| James N. Markels | ||||
|
|
Personal
Information Constitutionalist
Party Political/Policy
Writing Creative
Writing Resume |
by
James N. Markels With better than 8 percent real GDP growth per year
for the last five years, an unemployment rate of only 3.6 percent and
the lowest taxes among the twelve members of the European Union,
Ireland’s economy has overcome a stubbornly high inflation rate to be
the fastest growing economy in Europe. But Ireland has a labor shortage
that may threaten the boom, so the government has proposed to cut taxes
even more in order to stem union demands for higher wages and attract
more foreign workers. Little did Ireland expect to be reprimanded by the
EU itself for daring to do such a thing. “Sorry, but sometimes the teacher has to punish the
best pupil,” said Romano Prodi, the president of the European
Commission, which is the executive branch of the EU. Prodi’s attitude
is common amongst the other, larger EU nations. Sure, little Ireland has
a good thing going, but the managers in Germany and France think they
really know how to go about economic growth, even as Ireland outperforms
their economies year after year. The EU expects tax cuts to worsen Ireland’s
inflation rate, which is already twice what the European Central Bank
recommends for its members, and that might cause problems for other EU
nations. But Ireland is different from the other EU member nations in
that it is extremely reliant on imports from a non-member, the United
Kingdom. The main cause of Ireland’s inflation isn’t too much money
chasing after too few goods, but instead the result of trading with a
nation that has a stronger currency than the euro. As the euro’s value
falls, the price of UK goods go up. Ireland’s productivity has been
growing at a fantastic rate. There’s no reason to assume that a tax
cut will cause inflation. Most likely the real impetus behind the EU’s public
scolding is summed up by Pedro Solbes, the EU’s commissioner for
economic and monetary affairs, when he said, “People have to accept
peer pressure and adjust their economic policies accordingly.” You see, when a country joins the EU it’s
considered to be part of a team. What becomes important is not the
individual successes of any one nation, but whether the EU as a whole
benefits. The EU’s original proponents insisted that the new economic
alliance would not hinder sovereignty in any way, but over time that has
given way to a busybody posture that frowns upon countries doing what is
best for its people. Fortunately, Ireland is having none of the criticism.
Irish Finance Minister Charlie McCreevy notes the success of Ireland’s
economy and has indicated an openness to the suggestions from the other
EU members—as soon as they prove capable of matching Ireland’s feat.
But Prodi noted to The Economist this month
that the EU feels more and more like a government, and that means
there’s a push to create an EU authority that might be able to lob
more than mere criticism toward a rebel member like Ireland. Already
there is discussion about the creation of a constitution for the EU,
forming legal institutions with authority over some areas of the member
nation governments. One of these areas would probably be taxation, in
fact, so as to make tax rates more uniform and prevent competition
between nations for workers and businesses. A future EU government in
the fashion that Prodi envisions wouldn’t just reprimand Ireland. It
would tell Ireland what its tax rates are. |
||