The evidence confirms that based either on financial interest in conflict with my choate Virginia Attorneys Lien on Treasure
Trove, cronyism of Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys with Eric Holder, and animosity to me as an independent federal civil litigator
representing the rights of nonresident US/Colombian citizens, government attorneys and judges appointed by the Obama Administration
have participated in an ongoing business conspiracy, constitutional tort, and interstate racketeering enterprise
PETITION TO CONGRESS AND VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEYS’ USE OF
UNCONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULES AND VOID AB INITIO ORDERS .
"There is no crueler
tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …"– U.S. vs. Jannottie,
673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).
Therefore, simultaneous with the filing of
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does Members of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al.,
U.S. Dist. Ct. E.D. VA (Richmond Division) No. 12-cv-663-JAB (see http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/lawofficesofisidororodriguez/),
I petition for an investigation of attorney/judges appointed by the Obama Administration for their business conspiracy,
constitutional tort, and interstate racketeering enterprise to deny citizens access to an impartial court and jury trial of
malfeasance by use of unconstitutional court rules and void ab initio orders to usurp the legislative power of both Congress
and the General Assembly of Virginia.
The issue concerns government employees’
misuse of office to abuse the authority delegated by Congress and the General Assembly to promulgate court rules. Thus,
the petition does not conflict with “separation of power,” but rather underscores your duty to assure that delegated
power has not been abused, in violation of constitutional limitations and prohibitions.
request that you act forthwith on this petition given the evidence that I have been the target of retaliation by government
employees for previously exercising my 1st Amendment right to petition for an investigation of government employees obstruction
of my rights as a father in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204(See http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml).
Sea Search Armada v. Republic of Colombia, and Intervenor Isidoro Rodriguez v. Sea Search Armada, D.C. 00-cv-02083
The above intervener action was filed on April 15, 2011, to protect and enforce a Virginia Attorney's Lien on Sea Search
Armada’s claim to treasure troves valued at $17 Billion sunk off the coast of the Republic of Colombia.
Related to the above, Irene Rodriguez et al v. Douglas Shulman and Sea Search Armada et al, Dist. Ct. DC
#11-cv-01183(JEB)(June 28, 2011), was filed against an interstate criminal enterprise motivated by financial interest, cronyism,
and/or animosity to the independence of Plaintiffs as attorneys by the oligarch of Sea Search Armada et al., their
Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys, government employees/attorneys and federal/Virginia judges’ willful acts outside the scope
of their respective minister-ial/judicial authority and jurisdiction by oppression under color of law.
In summary, the oligarch’s interstate criminal conspiracy began in 2003 to punish Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez in
retaliation for: (1) litigating on behalf of nonresident US/Colombian citizens (e.g., Martinez v. Lamagno and DEA,
515 U.S. 417 (1995); (2) litigating to protect a Virginia Attorney’s property rights; and, (3) petitioning Congress
to investigate DOJ attorneys and judges’ obstruction of a father’s rights under Treaty, 18 U.S.C. § 1204, and
a Joint Custody Agreement (see ). In 2006 the conspiracy was compound-ed to deprive Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez of their right
to self-employment by willful acts of treason and misprision of the felony of treason in violation of Art. IV § 4 of the U.S.
Const., the Void Order Doctrine, Internal Revenue Code, the Racketeering Influenced and Corruption Organization Act
("R.I.C.O."), Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and rule of law
of separation of power under our constitutional system (see , and ).
Therefore this Press Release is a public service seeking to trigger an investigat-ion by the media of the oligarch’s
coup d’etat in Washington, D.C., depriving all citizens of the rights and limitation/prohibition pursuant to our constitutional
Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez
|Isidoro Rodrigeuz, Esq.
|Independent Federal civil litigator targeted by Beltway attorneys and judges.
Presentation to member of General Assembly on January 10, 2010, on treason of Supreme Court of Virgina by promulgating illegal
Virginia Criminal Complaint for Treason and Obstruction of Justice by the Collusion of Bob McDonnell, Judges and government
attorneys to violate the Va. Constitution, Va. Cde, and Rule of Law.
January 8, 2009 presentation to N. Virginia members to General Assembly on the usurping of legislative authority by the courts
and government attorneys.
2005 petition to Congress and General Assembly of Virginia to investigate the criminal obstruction of the rights of fathers
by government attorneys and judges.
Welcome to our web site! Our organization is to assure the right
of all citizens to secure access to an impartial court and jury civil trial to hold all government officials and judges
accountable for criminal or tortious acts.
Under the Judiciary Act of 1925 (43 Stat. 936), Congress delegated to the
U.S. Supreme Court the authority of "discretionary appellate jurisdiction." However, the evidence is that the Court under
the stewardship of Chief Justice Rehnquist and Roberts, has abused its discretion to permit the depriving of the right to
civil jury trials, the riht to pro hoc vice litigators, and federal statutory mandates under the Rules Enabling
Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and various pieces of Watergate legislation. Thus, based on its self proclaimed judicial
policy to let "issues ‘percolate’ in the 50 States in the interests of federalism over [its] responsibility to
resolve emerging constitutional issues." Johnson v. Texas, 509 U.S. 350, 379 (1993)(Justice O'Connor, dissenting),
the Court invited the criminal violations of statutory and Constitutional rights of all citizens by unilaterially declaring
both the Executive and Judicial Branch absolutely immune from civil suit for tortious and criminal acts.However, as explained in United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220 (1882),
[n]o man in this country is so high that he is above the law.
No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to
the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and
every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy,
and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives. (Emphasis added).