Bidding Analysis --------------- --------------- Board 1, Vul:None parNS= 450 (4H by NS); Table 1, KD vs ZD N E S W P P 1H P 3H P 4H P P P --------------- Board 1, Vul:None parNS= 450 (4H by NS); Table 2, CG vs GT N E S W P P 1H P 3H P 4H P P P --------------- Board 2, Vul:NS parNS= -400 (3N by EW); Table 1, KD vs ZD E S W N P P 1C P 1D P 1N P 2D P P? parNS= -130 (2D by E ); Better was 3N by W (ZD -270) P --------------- Board 2, Vul:NS parNS= -400 (3N by EW); Table 2, CG vs GT E S W N P P 1N P 2C P 2D P 2N P 3N P P P --------------- Board 3, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (1H by NS); Table 1, KD vs ZD S W N E P P 1C P 1S P 1N P 2N P P? parNS= 120 (2N by N ); Better was 3H by NS (KD -20) P --------------- Board 3, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (1H by NS); Table 2, CG vs GT S W N E P P 1C P 1S P 1N P 2N P 3N? parNS= -100 (4HX by NS); Better was 3H by NS (CG -240) P P P? parNS= -50 (3N by N ); Better was X (GT -50) --------------- Board 4, Vul:Both parNS= -600 (3N by EW); Table 1, KD vs ZD W N E S 1N P P? parNS= -150 (1N by W ); Better was 3N by W (ZD -450) P --------------- Board 4, Vul:Both parNS= -600 (3N by EW); Table 2, CG vs GT W N E S 1D 1S 1N P 3N P P P --------------- Board 5, Vul:NS parNS= -200 (5DX by NS); Table 1, KD vs ZD N E S W 2D P 2S P P P? parNS= 110 (2S by S ); Better was 4H by EW (ZD -310) --------------- Board 5, Vul:NS parNS= -200 (5DX by NS); Table 2, CG vs GT N E S W P P 1S X 3D 3H 3S 4H P P P? parNS= -420 (4H by E ); Better was 5D by N (CG -220) --------------- Board 6, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (2S by NS); Table 1, KD vs ZD E S W N P 1H P 1S P 1N P 2N P 3N? parNS= -100 (4SX by N ); Better was 3S by N (KD -240) P P P --------------- Board 6, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (2S by NS); Table 2, CG vs GT E S W N P 1H P 1S P 2C P 2S P 3S P 4S? parNS= -100 (4SX by N ); Better was P (CG -240) P P P? parNS= -50 (4S by N ); Better was X (GT -50) --------------- Board 7, Vul:Both parNS= -660 (3N by EW); Table 1, KD vs ZD S W N E P P 2S? parNS= -800 (2SX by N ); Better was 1S by NS (KD -140) X P 3H? parNS= -660 (3N by EW); Better was P (ZD -140) P P? parNS= -140 (3H by W ); Better was 3N by EW (ZD -520) P --------------- Board 7, Vul:Both parNS= -660 (3N by EW); Table 2, CG vs GT S W N E P P 2S? parNS= -800 (2SX by N ); Better was 1S by NS (CG -140) X P 4H? parNS= -660 (4N by EW); Better was P (GT -140) P P? parNS= 100 (4H by W ); Better was 4N by EW (GT -760) P --------------- Board 8, Vul:None parNS= -460 (3N by EW); Table 1, KD vs ZD W N E S 2H P 2N P 3C P 5H P 6H? parNS= 100 (6NX by E ); Better was 5N by E (ZD -560) P P P? parNS= 50 (6H by W ); Better was X (KD -50) --------------- Board 8, Vul:None parNS= -460 (3N by EW); Table 2, CG vs GT W N E S 2H P 2N P 3H P 4H P P? parNS= -450 (4H by W ); Better was 4N by E (GT -10) P --------------- Board 9, Vul:EW parNS= 400 (3N by S ); Table 1, KD vs CG N E S W P P 1D X 1S P 2C X 3C P P? parNS= 110 (3C by S ); Better was 3N by S (KD -290) 3D? parNS= 500 (3SX by EW); Better was P (CG -390) P 3H 4C? parNS= -100 (4NX by S ); Better was X (KD -600) P P P? parNS= -50 (4C by S ); Better was X (CG -50) --------------- Board 9, Vul:EW parNS= 400 (3N by S ); Table 2, GT vs ZD N E S W P P 1D 2D X 2S 3C 3S? parNS= 500 (3SX by E ); Better was P (ZD -100) 4C? parNS= -100 (4NX by S ); Better was X (GT -600) P P 4S? parNS= 800 (4SX by E ); Better was X (ZD -900) X P P P --------------- Board 10, Vul:Both parNS= 140 (2H by NS); Table 1, KD vs CG E S W N 1S P P X 3S? parNS= 500 (3SX by E ); Better was XX (CG -360) P P P? parNS= 200 (3S by E ); Better was X (KD -300) --------------- Board 10, Vul:Both parNS= 140 (2H by NS); Table 2, GT vs ZD E S W N 1S P P X 2S? parNS= 200 (2SX by E ); Better was XX (ZD -60) 2N? parNS= 140 (3H by NS); Better was X (GT -60) P P? parNS= 120 (2N by S ); Better was 3H by NS (GT -20) 3S? parNS= 500 (3SX by E ); Better was P (ZD -380) X P P P --------------- Board 11, Vul:None parNS= 450 (4S by NS); Table 1, KD vs CG S W N E P P 1S X 2S P 3S P P? parNS= 200 (3S by N ); Better was 4S by N (KD -250) P --------------- Board 11, Vul:None parNS= 450 (4S by NS); Table 2, GT vs ZD S W N E P P 1S X 2S P 3S P P? parNS= 200 (3S by N ); Better was 4S by N (GT -250) P --------------- Board 12, Vul:NS parNS= -140 (2S by EW); Table 1, KD vs CG W N E S P P P? parNS= 0 (PO by S ); Better was 1S by EW (CG -140) P --------------- Board 12, Vul:NS parNS= -140 (2S by EW); Table 2, GT vs ZD W N E S P 1N P P? parNS= -200 (1N by N ); Better was 2C by NS (GT -60) X? parNS= -140 (2S by EW); Better was P (ZD -60) P 2S P P P --------------- Board 13, Vul:Both parNS= -130 (4D by EW); Table 1, KD vs CG N E S W P 1C 1S 2D 2S 3D 3S P P P? parNS= 140 (3S by S ); Better was 4D by W (CG -270) --------------- Board 13, Vul:Both parNS= -130 (4D by EW); Table 2, GT vs ZD N E S W P 1C 1S P 2C X 4S? parNS= -200 (4SX by S ); Better was 2S by S (GT -70) P P P? parNS= -100 (4S by S ); Better was X (ZD -100) --------------- Board 14, Vul:None parNS= -420 (4S by EW); Table 1, KD vs CG E S W N 1N P 3N P P? parNS= -400 (3N by E ); Better was 4S by EW (CG -20) P --------------- Board 14, Vul:None parNS= -420 (4S by EW); Table 2, GT vs ZD E S W N 1N P 3N P P? parNS= -400 (3N by E ); Better was 4S by EW (ZD -20) P --------------- Board 15, Vul:NS parNS= 140 (3S by NS); Table 1, KD vs CG S W N E 1N 2H P 3H P P P? parNS= 50 (3H by W ); Better was 3S by NS (KD -90) --------------- Board 15, Vul:NS parNS= 140 (3S by NS); Table 2, GT vs ZD S W N E 1C 1H P 3H P P P? parNS= 50 (3H by W ); Better was 3S by NS (GT -90) --------------- Board 16, Vul:EW parNS= -140 (3S by EW); Table 1, KD vs CG W N E S P P 1N P 2H P 2S P P P --------------- Board 16, Vul:EW parNS= -140 (3S by EW); Table 2, GT vs ZD W N E S P P 1N 2H X P 2S P P 3H 3S P P P --------------- Board 17, Vul:None parNS= 140 (2H by NS); Table 1, KD vs GT N E S W 1D P 1H P 2H P 3H P P P --------------- Board 17, Vul:None parNS= 140 (2H by NS); Table 2, ZD vs CG N E S W 1D P 1H 2N? parNS= 300 (3CX by EW); Better was 1N by EW (CG -160) 3H? parNS= 140 (3H by S ); Better was X (ZD -160) 3S? parNS= 500 (3NX by W ); Better was P (CG -360) 4H? parNS= -100 (4HX by S ); Better was X (ZD -600) P P 4S? parNS= 800 (4NX by W ); Better was X (CG -900) P P X P P P? parNS= 1100 (4SX by E ); Better was 4N by W (CG -300) --------------- Board 18, Vul:NS parNS= 100 (4HX by EW); Table 1, KD vs GT E S W N 1C P 1H 2D 2H 4D P P 4H P P P? parNS= 50 (4H by W ); Better was X (KD -50) --------------- Board 18, Vul:NS parNS= 100 (4HX by EW); Table 2, ZD vs CG E S W N 1C P 1H 2D 2H 3D P P 3H 4D P P P? parNS= 130 (4D by N ); Better was 4H by W (CG -30) --------------- Board 19, Vul:EW parNS= 400 (3N by NS); Table 1, KD vs GT S W N E P P 1S 2D? parNS= 500 (2HX by EW); Better was P (GT -100) 4S? parNS= -100 (4NX by NS); Better was X (KD -600) P P P? parNS= -50 (4S by N ); Better was X (GT -50) --------------- Board 19, Vul:EW parNS= 400 (3N by NS); Table 2, ZD vs CG S W N E P P P? parNS= 0 (PO by E ); Better was 3N by NS (ZD -400) 1D? parNS= 400 (3N by NS); Better was P (CG -400) P 1H 1S X? parNS= 500 (2CX by EW); Better was P (CG -100) P 1N P P P? parNS= 300 (1N by W ); Better was X (ZD -200) --------------- Board 20, Vul:Both parNS= -140 (1S by EW); Table 1, KD vs GT W N E S P P 1C P 2D P 2H P 3D P 3N? parNS= 200 (4DX by W ); Better was 3S by EW (GT -340) P P P --------------- Board 20, Vul:Both parNS= -140 (1S by EW); Table 2, ZD vs CG W N E S P P 1C 1H X XX 2C 2H? parNS= -200 (2HX by S ); Better was P (ZD -60) P P 3C? parNS= -140 (3S by EW); Better was X (CG -60) P P? parNS= 100 (3C by E ); Better was 3S by EW (CG -240) P --------------- Board 21, Vul:NS parNS= -980 (6S by W ); Table 1, KD vs GT N E S W 1D 1H P 1S P 2S P 4S P P? parNS= -480 (4S by W ); Better was 6S by W (GT -500) P --------------- Board 21, Vul:NS parNS= -980 (6S by W ); Table 2, ZD vs CG N E S W 1D 2H P 2S P P? parNS= -230 (2S by W ); Better was 6S by W (CG -750) P --------------- Board 22, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (1H by NS); Table 1, KD vs GT E S W N P P 1S? parNS= 200 (1SX by W ); Better was P (GT -90) P 1N? parNS= 500 (2DX by EW); Better was P (GT -300) P P P? parNS= 200 (1N by E ); Better was X (KD -300) --------------- Board 22, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (1H by NS); Table 2, ZD vs CG E S W N P P 1S? parNS= 200 (1SX by W ); Better was P (CG -90) P 1N? parNS= 500 (2DX by EW); Better was P (CG -300) P P P? parNS= 200 (1N by E ); Better was X (ZD -300) --------------- Board 23, Vul:Both parNS= 80 (1S by NS); Table 1, KD vs GT S W N E P P P? parNS= 0 (PO by E ); Better was 1S by NS (KD -80) 1N? parNS= 200 (2CX by EW); Better was P (GT -200) 2S? parNS= -200 (2SX by S ); Better was X (KD -400) P P P? parNS= -100 (2S by S ); Better was X (GT -100) --------------- Board 23, Vul:Both parNS= 80 (1S by NS); Table 2, ZD vs CG S W N E P P P? parNS= 0 (PO by E ); Better was 1S by NS (ZD -80) 1C? parNS= 80 (1S by NS); Better was P (CG -80) P 1N? parNS= 200 (2CX by E ); Better was 1H by EW (CG -120) P P X P 2D? parNS= -200 (2SX by NS); Better was P (ZD -400) 2N? parNS= 500 (3CX by E ); Better was X (CG -700) P P P? parNS= 200 (2N by W ); Better was X (ZD -300) --------------- Board 24, Vul:None parNS= 400 (5C by NS); Table 1, KD vs GT W N E S P P P P? parNS= 0 (PO by W ); Better was 5C by NS (KD -400) --------------- Board 24, Vul:None parNS= 400 (5C by NS); Table 2, ZD vs CG W N E S P 1C P 3C 3S P P 4C P P? parNS= 150 (4C by N ); Better was 5C by N (ZD -250) P