Bidding Analysis --------------- --------------- Board 1, Vul:None parNS= 80 (1S by N ); Table 1, TG vs KC N E S W 1N? parNS= -100 (2CX by NS); Better was 1S by N (TG -180) P P P? parNS= -50 (1N by N ); Better was X (KC -50) --------------- Board 1, Vul:None parNS= 80 (1S by N ); Table 2, PP vs ZD N E S W 1D P 1N? parNS= -100 (2CX by NS); Better was 1S by N (PP -180) 2H? parNS= 100 (2HX by W ); Better was X (ZD -200) P P P? parNS= 50 (2H by W ); Better was X (PP -50) --------------- Board 2, Vul:NS parNS= 1100 (6SX by W ); Table 1, TG vs KC E S W N 1S 2H P 3H P 4H P P? parNS= 680 (4H by S ); Better was 6H by S (TG -420) P --------------- Board 2, Vul:NS parNS= 1100 (6SX by W ); Table 2, PP vs ZD E S W N 1S 2H X XX 3C P 3S P P P? parNS= 150 (3S by E ); Better was 6H by S (PP -950) --------------- Board 3, Vul:EW parNS= 450 (4S by NS); Table 1, TG vs KC S W N E P P 1S P P? parNS= 200 (1S by N ); Better was 4S by N (TG -250) X? parNS= 450 (4S by N ); Better was P (KC -250) XX 2H 2S 3H 3S P P? parNS= 200 (3S by N ); Better was 4S by N (TG -250) P --------------- Board 3, Vul:EW parNS= 450 (4S by NS); Table 2, PP vs ZD S W N E P 1H 2H 3H 3S P 4C P 4D P 4S P P P --------------- Board 4, Vul:Both parNS= -90 (1N by EW); Table 1, TG vs KC W N E S 2H? parNS= 200 (2SX by EW); Better was 1N by EW (KC -290) P P P? parNS= 100 (2H by W ); Better was X (TG -100) --------------- Board 4, Vul:Both parNS= -90 (1N by EW); Table 2, PP vs ZD W N E S 1H P 1S P 2H? parNS= 200 (2SX by E ); Better was 1N by EW (ZD -290) P 3C? parNS= 500 (3DX by EW); Better was 2S by E (ZD -300) P 4H? parNS= 800 (4SX by E ); Better was 3D by EW (ZD -300) X P P P --------------- Board 5, Vul:NS parNS= 140 (3H by NS); Table 1, TG vs KC N E S W P P 1H P 4H? parNS= -200 (4HX by S ); Better was 2H by S (TG -340) P P P? parNS= -100 (4H by S ); Better was X (KC -100) --------------- Board 5, Vul:NS parNS= 140 (3H by NS); Table 2, PP vs ZD N E S W P P 1H P 3H P 4H? parNS= -200 (4HX by S ); Better was P (PP -340) P P P? parNS= -100 (4H by S ); Better was X (ZD -100) --------------- Board 6, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (3C by NS); Table 1, TG vs KC E S W N 1H 1S P 2N P 4S? parNS= -300 (5CX by NS); Better was 3C by NS (TG -410) P P P? parNS= -200 (4S by S ); Better was X (KC -100) --------------- Board 6, Vul:EW parNS= 110 (3C by NS); Table 2, PP vs ZD E S W N 1H 1S P 1N P P? parNS= 90 (1N by N ); Better was 2C by NS (PP -20) P --------------- Board 7, Vul:Both parNS= -110 (3D by EW); Table 1, TG vs KC S W N E P 1N P P? parNS= -90 (1N by W ); Better was 2D by EW (KC -20) P --------------- Board 7, Vul:Both parNS= -110 (3D by EW); Table 2, PP vs ZD S W N E P 1N P P? parNS= -90 (1N by W ); Better was 2D by EW (ZD -20) P --------------- Board 8, Vul:None parNS= -990 (6N by EW); Table 1, TG vs KC W N E S P 1C 1N P 2D P 2H P P? parNS= -230 (2H by E ); Better was 6N by E (KC -760) P --------------- Board 8, Vul:None parNS= -990 (6N by EW); Table 2, PP vs ZD W N E S P 1C 1S P P? parNS= -170 (1S by E ); Better was 6N by EW (ZD -820) P --------------- Board 9, Vul:EW parNS= -500 (5SX by NS); Table 1, TG vs PP N E S W 4S P P P? parNS= -100 (4S by N ); Better was 5D by E (PP -400) --------------- Board 9, Vul:EW parNS= -500 (5SX by NS); Table 2, ZD vs KC N E S W 3S P 4S P P P? parNS= -100 (4S by N ); Better was 5D by E (KC -400) --------------- Board 10, Vul:Both parNS= 110 (3D by NS); Table 1, TG vs PP E S W N 1C P 3S? parNS= 200 (3SX by W ); Better was 1S by EW (PP -90) P 4S? parNS= 500 (4SX by W ); Better was P (PP -300) P P P? parNS= 200 (4S by W ); Better was X (TG -300) --------------- Board 10, Vul:Both parNS= 110 (3D by NS); Table 2, ZD vs KC E S W N 1C P 1S X 2N? parNS= 200 (3SX by W ); Better was XX (KC -90) P 3S P 3N? parNS= 500 (4SX by W ); Better was P (KC -300) P P P? parNS= 400 (3N by E ); Better was X (ZD -100) --------------- Board 11, Vul:None parNS= 1520 (7N by NS); Table 1, TG vs PP S W N E 1S P 2D P 3C P 3H P 4C P 4N P 5S P 5N P 6C P P? parNS= 940 (6C by S ); Better was 7N by N (TG -580) P --------------- Board 11, Vul:None parNS= 1520 (7N by NS); Table 2, ZD vs KC S W N E 1S P 2H P 4C P 4N P 5S P 6N P P? parNS= 1020 (6N by N ); Better was 7N by N (ZD -500) P --------------- Board 12, Vul:NS parNS= 600 (3N by NS); Table 1, TG vs PP W N E S P P P 1N 2D X P 2H P 2N P 3N P P P --------------- Board 12, Vul:NS parNS= 600 (3N by NS); Table 2, ZD vs KC W N E S P P P 1H P 2N P 3N P P P --------------- Board 13, Vul:Both parNS= 630 (3N by NS); Table 1, TG vs PP N E S W 1C P 1D P 3C P 5C? parNS= -200 (5NX by NS); Better was 3N by NS (TG -830) P P P? parNS= -100 (5C by N ); Better was X (PP -100) --------------- Board 13, Vul:Both parNS= 630 (3N by NS); Table 2, ZD vs KC N E S W 1C P 1D P 2C P 2D P 2N P P? parNS= 180 (2N by N ); Better was 3N by N (ZD -450) P --------------- Board 14, Vul:None parNS= -420 (4H by EW); Table 1, TG vs PP E S W N P P 1D X? parNS= -500 (1SX by NS); Better was P (TG -80) 1H? parNS= -420 (4H by E ); Better was XX (PP -80) P 1S P 1N P 3N P P? parNS= -400 (3N by E ); Better was 4H by E (PP -20) P --------------- Board 14, Vul:None parNS= -420 (4H by EW); Table 2, ZD vs KC E S W N P P 1D 1N? parNS= -500 (1NX by N ); Better was P (ZD -80) X P 2S? parNS= -420 (4H by EW); Better was P (KC -80) P 2N P P? parNS= -150 (2N by E ); Better was 4H by EW (KC -270) P --------------- Board 15, Vul:NS parNS= 620 (4H by NS); Table 1, TG vs PP S W N E P P 1D P 1H 2C 3H P P? parNS= 170 (3H by S ); Better was 4H by S (TG -450) P --------------- Board 15, Vul:NS parNS= 620 (4H by NS); Table 2, ZD vs KC S W N E P P 1N P 2C P 2H P 3H P 4H P P P --------------- Board 16, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (1H by NS); Table 1, TG vs PP W N E S P P P 1N P P? parNS= -50 (1N by S ); Better was 2H by NS (TG -190) 2D? parNS= 200 (2DX by E ); Better was P (PP -250) P 3D? parNS= 500 (3DX by E ); Better was P (PP -300) P P P? parNS= 200 (3D by E ); Better was X (TG -300) --------------- Board 16, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (1H by NS); Table 2, ZD vs KC W N E S P P P 1C P 1H 2D? parNS= 200 (2DX by E ); Better was P (KC -60) P P P? parNS= 100 (2D by E ); Better was X (ZD -100) --------------- Board 17, Vul:None parNS= -140 (2H by EW); Table 1, TG vs ZD N E S W P P 1N P P P? parNS= -50 (1N by S ); Better was 2H by EW (ZD -90) --------------- Board 17, Vul:None parNS= -140 (2H by EW); Table 2, KC vs PP N E S W P P 1D X P 1S P 1N P 2H P P P --------------- Board 18, Vul:NS parNS= 140 (3H by NS); Table 1, TG vs ZD E S W N P P 1C 1H 1S P P P? parNS= -80 (1S by E ); Better was 2H by N (TG -220) --------------- Board 18, Vul:NS parNS= 140 (3H by NS); Table 2, KC vs PP E S W N P P P 1H P 1N 2C P P 2D P P? parNS= 130 (2D by S ); Better was 2H by N (KC -10) P --------------- Board 19, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (1H by S ); Table 1, TG vs ZD S W N E 1N P P? parNS= 120 (1N by S ); Better was 2H by S (TG -20) P --------------- Board 19, Vul:EW parNS= 140 (1H by S ); Table 2, KC vs PP S W N E 1C P 1S P 1N P 2N P 3N? parNS= -100 (4CX by S ); Better was 3H by S (KC -240) P P P? parNS= -50 (3N by S ); Better was X (PP -50) --------------- Board 20, Vul:Both parNS= 630 (4N by S ); Table 1, TG vs ZD W N E S 1D 2C P 3C 3D 3S P 3N P P P --------------- Board 20, Vul:Both parNS= 630 (4N by S ); Table 2, KC vs PP W N E S 1D 2C P 3C 3D 4C P 5C? parNS= -200 (5NX by S ); Better was 4N by S (KC -830) P P P? parNS= -100 (5C by N ); Better was X (PP -100) --------------- Board 21, Vul:NS parNS= 100 (3SX by EW); Table 1, TG vs ZD N E S W 1C P 1H P 3C? parNS= -200 (3NX by NS); Better was 1N by NS (TG -300) P P P? parNS= -100 (3C by N ); Better was X (ZD -100) --------------- Board 21, Vul:NS parNS= 100 (3SX by EW); Table 2, KC vs PP N E S W 1C P P? parNS= 90 (1C by N ); Better was 1N by NS (KC -10) P --------------- Board 22, Vul:EW parNS= -100 (2NX by NS); Table 1, TG vs ZD E S W N P P 1D X 1H P 2D P 2N? parNS= 200 (3DX by W ); Better was 2S by EW (ZD -300) P 3D P P P? parNS= 100 (3D by W ); Better was X (TG -100) --------------- Board 22, Vul:EW parNS= -100 (2NX by NS); Table 2, KC vs PP E S W N P P 1D P 1H P 3D? parNS= 200 (3SX by EW); Better was 1S by EW (PP -300) P P P? parNS= 100 (3D by W ); Better was X (KC -100) --------------- Board 23, Vul:Both parNS=-2210 (7S by EW); Table 1, TG vs ZD S W N E P P P 1H P 1S P 3S P 3N P P? parNS= -600 (3N by W ); Better was 7S by W (ZD -1610) P --------------- Board 23, Vul:Both parNS=-2210 (7S by EW); Table 2, KC vs PP S W N E P P P 2C P 3C P 3H P 3S P 3N P 6N P P? parNS= 300 (6N by E ); Better was 7S by W (PP -2510) P --------------- Board 24, Vul:None parNS= -420 (4H by EW); Table 1, TG vs ZD W N E S 1C P 1H P 2C P 2S P 2N P 3N P P? parNS= 100 (3N by W ); Better was 4H by E (ZD -520) P --------------- Board 24, Vul:None parNS= -420 (4H by EW); Table 2, KC vs PP W N E S 1C P 1H P 2C P 2H P P? parNS= -170 (2H by E ); Better was 4H by E (PP -250) P