REPLY #5 TO|
"CRIME AND PUNISHMENT"
Boldfaced statements are parts of the original essay (or a subsequent reply) to which the respondent has directed his comments.
Italicized/emphasized comments prefaced by (R) are those of the respondent and are presented unedited.
My replies appear under the respondent's comments in blue text and are prefaced by my initials (MB).
(R) I am against capital punishment, but for a slightly different reason.
That human lives are too valuable to destroy, once the individual has
commited the crime.
(MB) What is "valuable" about the life of the murderer? What about the
value of the life or lives that he wrongly took?
(R) Admidatly they have lost all rights once sentenced
to death, but why kill them? Why not continue on with the idea of
getting them to give something back to society by making them more like
slaves. Have them work to clean up places and do other jobs. Make them
really work for their food (just as normal offonders should have to do).
(MB) If you consider that the normal appeals process for capital cases
tends to drag on for up to a dozen years after conviction, there is plenty
of opportunity to get some work out of the condemned criminal prior to his
execution. He might give some value back to society from this work, but
how could he ever make proper restitution for the lives of his victim(s)?
No, execution doesn't bring back the victim(s) or undo what was done, but
I feel that it's difficult to argue that it is not fair for somebody who
willingly and wrongly takes the life of another person to pay with his own
Created with Allaire HomeSite 4.0 .......... Last Update: 20 Dec 98
Earthlink Network Home Page
Go to next reply
Return to "Crime and Punishment" essay
Back to Philosophy page