Current Commentary

Coming Next

Highlights

Addict Nation

Yuppie Music I:

Experimental Finance

 

Jackson Browne

Comes of Age

 

 

 

 

July 13, 2009

 


Home
Commentaries
Mutual Funds
Risk Management
Experimental Finance
Online Articles
Books and Articles
Finance Notes
Rigged Online
Links
About Us
Contact Info

 

Addict Nation

by

Ross M. Miller
Miller Risk Advisors
www.millerrisk.com
June 8, 2009

It has been a while since I have written anything for public consumption that more than vaguely concerns either finance or economics. Over the past year or so I have been tempted several times to write a commentary entitled "I Told You So," but for now this commentary is about as close as I am willing to come to that.

Addiction, the topic of this commentary, lurked behind several of my early commentaries. The basis for my inaugural piece on this site, "The Bull That Will Not Die," was my confidence that then-Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan would continue to feed the financial market's "addiction" to cheap money by holding off any serious increase in interest rates, which, in turn, would feed the bull markets in stock and real estate. Despite (or because of) going against the received wisdom in the markets, I was correct and the coup-de-grace for the markets would not come until well into Ben Bernanke's reign at Fed some years later. This time around however, low interest rates by themselves were not enough to do the trick, not even zero interest rates. The private sector had lost its desire to buy at any price. Unfortunately for us, the public sector was more than happy to step in and take up the slack even if it meant racking up debt that goes beyond insane.

Speaking as the "voice of reason," let me tell you what is going on. Americans have become addicted to spending more than they can afford no matter how you measure it. The spending itself is not bad; however, when you have to borrow money from the rest of the world every minute, every day, every month, every year, every decade, to do it, that is bad. It is especially bad (and insane) when your economy is relatively mature and so should be investing in the rest of the world (and receiving an ownership stake in it) rather than borrowing from it (and selling off your future in the process). And behind all of this insanity is the federal government of the U.S. (and its proxies, such as the Fed), whose actions have thwarted (and continue to thwart) the strong market forces that should have brought the current consumption binge to halt as much as twenty years ago.

It is time for a little perspective. I grew up in a middle-class family during the 1960s. Like most other middle class families of the day, mine did not have color TV, any stereo form of music-reproduction equipment, cable television, or a fuel-injected car. All of these were available back then, but you had to be "rich" to own them. Indeed, by 1960s standards, currently all Americans, except for the desperately poor, are "rich," at least the way that an economist would view things. Indeed, many key elements of daily life, from personal computers and the Internet to a variety life-saving pharmaceuticals and medical procedures, did not exist then and are a relatively new phenomenon. Strictly speaking, these items have a value of infinity in 1960s terms, since no amount of money could have bought them. Viewed objectively rather than nostalgically, the 1960s were considerable worse than today, but not entirely unlivable, unless one needed a heart transplant or cancer therapy that went beyond the power of prayer. Back then, people were addicted to lots of things, including spending money, but financial institutions (including your neighborhood loan shark) had much higher lending standards, so it was difficult to keep the consumption monkey fed for long on legitimately borrowed money.

Addiction of any kind is something that economists have a hard time incorporating into their thinking and their models. Many economists are happiest viewing addiction as just another rational choice and see the choices made by an addict as well to be rational. At the core of addiction, however, is the fact that the addict consumes the substance to which he or she is addicted in a way that any rational (non-addicted) person could readily see is harmful. While "coffee addicts" certainly suffer withdrawal symptoms if they cut out caffeine, only the most extreme use of coffee qualifies as a true addiction because there is substantial evidence that coffee use even well beyond the point of moderation confers health benefits.

The most visible sign of addiction in America is "food addiction," which reflects a radical change in eating habits. Back in the 60s, virtually classroom in school had its "fat kid." There was usually only one unfortunate sole and frequently a "gland problem" was said to be to involved. The rest of us were quite scrawny  and hunger was a major issue in America. Moreover, fast food had not yet reached a national, much less global, level. For most of us, eating outside of the home was a luxury reserved for special occasions. I don't doubt that when I was twelve years old that I could have told you every single time that I had eaten in a restaurant back as long as I could remember.

I ate my mother's cooking (thankfully she was a superb cook even if I failed to appreciate it) and I had no choice but to follow a diet that allowed for no soft drinks, no cake (except at birthday parties and such), and a daily allotment of four cookies. (Ice cream, however, was available in abundance because it was viewed as a dairy product.) My parents were not considered strict back then; I had friends who lived on a strict regimen of forced fruits and vegetables and were allowed no sweets whatsoever, including ice cream. Of course, our parents, having grown up during the Depression, viewed us as living one long feast.

Nowadays however, America's most visible, wealthiest, and most influential media star, Oprah, is a recidivist food addiction, and food is one of her less serious additions. Her vast empire is based on consumption; if people failed to buy the goods that Oprah pushes on her television shows and magazine, she would be gone in a moment.

I browsed a copy of Oprah's magazine as research for this commentary, and was not surprised to find an ad for Lay's "Classic" Potato Chips along with ads for other processed foods. I can vouch for the appeal of Lay's flagship, bet-you-can't-eat-just-one product, but you would have to force feed them to me nowthey are fried, full of fat, and certainly have too much sodium for people with a genetic disposition to high blood pressure, like many of those in Oprah's target market, for me ever to consider eating more than one of them. The ad in Oprah's mag contains no warnings of any kind about this product and fails to mention that Lay's makes a low-fat "baked" chip that is a healthier alternative to it.

Oprah herself caused mini-riots at KFC outlets by promoting free chicken and biscuits there, just the way the coke dealers give away free "tastes." (As a putative animal-rights activist, I doubt that Oprah personally slaughtered any of the chickens.)

It is easy to find out what it takes to do to live a happy, addiction-free life and I do not doubt that Oprah provides some helpful information on this account through her manifold media outlets. It is apparent, however that she does not follow her own advice. Interestingly enough, Oprah has challenged her viewers to follow an austerity program that lasts for just a single week. Her austerity measures include: "That thermostat is going way down…to 69 degrees. If you get cold, put on a sweater." All I can say is "WTF?" The winter thermostat in the Miller household is set at 66 degrees during the day and 63 degrees at night. My employers, the State of New York, is not about to pay to keep my office at a toasty 69 degrees. Oprah's other austerity measures include watching only one hour of television per night (of course, you can watch all you want during the day, especially if it's Oprah) and not buying any new clothes for a week.

Of course, reasonable "austerity" measures, like following the American Heart Association's dietary and lifestyle recommendations (and not just for a week, but forever), which have a lot of hard science showing that they work to improve and extend life, is more than Oprah could ever request of her audience. Indeed, it is clearly more than she could ever manage on her own.

Oprah clearly is addicted to all the perks that go along with being Oprah, and in order to conquer her manifold addictions, she would have to let go of her perks, private jet and all. Fat chance of that ever happening.

(Food addiction side note: Proper eating is not something that can occur in isolation by merely following the aforementioned AHA recommendations, which is, nonetheless, an excellent start. Proper eating is just one aspect of proper living. You cannot simply shop around for some good things you want to do and ignore the other bad things or even a single bad thing. Trust me on this.)

You see, like virtually every "public figure," Oprah has one of the worst addictions of all, an addiction to fame, which at its heart is an addiction to controlling others. When you have control freaks trying to "run" the global economy, you are in for big trouble. (See, I got back to the economy.) The current situation is currently one of desperation. Leaders are supposed to have dignity. Our president should not be joking around on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno our Fed Chairman should not be on 60 Minutes. Our leaders are betting the farm on the current green-shooted recovery. If their efforts succeed, then they are golden and our collective consumption addiction will continue to be fed for years to come, even though they have done nothing to deal with the real problems underlying the economy. If their efforts fail, however, it will be very painful in the short-run, but probably much better for the economy in the long-run.

None this ever had to be a problem. Suppose that the U.S. went on a natural consumption diet that eschewed any further public indebtedness beyond that normally associated with cyclical downturns, one that would undoubtedly knock several percentage points off of GDP and possibly even enough to qualify statistically as a "depression." (We are already down 3 percent on GDP despite our extravagant government spending.) We would still be vastly better off than things were when my generation grew up and, in time, by kicking our collective consumption addiction, we would be better off than we are now, even if economic statistics might fail to reflect that improvement. Simply letting the economy "do its thing" (which will certainly never happen without massive political change) would make sure that the dose of reality was spread around to everyone who needed it and would not favor special interests and campaign donors.

As in summers past, this summer I will revert to entertainment mode and present you with a three-part series on a single theme. This summer's theme is "Yuppie Music." Each month I will explore a popular musician or musical group associated with Yuppies. In keeping with the theme of meaningless and addictive consumption for its own sake, the first part of the series will focus on Jackson Browne.

Copyright 2009 by Miller Risk Advisors. Permission granted to forward by electronic means and to excerpt or broadcast 250 words or less provided a citation is made to www.millerrisk.com.

Commentary
Archives


April 12, 2004
The Bull That Will Not Die

April 19, 2004
If an Irrationally Exuberant Moment Turns Into the Right Moment...

April 26, 2004
Anatomy of the Bull that Will Not Die
Part 1: Meme Wars

May 3, 2004
Anatomy of the Bull that Will Not Die
Part 2: All That Macro

May 10, 2004
Anatomy of the Bull that Will Not Die
Part 3: Stock Factors

May 17, 2004
Waiting for the End of the World

May 24, 2004
Black Gold or Bubbling Crude?

June 1, 2004
The Fastow Challenge

June 7, 2004
Bull for President, Oil, and Fed Funds

June 14, 2004
Rigged, Not Random

June 21, 2004
Three Cheers
 for the Subconscious

June 28, 2004
Infinite Liquidity,
Infinite Capital,
Infinite Jest

July 12, 2004
The Golden Age
of Wall Street:
Part I

July 19, 2004
The Golden Age
of Wall Street:
Part II

July 26, 2004
The Golden Age
of Wall Street:
Part III

August 2, 2004
The Golden Age
of Wall Street:
Part IV

August 9, 2004
Uncle Possum's
Handbook of
Mutual Fund Scams

August 16, 2004
Hedgehog
Chapter 19 from
Rigged

August 23, 2004
Is Google the Anti-Enron?

August 30, 2004
What Will Google
Be Worth
on November 30, 2004?

September 13, 2004
A Rigged Summer

September 20, 2004
Dan Rather and the Hedonic Age

September 27, 2004
Still Waiting for the End of the World

October 4, 2004
Fannie Mae Death Watch Part I: Overview

October 11, 2004
Fannie Mae Death Watch Part II: Abrupt Conclusion

October 18, 2004
Alien Abductions and
Your Financial Future

October 25, 2004
Factor Models 101

November 1, 2004
Google November

November 8, 2004
Post-Election Outlook

November 15, 2004
Adventures in Retailing:
Part I: Grocers

December 6, 2004
Adventures in Retailing:
Part II: Two Guys
from Retailand

December 13, 2004
Going Sporadic

January 6, 2005
Adventures in Retailing Part III: Manhattan Bookstores

February 24, 2005
Adventures in Retailing Part IV: Woodbury Common

March 21, 2005
Outlaw Financial Calculators

April 11, 2005
The Year of
Living Bullishly
and the
Oil Superspike

April 25, 2005
Adventures in
Retailing Part V:
Office Superstores

May 9, 2005
Be Careful
What You Model

May 23, 2005
Dude, Where's My Web Page?

June 13, 2005
Going Mobile

June 27, 2005
Splendid Isolation

July 11, 2005
Invasion of the
Asset Swappers

July 25, 2005
Adventures in
Retailing Part VI:
Arts & Crafts

August 8, 2005
The Political
Economy
of Pop

August 22, 2005
Errol Morris
Gets Inside
People's Heads

September 12, 2005
Mutual Fund =
Index Fund +
Hedge Fund

September 26, 2005
Calendar
Consciousness

October 10, 2005
Market
Mulligans

October 24, 2005
Google Again

November 14, 2005
The Human Variable

November 28, 2005
More TV Madness

January 9, 2006
The Shape of
Financial Time

January 23, 2006
Reality Has Never
Been So Real

February 13, 2006
Adventures in
Retailing Part VII:
The Search
for Dave

February 27, 2006
Adventures in
Retailing Part VIII:
Procuring Dave

March 13, 2006
Reality Swaps

March 27, 2006
Trial by Enron
Part I: Myths

April 10, 2006
Trial by Enron
Part II: Facts

April 24, 2006
Trial by Enron
Part III: Opinions

May 8, 2006
Three More Things
about
Risk Management

May 22, 2006
Hangin' with the Fed

June 12, 2006
The Public Side
of Self

June 26, 2006
Hedge Funds:
Corruptors of
Youth?

July 10, 2006
Oral Philosophers
Part I:
Jean Shepherd

July 24, 2006
Oral Philosophers
Part II:
Alan Watts

August 14, 2006
Oral Philosophers
Part III:
Spalding Gray

August 28, 2006
Adventures in
Retailing Part IX:
Costco and
Sam's Club

September 11, 2006
The Unbearable
Snarkiness
of Dividends

September 25, 2006
The Wide Angle

October 9, 2006
Wireless Routers,
Lemons, and
Bad Opinions

October 23, 2006
Dollar Donuts

November 13, 2006
Revenge
of the Matrix

November 27, 2006
Woz Foreshadowed

January 8, 2007
Be a Financial Woz

January 22, 2007
How I Write
These Commentaries

February 12, 2007
Financial Dogma

February 26, 2007
The Making
of
Stansky's
Monster

March 12, 2007
Attention
T-Mart
Shoppers

March 26, 2007
Absorbing Media

April 9, 2007
Adventures in
Retailing Part X:
AJ's Fine Foods

May 14, 2007
Bull Market
Update

June 11, 2007
What Me
Worry about
Credit Derivatives?

July 9, 2007
XM:
Music from Above

August 13, 2007
Internet Radio
and Beyond

September 10, 2007
Getting Things
Labeled

October 8, 2007
Adventures in
Retailing Part XI:
Amazon and Newegg

November 12, 2007
Podmania

February 11, 2008
Postmodern
Cupid

March 10, 2008
Back in
the Day

April 14, 2008
American
Top 40

May 12, 2008
Radio
Paradise

June 9, 2008
Teen Directors I:
Hal Ashby

July 14, 2008
Teen Directors II:
John Hughes

August 11, 2008
Teen Directors III:
Cameron Crowe

September 8, 2008
The Big Conversion

October 13, 2008
Vista and the
Software Gap

November 10, 2008
Whatever

February 9, 2009
Nerd Nerd
Revolution
Part I:
Introduction

March 23, 2009
Nerd Nerd
Revolution
Part II:
SXSW 2009

April 13, 2009
Nerd Nerd
Revolution
Part III:
Nerds on TV

May 18, 2009
Nerd Nerd
Revolution
Part IV: xkcd

June 8, 2009
Addict Nation