  |
|
|
|
|
SUIT AGAINST DOJ AND JUDGES FOR MALFEASANCE BY THE FELONY OF TREASON OF VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION
|
|
|
CURRENT SUIT | OPPRESSION UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW BY VIOLATION OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE | Letter to Congress on the Denial of the Right to Impartial Judicial Review of Misprison of a Felony | 2008-Opposition to the Appointment of Eric Holder as Attorney General of DOJ | 2008-Criminal Compalint for violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 4, 241, 242, 1513 etc. | VIOLATION OF SEPARATION OF POWER BY THE COLLUSION OF THE VIRGINIA COURTS AND BOB McDONNELL | OPEN LETTER TO MEMBERS OF THE U.S. SENATE | FATHER'S/SON RIGHTS | THE REASON FOR THE SUIT AND NOTICE OF FEDERAL TORT CLAIM | CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, VIOLATED 18 U.S.C. SECS. 1001 & 1204 | Court of Appeals Confirms Duty to Protect Father's Rights Under Treaty | PETITION FOR INVESTIGATION OF ABUSE OF JUDICIAL AUTHORITY | RICO/Bivens and Federal Tort Complaint Against Judge J. G. Roberts et al. | July 2005--Recent act by Judge J. G. Roberts and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia | August 2005 CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN G. ROBERTS INTENTIONAL FALSE STATEMENTS TO CONGRESS | Exception to Judicial Immunity | MISC. MATERIAL IN SUPPORT OF ACTION AGAINST JOHN G. ROBERTS | 2005 Letter to Congress on Collusion of DOJ with Judicial Branch | NEGLIGENCE OF NCMEC | Contact Me
|
|
PETITION TO CONGRESS AND VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO INVESTIGATE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEYS’ USE OF
UNCONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULES AND VOID AB INITIO ORDERS .
"There is no crueler
tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …"– U.S. vs. Jannottie,
673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).
Therefore, simultaneous with the filing of
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does Members of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., U.S.
Dist. Ct. E.D. VA (Richmond Division) No. 12-cv-663-JAB (see http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/lawofficesofisidororodriguez/),
I petition for an investigation of attorney/judges appointed by the Obama Administration for their business conspiracy,
constitutional tort, and interstate racketeering enterprise to deny citizens access to an impartial court and jury trial of
malfeasance by use of unconstitutional court rules and void ab initio orders to usurp the legislative power of both Congress
and the General Assembly of Virginia.
The issue concerns government employees’
misuse of office to abuse the authority delegated by Congress and the General Assembly to promulgate court rules. Thus,
the petition does not conflict with “separation of power,” but rather underscores your duty to assure that delegated
power has not been abused, in violation of constitutional limitations and prohibitions.
I
request that you act forthwith on this petition given the evidence that I have been the target of retaliation by government
employees for previously exercising my 1st Amendment right to petition for an investigation of government employees obstruction
of my rights as a father in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204(See http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml).
Malfeasance by denial of access to an impartial court and obstruction of the rights of a father under Treaty in violation
of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1204
Treason and Misprision of the Felony of Treason
Malfesance
LITIGATION FOR TREASON AND MISPRISION OF THE FELONY OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF VIRGINIA CONSTITUTION AND THE VOID AB INITION
ORDER DOCTIRNE
SUIT FOR TREASON AND MALFEASANCE OF THE FELONY OF TREASON OF CONSTITUTION OF VIRGINIA
"There
is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …"– U.S.
vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).
Although my U.S. citizen son returned
to the U.S. upon becoming 17 years old to attend and graduate from Va Tech in 2011, and is now 23 years-old in grad school
at Harvard, I have filed this suit for the ongoing violations of 5th and 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const. Since 2003
to the present I been deprived of access to an impartial court and trial by jury of the malfeasance of: first, government
employees, including judges, obstruction of my rights as a father in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204 ( See http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml),
deprived of my choate 5% VA Attorney's Lien on the claim of SSA LP and Armada Company to Treasure Troves valued at est. $17
Billion, my multinational law business, profession and to employment as a pro hoc vice federal civil litigator.
As
explained to members of the VA General Assembly on Jan 9, 2010, citizens are unable to hold government officials accountable
for criminal malfesance (See NOVA Presentation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9jBOJ34sa8). Therefore,
I have just filed in the U.S. District Court of the E.D. of Virginia, Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does of the Virginia
State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., No. 12-cv-663 (District Judge John A. Gibney,Jr.)(http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/lawofficesofisidororodriguez/).
In
summary, this litigation is based upon the evidence accumulated of a business conspiracy, constitutional tort, and interstate
racketeering enterprise by government employees, including judges, acts outside the scope of authority, jurisdiction, and
not in the interest of Virginia and/or the United States (see http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/; http://home.earthlink.net/~treason/;
and, http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror).
The benchmark of the current status of this
action is a pending Motion for Writ Quo Warranto pursuant to VA Code Sec. 8.01-635(2), (3), and (4), 18 U.S. C. Sec.
3771 (court has a duty, jurisdiction, and venue to act forthwith to protect Rodriguez as victim of ongoing federal crime of
misprision of felony of treason), and the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1651(a), against Defendants CYNTHIA D. KINSER, DONALD
W. LEMONS, S. BERNARD GOODWYN, LEROY F. MILLETTE, JR., WILLIAM C. MIMS, ELIZABETH A. MCCLANAHAN, CLEO E. POWELL, HARRY
L. CARRICO, CHARLES S. RUSSELL, ELIZABETH B. LACY, LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR., KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, CATHERINE CROOKS HILL,
JANE/JOHN DOE OFFICERS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR, JANE/JOHN DOES Members of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD, JANE/JOHN
DOE members of the VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION, and HARBESTON/HFP/IOTA et al, based on their ongoing misuse of office,
willful misconduct to usurp legislative power by corruption, and/or neglect of office by treason and misprision of the felony
of treason:
First, to
give legal effect to the unconstitutional Part Six, Sec. IV of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia (Defendant S. CT
OF VA) in violation of Art. VI Sec. 1, 5, and 7 of the VA Const.; and,
Second, to enforce the Defendant VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD void ab initio
order of disbarment in 2006 for litigating to enforce my statutory rights as a father and attorney( http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul06-dec06.html).
SUIT FOR TREASON AND MALFEASANCE OF THE FELONY OF TREASON OF CONSTITUTION OF
VIRGINIA
I have just filed in the U.S. District Court of the E.D. of Virginia, Isidoro
Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., No. 12-cv-663
(District Judge John A. Gibney,Jr.)(http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/lawofficesofisidororodriguez/).
This
litigation is based upon the evidence of a business conspiracy, constitutional tort, and interstate racketeering enterprise
by government employees, including judges, acts outside the scope of authority, jurisdiction, and not in the interest of Virginia
and/or the United States.
The benchmark of this action is my Motion for Writ Quio Warranto
pursuant to VA Code Sec. 8.01-635(2), (3), and (4), 18 U.S. C. Sec. 3771 (court has a duty, jurisdiction, and venue
to act forthwith to protect Rodriguez as victim of ongoing federal crime of misprision of felony of treason), and the All
Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1651(a), against Defendants CYNTHIA D. KINSER, DONALD W. LEMONS, S. BERNARD GOODWYN, LEROY
F. MILLETTE, JR., WILLIAM C. MIMS, ELIZABETH A. MCCLANAHAN, CLEO E. POWELL, HARRY L. CARRICO, CHARLES S. RUSSELL, ELIZABETH
B. LACY, LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR., KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, CATHERINE CROOKS HILL, JANE/JOHN DOE OFFICERS of the VIRGINIA
STATE BAR, JANE/JOHN DOES Members of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD, JANE/JOHN DOE members of the VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT
COMMISSION, and HARBESTON/HFP/IOTA et al, based on their ongoing misuse of office, willful misconduct to usurp legislative
power by corruption, and/or neglect of office by treason and misprision of the felony of treason:
First, to give legal effect to the unconstitutional Part Six, Sec.
IV of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia (Defendant S. CT OF VA) in violation of Art. VI Sec. 1, 5, and 7 of the VA
Const.; and,
Second, to enforce the
Defendant VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD void ab initio order of disbarment in 2006 for litigating
to enforce my statutory rights as a father and attorney( http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul06-dec06.html). Thus, by violation of 5th and 14th Amendment of the U.S. Const., I have from 2003 to the present
been deprived of access to an impartial court and trial so to deny me of my property interest in my choate 5% VA Attorney's
Lien on the claim of SSA LP and Armada Company (SSA LP et al.) to Treasure Troves valued at est. $17 Billion, my multinational law business, profession and to employment as a pro hoc vice federal
civil litigator.
| OBSTRUCTION OF FATHER/SON RELATIONSHIP |
|
|
| DEPRIVED OF RIGHTS AS U.S. CITIZEN |
"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of
law, and with the colors of justice …"– U.S. vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982).
“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the
voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes
a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." President Harry S. Truman
"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary,
in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced
the very definition of tyranny" (James Madison, Federalist No. 48, Feb. 1, 1788).
"THE ONLY THING NECESSARY FOR THE TRIUMPH OF EVIL--- IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING" Edmond Burk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATUS OF LITIGATION
Court records confirms that attorneys
in DOJ, the VSBDB, and the Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Jane and John Doe conspired with Beltway Lobbyist/Attorney
Eric Holder to file a fraudulent bar complaint against Rodriguez, so to have issued by the VSBDB’s void order
disbarring Rodriguez for exercising his federal rights, and for judges in both Federal and Virginia courts deny Rodriguez
access to impartial judicial review of the VSBDB void order-to cover-up treason.
The objective of the criminal conspiracy was to punish Rodriguez
by depriving him of his business, profession, and right to employment as an independent federal civil litigator, in retaliation
for:
(i) Rodriguez litigating for damages under the Federal
and Virginia Tort Claims Act, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. §1961 et seq.,
for the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204 (Add-3), by the government’s obstruction of his federal statutory rights as a
father to compel the securing of visitations with his Son pursuant to Article 21 of the Hague Convention on the Civil
Aspects of International Child Abduction, Oct. 25, 1980 ("Treaty"), the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 11601(a) & § 11602(1) and (7); Congressional Joint Concurrent Resolution 293, May 23, 2000; and, the Uniform Child Custody
Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act ("UCCJEA") VA Code § 20-146.01 et seq. See Canter v. Cohen, 442 F.3d
196 (4th Cir, March 2006);
(ii) Rodriguez petitioning Congress, the General Assembly
of Virginia ("General Assembly"), and law enforcement for an investigation of the criminal violation 18 U.S.C. §§ 4 and 1204
(Add-2) by the government’s obstruction of his rights as a father.; and,
(iii) Rodriguez opposing the confirmation of John G. Roberts
as Chief Justice for making false statement to Congress violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 4, 1001 and 1204, by as to Rodriguez’s
Federal Tort and civil RICO action for damages for the obstruction of his rights as a father.
B. Proceedings before the VSBDB
In 2003, DOJ’s independent contractor, the National
Center for Missing and Exploited Children, acting as an instrumentality of DOJ, retained Beltway attorneys/lobbyists Mr. Eric
Holder, Ms. D. Jean Veta, and Covington & Burling LLP, Ms. Susan Brinkerhoff, and Proskauer Rose LLP ("Holder et al."),
from the District of Columbia mailed to the VSBDB a fraudulent bar complaint against Rodriguez for litigating to enforce his
rights as a father under the Treaty and Va. UCCJEA (A-12). Also, Holder et al. conspired by use of the mail and wire
communication with Rodriguez’s former client for them also to file a fraudulent bar complaint for Rodriguez litigating
to enforce his perfected statutory property right under Va. Code § 54.1-3932 in his Virginia Attorneys Lien on approx. $3
to $10 Billion treasure troves sunk off the coast of the Republic of Colombia (A-4).
On November 28, 2006, based on the fraudulent bar complaints
filed for litigating to enforce his statutory rights the VSBDB issued a void order revoking Rodriguez’ license
to practice law in Virginia (A-4). The VSBDB posted the void order on the Internet and mailed it to federal courts
in and outside of Virginia. The VSBDB void order was affirmed by the S. Ct. Va. on June 28, 2007. This Court denied
a petition for certiorari, Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq. v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al., (S. Ct. No. 07-419, Nov. 2,
2007).
C. Proceedings before the D.C. Circuit
On December 18, 2006, Rodriguez gave notice of the VSBDB
void order to all of the federal courts to which he was a member to request a show cause hearing, and to seek their
protection as a victim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
Subsequently on June 17, 2007, based on the evidence
of the obstruction of his rights as a father and the interstate criminal conspiracy of the D.C. Ct. of App. Committee on Admissions
("Committee") to enforce the VSBDB void order to deprive Rodriguez of his right to a public hearing on his waver application
and right to employment in D.C., a second civil RICO action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
for damages for the conspiracy to punish him for exercising his Federal and Virginia statutory rights. Isidoro Rodriguez,
Esq. v. Editor-in-Chief, Legal Times, et al., DC Dist Ct. No 07-cv-0975 (Friedman, J.) (Rodriguez II); DC Ct. Of
App. No. 07-5234; cert denied Docket No. 08-411. See also denial of Writ of Mandamus pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 4 and
3771.
An Order to Show Cause was issued by the D.C. Circuit on June 18, 2008.
After Rodriguez filed his opposition to the imposition of any discipline based on the VSBDB void order, oral argument
was held on April 7, 2009. The Panel’s Order of Disbarment was issued on April 21, 2009 . The Petition for Rehearing
En Banc was denied on June 3, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
