.’” Well, I don’t what I would have said.
 
But here we are—you, Julia, me—making promises about how we are going to raise this child. And it doesn’t seem strange to me at all, even though I’m a Unitarian Universalist minister who feels very strongly that Unitarian Universalist parents need to intentionally raise their children as Unitarian Universalists. But life is full of surprises and compromises, and Julia and I have decided to raise Henry David as a Mennotarian. And bringing him up to trust God and choose the way of Jesus is a perfectly acceptable, even desirable, promise for me to make. It is, in fact, a blessing for me in many, many ways. One important way has been the opportunity for me to reassess what I believe it means to choose the way of Jesus. And the place I’d like to start with that reassessment is with the name of this church: Faith.
 
Do you what the most popular name for Unitarian Universalist churches is? All Souls. Do you now what the least popular name is? Trinity. (I went to Trinity United Methodist Church in Elkhart, Indiana when I was growing up, by the way). A close second for unpopular names might actually be Faith. As far as I know, there are no Unitarian Universalist congregations with that name because faith is a difficult concept for many UUs. It implies believing in something unseen, unproven. It implies abandoning one’s ability to reason and accepting what some religious authority tells you is true: the Bible is the literal the word of God…the universe was created in seven days…you are totally depraved and there’s only one way to salvation. Many Unitarian Universalists have fled from churches that insisted their adherents believe these things, things that they in good conscience could no longer believe. So they come out of the religious traditions of their youth and join Unitarian Universalist congregations and feel they are done with all that “faith” business.
 
But part of my job as the Lifespan Program Director of the Prairie Star District of the Unitarian Universalist Association is, I believe, to help people come to terms with this word faith. (Truth is, many of my colleagues who hold a comparable position to mine in other districts are called Directors of Lifespan Faith Development, but the word was too controversial for some folks hear in the more Humanist UU Midwest.) So I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about what this word means, and I believe I’ve found a way to talk about it that helps many of my Unitarian Universalist brothers and sisters understand what faith might mean in their lives. Here’s my favorite quickie definition (it comes from Wilfred Cantwell Smith, the great comparative religionist): “Faith at its best has taken the form of a quiet confidence and joy which enables one to feel at home in the universe.” I really like that. “Faith at its best has taken the form of a quiet confidence and joy which enables one to feel at home in the universe.” It’s something that I want for myself…for my family…especially for Henry David. More that anything else, I want him to feel at home in the universe.
 
Which is, I believe, exactly what Jesus son of Mary—Yeshua ben Maryam—found. I truly want Henry David to understand his teachings. And at the heart of those teachings is, indeed, the key to finding yourself at home in the universe. Here’s what Stephen Mitchell says about those teachings in his introduction to The Gospel According to Jesus: “What is the gospel according to Jesus? Simply this: that the love we all long for in our innermost hearts is already present, beyond longing.” Or as the Sufi poet and mystic Rumi put it, “Lo I am with you always means, when you’re looking for god, god is in the look of your eyes.”
 
This is what I want for Henry David, to find that love which is “already present, beyond longing,” to know that god is always already in the look of his eyes. And I believe that choosing the way of Jesus can genuinely lead one to find the love that makes one feel at home in the universe. I believe it is exactly what Jesus meant when he spoke of the “kingdom of God.” Again, here’s how Stephen Mitchell put it:
When Jesus talked about the kingdom of God, he was not prophesying about some easy, danger-free perfection that will someday appear. He was talking about a state of being, a way of living at ease among the joys and sorrows of our world. It is possible, he said, to be as simple and beautiful as the birds of the sky or the lilies of the field, who are always within the eternal Now. This state of being is not something alien or mystical. We don’t need to earn it. It is already ours. Most of us lose it as we grow up and become self-conscious, but it doesn’t disappear forever; it is always there to be reclaimed, though we have to search hard in order to find it…. Not that it is easy for any of us.
And here is where Jesus has a lesson for us.
If we need reminding, we can always sit at the feet of our young children. They, because they haven’t yet developed a firm sense of past and future, accept the infinite abundance of the present with all their hearts, in complete trust. Entering the kingdom of God means feeling, as if we were floating in the womb of the universe, that we are being taken care of, always, at every moment.
So, what is the best way to help Henry David (or any child) understand that he is being taken care of, always, at every moment, by the kind of loving god Jesus found? Well, I’m not sure what the best way is, but I think I know of one very good way: to bring him up in the faith community. Community can’t do it alone, that’s true, but it sure can help. Here’s a little more of what Wilfred Cantwell Smith has to say about faith (and this from an essay by my fellow Unitarian Universalist minister and religious educator, Barry Andrews):
Wilfred Cantwell Smith, author of Faith and Belief, prefers to view faith as something apart from either belief or religion. Belief is the holding of certain ideas. One does not have faith in a concept, he insists; one has faith in the reality about which propositions are fashioned. Nor is faith religion. For Smith, religion represents a cumulative tradition, including scriptures, myths, symbols, ethical teachings, creeds, rituals, and so forth. Faith, as he understands it, is deeper and more personal than religion. While it may be engendered by a religious tradition, “it is a quality of the person and not the system. It is an orientation of the personality, to oneself, to one’s neighbor, to the universe; a total response; a way of seeing whatever one sees and of handling whatever one handles; a capacity to live at more than a mundane level; to see, to feel, to act in terms of, a transcendent dimension.”
Mennonite…Unitarian…Mennotarian. A faith tradition—any faith tradition—in and of itself is not going to help Henry David (or you or me for that matter) feel at home in the universe. It’s up to each and every one of us to find that on our own—which is exactly what I believe “working out your salvation” means. But faith community can help, and today Julia and I have promised bring Henry David up in the faith community. And whether it is here at Faith or over in St. Paul at Unity Church-Unitarian, I hope that the “scriptures, myths, symbols, ethical teachings, creeds, rituals, and so forth” of both traditions will help engender in Henry David what Jesus was able to find in his life: the “grace-bestowing, inexhaustible presence of God.”
 
So what would a fortune teller see in Henry David’s future? A stint teaching English to Unitarian villagers in Transylvania? A Study-Service Term in the Dominican Republic building houses with Habitat for Humanity? A wild celebration at Jimmy’s Woodlawn Tap after the Chicago Cubs win the World Series? I have no idea, of course. Whatever it would be, I’m sure I would hardly believe it. But I know what I wish for him. It’s the same thing I wish for you and me. That among the joys and sorrows of this, our world, our blue boat home floating in the womb of the universe, we find a way to be as simple and beautiful as the birds of the sky or the lilies of the field, to know the love we all long for in our innermost hearts.
  |
10:54 am pst

Tuesday, November 8, 2005

Do Fish Go Woof, Quack, or Blub?
I'm posting the notes to a sermon I've been giving lately called "Fish Go Woof." I say "notes" because I've pretty much given up writing sermons out completely and have started to rely on a fairly detailed outline (with extensive quotes from others) as a guide for my sermons. Basically, I've decided to swap eloquence for passion. When I write a sermon out from beginning to end, I sometimes (often?) find myself being more concerned with the presentation than the message. I'm beginning to think that it's time to be more concerned about the message. Here's why.
 
As I mentioned here in the past, the University of Chicago reports that the number of mainline Protestants in the United States has most likely dipped below 50% of the population. I jokingly refer to this group as our "feeder system," but as with all jokes, there's a kernel of truth here. Unitarian Universalists have always relied heavily on disaffected people who are acquainted with the rituals and practices of mainstream Protestantism to fill our pews. If that number declines, so does our pool of potential UUs. That's the first bit of bad news.
 
The next bit of bad news is that, as Larry Ladd (former Financial Advisor to the UUA) has reliably reported, the number of children and youth in our religious education programs continues to decline. Here's how Ladd put it in his latest (and final) report, under the heading "Our Overall Growth Has Stopped":

While our religious movement has experienced slow but steady growth from 1982 to 2002, in 2003 and 2004 we did not grow. The figures I present below are UUA statistics excluding Canadians.

  • In 2004 our combined adult membership and RE enrollment was 206,134, compared to 209,172 in 2003 and 212, 783 in 2002.
  • In 2004, as in 2003, our adult membership grew while our religious education enrollments dropped.
  • Adult membership increased to 150,735 or 0.3% (at the low end of the annual growth patterns since 1982). However, religious education enrollments decreased to 55,399, a drop of 1.7%.

For four years in a row I have written in this report that the declines in religious education enrollments should be “a warning signal for our movement.” In my report in 2002 I wrote: “We need to identify the causes of the slowing growth in religious education enrollments. Is it that our adult membership is aging? Is it that we are becoming less successful in attracting young families and single parents? Is it other factors? Most importantly, this indicator likely predicts a decline in adult membership in the near future.” For the third year in a row, I regret to report that, to my knowledge, there has been no serious discussion within our movement about the implications of this regrettable development.

So. There are fewer mainstream Protestants for us to draw from. And we are losing our children and youth--not at the traditional age of 18 when 90% of them disappear, but children and youth who are below 18. I think Ladd is on the right track when he asks, "Is it that we are becoming less successful in attracting young families and single parents?" You bet we are! Truth is, we absolutely are the pits in that area. And as Ladd points out, "there has been no serious discussion within our movement about the implications of the regrettable development."
 
That's why I've exchanged eloquence for passion when it comes to sermonizing. We've got to do something, and we'd better do it soon. Here's my four point plan:
  1. Accept George Lakoff's challenge: make raising "empathetic, responsible adults" the priority for the progressive movement.
  2. Acknowledge our part in that movement as "spiritual progressives," which means we value service, compassion, community, empathy, responsibility, and fulfillment in life.
  3. Understand that our liberal religious institutions, our communities of faith, our congregations offer the kind support to progressive families they can't find anywhere else in society (at least not all in one place): we are intergenerational, we teach values, and we offer programming for a wide variety of ages.
  4. Finally, admit to ourselves that we are raising Unitarian Universalists. Although Channing warned us "not to bind [our children] by ineradicable prejudices to our particular sect or peculiar notions," that doesn't mean we shouldn't teach them the value of our "particular sect or peculiar notions." And that value is in our inclusive pluralism.
We are "spiritual progressives" par excellance. Here’s how Lakoff describes Spiritual Progressives:
[They] have a nurturant form of religion or spirituality, their spiritual experience has to do with their connection to other people and the world, and their spiritual practice has to do with service to other people and to their community. Spiritual progressives span the full range from Catholics and Protestants to Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Goddess worshippers, and pagan members of Wicca.
This is the alternative Bill Sinkford talks about when he says "In the face of the well-organized and well-funded dominance of the fundementalist religious right in the public square,...we are called to offer a liberal religious alternative." I'm afraid that this alternative will cease to exist if we don't start taking Ladd, Lakoff, and Sinkford seriously.
|
12:55 pm pst

Tuesday, November 1, 2005

Be Not Content to Be a UU Family Alone
You may have heard that Thomas Jefferson once said that he was content to be a Unitarian by himself. While it may be possible for an individual to maintain a Unitarian Universalist identity on his or her own, it’s highly unlikely that families could make the same claim. And rightly so. Maintaining a Unitarian Universalist family identity is a difficult task, one that inevitably requires some sort of congregational support.
 
Not only are congregations uniquely suited to support families as they develop and articulate a religious identity, they are an invaluable resource for helping parents raise responsible, empathetic adults. Here, for example, are three ways congregations can support families that can’t be found anywhere else in contemporary society (this according to Jolene and Eugene Roehlkepartain in their book Embracing Parents: How Your Congregation Can Strengthen Families):
  • Congregations are one of the few institutions where children and teenagers have access to an intergenerational group of people.
  • Congregations are also places that are more likely to articulate and teach values.
  • Congregations provide a wide range of structured activities for children and youth.
If we are going to have any success at all in raising lifelong Unitarian Universalists in our congregations, we need to acknowledge the unique role our liberal religious communities of faith play in helping spiritually progressive parents raise their children. This will require more than the attention of religious educators. As the Roehlkepartains point out, “When your [congregation’s] leadership is on board with helping parents and making parents a priority, your members are more likely to join in and participate.”
 
This is why I’ve made it a priority in my work to identify the congregations in Prairie Star District whose leaders—lay and ordained, paid and volunteer—are committed to raising lifelong Unitarian Universalists. One of my goals for this year is to find nine congregations in Prairie Star who are willing to make this a central part of their mission. And I’ll be passing along success stories from these congregations right here. Stay tuned.
|
1:09 pm pst

2007.06.01 | 2007.05.01 | 2007.04.01 | 2007.03.01 | 2007.02.01 | 2007.01.01 | 2006.12.01 | 2006.11.01 | 2006.10.01 | 2006.09.01 | 2006.08.01 | 2006.07.01 | 2006.06.01 | 2006.05.01 | 2006.04.01 | 2006.03.01 | 2006.02.01 | 2006.01.01 | 2005.12.01 | 2005.11.01 | 2005.10.01 | 2005.09.01 | 2005.08.01 | 2005.07.01 | 2005.06.01 | 2005.05.01 | 2005.04.01 | 2005.03.01 | 2005.02.01 | 2005.01.01 | 2004.12.01 | 2004.11.01 | 2004.10.01 | 2004.09.01 | 2004.08.01 | 2004.07.01 | 2004.06.01 | 2004.05.01 | 2004.04.01 | 2004.03.01

Recent Comments

Looking for something in the PLBOTP archives? Use PicoSearch!

PicoSearch
Site Search by PicoSearch. Help

www.flickr.com
psdlund's
                                             photos More of psdlund's photos

All services provided by Prairie Star District are funded by congregations who pay their District and UUA dues, as well as individuals who contribute to Friends of Prairie Star District.
Thank you for your generosity!

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Free Blog Counter

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.