The Inferior Planets

Mercury
Venus


Preface

I have observed both of the Inferior Planets before, but I have finally achieved the right combination of equipment and gear to seriously pursue regular observations, which I shall log here. If you like observing planets, and want a challenge that goes beyond checking Pluto after 24-72 hours for movement against the "background" stars, try undertaking your own personal observing program of the Inferior Planets: Mercury and Venus.
This kind of observing is not about finding one of these planets, although that is a key ingredient to success, the goal is to observe, and do it as often as possible. Where I would not use a GO-TO telescope to observe the Herschel objects (for the A.L. certificate), computer-controlled telescopes foster successes where none might have been achieved (see the Techniques section below) otherwise. In the past, I have gone out on evenings to attempt spotting Mercury where I then went home without success.
And I am sure that this will happen again, but with far lesser frequency. The morning session of 2/4/2002 has confirmed this notion for me. I may have found the Elusive planet with another telescope, but as faint as it appeared in the finderscope, I can not be certain that I would have.

Mercury

4 Feb 2002
I got to the Missile Site shortly after 6:00 AM (1300 UT, which was also the approximate calculated rise time of Mercury), to a small (vertically speaking) cloud bank right where I expected Mercury to be. After completing a two star alignment on Vega and Arcturus, I slewed to Mercury, and I could just barely make out a faint object against the bright dawn background sky. It was above the cloud bank!
46X: found and centered the object, which was the only thing visible in the sky in this area.
105X: definitely a disk, or a brighter star through very bad seeing. But after looking for a couple of minutes, I decided I was seeing a planetary disk. Nothing else was visible in the finder either, and the distance from the center of the cross-hairs would be explained by my poor wedge alignment with the celestial pole. Estimated phase of Mercury on 4 Feb 2002
74X: much better, though the seeing was still relatively poor. Now the central blob of poor seeing was smaller than the separation of the cusps, so I could make out the tips of the Mercurian crescent sticking out from the blob.
57X: tried reducing the magnification still further. This was pretty unsatisfactory, and did not yield any more information on the planet's phase.
74X: observed at this magnification again for 10-15 minutes and I was eventually able to make out quite a crescent shape on the planet. Of course, by this time Mercury was a little higher in the sky. From Ottewell's chart, I estimate an altitude of 12° at sunrise (which was at about 7:00 AM/1400 UT). [NB! Drawing above/right is my best guestimate of the phase I observed on 2/4/2002.]

Lunar addendum

Having satisfied myself that I had seen the best of Mercury for this time and place, I turned to the Moon. From the terminator of the Earth, I looked along the terminator of the Moon. Checking my Rükl, I found that I had observed 15-20 Lunar Transient Phenomena (LTP), the most striking of which was the double crater of Albategnius and Klein. The central peak of the former was casting a shadow against the crater wall closest to the terminator and the tip just barely crept up along the base of that wall. This shadow is visible in Rükl's Last Quarter photo on page 22, which is pretty much as I was able to see the Moon. I could see ridges on the inside of that wall, which reminded me of Copernicus. Mons Piton was also casting a nice shadow, as were the A & B craters (chart 12) immediately to the South. I did not take the time to memorize all the landmarks, and there were so many LTPs, I was busier trying to remember the best ones of the lot. I am pretty sure that I also observed the crater Triesnecker and the Rimae of the same name toward the terminator. The edge of the Rimae closest to Triesnecker cast a rather large shadow easily as deep as the lateral extent of that formation (chart 33). It was spectular to look at these things and realize just what it was I was seeing! LTPs galore!

Venus

This section intentionally left blank.

Reference

Annual Publications/Periodicals

Astronomical Calendar
for the current year by Guy Ottewell. The Sunset and Sunrise sky diagrams are very helpful as well as information on the best apparitions for the year, as well as data on planetary conjunctions, oppositions, etc. Published by Universal Workshop.
Observer's Handbook
for the current year. Very useful information and data on planetary conjunctions, oppositions, as well as satellite phenomena. Also information on the best apparitions for the year. Published by The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada (RASC).
Sky & Telescope
for the current month. Very useful information and data on short-term planetary events, as well as satellite phenomena. Published by Sky Publishing.

Links

A.L.P.O. Mercury Section
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rhill/alpo/merc.html


Techniques

Scout out a site
I scouted out a site to observe from that would be close to home. I wanted someplace that would be as convenient as possible to encourage frequent observation. After checking a few prospects near to my home, I realized that the best place is my nearby (close-in) dark sky site. It is on a rise that looks out to the eastern plains of Colorado from quite a lofty perch. You want a view of the horizon as ideally free of obstruction to the East to Southeast (morning) and to the West to Southwest (evening) as possible. Having to deal with clouds on the horizon is bad enough. Trees and structures only increase the problems. Note the travel time to your selected site. This is handy and necessary for planning.
Telescope Alignment
Less of a concern for morning observations because you can time your arrival to the site with sufficient time to align to Polaris (or other stars in the case of AltAz goto scopes). For evening observations, find a way to daylight "polar" align your telescope and mount, so you can be setup as the Sun sets, giving you the biggest jump on locating your evening star(s).
use GO-TO
Morning and evening observations of the Inferior Planets are problematic enough. Use any advantage to make that observation. For my first Mercury session with my ETX105/EC and Autostar, I had the tripod/wedge pointed pretty close to North, but I did not take the time to adjust the latitude adjustment or attempt to level the legs, so I was several degrees off of the celestial pole for my polar alignment. Also, in my haste, due to an error of user input into the Autostar, I had to start all over. After turning on the GPS to get accurate time again, my stars had faded into the dawn significantly, but I still got two stars (Vega and Arcturus) for my alignment. Upon breaking down my telescope, I also noticed that I had only put one bolt into the base of the scope to attach it to the wedge. Besides not having use the other two bolts, I also noticed that I hadn't even tightened the one bolt down! It was fine because I didn't seriously bump the tripod while I observed.
Plan and Prepare
The day before you think you might observe, study up on the location and the projected phase of the target using Ottewell's Astronomical Calendar. If you have a planetarium program (or other suitable reference), check the rise (or set) time of the planet, the Sun, and the beginning (or end) of Astronomical twilight. Pack up everything you will need in advance. Dress appropriately for the weather.
Weather Forecasts
Check the weather within twelve hours (if possible) of your planned session. This is one key to success especially for morning sessions.
Rise and Shine
There are several advantages to morning apparitions of the Inferior Planets: better atmospheric seeing; arriving early allows you setup your telescope using the last of the night sky (alignment stars); automobile traffic congestion is lighter for travel purposes, especially at the time and direction of your trip to your site. If you get to bed early enough, you can wake rested and refreshed, and you can be packed up and ready to leave as the Sun rises (always nice to witness). Also, if you have the time, you can stay setup, and tracking your planet(s) well into daylight. For the Inferior Planets, this is good because it gives you the chance to track and observe your target as it reaches a higher altitude from the horizon. Then dependence upon a smaller telescope is not a detriment.
Small Scopes, Lower powers
Catching an elongation of an Inferior Planet may mean low altitude in the sky. The smaller the aperture, to a point, the better. Small aperture telescopes better mitigate the effects of bad seeing, which is more pronounced at lower elevations above the horizon. I think my 105mm f/14 (focal length 1470mm) Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope is ideal for this purpose.

Copyright © 2002, Leroy W.L. Guatney.

Last Update: 12 November 2002

Back to my Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescopes page. Back to my Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescopes page.

Back to my Astronomy page. Leroy’s Observatory is his Home!