Bird Trips, Reports, and Rare Bird Documentation - A Photo Gallery
Home | Recent Work | Rare Bird Photos
Redpolls - February 2, 2008

A Study in Redpolls, Bushy Run Battlefield, Westmoreland County, PA
 
A pale redpoll among a flock of at least 30 Common Redpolls that has been frequenting thistle feeders at Bushy Run Battlefield for the past two weeks or so has been the subject of some debate among western PA birders. Ultimately some consensus was reached that the bird was frustratingly intermediate and probably best left unidentified. After a few brief and distant encounters I had over these two weeks during which I couldn't discern much about the bird, I finally got to study it closely and at some length on 2-Feb, and I obtained some detailed photographs.
 
First and foremost, I came away from Bushy Run on Saturday thinking that there may actually be two "white-rumped" redpolls present. The flock of redpolls at Bushy Run has a way of descending on the feeders rapidly and disappearing just as suddenly, so it is difficult to keep track of individual birds within the flock. Additionally, I have seen photos of a Hoary-type bird taken at Bushy Run several days before I made the images below that does not appear to be the same bird. Regardless of the truth of the "two-bird theory", this discussion centers solely around the bird I did photograph on 2-Feb.
 
Here it is:

redpoll_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_5004w.jpg

The bird appears to be a female. As can be seen from this angle, the bird's undertail is nearly unmarked; in reality there are two very thin streaks. The flank streaking is fairly sparse for a female Common Redpoll, but perhaps a bit too extensive for a "typical" Hoary Redpoll, though it does taper off well before the undertail and fade to virtual nothingness, unlike a typical Common Redpoll. And although not directly visible in this photo (or any that I got) the rump is slightly streaked but not boldly so. Also of note is the overall "ground color" of the bird -- paler overall than any other bird in the flock. The scapulars have a pale and even quality to them, and the face seems lighter overall as well. Here is another photo of the same bird, along with a photo of a Common Redpoll in the same bush in the same light and same angle, and taken with the same shutter speed and aperture as the pale redpoll:

redpoll_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_5002w.jpg

redpoll_common_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_5205w.jpg

Thoough subtle, the Common Redpoll's face is darker than the pale bird; even more noticeable is the darker scapular streaking on the Common. Finally, most obvious is the more extensive streaking on the flanks of the Common, and the presence of multiple dark streaks on the undertail coverts. It seems to me that the pale bird is safe to call a Hoary Redpoll.
 
Despite this, in the past, this bird would probably have been passed off as a "pale Common" by way of a long-standing rule among birders at our latitudes of accepting only the palest and most obviously streak-free of redpolls as Hoaries. Recently, this dogma has been put to the test by none other than David Sibley, who has written at length on his blog here about a new approach to redpolls. Sibley asserts that while it may be correct to be conservative with Hoary ID's, it is certainly incorrect to pass all intermediate pale redpolls off as "pale Commons". Sibley resurrects an old idea, a "character index" based on three estimations of the amount of streaking a given bird presents, as a way to guage redpolls. (See this entry on Sibley's blog.) When I apply my own "streakiness index" to this bird, I come up with a 4 (or 5) for the undertail, a 4 for the flanks, and a 4 for the rump. Adding up the minimums we arrive at 12, which, according to Sibley, is probably well inside the safe range for a female Hoary and not to be dismissed simply as a "pale Common".
 
Here is another typical female Common Redpoll, which I would score as 2-2(3)-2 (rump again not visible, so take my word for it), for a total of 6, obviously a Common:

redpoll_common_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_5188w.jpg

Finally here is a comparison shot of a Common Redpoll and what I think is the same bird as above (though this may be the mystery Bird #2 because the pattern of what flank streaking is visible didn't match up in my mind with the for-sure "pale redpoll" above when I was there in the field). Note in this picture the obvious difference in ground color and scapulars, and lack of streaking on the undertail.

redpoll_comp_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_4995w.jpg

I'd appreciate any comments at pomarine@earthlink.net on your thoughts about this pale redpoll.
 
Common Redpoll Gallery
 
I'll close this page with three of the nicer photos of Common Redpolls I made, selected specifically because they not only show the key features of Commons, but also the incredible variability displayed by individuals of this species. With practice and patience, it's probably possible to learn to recognize every individual in a flock of this size as unique in the group.

redpoll_common_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_5085w.jpg
A rosy male with thick, dark flank streaks

redpoll_common_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_5297w.jpg
A less-rosy male (looks pale due to use of flash), note rump and undertail streaks

redpoll_common_bshyrnpa_20080202_20d2_5279w.jpg
Six distinct birds

Unless explicitly indicated otherwise in the photo caption, all photos on this website were taken by and are 2003-2013 by Geoff Malosh. Unauthorized usage of these photographs for any purpose is strictly forbidden. If you are interested in using any photo for publication or if you are interested in obtaining a print, contact me at pomarine -AT- earthlink -DOT- net.