E-Texas Coastlines Magazine
Current Issue: Beach Erosion
Home
Favorite Links
Current Issue: Beach Erosion
Coastal Erosion Maps
Mailbag
Contact Me
STATE RECOVERY UPDATES
IKE DIKE - A Possible Solution?

In depth...
News from Texas General Land Office
Jerry Patterson, Commissioner
(Update Soon After Ike!)

Texas loses ground in fight against erosion
Long list of unmet needs goes unfulfilled despite $7.38
million in grants announced today
 
AUSTIN -- More than $7.38 million worth of state grants to
fight coastal erosion were announced today by Jerry
Patterson, Commissioner of the Texas General Land Office.
 
State Sen. Kyle Janek and several local elected officials
from coastal communities joined Patterson at the Capitol for
the announcement.
 
"These grants will get much needed projects under way
soon," Patterson said. "But frankly, I'm worried about the
future of the Texas coast."
 
The $7.38 million awarded to 20 projects today represents
only a fraction of the $36.5 million requested for 77 projects
by Texas coastal communities.
 
"The list of unmet needs here is much longer than the list of
worthy projects we were able to fund," Patterson said.
"Texas, as a state, needs to begin to recognize the
economic and ecological importance of the coast."
 
Since 2000, Texas has spent about $15 million every two
years on projects to fight coastal erosion. The grant money
announced today is less than half that amount for the same
two-year period.
 
"State funding for coastal erosion projects is a good
investment for the state," Patterson said. "So far, we've
gotten a four-to-one return in federal matching funds. This
money helps us to protect the state's economic and
environmental treasures."
 
A technical report on economic benefits of 13 CEPRA Cycle
I projects was submitted by the University of Texas at Austin
in August 2003. The report states "the direct net economic
benefits of these projects were impressive," and generated
economic wealth in five ways:
· Reduced losses to public property from storm damage and
erosion
· Preserved value of private properties in proximity to the
project areas
· Generation of additional property tax revenue
· Sustained visitation and related tourist spending in the
affected area
· Generation of additional user fees from recreational use of
the coastal asset
The report concludes that total net benefits of the 13 CEPRA
Cycle I projects will exceed $127 million over 20 years. 
 
"These estimates indicate that for every dollar invested in
CEPRA projects by Texas state government and local
partners, over $16 will be generated over the life of the
projects," the report states. "This 16-to-1 benefit-cost ratio is
based on a conservative set of assumptions used to derive
benefit estimates."
 
The report did not include the multiplier effects on the state
and local economies from the re-spending of
recreation-related revenues, which would make the returns
from the projects "significantly higher," according to the
report.
 
The funding announced today is for the third biennial cycle of
coastal grants made available through the Coastal Erosion
Planning and Response Program.
 
"This funding is a tremendous help in preserving one of our
greatest natural resources," said Sen. Juan Hinojosa.
"Stabilizing and rebuilding our beaches is essential for our
future generations and for maintaining the beauty of our
coastal region."
 
Despite the $7.38 million in state funding announced today,
Texas continues to lose ground in the battle against erosion.
 
Texas is a relative latecomer in stepping up to fight coastal
erosion. Because of that, in the 95 years the federal
government has given the states money to fight coastal
erosion, Texas has received only 1 percent of the total
money allocated. Florida, however, has gotten 32 percent of
that money. New Jersey has netted 27 percent.
 
That is why Patterson has led the effort to unite Texans to
protect the gulf coast. Coastal Texas 2020 is a long-term,
statewide initiative to unite local, state and federal efforts to
promote the environmental and economic health of the
Texas coast.
 
One goal of the Coastal Texas 2020 plan will be to increase
the state's share of federal funding to fight this rapid erosion.
 
Coastal Texas 2020 is designed to implement Patterson's
vision that Texas develop a comprehensive approach to
coastal issues that mixes local, state and federal funds with
money from the private sector, while combining regulatory
changes with market-based solutions.
 
Texas, with its 367 miles of gulf beach, has the third longest
coast in the nation. But Texas also suffers from one of the
fastest rates of coastal erosion in the nation, with some of
the most popular stretches of beach losing five to 10 feet of
beach each year.  More than tourism suffers from the effects
of wind and water. Public tax base, wildlife refuges and vital
infrastructure are eroding away.
 
"Protecting our coast, where it makes sense, is a wise
investment," Patterson said. "Projects like the ones we
announced today protect private property and public
infrastructure. These projects protect our natural resources
and wetlands. These projects increase tourism. The bottom
line is, these projects just make sense."
                                            ###
 
CEPRA Cycle 3 Project Descriptions
 
Project Number 1072
Project Name Local Match for FEMA Repair to the Big Reef
Project
Location Galveston County
Description During Cycle 2, CEPRA funded a two-part
project to dredge sandy material near Big Reef on the
eastern end of Galveston Island to improve wetland
circulation.  The dredged sand was dried, then trucked and
placed on the beach at the end of the Galveston Seawall,
which suffers from severe erosion.  Shortly after the beach
fill was placed at the end of the seawall, Hurricane Claudette
hit the Texas coast and damaged the new beach
nourishment project.  This Cycle 3 project provided funds to
match the FEMA post-hazard mitigation grant to repair the
damaged beach by replacing the sand lost to Hurricane
Claudette.
Project Partner Park Board of Trustees, City of Galveston
Other Sponsors FEMA
CEPRA Funding $130,000
 
Project Number 1157A & 1157B
Project Name  Rollover Pass Beach Nourishment - FY2004
Event & FY2005 Event
Location Galveston County
Description The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Galveston District performs routine maintenance of the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW), which includes yearly
dredging of the stretch near Rollover Pass.  GLO and
Galveston County will partner with the USACE to make
beneficial use of the dredged materials (BUDM) for the
upcoming two yearly maintenance-dredging cycles.  The
sandy materials dredged from the GIWW will be piped to the
beaches near Rollover Pass to nourish the severely eroding
beaches.
Project Partner Galveston County
Other Sponsors USACE Galveston District
CEPRA Funding Event A: $120,000  Event B: $110,000
 
Project Number 1159
Project Name Keith Lake Cut Fish Pass
Location Jefferson County
Description Keith Lake Fish Pass is an enlarged pass that
connects the Keith Lake chain of lakes to the
Sabine-Neches Waterway.  Tidal erosion has widened and
deepened the pass at Keith Lake Cut, which allows salt
water to penetrate the marshes of Sea Rim State Park. 
CEPRA funds will be used by the USACE Galveston District
in the feasibility study to select the best erosion control
solution and for design of the selected erosion response
alternative. 
Project Partner Jefferson County
Other Sponsors USACE Galveston District, Texas Parks &
Wildlife Department (TPWD), US Fish & Wildlife Service
(USFWS), National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA)
CEPRA Funding  $350,000
 
Project Number 1165
Project Name South Padre Island Beach Nourishment Using
BUDM
Location Cameron County
Description The USACE conducts maintenance dredging of
the Brazos-Santiago Pass every two years and dredged
materials are good quality sandy materials.  The GLO and
the Town of South Padre Island will partner to use the
dredged materials as beach fill for the town's beaches.  The
work will include engineering design and surveying which will
provide a basis for potential future FEMA storm damage
reimbursement claims.
Project Partner Town of South Padre Island
Other Sponsors USACE Galveston District
CEPRA Funding $1,000,000
 
Project Number 1166
Project Name USACE Section 227 Erosion Control
Demonstration Project
Location Jefferson County
Description The USACE Galveston District will construct a
series of groins and beach nourishment test cells and a
dual-design dune along the Gulf of Mexico shoreline in
Jefferson County near Sea Rim State Park. The project will
evaluate the effectiveness of various beach nourishment
test cells in reducing erosion of the natural clay strata and
the dune's ability to reduce overwash and retain sand within
the swash zone.  The project will also test the ability of the
groins to keep the beach nourishment sand within the groin
field. A monitoring program will measure the effects of
storms on the demonstration project over a three-year
period.
Project Partner USACE Galveston District
Other Sponsors NA
CEPRA Funding $25,000
 
Project Number 1171
Project Name Mad Island Shoreline Protection
Location Matagorda County
Description A seven-mile stretch of shoreline along Mad
Island Wildlife Management Area adjacent to the GIWW has
experienced an average 50-foot shoreline loss due to
erosion since 1978. The erosion has induced salt-water
intrusion into the wetland and upland habitats.  The GLO and
The Nature Conservancy, along with TPWD, the USACE
Galveston District, and Matagorda County will partner to
construct a permanent offshore rock breakwater along this
stretch of vulnerable shoreline.
Project Partner The Nature Conservancy
Other Sponsors USACE Galveston District, TPWD,
Matagorda County
CEPRA Funding $425,000
 
Project Number 1175
Project Name Large-Scale Beach Nourishment of Quintana
Beach
Location Brazoria County
Description The Gulf shoreline of the Town of Quintana is
eroding at very high rates, which range from 10 feet/year up
to 18 feet/year. Erosion is narrowing the beach and
threatening residences adjacent to the beach as well as the
primary evacuation route for the town (CR723). This project
will nourish the beach with a large volume of sand, thus
restoring the recreational beach and providing storm damage
reduction benefits to infrastructure and houses.  The CEPRA
rules allow for one large-scale beach nourishment project
using up to one-third the biennial appropriation to be
constructed each cycle without requiring a funding match. 
This project will complement a newly reconstructed dune
system funded by CEPRA in Cycle 2 in association with a
Texas Coastal Management Program grant.
Project Partner Town of Quintana Beach
Other Sponsors Brazoria County Shoreline Restoration Task
Force
CEPRA Funding $1,000,000
 
Project Number 1182
Project Name USACE Feasibility Study - Galveston County
Location Galveston, Chambers, and Jefferson Counties
Description The USACE Galveston District is conducting an
erosion response feasibility study for the stretch of Gulf
shoreline that extends from San Luis Pass in Galveston
County to Sabine Pass in Jefferson County.  The feasibility
study consists of a number of scientific and engineering
studies designed to understand the erosion processes
affecting this area of the Texas coast and develop
applicable erosion response alternatives.  GLO provided
CEPRA funding to the County in Cycle 2 for the feasibility
study and will provide continuing financial and technical
support for the study during Cycle 3.  Completion of the
study is an important step to obtaining federal funding for
long-term and large-scale erosion response projects for this
severely eroding stretch of the Texas Gulf coast.
Project Partner Galveston County
Other Sponsors USACE Galveston District
CEPRA Funding $150,000
 
Project Number 1188
Project Name Starvation Cove Marsh Restoration,
Protection & Acquisition Project
Location Galveston County
Description Starvation Cove is located on the south
shoreline of West Bay near Galveston Island State Park.
The area has experienced significant habitat losses and
changes over the past 50 years, including increases in open
water, losses of seagrass beds and coastal prairie uplands,
conversion of freshwater swales to brackish open water,
and migration and degradation of estuarine marshes.
CEPRA funding will be used to design and construct a
shoreline protection structure, which preliminarily includes a
geotextile tube breakwater system that would protect over
415 acres of critical habitat.  The project also includes
planting approximately 10 acres of estuarine intertidal marsh
behind the breakwater.
Project Partner TPWD
Other Sponsors USFWS, Coastal Wetlands Planning,
Protection and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) Grant, Trust for
Public Land, Spanish Grant Property Owners, Reliant
Energy, Galveston Bay Foundation, Galveston Bay Estuary
Program
CEPRA Funding  $400,000
 
Project Number 1189
Project Name West Bay Bird Island Marsh Restoration
Location Galveston County
Description West Bay Bird Island has experienced severe
erosion by wind driven waves and tidal currents over the
past 100 years, eliminating the island's medium brush habitat
that provides nesting substrates for the tri-colored heron and
snowy egret.  An engineering alternatives study was
conducted under CEPRA during Cycle 2. The preferred
alternative includes construction of a submerged
breakwater, dredging of a relief channel, and beneficial use
of the dredged materials to rebuild lost habitat.
Project Partner TPWD
Other Sponsors USFWS (funding includes a CWPPRA
Grant), Audubon Texas, Reliant Energy
CEPRA Funding $165,000
 
Project Number 1209
Project Name Isla Blanca Park Beach Nourishment - BUDM
Location Cameron County
Description Isla Blanca Park is located just north of the
Brazos Santiago Pass/Brownsville Ship Channel jetties on
the southernmost tip of South Padre Island.  The park
includes 0.75 miles of Gulf beach, which historically had
been a stable stretch of beach.  Since 1990 however, the
shoreline has experienced erosion averaging 30 feet per
year, impacting high-use facilities within the park. This
project will provide engineering services needed for beach
nourishment, which would use materials from the USACE
maintenance dredging of the navigation channels. 
Project Partner Cameron County Parks System
Other Sponsors USACE Galveston District
CEPRA Funding $90,000
 
Project Number 1212
Project Name City of Port Aransas - Corpus Christi Ship
Channel Shoreline Protection
Location Nueces County
Description The City of Port Aransas has partnered with the
GLO, through the CEPRA and CMP Programs, and the Port
of Corpus Christi in previous projects to acquire and protect
critical wildlife habitat within the city.  CEPRA Cycle 3 funds
will be used to extend the shoreline stabilization projects
along the ship channel to protect the Charlie's Pasture
property and Harbor Island.
Project Partner City of Port Aransas
Other Sponsors  Port of Corpus Christi Authority
CEPRA Funding $435,000
 
Project Number 1214
Project Name Beach Restoration - City of Jamaica Beach
Location Galveston County
Description The City of Jamaica Beach includes 0.6 miles of
Gulf-facing beach on Galveston Island, just west of
Galveston Island State Park.  Over the years, shoreline
erosion has moved the beach toward the city' s mature
development and has narrowed the recreational beach.
There have also been episodic storm damages and drainage
problems.  CEPRA funds will be used to complete a
high-volume beach nourishment project to restore the eroded
beach.  The city will also be completing a shoreline
protection project to complement the beach nourishment
project.
Project Partner City of Jamaica Beach
Other Sponsors NA
CEPRA Funding $750,000
 
Project Number 1216
Project Name USACE Feasibility Study - Jefferson County
Location Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston Counties
Description The USACE Galveston District is conducting an
erosion response feasibility study for the stretch of Gulf
shoreline that extends from Sabine Pass in Jefferson County
to San Luis Pass in Galveston County.  The feasibility study
consists of a number of scientific and engineering studies
designed to understand the erosion processes affecting this
area of the Texas coast and develop applicable erosion
response alternatives.  GLO provided CEPRA funding to the
County in Cycle 2 for the feasibility study and will provide
continuing financial and technical support for the study during
Cycle 3.  Completion of the study is an important step to
obtaining federal funding for long-term and large-scale
erosion response projects for this severely eroding stretch
of the Texas Gulf coast.
Project Partner Jefferson County
Other Sponsors USACE Galveston District
CEPRA Funding  $300,000  (includes the Cycle 2 funding
which was carried forward to Cycle 3)
 
Project Number 1220
Project Name Economic and Natural Resource Benefits of
CEPRA Cycle 3 Projects
Location Coastwide
Description As required by CEPRA legislation, the economic
and natural resource impacts of CEPRA projects will be
evaluated.  In previous cycles, a methodology was
developed to quantify economic benefits of representative
CEPRA projects as well as to provide an evaluation of
natural resource improvements associated with habitat
restoration and protection projects.  This Cycle 3 study will
evaluate the benefits associated with Cycle 3 projects using
of the methodology previously developed and will include a
focus on Galveston Island projects. 
Project Partner University of Texas at Austin, School of
Architecture, Community and Regional Planning Program
Other Sponsors  NA
CEPRA Funding $80,000
 
Project Number 1222
Project Name San Luis Pass Flood Delta Sand Source and
Dredging Evaluation Study
Location Galveston County
Description The flood delta associated with San Luis Pass
contains a substantial volume of sandy material that could
be used for future beach nourishment projects.  This study
will include geophysical and geotechnical surveys to
evaluate the quality and quantity of materials to see if they
are suitable for beach nourishment using dredging
technologies.
Project Partner Texas A&M University - Galveston
Other Sponsors NA
CEPRA Funding $25,000
 
Project Number 1224
Project Name Aerial Photographs of CEPRA Projects
Location Coastwide
Description Aerial photographs will be obtained to document
the CEPRA Cycle 3 projects constructed as well as nearby
projects completed in CEPRA Cycles 1 and 2.  Aerial
photographs are an important tool used for documenting the
construction and monitoring the performance of CEPRA
erosion response projects.  The photographs will be posted
to the GLO Internet site to provide easy public access.
Project Partner NA
Other Sponsors NA
CEPRA Funding $25,000
 
Project Number 1225
Project Name Local Match for Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) Pre-Hazard Mitigation Grant
Location Coastwide
Description GLO has applied for a FEMA pre-hazard
mitigation grant that would provide for the purchase and
removal of structures and hazards that have become
situated on the public beach easement on the Texas Gulf
Coast due to the impacts of coastal erosion.  The grant
requires a 25% local match to the federal funding.
Project Partner FEMA
Other Sponsors NA
CEPRA Funding $1,000,000
 
Project Number 1226
Project Name Coast of Texas Feasibility Study
Location Coastwide
Description The USACE Galveston District and the GLO will
partner to fund and conduct an erosion response feasibility
study of the entire Texas coast, including both bay and
beach shorelines.  This feasibility study is a fast-track study
that will be conducted by the USACE Galveston District.  The
feasibility study must be completed before the state can
qualify to receive federal funding for long-term and
large-scale erosion response projects for this area under the
Water Resources Development Act.
Project Partner USACE Galveston District
Other Sponsors NA
CEPRA Funding $125,000
 
 
 
Paul Sturrock
Media Specialist
Office of Communications
(512) 463-5339
(512) 936-1948 direct
(512) 849-6007 pager
paul.sturrock@glo.state.tx.us

Looking At Solutions:  Beach Nourishment
 
Galveston, Texas is fighting Beach Erosion with an active Beach Nourishment Program
 
Coastal Erosion Planning and Response Act

What to Expect After Beach Nourishment
 
Beach nourishment will be a unique and unusual operation for residents and visitors to the beach to observe. Experience indicates that most people are attracted to the work and not inconvenienced by it. The beach-fill operation is fascinating, providing "action" on the otherwise quiet beach while the beach grows before the viewers' eyes.

Sand will be pumped mainly to the dry portion of the beach to form the construction profile or cross section. Over the first few months following beach nourishment, the wide beach created will quickly decrease in width to approach the design profile. During this rapid period of adjustment, the sand is taken from the upper beach by the waves and currents, and is distributed throughout the beach profile, typically out to the main storm bar located in about 10 feet of water. This adjustment is normal, and residents should not be alarmed. This movement of sand contributes to the development of an overall healthy beach and was taken into account in the design template for the beach profile.

The pumped sand may be darker than the existing sand on the beach because it contains some fine silts and clays, as well as organic matter. Waves, tidal influences, and rain will gradually flush this fine material offshore where it will continue to move to very deep water. Such a process also occurs naturally when rivers discharge sediments; the sand stays on the beach while the fine material moves offshore. The sun will also quickly bleach the exposed sand.

The pumping operation can take several months. The exact duration will depend on the size of the project, on the schedule of the contractor, and on the weather. It is to the benefit of the contractor to finish as quickly as possible. Pipe will be laid along the length of the beach to be nourished. Gently sloping walkways will be placed over the pipe to allow access to the beach. Access to the area near the pipe discharge will be restricted due to movement of equipment and discharge of the sand slurry. The pipe length will be changed as the operation proceeds down the beach. As the discharge moves, the area of restricted access will also move. In this area, the contractor will relocate material and smooth the beach with heavy machinery and conduct surveys to assure that the construction cross section conforms to the design template. Soon after placement, typically a matter of days, it will be possible to walk on the new beach. So, as the discharge pipe is moved down the beach, a wider beach area will become available to the public.

The fill will be extended seaward at about the elevation of the existing beach, but sometimes the seaward slope may be steeper than the natural slope. It is possible that a scarp, or steep local beach face slope, will form at the water's edge along the new fill. The scarp could initially form with a 1 to 3 foot drop and pose a danger to small children and others who might step off it and unexpectedly encounter the drop. The scarp will disappear as the changing water level and waves smooth the profile. This type of scarp typically appears on sandy beaches during storms.

In the long term, over years, the beach fill will provide sand to the neighboring beaches. This is called a "down-drift" benefit of the fill, meaning that adjacent beaches will receive sand removed from the fill area by the longshore current. Beaches are dynamic and evolve over time. In the winter, sand is removed from the beach and deposited on the nearshore bars. The gentle waves of summer then move the sand from the bars back to the beach face. Beach nourishment will not stop shoreline recession in eroding areas, but only delay the shoreline from retreating. Beach nourishment increases the life span of the shore. For this reason, future periodic beach re-nourishment will be necessary.
 

covene1.jpg
The Gaveston Island Convention Center at the San Luis is under construction

Erosion and Coastal Storm Facts

 

 

·        Effects from past weather events

 

·         The best illustration of how the coast of Texas is continually subjected to the erosive forces of wind and water is the reshaping of our gulf and bay shorelines produced directly, and dramatically, by tropical storms and hurricanes.

 

·         The September 8, 1900 hurricane that struck Galveston Island, and surrounding areas, not only killed an estimated 6,000 to 10,000 persons, but it also swept away several city blocks closest to the Gulf. Damage estimates from NOAA (adjusted for inflation) were $928,160,793.

 

·         Developed areas of Texas have been spared from major devastation caused by hurricanes since Hurricane Alicia in 1983.

Beach erosion on West Galveston Island was analyzed following Alicia in a report written by Robert Morton and Jeffrey G. Paine of the University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology in 1985, entitled “Beach and Vegetation Line Changes at Galveston Island, Texas.” Some points from the report:

Ø      Alicia caused substantial landward retreat of both the shoreline and the vegetation line. Retreat of the vegetation line ranged from 20 to 145 feet and averaged 80 feet.

Ø      Surface elevations were lowered by as much as 4.5 feet.

Ø      More than 2,000,000 cubic yards — or about 200,000 dump trucks full — were eroded from West Galveston Island by Alicia.

Ø      Hurricane Alicia (1983) caused more beach erosion than did Hurricane Allen (1980), but less than Hurricane Carla (1961).

Ø      Historical records show that Galveston beachfront property will receive minor storm damage every few years and extreme storm damage about every 20 years.

 

·         Following catastrophic flooding which resulted from Tropical Storm Frances near Galveston, the county, in cooperation with the General Land Office, installed erosion protection structures along the coast called geotubes.

 

 

·        Erosion rates

 

·         The upper coast of Texas, near Galveston and Brazoria counties, suffers from erosion rates of more than 10 feet per year.

 

·         Some areas next to navigational channels have areas of accretion, where the shoreline is growing, but it is at the expense of the beach on the other side of the channel, which will have high erosion rates.

 

·         Areas along developed shorelines such as West Galveston Island, Bolivar Peninsula, and Follet’s Island have average erosion rates of five feet per year.

 

·         Areas on the southern Texas coast, with the exception of some areas around major navigational channels, have stable or accreting beaches due to the littoral drift meeting and providing sand from both directions to the those beaches.

 

 

 

 

·        Cost estimates on erosion prevention measures

 

·         Large-scale beach nourishment projects cost $3 million per mile. The unprotected portion of West Galveston Island (past Seawall) is more than 15 miles long.

 

·         Texas has lagged behind other coastal states, because Texas is one of the last developed shorelines in the country. The magnitude of the erosion was not as evident prior to development.

 

·         Texas has received less than 1 percent of beach nourishment funds from the federal government.  Florida received 32 percent and New Jersey receives 22 percent.

 

·         Geotubes cost more than $1 million per mile, and also may require beach nourishment and periodic maintenance such as sand recovering and patching.

 

·         CEPRA (Coastal Erosion and Planing Response Act) projects received funding requests in excess of $150 million in 2002. 

 

 

·        CEPRA Program

 

·         During the CEPRA program’s four-year history it has funded almost 100 projects and studies.

 

·         The first cycle (2000- 2001 biennium) of projects under CEPRA exceeded $28 million after leveraging the $15 million in allocated state funds with federal, local, and other projects.

 

·         CEPRA has funded two large-scale projects at South Padre Island. The eroding area has stabilized after these two projects, which are done every two years. If the project could not be funded in Cycle 3, the beach would likely begin to erode once again.

 

·         Through CEPRA projects, more than 45 miles of critically eroding areas have been protected and restored.

 

·         CEPRA funding was reduced by approximately half from the $15 million appropriated in Cycles 1 (FY 00-01) and Cycle 2 (FY 02-03) to $7.23 million in Cycle 3 (FY 04-05).

 

·        CEPRA will be required to work harder to leverage funds with greater federal funds to maintain the gains made in Cycles 1 and 2.

 

·         The CEPRA program will be working to leverage more federal funding in the future by participating with local governments and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for feasibility studies, which will qualify the state for beach nourishment projects in the magnitude of tens of millions of dollars.

 

·         The CEPRA program will be working to leverage more federal FEMA funds from hazard mitigation grants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

·        Storm Damage

 

·         According to NOAA records, of the 30 costliest tropical weather events (Tropical cyclones such as tropical waves, tropical depressions, tropical storms, or hurricanes) five have directly impacted Texas.

 

·         Three of those events were not even hurricanes, but were tropical storms.

Ø      In 1989, Tropical Storm Allison caused $500 million in damages to upper Texas coast communities. This storm ranks 19th costliest.

Ø      Tropical Storm Frances also caused $500 million in damages, however, both Texas and Louisiana sustained damage.  Brazoria, Galveston, and Harris counties were declared federal disaster areas.

Ø      In 1979, Tropical Storm Claudette caused $400 million in damages on the Texas coast.  Coincidentally, Hurricane Claudette recently caused damage to areas directly affected by TS Claudette in 1979.

 

·        Hurricane Alicia ranks 9th most costly tropical cyclone event in U.S. mainland history.

 

·         In 1999, Hurricane Bret struck the Texas coast at Padre Island.  Although considered a “small hurricane” by NOAA, reports from Port Mansfield Pass suggested that three to five feet of water penetrated this coastal location. Several cuts were observed in the dunes surrounding Padre Island. The largest of these, near mile marker 50 near the eye's passage, was mistaken by aircrews inspecting the damage as the Mansfield Pass.  Substantial beach erosion was reported near Port Mansfield.

 

·         No category 5 hurricane has struck the Texas coast.

 

·         Damage estimates to public infrastructure and housing come from Department of Emergency Management and Federal Emergency Management Association whose officials tour damage stricken areas with local officials.

 

·         There are two types of federal disaster declarations: one for housing (private individuals) and one for public assistance (infrastructure including CEPRA projects).  For Hurricane Claudette, Texas Governor Rick Perry requested a private disaster declaration on July 16, 2003.

 

 

 

 

Follow this link below For More Comprehensive Facts About Coastal Erosion :

We'd Like Your Comments on this very serious problem

Full name:
Email address:
Comment:
  

Be Aware - Be Involved!
New E-Texas Coastlines
More Interactive - More Concerned

EMAIL US:

Department of Homeland Security

Horizontal Divider 1

gnslogo01802.gif

Want to Know More About Coastal Texas
Click Guidry News Service - Online Current Information

Guidry News Service

Top stories
Headlines provided by Moreover

usa_1a.gif

texas_1a.gif

powered by lycos
SEARCH:Tripod The Web


Search Engine Optimization and Free Submission

Enter a city or US Zip
Today's Weather

Free Counter
Hit Counters