Has physics gone delusional? When a physicist goes on television and says physics does not have to make sense and another concludes his experiments know if he is watching then physics is no longer science but superstition. Physics is a descendant of philosophy where logic reason are the standards by which truth is discovered. The absurd beliefs that modern physics hold true are a resukt of the ambandoment of reason and the inability to admit mistakes. When a satelite is launched from earth it slows and loses eneergy. This energy becomes potential energy that is stored as mass so as the satelite slows it gains mass. Einstein says that mass is part of an object's energy so as the satelite slows it loses mass. In physics today and object gaining and losing mass simultaneously is acceptable just as an electron being in two containers at the same time until an observation makes the reality and confines the electron to one container. The old question, If a tree falls in the forest and there is no one there to heaar it does it make a noise?, is a trick question now. Unless there's a physicist there the tree can't fall.

The dual thin slit experiments concludes that electrons know if the experimenter is watching to explain the change from an interference pattern to a bright spot when the experimenter looks for the electron to go through one slit. The electron knew if the experimenter would be watching even if it has traveled millions of mile and millions of years. The uncertainy principle states that you cannot know both the position and velocity of an object so an electron not only knowing its exact poition and velocity but also every thing that will effect them for million of years would seem to vilolate this principle of physics. In modern physics thats quite acceptable.

Einstein said that nothing can excede the speed of light (except the force of gravity which is instantaneous) but when experiment show something faster than the speed of light instead of concluding that Einstein was wrong they invent tunneling photons where drafting allows the photons to excede the speed of light. Drafting does not allow a race car to excede its maximum speed it reduces resistance allowing the car to get closer to its maximum speed.

In modern physics the solution for every problem is a new subatomic particle that is smaal enough to never be found but large enough to fill any sized hole in a theory. Einstein started this never fail solution when he created the photon to explain the photoelectric effect. By definition the photon was a particle with zero mass which allowed it to resume its velocity after going through glass or water without consuming energy. The force of gravity is a product of the masses over the distance squared so with a mass of zero there should be zero force of gravity between a photon and any mass smaller that infinity but thats using old math and reasoning. Eistein predicted that photons would bend around large objects, such as stars, which was later was observed. This should mean either the photon has mass, which would violate the conservation of energy, the definition of zero, or the formula for the force of gravity is wrong but in modern physics contradictions are not a problem.

The new fundemental belief of physics is that it is right and anything that disagrees with it is wrong. As new information is discovered instead of redoing old theory they are kept as sacred text and perpetuated no matter what. The best example of this is gravity which is completely absurd. Jupiter is not a planet made up of liquid helium and hydrogen but a large massive planet with a large iron core producing a large magnetic field whose mass is far greater than that calculated by gravity. Consider the sun, earth, and moon and the theoritcal effects of gravity. The gravitational attraction between the sun and the moon is over fifty percent greater than the force of gravity between the earth and moon. The distance the moon orbits the earth is about one quarter of one percent the distance the earth is from the sun which would mean that the graqvitational force between the sun and moon would vary from being one half a percent stronger than the force between the earth and sun and one half a percent weaqker. When the moon is closer to the sun than the earth it will "fall" a little more towards the sun than the earth does. When The earth is closer to the sun it will "fall" a little more than the moon. This means that as the moon orbits then earth its orbit should expand except for the two times in its orbit that it is exactly the same distsance from the sun as the earth is. Newton calculated that the moon "falls" towards the earth at one half inch per second and since the force of gravity is stronger between the sun and earth the earth and moon should "fall" towards the sun at a greater rate. If the earth and moon have been around for billions of years the constant expansion of the moon's orbit by the gravitational force between it and the sun would have pulled it out of orbit eons ago. There is no force of gravity. A force is a function of energy not mass. There is very little mass in an atom. It is energy that give the atom structure and size.

In physics is is alright to make assumptions that you know are wrong and procede as if they are correct. The orbits of electrons around an atom's nucleus are calculated on the probability of finding an electron in that area. These calculations are done on the assumption that there is no magnetic field. This means these atoms do not exist on earth or in our solar system. If they exist anywhere in the universe we would not be able to detect them since without a magnetic field you cannot transmit an electromgnetic wave which is how things are detected. In the presence of a magnetic field the probabilty of where an electron would be changes to an orbit perpendicular to the magnetic field. An electron in orbit represents a current which would produce a magnetic field aligned with the existing magnetic field. A hydrogen atom with one electron orbiting the nucleus with a radius of one half angstrom and traveling at the speed of light would produce a current of .15 amps. A current of .15 amps traveling around a one turn coil of one angstom diameter would produce a magnetic field of 10 to the eighth amp-turns per centimeter. This is a huge attractive force for a single electron and as an atom increased in number of elecrons the force would increase. The weight or attractive force would be a function of energy so atoms of hydrogen would have different weights depending on the energy of the electron not the mass of the nucleus. This differs from the force of gravity where the mass on an atom is concentrated in the nucleus. According to gravity as electrons are added to elements the resulting increase in size negates the increase in mass. According to gravity hydrogen should be the densest and heaviest element and elements should become lighter the larger they become.

If atoms have such huge magnetic fields why isn't all matter stuck together in strings north pole to south pole? The answer is that unlike gravity magnetic fields have direction and if the atoms were to align in strings the nucleus and electron fields would also align maximizing the repelling force of the electrical charges. By shifting the atoms out of alignment into a body centered cubic lattice the repelling electrical force would be minimized while the magnetic attractive force would be shared by the atoms in the adjoining layer. This lattice structure would minimze repelling forces and maximize attractive forces giving structure to the universe. The attractive force would be a function of the energy the atom contained. The more electrons an atom had the more energy and then stronger the attraction to other atoms. This would result in the lattice being layered like an onion with the atoms with the highest energy towards the center and the atoms of succeeding layers having less energy. This lattice structure would provide an ideal means for transmitting electromagnetic waves. If an atom were disturbed and oscilated the changing magnetic poles would attract the atoms in the adjacent layer transmitting the oscillation to them while at the same time the tilt of the electron orbits would transfer to the other neighboring atoms by the repelling force between the electron discs. The high energy atoms of crystals or solids would be a part of the lattice just as atoms in gases. If the crystal structure of selenium were to leave an electron orbit exposed to the oscillation of an atom in the gas lattce the movement of the gas atom could dislodge this electron causing a current. There would be no reason to create the photon to explain the photoelectic effect.

This layered structure would also explain the bending of light and the red shift. As the oscillation was transmitted from stronger magnetic layers to weaker ones the distance between layers would increase as the attractive force decreased causing the wave length to increase and the light to bend. The magnetic field around a sun would bend light not the mass. The speed of light would not be constant but vary according to the strength of the magnetic field through which it is being transmitted. The stronger the magnetic field the faster the light would travel eliminating the need for tunneling photons. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed not becaused the speed of light is constant but because the earth is producing the aether not travelling through it. Consider two light waves entering a magnifying lens, one towards the center and one near the edge of the lens. In order for an image to be preserved the waves must travel in unison preventing interference. When the two waves enter the glass they both refract at the same angle and are transmitted to the back edge of the lens where they again refract and exit the lens. Since the wave towards the center of the lens must travel a greater distance than the wave at the edge the only why they could arrive in unison at the back of the lens is if the light travels faster in the glass than in the air.

This layered structured lattice would also explain the results of the dual thin slit experiments with electrons. An electron traveling through the lattice would create waves as its electrical charge disturbed the electron orbits of the atoms in the lattice. The speed of these waves would be determined by the strength of the magnetic field while the speed of the electron would be independent. As the electron moved it would generate more waves creating an interference pattern but if the electron was detected or altered the generation of new waves would cease ending the interference pattern.

The structure of atoms would be determined by the energy it contained. The more energy an electron had the faster it would move and the stronger the magnetic field. This magnetic field would constraining the electron keeping it in orbit in addition to the attraction to the nucleus. As energy was added to an electron its speed would increase increaseing the current which would increase the strength of the magnetic field. The electron would increase in momentum but the constraining magnetic field would increase more. When enough energy was added the magnetic field would collapse the electron into a smaller orbit explaining the quantum nature of electrons. It would also explain the lanthinide and actinium series of elements where the addition of an electron collapses the orbits of the inner electrons allowing room for additional internal orbits.

The formation of covalent chemical bonds would also be explained by this lattice structure. If an atom in a layer were to flip it would be held in the upside down position by the repeling force of the electrons an the attractive force between the magnetic poles with its layer neighbors. If this atom were to have a gap in its outer electron orbit while the neighboring atom had an electron that would fill this gap the atoms would mesh like gears shortening the distance between their magnetic poles and forming a stronger bond. This would explain why helium forms a diatomic molecule even though its electron orbit is full and one would expect that helium would form bonds with hydrogen. I bet either helium I or helium II is really dihydrogen helium.

The structure of matter would be determined by the relative strength of the atom's two fields A solid would be where the magnetic field is greater than the electrical field, a gas when the electrical field is greater than the magnetic field and a liquid when they are equal. Because covalent bonds form with magnetic fields facing opposite directions their electrical fields would tend to be greater than their total magnetic field which would explain why carbon dioxide is a gas while titanium is a metal even though they have the same moleculare weight and are about the same size.

The magnetic field produced by an atom's electrons would be strongest at the center of the atom which would have a constraining effect on moving protons. As a proton moved it would represent a current which would be repelled by the magnetic field but a neutron would be unaffected by a magnetic field so what would keep it in the nucleus. The answer is that a netron is not a neutral subatomic particle but a subatomic molecule made up of an electron and proton and carry both a positive and negative charge. One half of the molecule woul have a positive charge from the proton while the other half would be negative from the electron. In The nucleus the neutron would act as a monomer attaching to protons and giving the resulting molecule a positive one electron volt charge. This molecule would be confined by the magnetic field. If there were to many neutrons the positive one electron volt would be spread over a larger area reducing the effect of the magnetic field and allowing the molecule to interact with the field. If there were to few neutrons the molecules would be lighter allowing for higher velocity and again allowing interaction with the magnetic field. I both cases the atom would become radioactive.

What evidence is there that the neutron is really a molecule with dual charge instead of a particle with no charge? The fact that neutrons are influenced by magnetic fields would be one indication but The best evidence is that the neutron splits into a proton, electron, and gamma radiation afer twelve minutes when not confined in a nucleus. What force could overcome the attraction between a proton and electron side by side? As the neutron moved through a magnetic field the proton and electron would represent currents moving in the opposite directions. The right had rule states that the magnetic field would create a shearing force on the neutron trying to push the electron and proton in opposite directions and when the force became strong enough it would overcome the electrical attraction causing the neutron to split.

The energy of electrons in orbits would not only replace gravity but also the binding force for the nucleus. Consider what happens to two atoms traveling in the opposite direction when they collide. Since most of the mass of the atom is in the nucleus the momentum of the atoms wants to keep the nucleus traveling in the same direction. As the atoms collide their electron orbits are deflected shortening the distance between the colliding side of the atom and the nucleus. This would increase the attraction between the positive nucleus and the front of the atom while weakening the attraction between the nucleus and the back of the atom createing an additional forward impetus to the nucleus. If the nucleus were held in place by only attractive electrical forces the atom would be destroyed when it collided with another atom. There needs to be a means of transfering forces applied to the electrons of an atom to the nucleus of the atom to overcome the momentum of the nucleus. A confinement force produced by the electrons not only hold the nucleus together but binds it to the electrons.

By admitting that atoms exist in magnetic fields the need for nuclear forces, gravity, and most subatomic particles is eliminated. It also eliminates the question of relativity. An object only has relative speed and position in the organizing energy field where it is. The moon has no position or velocity relative to the sun since it is contained in the earth's energy field and therefore a part of the earth. An electron is only a part of an atom as long as it is in the magnetic field of the atom. The structure of things are determined by energy and its flow from highest concentration which is the smallest unit, the atom, to the weakest which is the galaxy.

In conclusion by assuming that atoms exist in a magnetic field and following the consequences the need for gravity and the nuclear forces disappear. The ever expanding array of subatomic particles are not necessary and explanations for the photoelectric, dual slit, and faster than the speed of light results are explained. In essence physics becomes simpler and more reasonable and again becomes a science.