Bio-illogical

Mike Males, Youth Today, January 2003

               Americans’ grotesque compulsion to trash their kids resurfaced in recent media alarms of a “middle-school sexual revolution.” Has anyone presented evidence of more sex between pubescent boys and girls? Not a shred. In fact (no thanks to older teenage and adult men, who cause most of what we call “middle-school sex”), the latest, 2001, Centers for Disease Control figures show 10-14 year-olds’ births, abortions, and sexually-transmitted infections have fallen to 30-50-year lows.

               But forget facts. What would Oprah, USA Today, “values” politicians, sex-education combatants, and teen-risk psychologists like Lynn Ponton (who confessed having sex as a teenager by her parents’ Christmas tree) do without seven-grade sluts to bewail?

               Anyway, do you know WHY youngsters are having rampant sex (even if they aren’t)? Because their little noggins can’t think. Just as scientists of 1902 declared blacks, women, and immigrants innately brainless, 2002 experts blame teenage misbehaviors on addled cerebral cortexes. Neurobiologist Richard Restak’s book, The Secret Life of the Brain, inspired a silly PBS episode proclaiming: “For the first time, scientists can offer an explanation for what parents already know--adolescence is a time of roiling emotions, and poor judgment.”

               Science? Hardly. A five-decade University of Wisconsin study found that scientists miraculously pronounce teenagers “capable and adultlike” when adolescents are needed for wars and economic booms--and “immature and slow to develop” during peacetime and economic recessions. Obsequious scientists who excuse treating youth as mere commodities reflect Americans’ larger anti-youth prejudices.

               Restak and his colleagues certainly dislike teenagers, branding them “difficult,” “unpredictable,” “moody,” suffering “biological tumult,” “impulsiveness,” and “disregard for consequences.” Adults, however, represent “the culmination of human brain development:” “mature,” “likable,” and “courteous.” After indulging such self-flattering hooey, scientists deploy Powerpoint brain-scans to “explain” youth phenomena that don’t exist (“adolescent risk-taking,” “teenage rebellion,” “storm and stress”) or are direct reflections of adult behavior (“youth violence,” “middle-school sex”).

               Realistically, it doesn’t matter whether teens cogitate with their adenoids. What matters is how they act. True, teens often act like idiots--compared to perfect standards of reasoning.  But compared to the ADULTS around them, teens aren’t so bad.

               Contrary to popular claims that teenagers perpetrate violence, AIDS, and addiction simply because they’re teenagers, statistics clearly show that youth risks vary widely and are far more influenced by social class, family, and adult behaviors than by anything attributable to adolescent age. “Decision-making for teenagers is no different than decision-making for adults," Northwestern University psychiatrist Daniel Offer concluded after examining 30,000 subjects and hundreds of studies over four decades. “Minors aged 14 were found to demonstrate a level of competency equivalent to that of adults” in standard cognitive measures, reported a typical Child Development study. Carnegie Mellon University researchers reviewed 100 studies and found adolescents actually harbor FEWER delusions of invulnerability than adults do.

               But who cares? The crazed-teen myth is politically useful. In defending the juvenile justice system, for example, Kim Taylor-Thompson of the Brennan Center branded adolescents innately incompetent, Vincent Schiraldi of the Justice Policy Institute (for which I recently worked as a consultant) called all youth reckless and amoral, and Steven Drizin of Northwestern University vilified teens everywhere as hair-trigger mob killers. If these youth advocates (resurrecting hardliner John DiIulio’s discredited “superpredator” specter) are right, we should abolish juvenile courts and lock up all teens.

               This retreat into long debunked bio-junk raises the opposite question: are adult brains inherently incapable of new ideas? As educator Jeffrey Moran (Teaching Sex) and sociologist Craig Reinarman (Crack in America) document, sex-ed and drug wars repeat the same clueless squabbles decade after decade.

               Instead of belittling teenage brains as undeveloped adult brains, then, Restak’s findings really show that adult brains are atrophied adolescent brains. After all, youths think more flexibly and can reform unhealthy habits while adults remain mired in destructive ruts.

               Deploring “unsubstantiated claims about the incompetence of adolescents,” Carnegie Mellon researchers instead suggest scrutinizing the “cognitive and motivational factors that promote (adults’) harsh view of adolescents.” Using crude stereotypes to deny teenage individuality, score easy political points, and uphold whatever official expediency is fashionable do not epitomize higher-order adult thinking.

 

Mike Males, senior researcher for the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, teaches sociology at the University of California, Santa Cruz.  http://home.earthlink.net/~mmales

 

Mike Males

P.O. Box 7842

Santa Cruz, CA 95061-7842   USA

 

Tel   831-426-7099

Email  mmales@earthlink.net

Homepage  http://home.earthlink.net/~mmales