Times Square as
honky-tonk carnival (1930s to mid-1990s) vs Times Square as
corporate office tower and entertainment complex (mid-1990s to date)
Many New Yorkers
deplore the generic and mall-like shops, theaters, and restaurants; the
incessantly glowing advertising signage and digital images;
and the self-consciously histrionic architecture that mark out the area
since Disney
invested in the New Amsterdam theater. Others point out that the
lights, music, disparate mobs, street salesmen and artists, and even a
few XXX stores are still in evidence. The music and dancing at B B
King's is
rumored to be hot and wild on Saturday nights. They add that popular
entertainment entrepreneurs always wanted families and women to feel
safe in their dance halls, restaurants, and theaters. For example,
pre-WWI Lobster Palaces encouraged ladies to attend, and deplored the
older "sporting life" rowdiness. On
Coney Island the bars and whore houses were relegated to a small area
called "the gut," George Tillyou wanted a friendly, benevolent crowd at
his shows, and Dreamland was a very upscale, refined place.The theme
park, with its shallow, patriotic view of history, was hardly invented
at Disneyland. Coney Island had its recreations of great American
victories at sea. 42nd Street's Murray's Roman Gardens, which
occupied the building Hubert's Flea Circus later took over, simulated
ancient Rome, and the movie palaces of the 20s and 30s made one feel
s/he was in a starlit night in Greece, in an Egyptian court, or in a
medieval palace.
The phenomenon loosely called "Disneyfication" has been carefully
analyzed. Issues of privatized public space, and of
corporate-sponsored entertainment venues, are
of major concern to anyone who is concerned about
dystopias that 21st century big business, with its technological,
financial, and lobbying power, is uniquely qualified to create. Policed and TV-monitored in a way that
scorns privacy, discourages any kind of diversity in dress or
behavior, and enforces the political status quo however (like
Bushworld) corrupt
and hypocritical, urban public space has become something that makes
anyone who remembers "naughty, bawdy, gaudy" night life--or has read 1984--shake his/her head in
dismay.
If shop owners, police, politicians,
real estate owners, investment bankers treat Times Square and the
people who frequent it more respectfully today than before
Disneyfication (and they do, by a long shot), it is because today's
passing parade is considered a consumer of upscale, if not elite,
merchandise. The passing parade is no longer in search of pornography,
drugs, booze, gambling opportunities, or prostitutes. Mob presence is
gone, as are most pariah capitalists, except for the 8th Avenue porn
store owners, mostly Sri Lankans, the latest of the immigrant
middlemen. The mega-corporations who
own the media, banking, and entertainment giants need the income from
Times Square's businesses just as they do from shopping malls, theme
parks, stadias, gentrified downtowns. They know how to make their
customers feel safe, important, and, by their lights, "American".
Below I list and summarize some
of the key statements on the subject by
sociologists, historians, and lovers of New York City. But to start,
the criminal negligence of Bushworld (Texas-style cronyism,
contempt for "entitlement" programs such as the 2001 proposal for
strengthing the levees, bureaucratization, Cheneyistic indifference) is
part of this story. What are the plans for rebuilding New Orleans?
Well, it needs to be smaller. That is, the poor people need to be, or
to stay, disbursed. That's the opinion of NY Times' Business Page
reporter Frank Nocera, and it is echoed by other real estate and
investment counselors (W. Ribczynski of The Wharton School, for
example). Nocera ("To Be Better, New Orleans, Think Smaller," 9/25/05,
pp.C1, C5). Nocera believes the tourist entertainment business would be
a good fit for the venerable city. That is what occasioned the
Disneyfication of Times Square, and Bloomberg--immune from charges of
corrupt influence because of his own bottomless
fortune--has seen to it that Coney Island and a swatch of
Ratner-infested Brooklyn will look like the New Times
Square in future.
Nocera states that the New Big Easy will have need of people who take
the low-wage jobs that today's
entertainment industry doles out. But it will need 200,000 less than
lived in the city before Katrina/Bushworld. It's those poor people who
are malleable, and if there were fewer, maybe they could have their
ruined houses "replaced with something that will be new and safe and
afordable." Gee thanks Frank, who adds "and if the population can stay
down, . . . there is a chance that the school system could be good."
Well, at least there's a chance. Quoting a mogul in a "New York
Investment Bank that specializes in bankruptcy and restructuring
deals," Nocera explains that casino gambling would be a part of the new
entertainment landscape, trading on the "ribald" past of New Orleans in
the way only PR spinners can. Oh yeah, creativity and feral energy can
be good for business too, if "managed" the right way.
The result: "an adult Disneyland."
Bottom
line: the corp-se suits and the journalists who suck up their
self-serving drivel do not see that phrase as an oxymoron.
Samuel Delany, Times Square
Red, Times Square Blue (NY: NYU Press, 1999.)
"The Times Square renovation is not just about real estate and
economics . . . . Because it has involved the major restructuring of
the legal code relating to sex, and because it has been a first step
not just toward the moving, but toward the obliteration of certain
business and social practices, it has functioned as a massive and
destructive intervention in the social fabric of a noncriminal element
in the city . . . ." (193-94)
Delany frequented the gay porn theaters and found
companions and friends there. He describes the atmosphere of tolerance,
existing no where else in the city, for people's sexual kinks, however
bizarre. Delany finds of carnival-like touch of anarchy essential to
human expression. He also praises the contact between races,
social classes, and ethnic groups. In Times Square, porn made sex
"friendlier, more relaxed, more playful" -- for those who could
overcome the guilt and revulsion they had been taught to express for
"deviance" and for tabooed sex's equation with disease and criminality.
It was the antithesis of "family values."
One of the most interesting passages is the
description of the "working class residences and small human services
(groceries, drugstores, liquor stores, dry cleaners, diners . . .
electronic stores . . . retailers of theatrical equipment . . .
inexpensive hotels . . . bars and the sexually oriented businesses . .
.)" What has taken their place are the theaters, restaurants, tourist
hotels, and skyscrapers.
#######
Neil Gabler's Life
the Movie (1998) describes the way entertainment in a
monolithic, technologically-advanced society provides leisure time
entertainment which is passively enjoyed and escapist. Films, TV shows,
musical and melodramatic theater entertain by making spectators avoid
thinking about themselves, their circumstances, their own
responsibilities, or those of their employers or elected officials. The
way corporate "news" covers events is a good example: as a contest
between opponents instead of discussing the reasons, for example, of
opposing views on a Supreme Court nominee or a political advisor under
fire for revealing the identity of the wife of an administrative
critic. "Human interest" not talent or message is the way to generate
automatic reactions and melodrama. Thus personalities become famous not
for talent but for how personable or outrageous they appear. Enforced
stupidity is the result, if "dazed" and "shocked" are the
definition of stupid. In this connection, we should say that the
technological breakthrough which convinced distributors of
consumer items such as clothes, cell phones, vacations, cars, and
computers to advertise in the new Times Square was the digital open air
TV screens.

######
Guy DeBord's The Society of
the Spectacle (1967) is the key text about commodity fetishism.
The capitalist economy makes people desire products because they are
advertised as holding the keys to happiness and
empowerment. The citizen is made to confuse false needs with
personal and even spiritual fulfillment, through the media of film,
radio, newspapers, photographs, genre fiction, stage entertainment.
S/He is also made a passive spectator, alienated from any sense of
individuality ("be different, like everybody else"), politically
complaint, and part of a mass behavioral consensus, even if s/he
is alone in home. "The spectacle proclaims the predominence of
appearances and asserts that all human life, which is to say all social
life, is mere appearance. . . . It is the sun that never sets on the
empire of modern passivity."

#####
Frank Rose, "Can Disney Change 42nd Street?" Fortune 24 June, 1996,
p.95-104. Extremely informative piece. In 1995, the investment seemed
financially negligible for Disney, but was an innovation. "Festival
marketplaces" in Boston and Baltimore were flourishing. And Starbuck's
was a surprise, proving that "people want to be with people."
Disney wanted a vibrant, authentic environment, not a slick and
synthetic one. The transportation and entertainment center that had
been Times Square for a century was a rich source of excitement,
lights, music, fun, and adventure. It also supported a Gap and
McDonald's lucrativeely, despite the area's shabbiness.

If Disney could make Times Square
tourist friendly, with the kind of
mid-level clothing, electronic, and accessory stores that had drawn
people in the 1950s, then they could be a bellweather for the return of
the center city to commerical prominence. Good theater was important
too--thus the New Amsterdam ("a glance into fairyland, said Michael
Eisner, envisioning the refurbishing), The Lion King, and backing
for musical comedy at new and renovated 42nd Street theaters.
Further incentives were that the country would only support a few
Disneyworld theme parks, that considerable fortunes could be amassed by
consumer centers and multiplexes, and that architects' creativity will
produce attractive environments "sharing elements of theme
parks."
Such ambiences pay off big--especially with the digital moving images
on both large
screens and small ones that can be put in stores, on subway kiosks, and
sides of buildings.
######
Vincent Moscov, "New York.com: A Political Economy of the
'Informational' City," http://www.queensu.ca/sociology/Faculty/Mosco/vmny.htm
A network of informational offices set up to sell goods and services
online--a "Silicone Alley"-- now exists in Tribecca and the Battery,
and in midtown New York also, where it coexists with a mas
entertianment complex. The latter came of age when Disney insisted that
the sex busineses, along with the downscale restaurants, grocery
stores, electronic outlets, and bars, had to be razed before it
restored the New Amsterdam theater. The skyscrapers are occupied by
advertising, media, fashion, banking, and telecommunications concerns.
Some consequences of this kind of concentration of corporate power:
surveillance by electronic equipment, Business Improvement Districts
who have power to privatize previously municipally-funded services, the
demise of privacy, and an increasing financial gap between the wealthy
and the poor. [editorial addition:
That gap is the largest of any city in the nation, and growing every
year under the immensely wealthy and consitutionally deaf and dumb
Michael Bloomberg, who will, if elected to a second term, impose upon a
large area of Brooklyn and Coney Island a corporate
entertainment-luxury apartment-office center the sterility of which
will equal that of any mall in the nation. Downscale, and often
immigrant, neighborhoods will be demolished. This is the Bloomberg who
wishes to restict Central Park entertainment to elite and enormously
funded public events, while making it off limits to people of
various races, classes, and political persuasions who desire to stage
spontaneous events in which they express themselves creatively and
politically.]
Bloomberg with the cast of Chicago. You
gotta give him credit.
In view of Bloomberg's, and
Giuliani's, desire to ban street musicians, incense sellers, portrait artists, and sidewalk book and magazine
salesmen from other areas of the city, the presence of all of these
people in Times Square is remarkable. Perhaps the BID figures they
provide a touch of the "authentic" for the tourists who form part of
the background noise at the networks' morning shows, where they can be
seen smiling over the shoulders of the mike-clutching "personalities"
who call themselves "journalists."
#########
John Hannigan, Fantasy City:
Profit and Pleasure in the Postmodern Metropolis (London:
Routhledge, 1998).
In the early 20th century, the middle classes
were nervous about working class behavior in entertainment venues. At
Coney Islaand, for example, the middle classes fled when the proles
took over. See Robert Caro's The
Power Broker for Robert Moses' motivation for replacing hionky
tonk Coney with spacious and immaculate Jones Beach. With
suburbanization, people stayed at home, focussing life around TV,
neighborhood clubs, local or better yet, private swimming pools. Malls
developed, multiplexes, and baseball stadia with vast parking lots,
away from the urban settings the avoidance of which caused Shibe Park,
Ebbets Field, Braves Field, Griffiths Stadium and Forbes Field to be
abandoned. Today's "vintage" ball parks double as theme parks, with
electronic noise and adverts, theme restaurants, digital scoreboard
images, kids' playgrounds, professional cheerleaders--and super boxes,
so the elite do not have to sit in stands but rather can eat, drink,
and watch the game on large screens while networking with clients!
Disneyland was not close to a city, and was a
new age marriage of moving images, toys, live entertainment, and a
shrine to an American history cleansed of exploitation,
class conflict, and depredation. Umberto Eco: "America demands a
hyper-reality, and so has invented the absolute fake."
As entertainment returned to the inner city in the
1980s, a nostalgic mix of travel and adventure predominated. Although
to some degree the inner city revival meant exciting specialty shops,
clever restaurant menus, and independent film centres, the larger and
more generic event settings predominated. Appeals to a romantic past
helped transfer allegiance from history to consumer items. The shopping
"experience" became a "stand-in for real life travel and experience."
Such inner city travellers could "see" a large city without setting
foot in any neighborhoods or sampling their ethnic diversity regarding
clothing, food, celebrations, or music.
Hispanic
Newark, NY
Comfort Siutes Inn, downtown Newark, NJ
#########