James N. Markels


"I'm not bad, I'm just drawn that way."
         --Jessica Rabbit

 


Home

Personal Information
(Bio, etc.)

Constitutionalist Party
(Political third party I founded)

Political/Policy Writing
(Op-eds & longer papers)

Creative Writing
(Short stories and poetry)

Resume

Odds and Ends

(Links of idle interest)

Contact Me

 


A Long, Long Run in Kosovo

by James N. Markels

During NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia on behalf of the Kosovar Albanians, former President Bill Clinton argued that the aerial campaign “is the right thing for our security interests over the long run.” Almost two years later, we can see that he was horribly wrong. U.S. troops now find themselves trying to restrain the same militant Albanians they once fought for. These Albanians are now trying to forcibly take portions of Macedonia along the border of Kosovo, where skirmishes led last Wednesday to our troops opening fire on Albanian guerrillas, wounding two. It’s just a matter of time until the Albanians, who are starting to see our soldiers as a threat to their goal of a Greater Albania, return fire.

Add to the mix NATO’s decision to allow Serbian troops back into the buffer zone along the Macedonian border in order to provide protection against forays by the guerrillas, and you have all the ingredients for another all-out war, this time on the ground where our technological advancement provides only nominal protection.

The notion that “security interests” have been served on any level by NATO’s intervention in Kosovo is undeniably false. Conflict is now spreading to neighbor nations with large ethnic Albanian populations, thereby undermining regional security. The bombing campaign also served to extend former Yugoslavian President Slobodon Milosevic’s reign, according to the victorious opposition candidate Vojislav Kostunica. And now the security of our own soldiers is under risk.  

And now the “long run” looks very long indeed, as Secretary of State Colin Powell has indicated that America will “stay the course” in Kosovo and keep troops in the area until peacekeeping is no longer necessary. What started as Clinton’s war has become President Bush’s problem, and the odds look good that it will become a problem for the president after him. And so on.  

The ultimate problem is that NATO has given itself no way out of Kosovo. The province is now occupied almost exclusively by Albanians, much unlike the multi-ethnic population before the bombing began. Naturally, the Albanians want autonomy, but the agreement brokered with Milosevic for the ceasefire expressly assured that Kosovo would remain part of Yugoslavia, with the specifics of its governance to be determined later. But if NATO can’t let the Albanians take over and the Albanians will violently refuse Yugoslav rule, there’s no one left to claim authority except for NATO peacekeepers.

In other words, if the avoidance of armed conflict is the pre-eminent goal, then rest assured that U.S. troops will patrol Kosovo for decades on end.

But this is precisely the kind of tar-baby born from the unilateral military actions of a president acting without a congressional mandate. Perhaps now Bush can appreciate in some small sense how Nixon felt to inherit Vietnam. And to this day we’re still in Korea, and we’re still bombing Iraq from time to time.

The Constitution specifically states that “the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual service of the United States (emphasis mine).” Actual service means a declaration of war by Congress, not merely the establishment of armed forces. The reason for this was simple: The direction of war is best served by a single hand, while the act of war itself requires the confidence and will of the people. Presidents acting to levy war without Congress’ blessing have found their efforts to be painfully limited in success, with political concerns overwhelming strategic goals.

In most cases, these political concerns leave future presidents with few options for resolving the situation. Even if the original goal that was desired is unachievable, the loss of face from admitting failure is often too high. Our overwhelming military dominance makes it even harder for a president like Bush to voluntarily stand down from a challenge.

The “right thing for our security interests over the long run” is for Congress to direct what those interests are according to the will of the people, and then only hand over the military to the president when force has been deemed necessary to achieve them. Leaving these decisions up to the president alone ensures that U.S. troops will find themselves in open-ended, poorly thought-out missions that have little to do with America’s national security. It’s too late for Congress to undo Kosovo, but the next time a president is itching to send our troops on another “peacekeeping” mission, Congress needs to step forth and claim its rightful constitutional territory.