Thank, You, Baby  |
|
April/May 2005 |
[A speech delivered at Bethel College's traditional
graduation banquet on April 30, 2005, for an audience of more than eight hundred.]
Good evening. I’m
Rachael Phillips, and, yes, I am a graduating senior—finally. I’ve
been asked to represent Bethel’s married students in thanking our spouses and our families. Perhaps I’m a little
unique in this gathering in that I have experienced both sides of this “married student” coin. Thirty years ago,
I was the student wife that waited—prayed—fasted and prayed—for Graduation Day.
Believe it or not, you married students and spouses will one day look at a jar of Aldi’s peanut butter without
gagging. You may even drive a car that gets miles to the gallon rather than miles to the push.
But—back to my main point: we students appreciate the superspouses who have loved us “for better or for
worse.” More often than not, they’ve loved us for worse during our college careers. We have excelled in biology,
psychology and eschatology, yet we forget to pay the light bill, plunging our homes in outer darkness.
We know how to discern literary archetypes and construct syllogisms, yet we somehow never make it to the grocery, and
the family eats five-day-old onion pizza for breakfast.
And when our spouses turn the lights down low and play “our song,” looking forward to a romantic evening,
we say, “Sorry, honey, I can’t; I have to write a research paper on “Principles for a Successful Christian
Marriage.”
We ask your forgiveness, and we thank you.
Our children, too, have made sacrifices and helped us out. You’ve fixed our computers, helped us with our homework
and listened to us gripe about our teachers.
You’ve also said, “Go, Mom!”
and “You can do it, Dad!” and your encouragement has meant far more than you’ll ever know.
Despite our deep love for our little ones, we have not always been able to give them the time and attention they deserve.
We hold them close and read them a storybook at bedtime—but guess who falls asleep first? However, we graduates look
forward to better days. As for my own little granddaughter, Annabelle Kate, Grandma is finally all done with her homework,
and she can come out and play now.
We cherish you all; we are grateful for your love, your patience, your faith in Jesus, your faith in us. But I must
close with a special tribute to our superspouses: this long, difficult, wonderful journey has proved all the richer, all the
sweeter, holding your hand.
Rachael
Phillips Copyright 2005
| |
Married Is Better
(February/March
2005)
It is my unfashionable but astute opinion that married is better. Better
than what? you may
ask. Better than jumping off the Marshall County
Courthouse in pajamas
with a big red golf umbrella from Bloomingdale’s?
Better than being
tied to a crocodile who prefers the bottom of the Nile to the
top? Better than
working alongside Osama bin Laden in a nuclear power
plant?
Perhaps I should define my position a little more succinctly: I believe that being married is better than being single.
Yes, I really do.
For starters, if I were single, I would have spent the past thirty years of my life in utter darkness. You see, I was
born without the gene which aids in changing light bulbs.
Victims of this grievous handicap rarely survive. They have not changed their refrigerator light bulbs since Carter
was president. They subsist on diets of hairy leftovers and solid milk because they cannot see.
Add to this
the dangers involved when every last light is burned out on the afflicted person’s automobile, and you can understand
the low rate of survival.
In contrast, my husband changes and re-changes every bulb in the house, even as they burn.
He would, however, die of starvation as a single person because no one would be there to hit the microwave button.
Marriage provides for the mutual society and sanity of both partners in many ways. For example, I awaken nightly for
my official Worry Time about 3:00 a.m. I worry about our parents. I worry about our grown children.
Will the future bring the demise of Social Security, the collapse of America and even pointier shoes? If I were
single, no deep, sweet voice of reason would calm my fears: “Don't worry, babe. You’ll be dead by 2030 or
so, anyway.”
As a bachelor, my husband would have computerized the garage door, the kitchen faucets, our ice cream scoop.
I would have bought band candy from every big-brown-eyed child in the western hemisphere.
He would have grown a bumper crop of spaghetti in his beard.
I
would have sported a bale of spinach between my teeth.
If we have stayed single.
Not to mention that we would not have produced together the smartest, most gifted, most beautiful children in
the universe. Just ask their grandparents.
Or us.
But, you protest, I am living in the 50s, right back there with Beaver Cleaver and the Ricky Ricardos. Get real, because
this is the new millennium, and we can do all that without being married.
True. But for the religious, the answer to that is simple: we have ample reason to believe God likes marriage better,
too. But even if you have decided He does not exist, living together without marriage poses other concerns.
Two people can say, “I love you, and I want to live with you,” without the overpriced ruffled white
dress, a cousin's off-key version of "I Love You Truly," cake loaded with Crisco icing, or signatures on the dreaded
piece of paper. However, living together without marriage inevitably means, “I love you,
but….” Long, romantic explanations emanate from polite partners who
balk at marriage: "We respect each other’s freedom"; "I don’t
want to tie you (and definitely, not me!) down"; and "The
planets, stars, satellites and space shuttles are not in cosmic harmony."
For the not-so-polite (and more honest), the “but” boils down
to one clear credo: “I never know when somebody better might come along.”
I am truly sorry for people who seem to regard themselves and each other as bologna samples to be passed out on Bargain
Day.
And I am truly glad that my husband, like myself, believes that married is better.
Based on a column in the South Bend Tribune Hometown,
February 13, 1998.
Copyright Rachael Phillips 2005
Manger
Madness
(December/January 2005)
It was a silent, holy night.
Heavenly music encircled the darkened church sanctuary like a golden Christmas ribbon. Worshipers breathed the spicy
green fragrance of pine wreaths and garland, warmed to the glow of haloed candles that dripped slowly as if on cue.
I saw the church children’s choir director slip into the front pew. She threw me a weary glance over her shoulder.
I, a fellow musician, understood. After a month of Sunday afternoon Christmas practices, she would gladly have exchanged places
with the New Testament martyrs, who faced only lions.
Later she told me about the dress rehearsal earlier in the day. The Shepherds clobbered the Three Kings with their
crooks. Having missed their rest times, the cranky angels refused to sing. The buttons on the sanctuary keyboard stuck during
their practice, and “Silent Night” on chimes setting erupted into a wall-shaking dirt guitar version. When the
director and her helpers herded the entire nativity scene into the restrooms for a last potty break, five-year-old Joseph
dropped his lapel microphone into the toilet and flushed it down.
But now, lovely and fragile as a Victorian Christmas card, “Silent Night’s” melody tinkled as the
children entered. I held my breath. Maybe she shouldn’t have chosen anything
that remotely resembles “tinkle.” But the potty break, while
complicated and a bit expensive, had done the trick. The three-year-olds kneeled with hands—or paws—at their sides
before the manger, adorable in furry puppy costumes. A multitude of lovable bunnies, teddies, kittens, and lambs, along with
two cows (complete with udders) and a two-kid camel crowded around the manger. A curly-haired Mary and Joseph (minus microphone)
hovered around the pastor’s baby girl in the manger, who followed the script, sleeping sweetly.
Lights went up on the big-eyed heavenly host, who actually stood still on boxes behind them, raising small, chubby
arms in holy benediction. One king sucked his thumb, and one shepherd fingered his staff, longing to wield it. But he refrained,
as his mother sat, poised for attack, in the third pew. After a few minutes of quiet, even the much-enduring mom relaxed.
A supernatural tranquility pervaded the scene. The choir director bowed her head. I marveled at the miracle. If peace was
possible here, maybe the Middle East wasn’t a lost cause, after all.
“You’re in my place.” The thin whisper from the stage pierced the gentle quiet like a broken bell.
The director froze.
“You’re in my place! Move!” One of the bunnies elbowed the large teddy bear near her. He glanced
her way. Obviously, the only way to deal with an angry woman was to ignore her. He did so, to his peril.
“Move!” she yelled, and swung a right that would have put Evander
Holyfield to shame. The teddy collapsed into a heap, knocking the camel flying. The entire animal group crashed down like
dominoes, only to rise for a battle that resembled Gettysburg in a petting zoo.
The shepherds and kings tackled each other, the angels wailed.
Baby Jesus, enraged at the disturbance, let the entire world know what she thought of the whole shebang. Obviously,
she’d never learned the second verse of “Away in a Manger,” because everybody knows the Little Lord Jesus
never cried, even when the cows in the stable bawled directly into his divine Ears. And Baby Jesus came on a Silent Night,
when all was “calm and bright.” His teenaged mother never sweat during her labor. She did not scream that she
didn’t want to birth the Son of God in a smelly, disgusting stable, and why hadn’t Joseph made reservations?
Baby Jesus came to clean-shaven Shepherds who used Right Guard. He arrived in picture-book Bethlehem
and made His home in a world as perfect and peaceful as a Christmas nativity scene.
Didn’t He?
Maybe the little kids got it right, after all.
Rachael Phillips Copyright 2005