
The film Edmond,
a selection for the Venice Film Festival in 2005, is a virtual
replication of David Mamet's 1982 play with a screenplay by him. Edmond
is an upper middle class executive, and his story is a kind of morality
play, with the Beelzebub and the Christian figures internalized in one
cold Manhattanite Everyman. Therefore, as many reviewers complain,
realistic motivation is missing. The stage directions suggest a small
amount of scenery, as would be sensible given that the one-act play has
25 scenes set in a variety of places, the majority of them in Times
Square's places of business: bar, street, massage parlor, peep show,
cheap hotel, pawn shop, subway, mission. It's the mind of Edmond where
the drama takes place. He's a type, and so are those he meets. It's the
play's virtue, not its weakness.
After hearing a fortune teller declare he is not where he belongs,
Edmond tells his wife he is leaving (she does not excite him
"spiritually or sexually"). Impeccably dressed, he meets an
impeccably dressed shill--as the play proceeds, he loses his tie, his
clothes becomes rumpled and then bloody, he dons a prison suit, is
marched naked through the cell block, and finally acquires an entirely
new appearance, to which I will return. This kind of stage business is
typical of the medieval genre on which I think Mamet modeled his play.
After a brief conversation about how Blacks are to be
admired because they do not have the white man's responsibilities and
restraints, the shill directs Edmond to a bar ("you have to get
something opens your nose").

Edmond does find something that opens his nose, but it's not among the
commercial sex attractions of the Deuce. B-girls, strippers,
prostitutes, live peep dancers, 3-card monte games: Edmond does not
like to be rooked, and bargains unsuccessfully to drive down their
prices as he negotiates his way among the ethnic, sexual, racial
diversity of the city's vice zone: Italian, Russian, Asian,
African-American, Hispanic, Israeli. It's his middle-class
businessman's way of keeping self-respect, establishing control. The
result is that the monte scammers beat him up. So he gets himself a
gun, and uses it to pistol-whip a pimp who tries the Murphy Game on him
("you coon, you cunt, you cocksucker.")
Now he's the man. Turning into a ur-Dr. Phil clone, he chats up a
waitress with an "in the moment," break-loose-and-follow-your-impulses
spiel about rejecting the restraints of decency and civility.
"There is no history; there is just now." He stood up for himself
against the pimp who would rob him, got some "warlike blood in his
veins." Now that he's earned respect, he can, for the first time,
recognize the Black Man as a person. That is, a person he has beaten
and bloodied.
But Everyman can't stop preening. Back at the pretty young waitress'
apartment, he freaks her out with his rant ("I want you to change
your life with me. Right now, for whatever that may be"). She
screams, calls him the devil, and curses him. He kills her with a
kitchen knife, shouting "now look what you've done." There is nothing
of Christian restraint or humility in Edmond. He's
asserted himself, he's broken loose. Now he's Beelzebub.
He's engaged in assault and murder, the murder of a young woman whose
only mistake was listening too closely to a man who must have
communicated to her his light-hearted enthusiasm and his feeling of
liberation from long-tolerated frustrations.
Mamet does not, of course, preach about despair and repentance. It's
the 20th century, and God is silent, and inaccessible. Mamet sends his
Everyman off to what may be hell. His wife visits him, which is like a
funeral to him. He ruminates that "every fear hides a wish," and he
thinks he is going to like it in prison. After the humiliating march
naked, while other prisoners jeer, to his cell, where his cell mate
tells him, "just get on my body." In the film's final scene, Edmond
seems much older. He has shaved his head, has a walrus mustache, and
wears a tattoo: two hearts pierced by an arrow (a gruesome reminder of
his murder). He also has a black dot beneath one eye, perhaps a sign to
other prisoners that he is his cell mate's sexual property. And yet,
after rejecting the prison chaplain as an ineffectual hypocrite, he may
have found the place where he belongs. He kisses his roommate good
night after a philosophical conversation about whether it is possible
to know good people from evil ones, whether there is an afterlife, and
whether it's a hell or a heaven. The conversation reflects the
total moral and intellectual confusion of the two men. But there is
also change and struggle, as opposed to the rootedness in limbo of the
Times Square shills, pimps, prostitutes, con men and bar owners, and
their customers.