Bidding Analysis --------------- --------------- Board 1, Vul:None parNS= -430 (3N by EW); Table 1, DK vs ZD N E S W P 1N P 3N P P P --------------- Board 1, Vul:None parNS= -430 (3N by EW); Table 2, TG vs BD N E S W P 1C P 1D P 1S P 1N P 3N P P P --------------- Board 2, Vul:NS parNS= 1100 (7DX by EW); Table 1, DK vs ZD E S W N P P P 2C P 2D X 2H 2S 4H P P? parNS= 680 (4H by N ); Better was 6N by NS (DK -420) P --------------- Board 2, Vul:NS parNS= 1100 (7DX by EW); Table 2, TG vs BD E S W N 3S P 4S 5H P P? parNS= 680 (5H by N ); Better was 6N by NS (TG -420) P --------------- Board 3, Vul:EW parNS= -140 (1H by EW); Table 1, DK vs ZD S W N E P 1S P 1N P P? parNS= -120 (1N by E ); Better was 2H by EW (ZD -20) P --------------- Board 3, Vul:EW parNS= -140 (1H by EW); Table 2, TG vs BD S W N E 1N? parNS= -500 (2CX by NS); Better was P (TG -360) 2S? parNS= -140 (3H by EW); Better was X (BD -360) P P P --------------- Board 4, Vul:Both parNS= 110 (2D by NS); Table 1, DK vs ZD W N E S P 1H X 1N 2S? parNS= 200 (2SX by W ); Better was P (ZD -90) 2N? parNS= 110 (3D by NS); Better was X (DK -90) 3S? parNS= 500 (3SX by W ); Better was X (ZD -390) P P P? parNS= 200 (3S by W ); Better was X (DK -300) --------------- Board 4, Vul:Both parNS= 110 (2D by NS); Table 2, TG vs BD W N E S P 1N X? parNS= 200 (2SX by EW); Better was P (BD -90) 3D? parNS= 110 (3D by S ); Better was XX (TG -90) P P P --------------- Board 5, Vul:NS parNS= -110 (2H by EW); Table 1, DK vs ZD N E S W P P P 1C P 1H P P P --------------- Board 5, Vul:NS parNS= -110 (2H by EW); Table 2, TG vs BD N E S W P P 3D? parNS= -200 (3DX by S ); Better was 1D by NS (TG -90) P P P? parNS= -100 (3D by S ); Better was X (BD -100) --------------- Board 6, Vul:EW parNS= -120 (2N by EW); Table 1, DK vs ZD E S W N 1D P 1S P 2D P 2N P 3N? parNS= 200 (4DX by E ); Better was P (ZD -320) P P P? parNS= 100 (3N by W ); Better was X (DK -100) --------------- Board 6, Vul:EW parNS= -120 (2N by EW); Table 2, TG vs BD E S W N 3D? parNS= -110 (3D by E ); Better was 1N by EW (BD -10) P P P --------------- Board 7, Vul:Both parNS= 110 (3C by S ); Table 1, DK vs ZD S W N E 1C P 1D P 2C P 3N? parNS= -200 (4CX by S ); Better was 2D by N (DK -310) P P P --------------- Board 7, Vul:Both parNS= 110 (3C by S ); Table 2, TG vs BD S W N E 3N? parNS= -200 (4CX by S ); Better was 1C by S (TG -310) P P P --------------- Board 8, Vul:None parNS= 90 (1D by NS); Table 1, DK vs ZD W N E S P P P P? parNS= 0 (PO by W ); Better was 1D by NS (DK -90) --------------- Board 8, Vul:None parNS= 90 (1D by NS); Table 2, TG vs BD W N E S P P 1S? parNS= 100 (1NX by EW); Better was 1C by EW (BD -10) P 2C P P P? parNS= 50 (2C by W ); Better was X (TG -50) --------------- Board 9, Vul:EW parNS= 1520 (7N by NS); Table 1, DK vs TG N E S W 1D P 1S P 1N P 3S P 3N P P? parNS= 520 (3N by N ); Better was 7N by N (DK -1000) P --------------- Board 9, Vul:EW parNS= 1520 (7N by NS); Table 2, BD vs ZD N E S W 1D P 1S X 2D P 3S P 4S P 4N P 5S P 6S P P? parNS= 1010 (6S by S ); Better was 7N by S (BD -510) P --------------- Board 10, Vul:Both parNS= -110 (2H by EW); Table 1, DK vs TG E S W N 1N P P? parNS= -90 (1N by E ); Better was 2H by EW (TG -20) P --------------- Board 10, Vul:Both parNS= -110 (2H by EW); Table 2, BD vs ZD E S W N P P P? parNS= 0 (PO by N ); Better was 1H by EW (ZD -110) 1C? parNS= -110 (1H by EW); Better was P (BD -110) X 1D 1H 1N? parNS= -200 (2SX by NS); Better was 1S by NS (BD -90) P P P --------------- Board 11, Vul:None parNS= -100 (5SX by NS); Table 1, DK vs TG S W N E 2S 3H 4S 5H P P 5S X P P P --------------- Board 11, Vul:None parNS= -100 (5SX by NS); Table 2, BD vs ZD S W N E 2S 3H 4S 5H P P P? parNS= -450 (5H by W ); Better was 5S by S (BD -350) --------------- Board 12, Vul:NS parNS= 110 (2H by NS); Table 1, DK vs TG W N E S P 1N P 2N? parNS= -200 (3DX by NS); Better was 2H by NS (DK -310) P P P? parNS= -100 (2N by N ); Better was X (TG -100) --------------- Board 12, Vul:NS parNS= 110 (2H by NS); Table 2, BD vs ZD W N E S P 1N P P? parNS= 90 (1N by N ); Better was 2H by NS (BD -20) P --------------- Board 13, Vul:Both parNS= 620 (4H by NS); Table 1, DK vs TG N E S W P P 1D P 1H P 1N X P 2C P P P? parNS= 500 (2C by E ); Better was 4H by N (DK -120) --------------- Board 13, Vul:Both parNS= 620 (4H by NS); Table 2, BD vs ZD N E S W 1C P 1D 1S 2C 2S 4C P P? parNS= 130 (4C by N ); Better was 4H by NS (BD -490) P --------------- Board 14, Vul:None parNS= 400 (3N by NS); Table 1, DK vs TG E S W N P 1C P 1H P 2C P 3N P P P --------------- Board 14, Vul:None parNS= 400 (3N by NS); Table 2, BD vs ZD E S W N P P P 1D 1H X P 2C P P? parNS= 130 (2C by N ); Better was 3N by NS (BD -270) P --------------- Board 15, Vul:NS parNS= -400 (3N by EW); Table 1, DK vs TG S W N E P P P 1D P 2D P 3N P P P --------------- Board 15, Vul:NS parNS= -400 (3N by EW); Table 2, BD vs ZD S W N E P P P 1N P 2N P 3N P P P --------------- Board 16, Vul:EW parNS= 430 (3N by N ); Table 1, DK vs TG W N E S P P P 1D P 1N P 2H P 2N P P? parNS= 180 (2N by N ); Better was 3N by N (DK -250) P --------------- Board 16, Vul:EW parNS= 430 (3N by N ); Table 2, BD vs ZD W N E S P P P 1D P 1N P 2H P 3C P 3N P P P --------------- Board 17, Vul:None parNS= -120 (1N by EW); Table 1, DK vs BD N E S W P 1D P 2C P 3C? parNS= 100 (3NX by EW); Better was 2N by EW (BD -220) P 3N P P P? parNS= 50 (3N by W ); Better was X (DK -50) --------------- Board 17, Vul:None parNS= -120 (1N by EW); Table 2, ZD vs TG N E S W P 1N P 2C P 2D P 2S P 2N P 3N? parNS= 100 (3NX by E ); Better was P (TG -220) P P P? parNS= 50 (3N by E ); Better was X (ZD -50) --------------- Board 18, Vul:NS parNS= 1400 (7CX by EW); Table 1, DK vs BD E S W N P 1S P 2H P 2S P 4S P P? parNS= 680 (4S by S ); Better was 6N by S (DK -720) P --------------- Board 18, Vul:NS parNS= 1400 (7CX by EW); Table 2, ZD vs TG E S W N P 1S P 2H P 3H P 4H P P? parNS= 650 (4H by N ); Better was 6N by S (ZD -750) P --------------- Board 19, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (2H by NS); Table 1, DK vs BD S W N E P 1D X P 1H 1S 1N P P? parNS= 90 (1N by N ); Better was 2H by S (DK -20) P --------------- Board 19, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (2H by NS); Table 2, ZD vs TG S W N E P 1D 1N P P? parNS= 90 (1N by N ); Better was 2H by NS (ZD -20) 2D? parNS= 200 (2SX by EW); Better was P (TG -110) P P 2H? parNS= 110 (2H by S ); Better was X (ZD -90) P P P --------------- Board 20, Vul:Both parNS= -130 (1D by EW); Table 1, DK vs BD W N E S 1N P 2C P 2D P 2N P P? parNS= -120 (2N by W ); Better was 3D by W (BD -10) P --------------- Board 20, Vul:Both parNS= -130 (1D by EW); Table 2, ZD vs TG W N E S 1D 1H? parNS= -500 (1SX by NS); Better was P (ZD -370) X P 2C? parNS= -130 (2D by W ); Better was P (TG -370) P 2D P P P --------------- Board 21, Vul:NS parNS= 100 (3HX by EW); Table 1, DK vs BD N E S W 1S P 1N P 2S P P P? parNS= 110 (2S by N ); Better was 3H by EW (BD -10) --------------- Board 21, Vul:NS parNS= 100 (3HX by EW); Table 2, ZD vs TG N E S W 1S P 1N P 2S P P P? parNS= 110 (2S by N ); Better was 3H by EW (TG -10) --------------- Board 22, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (2D by NS); Table 1, DK vs BD E S W N P P 1S 2D 1N P 2C P 2N? parNS= 200 (3CX by W ); Better was P (BD -90) P P? parNS= 300 (2N by E ); Better was 3C by W (BD -100) P --------------- Board 22, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (2D by NS); Table 2, ZD vs TG E S W N P P 1S 3D X? parNS= 500 (3HX by EW); Better was P (TG -390) P P P? parNS= 470 (3DX by N ); Better was XX (ZD -30) --------------- Board 23, Vul:Both parNS= -500 (5SX by NS); Table 1, DK vs BD S W N E 2S P 4S P P P? parNS= -100 (4S by S ); Better was 5D by EW (BD -400) --------------- Board 23, Vul:Both parNS= -500 (5SX by NS); Table 2, ZD vs TG S W N E P 1D P 1H P 2D P 3C P 3D P 5D P P P? parNS= -600 (5D by W ); Better was 5S by NS (ZD -100) --------------- Board 24, Vul:None parNS= 100 (3DX by EW); Table 1, DK vs BD W N E S 1S P 1H 2C 2H P 3D P 3N? parNS= 300 (4DX by E ); Better was P (BD -200) P P P? parNS= 150 (3N by W ); Better was X (DK -150) --------------- Board 24, Vul:None parNS= 100 (3DX by EW); Table 2, ZD vs TG W N E S 1S P 2H P 3C P 3N? parNS= 300 (4DX by EW); Better was 3D by EW (TG -200) P P P? parNS= 150 (3N by E ); Better was X (ZD -150)