"With
abstraction the problem is more one of sustaining pictorial
energy than of keeping an image intact. . .
in a sense abstraction
gains its freedom, its unfettered expandability, its own working space
by eluding
the spatial dictates of the real and the ideal image."
Frank
Stella ' Working Space '
Figuration - Abstraction :



Why does a considerable part of our culture
comprehend art as
representation, as a (visual) correspondence between object and
subject, as ‘familiar’ picture. It gauges artistic
proficiency as portrayal, as depiction. One might argue that a
visual
sophistication is far from us, that, in fact, we have innocently
reached a comfortable analytical bottom. Our lowest common
denominator of resemblance, of this equals that, and that it insures
not only
picturial agreement between copy and original, but intellectual
sedateness.
Language:
I n
contrast to the figural image, where its power of communication
lies in its representational qualitiy, its truth to an original, the
communicative capacity of abstraction resides in the freedom that it
imparts to the complex processes of perception, a potential that is
devoid of academic knowledge or systematic disposition, one that is
consolidated solely on the possibilities of uninhibited and direct
observation. In other words, where visual experience is not influenced
by instituted rhetoricalconcepts and it is the development and
expansion of such experience that allows the various states of psychic
and poetic development to unfold.
Although
presented as visual totalities, through the process of fragmentation
and assemblage, the drawings propose a paradoxical conceptual order
that negates the possibility of a compositional synthesis. Through
various strategies of de-stabilizing the traditional modes of graphic
presentation these drawings avoid a compositional cohesiveness that,
typical of figural works, may suggest a self sufficient entity with
its attendant pathos and psychic manifestations that they may
impart
upon the viewer.
De-Stabilization:

There are several methods of de-stabilizing the conceptual-visual totality of these drawings. Apart from the horizontal order of the binding, one method is the absence of a preferred viewing direction, of an indication of a `picture' in the traditional sense; i.e., the drawings invite inspection from any direction and judgments of orientation are left to the discretion of the observer. A second mode of undermining the traditional idea of wholeness is the plurality of possible tectonic relationships where all attempts at a cohesive (conventional) reading collapse. The drawings, composed of interchangeable parts, defy all attempts to locate the "finished" composition as a closed system and the natural incompatibility of the various parts, against a cultural memory of integral appearance, is always present. As such the paradox is never dismissed and their phenomenology becomes a provisional phenomenology, a trans-phenomenology in fact, where incongruity becomes a provocation to move beyond a traditional or sanctioned interpretation into the realm of the dream-image.
A third method is the absence of traditional formal
organizational
strategies. Such conventional grammatical component-elements such as
boundary,
centrality, symmetry and inflection give way to an overall planning
that
is devoid of established compositional devices. The potentially
infinite
number of permutations destroy a definitive reading, and any wholeness
is made possible only through a mental integration where every
visual-mental time frame is established as a component of other
possible frames and ultimately of a broader assemblage implying a
continuous process. The unity of these abstract drawings, then, depends
not on a grammatical structure but on a
heterogeneous identity, one that lies in a field of differing
structural
relations whose very nature resists a unified structure of
consideration and becomes whole only to the extent that an observer
admits the possibility of unity; i.e., to the extent that he or she
experiences the compositional connections as aspects of a larger
trans-physical totality.

ov, san
francisco, 1991