|
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
The Prairie Star Power and Light Cooperative
Here's a sneak peek at my upcoming column for The Prairie Star, our district newsletter:
What does it take to raise a lifelong Unitarian Universalist? Plenty! Certainly more than any one group—be it a family,
a congregation, or an entire association—can provide. Each group, however, has a role to play, and if we’re going to take
our commitment to raising lifelong UUs seriously, we need to understand the relative importance each group plays in developing
the faith of children, youth, and adults.
It all starts with the family, of course, which is a mixed blessing for Unitarian Universalists. Most of the children who
participate in our religious education programs come from more-or-less stable family environments—that’s good. But other than
a few parenting courses that were developed in the 80s and the 90s, the UUA hasn’t given our congregations too much guidance
in the area of family programming. And, sadly, Pat Hoertdoerfer—the one staff member at the UUA who actually has the word
“family” in her title—is retiring at the end of this church year.
Now this doesn’t mean that families are being abandoned by the UUA (the new curriculum currently being developed will have
components for everyone—including parents), but it does mean that if we are going support families interested in raising their
children as lifelong UUs, we need to be creative. Fortunately, we here in Prairie Star have creative energy to burn; so much
so, in fact, that I sometimes refer to our district as The Prairie Star Power and Light Cooperative!
As I travel around the eight states that make up Prairie Star, I’m finding a groundswell of support for new initiatives
that bring families of all formations together, either in small groups, like the Family Chalice program at the First Universalist
Church in Minneapolis, or in larger communities, like the new Wednesday night programs that are taking root all over the district.
Small or large, these programs help families develop a shared liberal religious identity, an identity that says, “We are a
Unitarian Universalist family—and we’re proud of it!” And since the energy and commitment for these programs is coming from
our congregations and not from the district or the UUA, that identity is much more tangible. It’s something that everyone—children,
youth, and adults—can see and feel whenever they gather together as part of a multigenerational community of faith.
So what does it take to raise lifelong Unitarian Universalists? Parents who want their children to develop and articulate
a liberal religious identity…congregations that are committed to providing time, energy, love, and support to families of
all formations…district resources to help religious professionals develop and maintain faith development programs for all
ages…and the presence of a larger association of congregations to constantly remind us that we are not alone.
Maybe your congregation has been putting some creative energy into new family programs. If so, please consider sharing
your ideas with other congregations in the district. Just drop me an e-mail at plund@psduua.org or give me a call at 612-230-3274
and let me know what family programs are working in your congregation.
|
7:58 am pdt
Wednesday, April 20, 2005
What Happens After You BYOB (Bring Your Own Beliefs)?
I accidentally stumbled across an article by Neville Buch in Meadville Lombard's Journal of Liberal Religion
entitled, " Preliminary Conclusions in the Search of Philosophical Grounds for Contemporary Unitarian Identity." Accidentally because I was originally searching for links between Mennonites and Unitarians to see how others might
be dealing with the same religious mix that my Mennonite wife and I are tussling with (we're calling ourselves "Mennotarians"
for the time being). Aside from mentioning theologian Gordon Kaufman (a Mennonite), the article wasn't much help with my situation
at home. But it did help clarify some thoughts about why it's so difficult to articulate a contemporary Unitarian identity.
Buch ends his article with these words: "We need to be concerned to see Unitarian bodies re-establish their place in
wider and current intellectual debates. This can only happen if stated Unitarian principles can be bridged with Unitarian
identity." As you may know from my previous posts, re-establishing our "place in wider and current intellectual debates" is
not at the core of my mission; raising lifelong Unitarian Universalists is. And I can see how bridging our Unitarian Universalist
principles with our Unitarian Universalist identity is essential for making that happen.
If I'm reading Buch correctly, it looks like we're not going to be able to develop a truly distinct contemporary Unitarian
identity (which in the United States means a Unitarian Universalist identity), until we can articulate some shared principles
that are specifically Unitarian. The standard Seven Principles (or Seven Banalities as Davidson Loehr calls them) from the front of our hymnal are no help here because there is nothing about them that is uniquely
Unitarian Universalist. Any liberal religionist would agree with most, if not all, of what they say.
Buch suggests that "some basic philosophical articulations of complex multiple concepts used to describe Unitarian identity–-liberalism,
naturalism, transcendentalism, humanism, and pluralism–-are needed." But, he goes on to explain, "here’s the catch–-for Unitarian
identity to be justified, it must be explained how all these concepts relate together into one doctrine which is called Unitarian."
Here's how I would put it: What is it about contemporary Unitarian Universalism that makes it a suitable spiritual home for
such a wide variety of theological orientations? Whatever it is, that's our unique Unitarian Universalist identity. And if
it isn't there? Then maybe we've been building this spiritual home on sand. |
2:10 pm pdt
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
Unitarian Jihad Vs. Theological Despair
I was planning to write about the notion to "theological despair" when this Unitarian Jihad business appeared (by the way, my Unitarian Jihad name is Brother Atom Bomb of Looking at All Sides of the Question); and it's got me thinking that at one time liberal religion
in the United States was much more aggressive than it is today. Indeed, the liberal Christians (including Unitarians and Universalists)
of the late 18th and early 19th centuries were responding to not one, but two "Great Awakenings," complete with hellfire-and-brimstone
sermons fueled by the notion of the "total depravity of man."
The liberal religionists of the day needed to respond--and they did. Take, for example, these words from one of our great Universalist forebears, John Murray:
Go out into the highways and byways. Give the people something of your new vision.You may possess only a small light,
but uncover it, let it shine, use it in order to bring more light and understanding to the hearts and minds of men and women.
Give them not Hell, but hope and courage. Do not push them deeper into their theological despair, but preach the kindness
and everlasting love of God.
If they sound vaguely familiar, you may be recognizing them from the "Benedictions and Closing Words" section of Singing the Living Tradition, our current Unitarian Universalist hymnal. Thing is, that version leaves out the "do not push them deeper into their theological
despair" part. Why? Maybe liberal religion (including our mainstream Protestant cousins) in the United States was feeling
in a bit of a triumphalist mood at the close of the 20th century. James Freeman Clarke's " onward and upward forever" had decisively beat Jonathan Edwards' theological despair.
But wait? Didn't Bill Moyers just report "that 59 percent of Americans believe that the prophecies found in the Book of Revelations are going to come true"?
I don't know what you would call a majority of Americans believing in a swiftly approaching Armaggedon, but I certainly think
it qualifies as "theological despair." And that could make the Unitarian Jihad's notion of "pockets of reasonableness and
harmony" (at your local UU congregation, perhaps) a 21st-century equivalent of Murray's "hope and courage."
I truly do believe that now is the time for us to keep our message clear and straightforward. Conservative religion in
America is giving our friends and neighbors the same old world view of fear and hopelessness that it has for over 200
years. And we still need to present our better alternative. Unitarian Universalism continues to offer families and
individuals the kind of hope of which John Murray spoke. We've got the light--now let it shine! "People of the United States!
We are Unitarian Jihad! We can strike without warning. Pockets of reasonableness and harmony will appear as if from nowhere!"
|
10:36 am pdt
Tuesday, April 5, 2005
Our Mission: Raising Lifelong Unitarian Universalists
Things are pretty busy out here on the edge of the prairie these days. Right now we're gearing up for our Annual Conference
and Meeting in St. Paul, hosted by Unity Church-Unitarian. So for this week's post, I'd like to pass along my annual report to the Prairie Star District. Nothing special, although I am proposing a Mission Statement for the PSD Lifespan Program Area which emphasizes
our desire to raise lifelong UUs....
Consistently, a majority of children move through RE and stay in the denomination, and High quality life
span programming in congregations. These were the top two priorities for both the congregational leaders (ministers,
religious educators, board presidents) and the lay district volunteers who responded to the Prairie Star District Evaluation and Vision Survey back in 2002 (the same year, incidentally, I was hired as Lifespan Program Director). On the surface these priorities may
not sound remarkable—but they are. As far as I can tell, Prairie Star is one of the only entities in contemporary
Unitarian Universalism that has explicitly expressed a desire to see the children and youth who are raised in our congregations
become lifelong Unitarian Universalists. What’s more, the second priority demonstrates a clear understanding of how and where
this process of developing lifelong UUs might take place—through lifespan programs within our congregations.
This emphasis on the role of congregations in shaping the future of our living tradition has been adopted by the Unitarian
Universalist Association as well. In a report last fall, President Bill Sinkford shared with the UUA Board of Trustees the
Headquarters staff’s new mission statement: “to provide visionary leadership and resources to build and support vital congregations
so UUism and liberal religious values thrive the world.” I like the sound of that. So much so, in fact, that I’d like to offer
it as a model for a new Lifespan Program Area mission statement, something like: “to provide visionary leadership and high-quality
lifespan program resources to congregations in Prairie Star District so that a majority of their children and youth will stay
in the denomination.”
With that in mind, I’ve been looking into what resources are needed for congregations to develop lifelong members of
a faith tradition. The good news is that we have an abundance of the most important resource—people; specifically, families
and mentors. The bad news is that all too often we do little (or nothing) to fully develop this resource. Fortunately, Prairie
Star is in an excellent position to begin moving toward this new vision. We’ve grown again over the last year, and perhaps
more importantly, we’ve avoided the steady decline in Religious Education enrollment that the UUA as a whole has suffered
recently. In fact, our RE numbers were up in 2004 for the first time in two years.
So, what’s next? For my part, I’m assembling a group of religious professionals—ministers, religious educators, and youth
advisors—who are responsible for the lifespan programs in their congregations to ask that very question: What’s next? Do we
continue to provide the same services we’ve been offering for the last however many years in hopes that our growth in adult
membership will continue and that our RE enrollment won’t follow the national trend and lapse into decline? Or will we follow
a new vision that takes seriously the priorities set by both congregational leaders and district volunteers and begin to offer
new programs and new resources that help congregations strengthen families and connect Unitarian Universalists across the
generations?
Of course this isn’t a matter of either/or, it’s a matter of both/and. We can continue to support our current district
programs and we can begin to offer new programs that will help Unitarian Universalism in the Prairie Star District
not only survive, but thrive. For example, PSD Lifespan Program Intern Dawn Cooley and I have been adapting a “Church Census” to help congregations assess their family ministry needs. And Committee
on Religious Education member Kimberly Beyer-Nelson and I have been exploring the use of online adult religious education opportunities designed to help congregations
deepen the faith and strengthen the commitment of their members.
When I first spoke to you, the people of Prairie Star, back in 2002 at the Annual Conference and Meeting in Ames, Iowa,
I told you that I wanted to see Unitarian Universalism move from a collection of come-outers to a community of stay-inners.
Keeping a majority of our children and youth in our tradition—that is, approaching lifespan faith development with the intention
of raising lifelong Unitarian Universalists—is the best, maybe even the only, way I can imagine us doing so. The mission
of the Lifespan Program Area of Prairie Star is to provide visionary leadership and high-quality lifespan program resources
to congregations in Prairie Star District so that a majority of their children and youth will stay in the denomination.
If you know of any other Unitarian Universalist organization on any level--a congregation, another district,
or some group within the association--that has made raising lifelong UUs part of its mission, please let me know!
9:14 am pdt
|