Electronics Technician Chief Petty Officer Mark A. Mathews, United States Navy, Retired
Politics & War
QUARTERDECK
Politics & War
President Ronald Wilson Reagan Memorial
Religion
Military Websites
Military Photos
"Down-Under"
Mothballs, Reefs and Scrapyards
Interesting Web Sites
Humor

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD's)

The following is a list of statements made by prominent Democrats on Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction program:

 

Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) "According to the CIA's report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that Saddam Hussein wants to develop nuclear weapons."

·  Congressional Record, October 9, 2002

 

Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) "In the four years since the inspectors, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

·  Congressional Record, October 10, 2002

 

Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) "It is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and potential future support for terrorist acts and organizations, that make him a terrible danger to the people to the United States."

·  Congressional Record, October 10, 2002

 

Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) "We must eliminate that [potential nuclear] threat now before it is too late. But that isn't just a future threat. Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose real threats to America today, tomorrow. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East. He could make these weapons available to many terrorist groups, third parties, which have contact with his government. Those groups, in turn, could bring those weapons into the United States and unleash a devastating attack against our citizens. I fear that greatly."

·  Congressional Record, October 10, 2002

 

Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.) "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”

·  Remarks at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, October 27, 2002

 

Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) "There is no question that Iraq possesses biological and chemical weapons and that he seeks to acquire additional weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. That is not in debate. I also agree with President Bush that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must be disarmed, to quote President Bush directly."

·  Congressional Record , October 8, 2002

 

President Bill Clinton "In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now - a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers, or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed. If we fail to respond today, Saddam, and all those who would follow in his footsteps, will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council, and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program."

·  Remarks at the Pentagon , February 17, 1998

"Let's imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he'll use the arsenal. And I think every one of you who has really worked on this for any length of time, believes that, too."

·  Remarks at the Pentagon, February 17, 1998

"Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them, not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq. The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again."

·  Remarks at the White House , December 16, 1998

 

Vice President Al Gore "[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He's already demonstrated a willingness to use these weapons; he poison gassed his own people. He used poison gas and other weapons of mass destruction against his neighbors. This man has no compunctions about killing lots and lots of people."

·  Larry King Live, December 16, 1998

"Remember, Peter, this is a man who has used poison gas on his own people and on his neighbors repeatedly. He's trying to get ballistic missiles, nuclear weapons, chemical and biological weapons. He could be a mass murderer of the first order of magnitude. We are not going to allow that to happen."

·  ABC News’ "Special Report,” December 16, 1998

"We know that Saddam has stored away secret supplies of biological weapons and chemical weapons throughout his Country."

·  Remarks to the Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, Calif., September 23, 2002

 

Secretary Of State Madelyn Albright "Countering terror is one aspect of our struggle to maintain international security and peace. Limiting the dangers posed by weapons of mass destruction is a second. Saddam Hussein's Iraq encompasses both of these challenges.”

·  Remarks at the American Legion Convention, New Orleans, La., August 9, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from America, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face. And it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm. In discussing Iraq, we begin by knowing that Saddam Hussein, unlike any other leader, has used weapons of mass destruction even against his own people."

·  CNN "Showdown With Iraq: International Town Meeting," February 18, 1998

 

Defense Secretary William Cohen Cohen appeared on ABC’s "This Week” in 1997 to talk about Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction. To illustrate the danger, he brought a five-pound bag of sugar.

Cohen: It’s important when we talk about weapons of mass destruction that we translate that into something that the American people, and hopefully, the world community can understand. If you take a five pound bag of sugar and accept – call this anthrax (holding up a 5-pound bag of table sugar). This amount of anthrax could be spread over a city – let’s say the size of Washington. It could destroy at least half the population of that city. If you had even more amounts ...

One of the things we found with anthrax is that one breath and you are likely to face death within five days. One small particle of anthrax could produce death within five days.

VX is a nerve agent. One drop from this particular thimble as such – one single drop will kill you within a few minutes.

Cokie Roberts: Would you put that bag down please.

Cohen: Now I want to point out – I will spill it on the table – point out that he has had enormous amounts and I’d like to go to some of the lies that have been told about this, because originally, if we could look at this particular chart, the original declaration of Iraq, he said he had small quantities of nerve agent for research. We found almost four tons of VX – that little vial I just showed you – four tons of it.

·  "This Week” on ABC, November 16, 1997

Liberals, Conservatives & Southerners:

 How do you tell the difference between Liberals, Conservatives and Southerners? Pose the following question:

  You're walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children. Suddenly, a dangerous looking man with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, raises the knife, and charges.

  You are carrying a Glock .40, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.

 What do you do?

 

Liberal Answer: Well, that's not enough information to answer the question!  Does the man look poor or oppressed? Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack?

  Could we run away? What does my wife think? What about the kids? Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand? What does the law say about this situation? Does the Glock have an appropriate safety built into it?

  Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children? Is it possible he'd be happy with killing just me?

  Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me? If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me? Should I call 9-1-1?

  Why is this street so deserted? We need to raise taxes, have a paint and weed day, and make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior.

  This is all so confusing! I need to debate this with some friends for a few days and try to come to a consensus.

 

Conservative Answer: BANG!

 

Southerner's Answer: BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! Rackety-click...(sounds of reloading).

  Wife: "Hun, he looks like he's still moving, whadda y'all kids think?"

  Son: "Mama's right Daddy, I saw it, too."

BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! click.

  Daughter: "Nice group Daddy! Were those the Winchester Silver tips?" Edit

 

Go Ahead - We Dare You !
     Enter
Mexico
illegally.  Never mind immigration quotas, visas,
international law, or any of that nonsense.
     Once there, demand that the local government provide free medical care
for you and your entire family.  Demand bilingual nurses and doctors.
     Demand free bilingual local government forms, bulletins, etc.
     Procreate abundantly.  Deflect any criticism of this allegedly
irresponsible reproductive behavior with, "It is a cultural
United States
thing. You would not understand, pal."
     Keep your American identity strong.  Fly Old Glory from your rooftop, or proudly display it in your front window or on your car bumper.
     Speak only English at home and in public and insist that your children do likewise.
     Demand classes on American culture the Mexican school system.
     Demand a local Mexican driver license.  This will afford other legal rights and will go far to legitimize your unauthorized, illegal, presence in
Mexico.
     Insist that local Mexican law enforcement teach English to all its officers.
     Good luck! You'll be demanding for the rest of time. Because it will never happen.  In
Mexico
or any other country in the world... Except right here.   Land of the Naive.
     God Bless
America---She needs it.
  Edit