Golden Gate Park Preservation Alliance
2013 Draft ROSE - sample letter
Home
SF Recreation and Park 2016-2020 Strategic Plan violates City Charter
SB47 defeated - Politics trumps kids' health
Beach Chalet Soccer Fields - act now to preserve our parkland!
Online Celebration of the Beauty of Golden Gate Park, the Beach Chalet fields and Ocean Beach
2013 Draft ROSE
ROSE Sample Letter
Festivals in Golden Gate Park - Impacts and reports
Water Treatment Factory moved outside of Golden Gate Park!
Commonwealth Club panel: Golden Gate Park Under Siege
What is the value of Golden Gate Park?
Other issues impacting Golden Gate Park
Festival Reports
Steering Committee
Media Links
Volunteer!
Contact us
Write Today!

Start with this template -- please modify to reflect your feelings!

                                                                                January 24, 2014

Ms. Kimia Haddadan

Planning Department

1650 Mission Street, 4th floor, SF CA   94103

Re:        2013 Draft ROSE - preservation of open space in our parks

Ms. Haddadan:

I am concerned that the Draft 2013 ROSE encourages building in our parks.  Our parkland is limited and precious.  Without a firm "no" to new buildings, we leave our parks open to powerful and well-funded special interest groups.  Once one building went up, more would certainly follow.  San Francisco as a City will become only more dense.  To protect our parks as open space for future generations, the 2013 Draft ROSE should have strong restrictions against new buildings in our parks. 

San Francisco must budget for more open space and, if a new buildings are needed, the City should allocate funds for both acquisition of the land and the construction of that building.  San Franciscans should not have to sacrifice their parks and playgrounds to new buildings.  I would like the final 2014 ROSE to reflect that option, as did the 1986 ROSE.

Secondly, the ROSE has incorporated good language on preserving Golden Gate Park's historic value for passive and active recreation within a naturalistic landscape.  However, I am concerned that the ROSE's proposal to open up the recent 1998 Golden Gate Park Master Plan to changes could lead to undermining the Master Plan.  Please modify that language to stress the importance of evaluating all new proposals for the park within the  design intent of the Park and protect the landscape as described in the '1998 Golden Gate Park Master Plan,' Objective II, Policy A: Landscape Preservation and Renewal."

Thank you for your consideration.

(Your Name/ Address/ contact information)

cc:         Planning Commission

              Historic Preservation Commission

Planning Commission & Staff

Historic Preservation Commission and Staff

Kimia Haddadan, ROSE Planner

Please fill out the form on the Contacts page to offer comments or to join our mailing list. 
Name, logo, and content copyright 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 GGPPA, K. Howard
This does not include drawings provided by other organizations.

Last updated on