file://InternalText/Help/RevelationNotes
Untitled
2008-01-21 / English / us-ascii
7115 score, 140 phrases, 3257 words, 18 kb, 1132 terms, 0 links.
 revelation monadic cylinder vase opened event tantra lamb interpretation 
indexicals self-same principles described father tantric self alpha phenomenon 
everywhere metamorphosis discovered remarkable referent

Interpretation of the Book of Revelation.

 Come and hear. It's your life. The improbability of it: I am Jesus Christ. I 
have opened the book. Be sure of your part in it. There is judgment coming; it 
has always been here.

 I received the following 'skit', line by line, slowly, as if being taught it, 
while awakening:

 For play, a coital phantasy:

 Scene: Male recollects Female at the water cooler.

 M: This only works in wings.

 F: Where were we?

 M: Explode or leave it in her office.

 F: You told me that a couple weeks ago.

 M: The fur trucks for free.

 F: Jerk the pink, or whatever.

 M: Unique identifier is a book in a city.

 Blood everywhere, biological and anti-theurgic.

 F: THAT'S IT!

 M: Take a Polaroid.

 If that piques your interest, step up. If it offends you, step off.

 I will give you new meanings for words. You will confirm that sin and salvation 
is no empty fable, but real, and active in your life already; the reality of 
blessing and cursing; and by praxis, or works, obtain the riches of the glory of 
Christ in your life. Some of you will apply the novel insights given herein to 
critical theory, gender studies, phenomenology, and theology.

 The topic is sexuality. Dogmatic theology's fear-inducing legalistic 
proscriptions ensure it will never come close to discovering this truth. 
However, the sexuality of Christ is monadic, not to be found in the most 
liberal, orgiastic worldly thinkers.

 I have not lived an exemplary life according to commonly instructed rules. 
However, mine seems to be that life of the Lamb described in Revelation. 
Therefore, I am able to decode the meaning of its symbols, which are then of a 
more general application, to decode all religious texts.

 How can a finite man have a handle on the infinite? By representation, by 
knowledge. The horizon of my understanding does not reach to the creation of the 
world, or of man. I have moved dirt by the shovelful, and cannot fathom how all 
of this came into being by a word, unless that signifies merely a similarity of 
two, micro and macro, concepts. I am not inclined to believe that one day there 
was no one, and the next day there existed one fully formed syzygous pair, Adam 
and Eve. Rather it appears that the story of Adam describes the arising of a 
distinguished being out of a ground of pre-existing, evolved creatures. Given 
our thrown-ness into the world, into life, empirically, we each occupy a span of 
time from birth to death, while the world as a whole occupies a longer time 
span. Despite the appearance that mind is an epiphenomenon of embodied being, I 
hope that something personal, call it mind, soul, or spirit, exists outside 
these limits of time.

 Within these limited horizons, I will suggest new hypotheses to unsettle 
established dogma, and hope that others following me will validate and perfect 
the discourse.

 What I have are numerous anecdotes about tantric events in my life which give a 
first indication of the novel possibilities opened up by monadic tantra, both 
for praxis, and as the significant ground of referents to map otherwise 
incomprehensible metaphors used in religion.

 The first principle is that oral sex is a speech act: a word, and sometimes, 
The Word. Contrariwise, sodomy is the surest way to erase a man's name from the 
book of life. With those preliminaries stated, I will henceforth use an encoding 
scheme to avoid using highly charged words. Let M=Male, F=Female, and wherever I 
use M of F twice in a token, they stand for the single self-same entity, 
reflexively. Let these punctuation denote body parts: Either < or > for mouth, % 
for breasts, @ for navel, - for genital, : for anus, also H or RH or LH for 
hand.

 Now, for example, I can use "M--F" to encode conventional coitus. It turns out 
that M--F is many things: It is God, as the creator of all creatures, and The 
Law, the innate goal of them all, that all sexually created creatures worth-ship 
innately. It is the express Adamic law, to procreate. This is that fallen state 
of original sin, into which we are all thrown, without exception. This primitive 
essence of being is modulated, or colonized, by the demands of a social being, 
causing M--F to be holy, or set aside.

 There may arise spontaneously, in all peoples and places and times, sages, 
mages, avatars, etc. that have exceeded this register of being, and have been 
given a glimpse, a direct gnosis, into another, timeless or eternal register of 
being. Buddha is such a one, and Jesus Christ, and there are countless others in 
mythology, but it is the discourse of Christianity with which I am most 
familiar, and I will use its vocabulary.

 I was raised an obedient, even avoidant, scholarly youth, a weak atheist, and 
would surely have become a secular humanist, had it not been for a chance event 
that changed my life, introducing direct gnosis, and unfortunately, several 
years of mental illness, until I integrated this new knowledge with my worldly 
knowledge. I had been in the Army, and visited four whores in that time, which I 
shall map on the first four seals of revelation, and now was at home with my 
parents, when in a libidinal excess, I chanced to roll my legs up over my head, 
and discovered M<-M.

 This was that event of Atlas, shouldering the world. This was that event of 
Adam, discovering knowledge of, and simultaneously losing, the eternal state. I 
was given to know I am Jesus, a situation I had no knowledge of, and had to 
enquire of my Father. In fact, I discussed with my father an idea that I had to 
kill him, and could not even discuss another unspeakable idea that I had to have 
my mother. Very Oedipal, very Hamlet (if you read Claudius as his biological 
father). This is the situation of Gregor Samsa, in Kafka's Metamorphosis. This 
is also the referent to understand the parabolic story of a Boa eating an 
Elephant in Saint Exupery's The Little Prince, which story he presents while 
discussing the untellableness of it.

 One of the mental images I was left with from this event was remarkable: I saw 
a vase, a simple pottery vase, floating alone in my mental representational 
space. Its shape may be described as the revolution of one period of a raised 
sine wave. There was some source of outside illumination shining on the vase, 
and there was darkness in the mouth of the vase. As I watched, the surface of 
the vase began to craze, dark lines appearing all over it. The lines multiplied, 
as the material of the vase was being subdivided ever finer. The vase was in 
fact, becoming a mathematical sponge, an instance of a Klein bottle, not drawn 
as in the standard schoolbook illustration with one circle of self-intersection, 
but its self-intersection was distributed everywhere, and the darkness of the 
crazing was in fact the darkness of the interior, as the interior and the 
exterior surfaces had become one, indistinguishable, a pure boundary in N space 
of an N+1 dimensional entity.

 If you will compare the letter to Thyatira, you can see that this is well 
described therein: 2:23 And I will kill her children with death; and all the 
churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I 
will give unto every one of you according to your works. ... 2:27 And he shall 
rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to 
shivers: even as I received of my Father. This event is in fact a type of death, 
and note that in the next seal event, we read: 6:9 And when he had opened the 
fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word 
of God, and for the testimony which they held. This event of M<-M is in 
particular, the effective tantric death of the lamb described in Revelation. It 
turns out that, like Hamlet's ghost father, discovered by Hamlet upon the event 
of M<-M, the lamb himself is his own self-same father, due to a long prior 
potentiating event, M@-M, and this event is his very "coming in the name of the 
father".

 Although M@-M is a distinctively male phenomenon, giving the currently 
predominant religions their patricentric flavor, monadic tantra is not limited 
to males. I had for many years been uncovering in the classic poets and 
prophets, predominantly male, that the event of M<-M and its freight of death 
are the unstated referent grounding the enduring classics. After fifteen years 
of research, I discovered to my delight, one amazing female exegete of monadic 
tantra, Emily Dickinson, who speaks much of death in her poetry, and calls 
herself rightly, the Queen of Calgary. You can readily convince yourself that 
F<-F is the predominant topic of her poetry. One of her expressions of the 
metamorphosis is "blown to powder", similar to my vase. The same referent of 
F<-F can be read into, and out of, the biblical accounts of Mary, mother of 
Jesus.

 There are several structuring principles of the gendered tantra underlying 
religion.

 First, let me observe a phenomenon of embodied language. Indexicals are parts 
of speech that point out, or index. There is a strong correlation of the 
indexicals "this" and "here" with '<', and of "that" and "there" with '-', while 
the indefinite indexicals "what" and "where" correlate with ':', and, being a 
fairly unexplorable remote location, such : are impersonal indexicals, shared 
universally in common, and also relate to such religious terms as hiddenness and 
wilderness. Also shared universally in common, is "it", which I correlate to 
"M--F", or it may better signify coming. The bi-form '%' gives us plurals and 
alternation, "these", and by inversion of circuits below, "which". Everywhere 
that Revelation used the Greek MEGA, great or loud, it is surely an indication 
of a reflexive monadic event symbol.

 I posit, to make sense of many religious symbols, the existence of two internal 
bodily circuits, one connecting the '<' with the '-', and another, bifurcating, 
connecting the '%' with the ':'. Since the vestigial % of a male are largely 
unexplored, and the : should be left unexplored, there are eight fundamental 
heterosexual conjunctions. But M-:F is seriously deprecated, leaving only seven 
acceptable principles that structure the series of sevens in Revelation, also in 
Genesis. There are reasons to suggest that H and < are seriously related, if not 
interchangeable terms. Also Foot is similarly correlated with both : and -.

 The numbers 3 and 4 are emblematic of M and F, in M for the treble shape of -, 
in F for the two-speaking-two of F<%F, which interestingly correlates to the 
many 2?2=4 relations of math: 2+2=4, 2x2=4, 2^2=4. One thousand and one myriad 
(ten thousand) are also related to M and F as powers of ten, our quantity of 
digits. The fullness of 7 and 12 are from 3 and 4. The number 666 is 
significantly two thirds of one thousand, and pertains to a specific tantric 
event with which those numbers agree.

 While F<%F is not remarkable, or remarkable only for its unnoticeable 
ordinariness, the event of M<%M is unusual. This MEGA event caused a great 
number of symbolic numinous phenomenon to be observed by me, and has to do with 
the Revelation 12 event of the so-called "woman", which is in fact that 
self-same male lamb, to beget a man-child, which is his self-same self, in a 
very Egyptian rebirth episode, which is surely what Jesus meant when telling 
Nicodemus, "You must be born again." It transpired that after M<-M, I anointed 
my body in the M<-M accidents, and my paps spontaneously moistened, whereupon 
M<%M occurred to me. Immediately thereupon, I was sitting in lotus position, and 
did LH M@-M (cf. the Goddess Tara) and was struck with a swooning, and these 
symbols: incomplete pentagram figures rained down from above my head, like so 
many jacks, and there was a spinning around my head, that floated down to my 
right hand, appearing like a number of golden smurfs chasing one another, each 
RH at the loins of one before him. And I saw myself bi-located: One of me in 
lotus position was propelled forward from north to south in space, inside a 
helix in which chords were being inscribed, while another of me was standing to 
the south-south-west, facing East, like a knight's move, and I have a perfect 
memory of both views. This is the second Alpha and Omega entity of the 
introduction to Revelation that instructed John, whereas the first Alpha and 
Omega was simply M<-M as demonstrated by John himself. I figure if there were 
originally 12 stars in a crown, and one represents the dragon who drew away a 
third of the 12, you are left with the 7 good stars found in the right hand.

 I think to leave off describing the muddy waters of my own life, sure that many 
by praxis and theorizing from these few principles can repeat all my results, 
and finish the task of decoding the books, lest it be said to be all of my own 
opinion. But there are a couple more things worth mentioning:

 My interpretation of Ezekiel chapter one as the description of an automobile 
engine, which is marvelous, and perfect, and you can verify it; I was given that 
revelation nearly entire within a month after performing M<-M with - enclosed in 
and penetrating the cylinder of a Honda CH250 scooter engine that I was 
rebuilding. This is the very event of that biblical prophecy of a man who was 
told to go in between the wheels, and take fire to scatter over the city. It 
also shows that monadic tantra grants direct gnosis. Its perfect interpretation 
however, requires a four-cylinder 16-valve OHC engine. This modern device seems 
to be a teleological structuring principle of the fourfold nature, or perhaps 
just a correlation.

 F<-F are seraphs--just ponder their description and my claim until you 
recognize wings=labia. However, the four beasts of Revelation are not seraphs, 
but simply females, and one of them may be the lion that opened the book, 
concurrent with the lamb taking it. That they are also centaurs is given by 
F<%F, which I posit is equivalent to F:-F, were that possible.

 For you worrying about an RFID chip as mark of the beast, let me flesh out how 
that story went down on an individual tantric basis: After the re-birth events, 
I did M<:F on the seventh church, my eventual wife of many years, and later I 
prayed, clasped hands, "You are holy, and your spirit is holy", whereupon a 
sensation ran from my hands to my right elbow, and back. I opened my hands to 
discover a mark in the right palm: two red dotted circles: a double sun-sign; 
while opposite, in the left palm, I saw two raised mounds of flesh. All this 
vanished shortly thereafter. I was moved to raise my right forearm in an oath, 
and I sware myself unto truth. After that, a 666 reticulated gravure appeared on 
her bosom.

 That was a season of abuse, and I fled several times. Once, driving north, very 
angry, and meditating hard and long on some idea that this world might part, 
like a celluloid film, and reveal standing there the true cross of Jesus; 
Appeared after a hard rainstorm a golden light from a solitary cloud. It grew 
over a long time to a huge size, like the rambling Omega on Words,Extended's 
splash screen, appearing as a torus and a cylinder joined, and a broad void at 
the girdle of their intersection. I mistook the cylinder as east-to-west with 
the torus to the north of it, but the cylinder as conical, having some wierd 
perspective, all that seen to the north-west of me. But after watching my spash 
screen, I now know the cylinder was not tapered as I perceived, for I had 
misrecognized its near and far ends. If fact, the cylinder was north-south and 
its northern end elevated, say, 45 degrees. So the cylinder was parallel to the 
earth's axis, and the torus was located as the dawning would then be, on the far 
side of the earth.

 As for the casting out of the serpent, again personal tantra has it covered: I 
was meditating in a basement apartment, in mrtkasana, or corpse pose, erect, 
supine, longtime, when I somehow saw behind me a gigantic red figure, of such a 
size and position that I was his -, and simultaneously heard a deep loud male 
voice shout "Allelu...", at which I sprang up in fright, and the voice ended 
mid-word. The significance to derive from this event is that Satan is also an 
M<-M man who is antipodal to M<-M Jesus, having < for -, and - for >.

 The season of sickles in Revelation is a technique of M-:M, carried out in a 
spirit of judgment, for I considered M<-M a blessing. This is the exclusion 
named Antipas, and M<:M is its post-requisite, which Revelation terms sword of 
my mouth. In that season, I saw a vision of a phallus, self-luminous, with a 
brighter line traced inside it, I thought a lowercase Greek gamma, but in fact, 
an alpha. This is the alpha used in Greek as a prefix of privation, to signify 
NOT. This is a name that signifies NOT-fornication. Fornication must be 
precisely M-:F for a perfect interpretation in all passages. At the third 
Pergamos seal event, the third whore with her dark paps--the black centaur, 
initiated M-:F, as is portrayed in Dali's Metamorphosis of Narcissus. I knew not 
to distinguish : from - then. Luckily she relented. If I had finished in M-:F, I 
would have been Nicolaitan, and later, M<-M make me Balaam.

 The 144,000 are produced in one monad, like the 12 stars in the rebirth 
episode, by M-xM, wherein x stands for forehead and eyes. Hence, the symbolic 
144000 are that single monad and have the name of His Father written on their 
forehead.

 The Jewish heptad is produced from the Egyptian ogdoad by exclusion of one of 
the eight cases, wherein is judgment. I suggest the following principles of 
conjunction ground all the series of sevens to be decoded in Revelation:
 #1 M->F Ephesus
 #2 M--F Smyrna
 #3 M-:F Pergamos
 #4 M-%F Thyatira, Jezebel
 #5 M<>F Sardis
 #6 M<-F Philadelphia
 #7 M<:F Laodicea
 #4 M<%F Thyatira, mother

 The successful practitioner will employ the poetic death of monadic X<-X for 
transcendental phenomenological enquiry, to directly know things-in-themselves, 
and the poetic life principle of monadic <% to cause rebirth therefrom, in 
imitatio Christi. Knowing, one can make life choices consistent with M<>F, M%%F, 
and M--F, and reject those antipodal choices and their entailments that may be 
deduced from the bodily circuits. This subsumes all the morality given in the 
bible.

 I think that is enough. Let the books be opened!














  -- file://InternalText/Help/RevelationNotes