The speed of light represents a perfect elastic collision in the matrix of space. This matrix is composed of strings which are Distance, Time, and Velocity in negative, positive, and neutral. Hence in three dimensions you have 3 x 3 x 3 = 27 superstrings and the monopole or node of the matrix is the photon. Strings are mathematical in relationship and form the construct of the universe. What we see are the interference patterns of the spinning strings and their active rotation in a spherical and three dimensional matrixes. The form of the geometry is spiral such as in a toroid. The overlapping superstring form the photon in a three dimensional tetrahedral and spherical geometry. What we see is the vibration of that matrix on the receiving end of vision. But at the most minute level of the matrix, all is light.

In a perfect elastic collision energy is conserved; however, even after a long journey of billions of miles through space light may seem to dim. Current theory accepts the dilemma of the double slit experiment without clarification and assumes that the contradictions in current theory are satisfactory to explain truth. A model that space has structure resolves the issue. Next time you go to the beach, imagine that it is space, where the water is not moving to you are the speed of water. Molecules collide to transmit kinetic energy. And so why would electrical or photonic current (elastic collision) be the exception? The speed of light means elastic collision; unlike the ocean space is a perfect elastic medium of which the photon is a constituent part. And if the photon has no time, and is essentially everywhere, then the concept of structure makes sense. The elastic wave of the light speed can decay due to the shift in space density or creation/subtraction of space, or compression/expansion of space, but ideally the matrix is elastic. The photon does not decay.

If you see space as a fractal geometry or matrix, where a photon is the result of an elastic collision along the matrix, or the transfer of kinetic energy, then you can resolve the conflict in the experiment, that light is particle and wave. Light is kinetic energy transferred through the matrix of space which is transferring motion? Yes, so the photon is an impulse with no mass, except for the transfer of the kinetic energy which we detect. So this matrix is affected by optics and barriers, and through the slit(s) kinetic energy is transferred depending on how the space matrix is either blocked or distorted. Kinetic energy of an elastic collision can be diverted by as it passes through slits or barriers. Any distortions in the matrix will affect the path of kinetic motion. If you see the photon as “the effect” (light) of an elastic collision, and not the “product” or light, you can resolve the duality of the experiment. Particles are the results of circular or spin wave interference patterns, so what we see are the effects of the real component waves. That is not to say that the universe is waves. It is composed of strings that are related in groups of multi dimensions of space by motion, and the interference patterns are the particles we see. Hence space creates matter, components, those things unseen are the substance that creates the particles we see, and hence that is why there is so much more space than particles, because the relationships are established by dimension of space components. It may be that the interference nodes or monopoles of the space matrix are “photons”, and the elastic collisions of these nodes transfers the “light” in the same manner the elastic collision or electrons transfers the “electricity in a wave at the speed of light. However, the photon does not traverse space, but the motion of collision is at the speed of light. Hence the arrival of a photon is the arrival of a node of the matrix on the receiving end.

The dual nature of light is the dual nature of the experiments. But the true nature of light is very different. Light is a monopole of three dimensional space matrixes, which is a matrix and superconductor. The dual nature is only the experiments that claim a dual nature; not the true nature of light. All is infinite in the matrix of space and the monopole photon and you are but a reference point. The matrix is also transparent to denser matrix forms, dimensions of space, and heavier and slower interference patterns. As the interference patterns of the space matrix build, particles result and motion slows to sub light speed. As particles acquire mass, their transparency decreases. The discrepancy between quantum equations and relativity is that quantum described the relationship of particles and relativity refers to the behavior of strings. Strings form the matrix of space and the interference patterns due to rotation, superposition, and compression of the matrix creates particles. So there are no particles, only an effect of the behavior of strings, a shadow of the main event of string processes, or better expressed as a minute portion.

Entropy and the expansion of the universe are similar actions. The fabric of space limits motion since it is difficult to exceed the limits of space or the speed of light. The retraction of the universe is disentropy. Equilibrium or motion between entropy and disentropy that is established between dimensions and the limits of motion that are permitted in each dimension by natural occurrences results in perpetual motion. Entropy and the expansion of the universe are similar actions. Disentropy and the retraction of the universe are also similar actions. The motion between entropy and disentropy is perpetual motion. The separation of matter due to entropy is the expansion of space. The union of matter and retraction of space is disentropy. There is a limit to the generation of space due to its relationship through dimensions (to 23 or Black hole) just as there is a limit to motion relative to the speed of light. There is also a limit to the retraction of space, which reverses and causes or explodes into an expansion. Balance and order exist, even in a black hole. Closed systems cannot predict the function of the universe. Telescopes cannot predict the size. The reality of entropy can only be expressed within a unified field theory.

Let us explore M=D^3 (cubed) T^2 (squared), so D is proportional to the　cube root of the mass. By this relationship we know that space is in relationship to mass by the cube root. So for a mass 125, cube root is 5; now　half the mass to 62.5 each, and take cube root of each, and you will have 4 and 4 which is 8. So in the explosion of a galaxy, when you half the mass of a single bodied system, you nearly double the space and probably by a factor of C^2 squared. The relationship of mass and space and gravity is illustrated.

The other point I would like to make about space is that there is a ratio of matter to space. The 2 have a symbiotic relationship. Matter does not exist in space, but the two create one another. So at the creation of the universe or big bang, as the pieces separated, or matter separated, you get a doubling of space every time the amount of matter breaks into 2 halves. And you perhaps get spaces adding to one another, as gravity does. So with many pieces, you get quite an acceleration of space. Recently science has discovered that the universe is accelerating outwards, and that it is caused by an "invisible energy", what I presume in my theory proposed to be space itself and its relation to matter. But as matter comes together and forms a black hole with increasing gravity, you have the reduction of space.

An equation explaining the relationship of space to mass is D^3 (cubed) T^2 (squared) = mass, so mass is related to space by the cube root. This means that if you half the mass, you more than double the space, perhaps multiplied by some constant. That may explain the ratio of mass to space in the universe. So an exploding star would create vast amounts of space, while a black hole would diminish space.

D is the smallest particle or component. Let us use string terminology to describe D. D is a string from which everything is made. I would rather say that each dimension is made of vector that combines v and t. Just like we add electrons in the periodic table which is also similar to addition and subtraction, the universe is multiplication. Each dimension adds 2 vectors of V and T, which results in D. Now in three dimensions, you have three vectors. Now you ask, what does it mean, that’s what is so incredible about the whole thing, these vectors combine to form matter, gravity; things upon observation seem totally unrelated. How can you jump 4 dimensions from D^3 and have D^7 or gravity?....well think of molecules and how different they are just to add an electron (addition), but now instead of addition, multiplication.　 So now in our third dimension you have a matrix of D in three directions, and the elastic collision of that matrix is a photon. If a crystal can bend it, then it must be like a fantastic hologram. What super colliders will find if they could is D, V, and T, the basic components of all construction.

What I understood by the M = D^3 * T^2 = Space * Density........at first I thought that D or the vector component of d or space related to mass was influenced by the cube root. So my interpretation was that if you had a star, and it exploded into 2 pieces, you would more than double the space. So if there was a big bang, the acceleration of space or expansion of it was a mighty unfolding. Mass is a relationship to space and density (T^2). Half the mass or a large object into two separate pieces, more than doubles the space.

D = Root to 5th (MC^2 squared).

If you calculate the mass of the sun and solve D, the distance for space D is just　inside　or short of Neptune. Note that planets beyond Neptune have a more eccentric orbit and not orbiting in the same plane as other planets. Take for example Pluto. As Pluto escapes the umbrella of space generated by the Sun, it travels through less dense space, and thus the path of Pluto is more eccentric, deviated from the ecliptic plane, and asymmetric about the Sun, caused by moving through a medium of space of varying density. Our solar system must be in the umbrella of space caused by the center of our galaxy or Milky Way. So a planet such as Neptune is affected by space matrixes from the center of the galaxy, from the sun, and that space generated by it and interacting with other spaces. So for any particular piece of matter space is infinite, since you can never travel to the limit of space that is generated since you are at the center. Space itself must be the dark matter that keeps galaxies apart and in equilibrium or evenly distributed in space. Of course smaller matter would have more freedom to move between the larger generators of space. Also, it may be more difficult to travel between galactic space generators as in the thin space areas between them, where　space may be more distorted rather than homogeneous as in our solar system. Due to rotational; motion of bodies, space has many twists in addition to varying density.

Sun & Orbits

In the theory of space generation, if mass generates space, then the sun with a mass of 2*10(30thpower), and C plugged into the equation D (5th) = 5th power cube root of (mc (squared)) = a distance of 3 x 10 (9th power), which is the space generation of the Sun. Neptune is just on the edge of this at 4.5 (9th power). After Neptune, outer solar orbits such as Pluto show more deviation from the ecliptic and asymmetry in orbit, where the layers of space thin out and vary density. You are under an umbrella of the center of the galaxy at Pluto. So Pluto travels through light and dense space matrix/matter, in and out of our sun's umbrella. From this you might assume well, should not the space of the sun extend further out to include Neptune in a model of planets in the space of the sun aligned within the plane of the ecliptic? Well, maybe the sun's mass is a bit more, or maybe it was at one time but has expended this via nuclear fusion, and Neptune is in a stable space density zone now for some time since its original orbit. When I refer to eccentricity of planets beyond Neptune being more eccentric, beginning with Neptune, I refer to the "deviation from the ecliptic plane" and asymmetry in orbit. What I am trying to convey is that a less dense space does affect orbits differently. In the case of Mercury, it is very possible that the compression of space close to the sun is also affecting its orbit at the opposite extreme, space there is more distorted. Compression and expansion of space due to density, a concept not even considered, affected by its originator, and the spin of the source.

It could be that the eccentricities of Neptune and Mercury are also due to variations in space density, the density being greater near the Sun. Deviation from the ecliptic and asymmetry in orbit are results of lighter space density bordering greater space density. Neptune orbit begins to be more asymmetric to a center. Neptune is within the limit however believe its orbit was established when the sun had more mass, and is now receding and effecting its orbit slowly. Beyond Neptune orbits get wild.

Every component　of the universe can be explained by other components, so you can equate any component of physics to others components. Hence you have a Trans-Dimensional Unified Field theory to explain all these relationships.

Motion & Density

Space by these equations is proportionately related to motion and density.

Note the following:

1.) D= (Cube root) of M/T^2 (squared)

2.) Acceleration * Density = D

3.) Force/D^3 (cubed) = D

It could be that spaces generated by various bodies are additive and overlap as gravity is additive. Hence there are different densities of space surrounding and in the path of different planetary bodies. This could explain the eccentric, asymmetric, and a-ecliptic orbits of planets, where more eccentric, asymmetric, and a-ecliptic orbits result from greater fluctuations in space density in the orbital path. Perhaps Pluto's orbital path is the least homogeneous.

Space Density

In the theory discussed, mass generates space. The space created by the sun is just up to Neptune. The space beyond is covered by the center of the galaxy, so it is less dense. It may be that planetary bodies prefer to exist in areas of greater space density. So in a sense, the counterbalance to entropy is found where the dispersal of energy is reversed. So we see the result as a spiral galaxy where bodies tend to concentrate in spiraling arms from the center of the galaxy in arms of greater space density. It may be easier to travel in areas of greater space density, which is opposite to our normal thinking of traveling through higher densities. As the galaxy spins about its center and pulls its space, the resultant effect is a spiral from its center. Entropic inertia keeps the forms in spiral rather than circles with condensed bands of space.

According to　this theory, planets or bodies create space. The density of space varies. So the sun creates an umbrella of space just short of Neptune from the equation D^5 = MC^2 squared, Einstein left out D^5 to the 5th. So the center of our galaxy creates space that passes through our solar system. The density of space varies. Maybe that explains why the orbit of bodies is more asymmetric from Neptune to beyond. Think of an object traveling from oil into air.　If all things are related, why not space. I'm thinking that the smallest particle is space. So the things affecting planetary orbits are multiple, to include the fabric of space itself. This also could explain why objects exiting our solar system into deep space diverge in their paths because the gravity of other celestial objects could affect them differently in a different space density. Gravity equations will have to be altered to include space density.

It is possible that early in the evolution of the solar system, the space generated by our sun was a bit further away than Neptune and perhaps just beyond Pluto, but has slowly been receding. It may be that the shift is space density from a higher density of our solar system to a lower density of interstellar space is also responsible for the creation of the heliosphere. This area of “space-density” transition would create a transitional density zone between solar space and interstellar space.

Each dimension of space is a different field or matrix type of space. The monopoles of that space matrix are different. It could be that the space from different celestial generators overlap affecting the dimension of space, such as the space of D^3. Also the space of a gravitational field of a higher dimensional matrix may blend with the space of D^3. Hence the density of space may vary according to blend of different space matrixes and types. And the extension of these spaces from the celestial generators may also vary. Hence the reality of space may be a complex blend of densities and matrixes of the same and different types. Since these matrixes are transparent to the human eyes, we perceive space as homogeneous energy field which it is not.

F=Magnetism/D^2 (squared) = MA = D^4 (forth power)

Gravity Force Vector = (MAGNETISM)*D　= F*D^3 (cubed).........The idea of gravity intrigued me. It is true that an atom does not exert a magnetic field, which is a mystery, but I claim that it does, but the nature of it　being one dimensional and this is expressed as gravity in my opinion. Hence the connection to electromagnetism is discovered in the atom. And perhaps to recreate the mechanism of the atom would actually create a gravity generating device, and once this was understood, the counter principle could be engineered to create a gravitational field of opposite polarity. Maybe this is what flying saucers use. From the equation we have determined the relationship of magnetism and gravity. Gravity is the result of magnetism acting as a one dimensional vector. Since all atoms each exert gravity, we have to look to the atom and see what component of the atom generates a magnetic field restricted to a single vector or point. Since moving electrons create a magnetic field, we can assume that magnetism is caused in each atom but restricted　to a 1 dimensional component by the moving electron (s) proton interaction. This magnetic field, restricted by its interaction with the positive proton and in one dimension, is the gravitational component. Hence, gravity is magnetism, but of Dimension 1. By this we can now know how to create a machine that can create gravity. We need to map the path of an electron around a nucleus, and create a machine with electric current that does the same, but of greater magnitude. And also, the reverse of such a process in polarity would be to create an anti-gravitational field. A reverse in polarity means a reverse in the direction of gravitational vector or field. A reverse in polarity would then be a reverse in the relationship of orbiting charge.

According to　this theory, the smallest particle is space and a photon is the result of an elastic collision along the matrix of space. Photon nodes collide to transfer the collision wave and the effect is light, but light is not a traveling substance much like electricity. Hence you have a particle and a wave, the elastic collision being the particle, and the matrix of space the wave. But since the matrix of space is transparent (penetrating all matter), it can be bent and turned such is the phenomena of light. The fastest speed that the collision can occur is the speed of light. So it is hard to travel faster than the matrix of space will allow without disturbing it. Space represents the smallest dimension (1) and particle. As relationships build to 23 dimensions, you get subatomic forces and particles of great energy. No wonder a supercollider has to work so hard, to transform 23 dimensions into 1, is it possible, isn't it comical to look for what is in front of you already? The relationship of complex geometric/dimensional structure allows far less flexibility at high dimensions such as 23 dimensions (at the　subatomic level) than at low level exoatomic level of space. Hence you get the behavior of atoms attracting and repelling to conform within the limits of the subatomic parameter dimension of high order.

Time & Time Travel

I am exploring time. To me it appears a velocity. 5 dimensions of time are resulting in mass. In the space time we have 3 vectors of time. We measure our clocks with 1 dimension.　 M=D^3 (cubed) T^2 (squared) =V^3 (cubed) T^5 (5th power). T^2 Squared = Density

T^1 = Time = (MV) D^3 cubed / Gravity (D^7). Density means time is defined by momentum in three dimensions divided by gravity. Hence momentum, space and gravity define time. So to increase T directly or by induction would increase momentum, speed up time, and reduce gravity. So a spinning ball (high rpm) would rise faster and fall faster than a non spinning ball.

T^2 = Time^2 Squared = Density

T^3 = T in 3rd dimension, but we measure T. But in D^3 there are three vectors or superstrings of T.

Gravity (density) = V^7 seventh x　T^7 seventh = D^7 seventh. Now take a limit of C and

Time = seventh root of G/C = seventh root of G/V, where G approaches 1 and hence T = V

So, time is nearly a velocity, inversely proportional, but in some instances equivalent.

T=D/V; T=D/C, and so at the speed of light time approaches 0.

Where the gravity is greater than 1, time　decreases with velocity, but at the subatomic level (higher dimension such as 4th or 5th dimension) where gravity is less than 1, time speeds up or the reverse happens relatively. So, the implications for time travel exist, but in such a scenario, time is moving forward, as in a river, with slow boats and fast boats. Time travel in the reverse would work in a physics that is working in reverse. This would exist particularly in the physics of polarity yet to be discovered in the area of antigravity and antimatter. However, the actual existence in such a dimension may be impossible. There is a crossing point where time and velocity are equivalent between exo and subatomic worlds.　In the exo world or our world, when you speed up, time slows down relatively, this is known. At the subatomic level, when you speed up, time speeds up　relatively or faster into the future according the equations. This means a leap into a higher dimension can propel you into a faster time rate, such as faster than light travel or hyperspace. This is discussed in further detail at T4 (time to 4th power) below.

Time travel into the past would require traveling in dimension of polarity. In the case of polarity in the exo world or polar exo world, you are traveling back in time. As you speed up in the polar exo world, time goes back slower, and at the subatomic exo world,　time is faster　as it moves backwards; both scenarios are moving backwards in time and opposite to our normal world (exo and subatomic). So a spaceship, to time travel to the past if possible, has to enter polarity at a　lower dimension (polar exoatomic or 3rd dimension like our own)　for normal time or at a　higher　subatomic dimension　for faster hyper time　(opposite to here). So the ship must have the capability to enter exo polarity at a　lower dimension and move to a higher dimension to go backwards faster, but return　via higher "normal" subatomic dimension to speed forward. The question is how effective is the time spread involving inter-dimensional travel, meaning, how fast can you move back or forward or backward in hyperspace; and of course, traveling via other dimensions, the time displacement will be different. This is complicated physics and requiring much advancement in the relative motion of different dimension, or more exactly relative time T, distance D, and velocity V. You may not be able to travel in a polar dimension. I do not believe there are any paradoxes in physics or time. Time is a velocity, like a river, with motion or a motion picture. The river has a destination, and you can ride a boat to the destination to the point that you departed, going forward seems to be unknown. If there is a loop back, it is just that, still a part of the river.

Time travel can be induced because Time can be induced.

T^4 = T * Density * (MV) D^3 cubed/Gravity Force (D^4); a relationship construct of these in velocity and rotational motion will induce time (T). Space is constructed by the smallest particle D. And a photon is an elastic collision along the matrix of space, at the speed of light, which is the limit for the matrix of space.　 Can the galaxies expand faster than the speed of light? Or a better question is can space expand faster than the elastic collisions it allows? No, since we would not detect the phenomenon of light under these conditions. Since space permeates or passes through everything, it is pliable. Since it is possible to redirect light through a prism, we can assume that space elastic collisions are　directionally altered in a prism. The control of light is the bending, compression, or turning of space and redirection of the elastic collisions that are taking place. Thus, by principle of induction, we can rotate space by rotating light in the third dimension, and induce a vector or component of time. Hence this could be a possible method of inducing time travel. Not the equation also implies other events. The rotation of space not only involves the induction of time, but 1/gravity which could be a polarity of anti gravity. The bending of space could induce not only time, but anti gravity. This has nothing to do with photons, but the photons can show the direction of space since photons demonstrate or are the elastic collision of space. Reference the T^1 equation above.

Other possibilities

T^4 = Density Squared, a fluctuation in the density of space will induce T.

T^4 = D^4/V^4=D^4/C^4; at the speed of light T^4 = Force　or fourth dimension (D^4) which might me the portal for time travel. Since the distances are so great in the galaxy, time travel may be necessary to get around. Perhaps time as we see it is different from what it really is.

T^4 = Space (D^3) * M * Density/Magnetism (D^6); manipulation of magnetic construction of space will vary the density of space and time.

Relative Time, Inter-Dimensional Travel

In T^4, time would be flowing at C^2 squared compared to the 3rd dimension. Since by adding a VT to the next higher dimension you square or add a power　to the result of time, velocity, and distance. So 3x10 to the　8th power　kilometers for 1 second of time of light speed would be 9x10 to 16th power kilometers for 1 second of time in 4th dimension (hyperspace) relative to the 3rd dimension, and this would even magnify to another power or C^3 for the 5th dimension of hyperspace. So flying a spaceship into the fourth dimension in an instance you would travel across the galaxy. So an adjustment of relative time in hyperspace 4th dimension would result in vast jump in space on the 3rd dimension. Adjusting relative motion in hyperspace or 4th dimension would also be an issue of time travel, since I believe adjustment of motion faster would push you forward in time, and slowing down perhaps backward, but I doubt the backward component since I believe all things move forward. The key moving forward would be to　maintain relative velocity to freeze relative time;　and to slightly adjust relative time to affect a change is distance travel.　Or by adjusting relative distance travel without adjusting relative motion, that would affect relative time travel. Hence time would adjust distance, velocity would adjust time, relatively speaking. And of course the ship would have to be transformed magnetically on the exterior to conform to a multidimensional matrix.

According to　this theory, 1 second in hyperspace (4th dimension) is equivalent to 10,000 light years away in travel. The Milky Way galaxy is 100,000 light years in diameter and 1000 light years thick. So travel across our galaxy would be 10 seconds. Now the horizon of the visible universe is 14 billion light years away, so in the 4th dimension, travel would be 1400000 seconds or 388.88 hours or 16 days in hyperspace. Multidimensional travel is definitely the way to traverse space. It wouldn't surprise me if the universe is much larger. I’ve heard recently that Hubble saw a horizon of 76 billion light years; it would not surprise me if it was 1 billion times larger.

Ø Time adjusts Distance in hyperspace.

Ø Velocity adjusts Time in hyperspace.

I prefer the concept of time travel to the past being possible by concept of polarity where the motion of time is naturally reversed if possible at all.

When you think of breaking the speed of sound, you have broken one, sound and air, but still are traveling in another medium, space. What happens when you pass the speed of a medium, and then there is none left behind it? Well, then you cannot. You cannot travel faster than the speed of light of the medium or space. With relationship to the speed of light, to exceed you need to disappear to the 4th dimension or hyperspace where time varies distance and velocity varies time relative to the 3rd dimension. So before you ever break the barrier, you are going to bounce to hyperspace. In this hyperspace your relativistic connection to your home dimension is drastically altered and will involve huge displacements of position, time, and velocity. So much so that the first explorers may in fact be lost in time.

Time Travel

About time travel; if it is possible to travel into the past, I believe the following scenario:

Gravity is the result of the helical path of an electron around a proton. The multiple helixes created by rotating and circular-helical orbit create multiple vectors of gravity to the center of the nucleus. Hence you have gravitational forces to the center of mass from all sides or points of spherical surface. This is only possible by an orbiting electron at very high speed-energy at very small distances and so all points of the surface of the sphere are covered almost instantaneously or simultaneously. At near the speed of light, multiple gravitational vectors toward the center of the nucleus (positive charge) is possible as almost to appear instantaneous, or more appropriately, simultaneous. It is possible to produce a gravity machine by rotating electrons in a circle or sphere at high velocity. If in a sphere as in an atom, you will get a gravitational field pulling equally from all directions to a point or inward. If in a circle, you will have a bipolar gravitational field. Understanding this mechanism of a gravitational field is the beginning to deriving a solution for the creation of an anti gravitational field. A reverse in polarity is required, where the orbiting charge at high speed is positive and may be assisted by a central negative charge. Rotational motion of interrelated positive and negative charge has a relationship to gravity. The two forces related are gravitational. And this can be applied to the construction of gravitational or anti gravitational machines.

If you want to create antigravity, what is required is to reverse polarity of the atom “model” that creates the gravity as we know it to be. This can be accomplished by a proton current around negative charge. How easy is that? The resulting gravitational vectors will be in a radial pattern outward rather than oriented to the center of the nucleus caused by small orbital electron circles of planar area tangent to the nucleus. A model that reverses the relationship of charge will create an antigravity model. The repulsion of the planet’s gravity may be accomplished in several ways to include the following:

It is my contention that to duplicate the mechanism of an atom, rotating motion is required; however for weak fields of antigravity, it may be possible to find repulsion in various mechanisms that produce positive charge or polarity to the natural gravitation construct. Superconductive mechanisms may be a manner for creating electron orbits. Other mechanisms are also possible due to the variety of relationships in a trans-dimensional or multi-dimensional model.

Orbit of an electron usually describes the size of an atom. The orbit is usually 10^5 larger than the radius of the nuclei, or something like a grapefruit seed in a soccer stadium. So by size comparison, there is much more space than matter by relationship of distance. This is something like our sun to the furthest planet in orbit. From our perspective of distances, the distances of an atom are very small, and an electron, traveling near the speed of light, is virtually everywhere in orbit. So you have the concept of an electron cloud. And you have the possibility of simultaneity, that multiple gravitational vectors that radiant toward the nucleus center appear simultaneous due to high electron speed and small distance of orbit. Electricity and magnetism caused by the orbiting electron and relationship to proton hold the atom together and define the space of the atom. The atom's center nucleus is positively charged and the electrons that move around this nucleus at very high speed are negatively charged, so they attract each other. The reason the force is strong is because the atom is so small. The distance between the nucleus and the electrons is about 1 Angstrom; this is 0.00000001　cm (10^-8　cm) or about 4 billionths of an inch. Since the electric force varies with the distance between the positive and negative charges like 1 over the distance squared, the force gets large for small distances. The electron is small compared to the nucleus. One can consider that a 1 neutron = 1 proton + 1 electron. This accounts for a large part of the difference between the neutron and proton mass. The actual explanation is much more complicated when described in terms of smaller particles, but the above explanation is approximately true.

A photon is an elastic collision along the matrix of space. The components that create space and its matrices rotate at the speed of light. When the wave patterns intersect, they create interference patterns or the particles that we see, that also slows down the rotation of the waves that caused the interference particles. Since the interference or superposition of space components creates the particles we see, there is more space than particles and that is why there is more space in the universe both exoatomic and subatomic; since particles are created by rotating components that compose space. When the patterns or space wave components rotating at the speed of light intersect or interfere to create particles with mass, their speed of rotation slows down. Hence we have such things as electrons and other small particles moving slower than the speed of light and acquiring mass.

I like the double slit experiment to describe the distinction between the nature of a particle and the nature of a wave. Actually a photon is an elastic collision along the matrix of space. So by such an observation you then reconcile the dilemma between the wave and particle perceived in a photon. A photon is not the "thing" or particle, but the effect or elastic collision of the fabric of space, which will not exceed the vibratory motion of the space matrix, which is the speed of light.

With regard to the wave description of an electron, there are 2 waves to consider as follows:

The first waves (strings or spheres) and their interference patterns result in the construct of an electron. An electron is made by the interference patterns of the "strings" (or spheres) that make up space. And then the wave (as we know) or elastic collision of electron is the electricity or electrical wave. Electrons are interference points in space and the result of space interference patterns. So think of an atom as a collection of rotating strings or spheres. These interference nodes are particles, and the elastic collisions of those nodes are waves. So in a model for the atom, think of each particle comprised of the intersection of motion of strings or spheres, and this superposition of a new geometry will allow you to see what is not seen, and understand what a wave is, and reconcile the dilemma between first wave or space, particle and wave. Particles are made from the intersections of space waves, and the elastic collisions of those particles are the other (transverse) waves we know. So now the particles do have their separateness and combined effect as waves. Particles like electrons are a high dimension of space, but are not the waves or elastic collision we imagine, but a particle generated by a circular wave.

The centricity of gravity convinces me that the electron path shifts as it orbits a nucleus. Take it for a given that in nature motion is orbital and causes induction of other properties (space relationships). And the rules are different for each different dimension of space. Thus one could surmise as a natural law:

The waves of space or strings or spheres, however you want to identify them, are the construct of space. These strings are Distance (D), Time (T), and Velocity (V), and their relationship to higher dimensions increases the complexity of physical phenomena that we see. The most fundamental wave or first wave is space, so let’s call that a string to separate the concept. The wave we normally think of is an elastic collision of the constructs of first wave or space. The first wave is "the" smallest component which builds space and particles; and their vibration of collision generates other waves.

The shift in the orbiting electron must have to do with some asymmetry in the arrangement in the nucleus and/or its relationship to the electron, so with each pass, you get a shift. Perhaps what is asymmetrical in the nucleus is that it is spinning, pulling the electron and shifts its position constantly. Because both the electron and nucleus are rotating, and the charge relationship is slightly shifting, the electron shifts its orbit. And at high speed, covers the entire area of an orbital sphere, and each orbit creates a gravity vector to the center. This multiple action, in the millions are what is perceived to be a spherical action or electron cloud, and achieves a resultant effect of a concentric gravity from all points of the sphere around a nucleus.

The evidence in current gravitational experimentation so far has to do with experiments that induce gravity. Many experiments create bipolar fields because the positive superconductor in some experiments that use them is not shifting position as it spins. The goal in imitating gravity is to create a concentric three dimensional effect, and that is only possible with a shift. Now antigravity does not need to be three dimensional, but only to repel gravity, hence a unidirectional or bipolar device would suffice.

A photon of light is the result of elastic collisions in the fabric of space. The light is the effect of the collision and not a “substance” in transit. If light can be bent by a prism, then a prism can bend space. Coherent light or the light of a laser can be accomplished by compressed space and/or geometric superposition. The geometry of space has the flexibility of compression and superposition. The geometry of space is radial, spiral, and allows for a Cartesian interpretation. A radial geometry allows the shortest line between two points. Spiral geometry is sympathetic to circular motion or spin. This flexibility in the geometry has its foundation in spherical geometries, somewhat like the double spirals of a sunflower, except in three dimensions rather than two. What we see in nature reflects the geometries of space. The nodes of this matrix of space are transparent or unseen, and would be the smallest particle (photon) and the strings supporting them are traveling at the speed of light. At higher dimension or subatomic level the nodes become denser, for an example, an electron, and the space of the higher dimension is superimposed on the transparency of three dimensional spaces.

As the dimensions increase, the degree of compression and superposition is increased from the exoatomic level to the various subatomic levels. The interference patterns of various dimensions of space or the interference of spacial circular motion create the particles that we see. And these particles also decrease the motion of the component strings or waves that comprise that dimension. Hence an electron exists in a different spatial dimension than the surrounding space. A beam of electrons exist because of the compression and superposition of space in its corresponding dimension. And by the rules of a trans-dimensional framework, each dimension has a relationship to others by a set of rules. Hence magnetism and charge have　relationship to all dimensions of space, including electrons and their motion, or gravity, or whatever you wish to discuss. Or more precisely put, a dimension of space has a relationship to all other dimensions of space. For example all dimensions have an impact and relationship to Time, or all other relationships conceivable. So the most remote relationships can be discovered. An electron exists as an interference pattern of a more fundamental circular wave pattern of space. An electron is an effect of space.

The waves or strings that make up space and all matter are an extension of the center of each galaxy or black hole, and these are connected to infinite space. To limit the explanation, space is the building block of all that we see, and the strings that comprise space are in motion at the speed of light, and so have existed since creation.

If you have an electron rotating around a rotating nucleus, the path motion of the electron will definitely be altered by a positive charge in the nucleus that is constantly changing position, even if the points of positive charge or protons and dispersed symmetrically, since you will have both strong points and weak points on the surface of the nucleus. This variation of charge and the interaction of a spinning nucleus coupled with a spinning electron will cause a shift in the position of the electron. Gravitational experiments have produced bipolar results in the induction of gravitational fields because in the atom, the relationship is constantly shifting, and has not been replicated in a lab. In a symmetrical model, where you have the positive and negative charge placed symmetrically, the relationship to the electron cannot be symmetrical if the nucleus is spinning. Therefore the charge relationship of photon to electron is constantly changing. That means the path will change. There is plenty of current experimentation in gravitics or gravitational generating devices that says a concentric and uniform field has not been developed. I attribute this to the absence of the kind of orbital field I am explaining. If the nucleus spins, the electron path would have to change. The concentric nature of gravity suggests a shifting electron path around a nucleus.　 Although not related, but even planets in their orbits shift position, and near the speed of light, it’s a movie fast forward. Gravity is concentric.

Particles are the result of space relationships. Hence it is conceivable to covert the matrix of space into a group of electrons or the matrix of space into a hydrogen atom. We normally think of fusion as combining atoms like helium to more complex atoms, but by this theory, it is possible to create any element from space, even a black hole, and to convert back to space again.

The idea that magnetism can influence the path of electrons can be restated that one dimension of space and geometric dimension has a direct influence on another space and geometric dimension; since their commonality is the very same thing they have in common, the geometry of space as a building block. This is no more farfetched than saying hydrogen is related to sulfur by a fusion reaction of common elements or particles. We can manipulate elements by knowing what the commonalities are between them. And for a general theory this commonality is the geometry of space, whose components are Distance, Time, and Velocity.

Electrons are not invisible, since they are the interference patterns, but the elements or space components that make up an electron are not seen by current physical measurement techniques.

Anti Gravity, Reverse Polarity, and Super Conductivity .

Anti gravity is generated by the reverse in polarity of positive and negative charge in rotational motion. The classic view of gravity as discussed is the electron orbiting a positive nucleus. Gravity vectors are generated towards the center by an electron orbiting and shifting orbit constantly in rotation around proton(s) at 75% of the speed of light. Hence the high speed of the electron in all orbital positions gives an almost instantaneous effect or electron cloud and vectors of gravity toward the center of the nucleus that cover an entire sphere. So to reverse polarity, positive charge needs to orbit and generate a field of anti polarity or anti gravitation; reverse model.

Substances where positively charged particles or ions can be rotated could be in superconductor rings, which would also include super fluids such as helium or other elements which are also superconductors. A ring would allow the arrangement of charge in a circle to be rotated or spun. A super fluid would allow the ration by spinning of the fluids within a superconducting ring. Rotational motion induces the gravitational fields that the experiment would be looking for.

Superconductors expel negative charge from their interior which consequently becomes positively charged; this displacement in rotation can be used to generate an anti gravity field.

We now have understood that the analogy is in fact much closer than originally thought: not only is the diamagnetic behavior of superconductors similar that of atoms, but also the charge distribution of superconductors is qualitatively similar to that of atoms: more positive charge near the center, more negative charge near the surface. Perhaps in a ring this displacement would allow the manipulation of the positive charge in rotational motion where the concentration of positive charge and its rotation will induce an anti gravitational field in the manner expected.

When this principle is understood more fully, it may be possible to induce anti gravity by other manipulations of the space matrix, since in a multi dimensional construct; induction can be achieved by many different mechanisms. In such a superconducting ring, many different elements can be tried, and perhaps those that work best might have magnetic properties.

Every dimension is a superposition of space. Every dimension of space has a matrix of strings. These strings are Distance, Time, and Velocity. Each string comes as positive, negative, and neutral. The strings have spin, and appear as spheres. When the lattice of strings overlap or intersect, they form in interference patters or particles that we see. The strings spin at the speed of light, but move slower when the interference patterns create subatomic particles. Nearer to the speed of light, the interference patterns or particles are those such as neutrinos and photons. And in the third dimension and sub dimensions of one and two, the particles of the interference patterns are transparent and pass through matter. The matrices of space or strings themselves are also transparent and allow superposition. Superposition is the compression and overlap of space to higher density and dimension. And in these higher densities you have more complex rotation of space and interference patterns as well as heavier particles. So all matter and dimension at whatever level is made of the lattice of space. All space has current, or the elastic collision of the nodes of the lattice of space, which occurs at the speed of light. The node of the lattice of space for the third dimension is the photon. For a higher dimension, it is the electron. The collision of these nodes or particles of the space lattice is “current”. Current can be harnessed whether it is electrical or photonic. Photonic current can induce electricity via induction. A possible experiment would be to rotate light in a crystal of fiber optics as in a Tesla coil. This rotation, which is also a rotation of the lattice or space would induce currents in other dimension, such as electrical, since all dimension are related via rotational motion. Rotation means induction. Particles that travel through a space matrix cannot exceed the elastic collision of that space-time, as described in relativity. However, the relation between dimension is related by C, so in the fourth dimension, velocity related to the third dimension is C^2. But in each dimension it is still C. So relativity changes the relative time between dimensional spaces.

The elastic collisions through different dimensions of space result in different types of current. The current (light) through three dimensional spaces is different than the current of superimposed space (electricity) where you find a metal like iron. So the elastic collision we call electricity is different than the elastic collision we call light. Both are current and wave induced by elastic collisions. In this theory, electricity (electric elastic collisions) and the generation of current via electrons is related to elastic collisions in other dimension; by induction. Hence it is quite conceivable to harness the power of light from the sun and by induction to deliver an electric current in a wire. Hence all elastic collisions, no matter in what dimension, are a source of power when properly harnessed by induction. The elastic collisions of light from the sun to the Earth can be seen as current ready to be harnessed, like a circuit waiting to be completed. The task is to find out how to induce electric current in a wire from the vacuum of space, and establish the relationship between space current of the third dimension and that associated with electrons or electricity at a higher dimension. The only medium that properly manipulates light and space is a crystal, and therefore must be the medium for experiment and induction of electrical current in a wire. And from there harnessing a great deal of available and free energy. This might be obtained by rotating space and light and inducing current in a wire.

Elastic collisions are a phenomenon of current for every dimension of the space matrix. And ideally without impurities or imperfections, these collisions occur at the speed of light. So we can speak of dimensional matrixes and mediums of space that have current or properties of elastic collision, and that the current is the result of collisions of the nodes or superposition of the dimensional matrix associated with the particular dimension. Hence we can speak of photonic current and electrical current and they are nodes of different dimensions of space. Sound is also an elastic collision, and therefore there must be a matrix of space that will allow sound or molecular elastic collision to occur at the speed of light. Since it is possible for sound or molecular elastic collision to occur at the speed of light, it may be possible via induction or rotational motion to induce anti gravity via sound (molecular vibratory motion) occurring in a circular path.

Three dimensional space is transparent, which means that the components and particles that constitute three dimensional space pass through more dense space, matter and subatomic particles. As space superimposes to produce more dense space, these transparencies are replaced partly by particles created by the interference patterns of this superposition. Thus you have more dense space which is still transparent, and the interference of these superimposed spaces and their overlapping spin that creates the particles that we see. For an example, an electron is the result of the interference pattern of superimposed space. At the level of transparent space of the third dimension and also transparent particles, we are at a level of the speed of light for both spin of spatial dimension string components and the particles created by interference patterns at the same level. Neutrinos are the transparent particles of transparent space. It is my contention that the three neutrinos (electron neutrino ν_e, muon neutrino ν_μ and tau neutrino ν_τ ) combine to produce the photon of three dimensional space, which is the combination of positive, negative, and neutral transparent particles at the speed of light. This then becomes a model for the universe where relationships are related in positive, negative, and neutral. As the interference patterns occur with the result of more dense particles that are not transparent, such as an electron, the speed of particles and supporting space structure slows to a sub-light speed. /hence in an atom, you may have the electron traveling at 75% of the speed of light, which is still fast to complete the millions of orbits required to generated concentric gravity. If neutrinos do have a mass, then they are particles of a higher superposition or dimension, maybe dimension 4 or higher. Consequently the transparent particles that constitute a photon still need to be discovered for the third dimension, in addition to those of the second and first dimension.

The detection of space is the detection of a transparent matrix of component strings (distance, time, and velocity) in positive, negative, and neutral. The intersections of these strings are particles or intersection nodes of the matrix of space. Each dimension of space has different nodes which are heavier at higher dimensions. At lower dimensions the intersection particles are transparent along with the strings. The elastic collision of the matrix of space is at the speed of light and is called “current”. Quantum physics measures the particles (intersections of the matrix of space strings), and perhaps it will be much more difficult to measure or detect transparent particles in lower dimensions of space. Even further down the road it will be hard to detect the transparent strings which are the building blocks of all space and particles. The relationship of strings in various dimensions of space has the effect of what we call dark energy; that motion associated with the perpetual motion machine of space universe, the relationship of all dimensions of space, and associated ratios. Each dimension of space exerts a force on associated or adjacent spaces or dimensions. The ratio of mass to space is D^5=MC^2. Hence with ratios there is implied force to equilibrium.

Dark energy is space. Space is made of strings with spin (spheres) and the intersections of these spheres are particles. Space and its properties are defined by Dimension (D), which is the superposition, compression, and density of strings in a geometric space matrix.

For example:

D^5=MC^2 or E^2=Gravity = D^10;

A Black Hole is D^23 = E^4 * D^3. This equation can be reduced to E^2 = G (Gravity). From the equation we see that in a Black Hole Energy is squared, and the field of gravitational space is much larger than photonic space. Before I go on, I want to make clear that each dimension in this theory is a different dimension of space matrix. Hence you have the photonic field of D^3 with its photon monopoles, and in higher dimension you have gravitational fields, electric fields, magnetic fields, and so on. So the space we traverse in outer space has various densities, transparencies, and types. “Outer Space” or the ether is not one type of space, but a myriad of different and complimentary spaces geometries or matrixes that exist together. So E^2 = G suggests that the distance of the field of gravitational space is square the distance of photonic space. Hence its action on objects is very far away. For the sun, this action would be far beyond the Solar System to planetary objects like Sedna.

Sedna is a planet or planetary body roughly the size of the earth’s moon and very far away from the orbit of the sun, about 1 x 10^11 km from the sun. If you calculate the value G for the earth and sun using G = E^2, you will find that the ratio of gravity between the earth and the sun varies by the value M^2. And by calculation of G for the Sun and the Earth, you will find that G for the Sun is about 1 x 10^11 times that of the earth. So it appears that the distance of the effect of the gravitational field matrix from the sun is also about 1x 10^11 km from the sun or the distance between the Sun to Sedna.

Black holes have spin and are spheres, since everything in the universe is made of compaction and superposition of space matrixes or geometry. The spherical nature of a black hole reinforces the following concepts:

What makes the gravitational field space of a black hole so strong is E^2, which means that the field space of gravity extends far into the universe, generating most of the space that appears black in the universe. And if you calculate the average distance between galaxies, you will find they are based on the equation G= E^2, where the distance is squared to the D calculated from D^5=MC^2.

Strings (D, T, & V) make up the matrix of space. The strings are transparent and have spin at the speed of light. The monopoles or nodes of the matrix are where the strings intersect or overlap to create interference nodes or monopoles. So the space field is directly related to the existence of matter. In the third dimension the monopole is the photon, and at the lowest dimension D^1 you have the smallest particle which is transparent like the field itself. The relationship of D particle is the relationship of string V and T. Strings are the mathematical construct of the universe dimension per dimension. The interference patterns created by the space field are the particles that we see. And in the universe there is a ratio and relationship between the entire dimension and superposition, and all the mass and associated space per dimension. If there is a Higgs field, it is the fabric of space, the dark energy. This field contains all the elemental strings by which all matter is made. This field is also the building block of all particles of mass and space dimension per dimension via superposition. Strings are in positive, negative and neutral, and these properties are also seen in particles. Hence the smallest denominator is in a relationship of three strings in 3 positive, negative, and neutral; or a relationship of 9; and 27 for three dimension D^3. But to simplify the understanding, D^1 is at the lowest level of interference of the matrix.

Since the universe is multidimensional, at the big bang, the existence of these entire dimensions was simultaneous, since their existence has a direct relationship to infinity at dimension 23 or the black hole. The entire perpetual motion machine exists by relationship and ratio and hence did not progress from a state of low energy to high energy, but descends from infinite energy. This universe is a particular qualification of infinity.

There is no particle that gives mass to all other particles, but there are string fields that do, and there is the smallest particle D^1 from the string matrix that combines to form all other matter. If this is the Higgs Boson that is being searched for, then it needs requalification. This particle would be transparent much like a neutrino and hard to detect.

Speed of light means elastic collision which is supported by a matrix. E=MC^2 suggests an elastic collision in space. This is now D^5=MC^2 which shows the relationship between mass and space and the construct of strings that result in mass. Light is a current since it is an elastic collision as electricity is a current and elastic collision. The elastic collision of the matrix of space transmit photonic current; hence as in electricity where the electron does not move at the speed of light, the photon is not moving at the speed of light, but both transmit a wave via elastic collision at the speed of light. The photon, a monopole in the matrix of space vibrates and transmits a kinetic wave or current. What we see is the wave crashing on the receiving end like a wave crashing on the shore of a beach. Hence the photon does not travel through space, but as a component of the space matrix, transmits the impulse to use via elastic collision at the speed of light. We see the photon on the receiving end.

Trans-Dimensional Unified Field Theory is a theory that somehow reconciles concepts of String Theory, Quantum Mechanics, and Relativity into one conceptual model. In this theory it says that space is comprised of a matrix of strings that makes up all space, particles, and dimensions of space; each space dimension contains specific particles per dimension and associated space dimensions matrix. Mathematics “can” describe all the dynamics of dimension since the strings that comprise a dimensional matrix are mathematical in relationship. The relationship of the string matrix dimension per dimension is related by the multiplier VT; hence a periodic table of dimension from D^1 (VT) to D^23 can be established. That is what a unified field theory as described here attempts to do, derive the fundamental mathematical relationship between all dimensions of space that define associated space matrixes and particles.

The order of the theory however needs to be developed into various structures of what is seen and unseen which present day physics does not have. In this theory what is unseen (space strings and matrix) is the universal mathematical construct, and what is seen (particles) are the interference patterns of the space matrix or monopoles of the space matrixes and superposition of space dimension per dimension. So the particles are shadows of the larger construct and our understanding of physics is largely hidden from view. The things unseen are determining what we see, and so our visual understanding is backwards to the underlying reality.

The structure of the order or universal construction is a matrix of Strings: Strings are the mathematical structure of the universe and space is in relationship to three strings that are Distance, Time, and Velocity. Strings form the matrix of space. These strings exist in positive, negative, and neutral, so for three dimensional spaces you are looking at a geometric matrix of 27 strings. Each string has spin and related together in a rotating active geometry. I say active since all of the structure has rotation and spin. This active geometry is similar to toroids, fractals, and recursive spherical geometries. The intersection or interference patterns of these strings (with spin) form the particles that we see and the variety of particles is made possible by space superposition in the various dimensions. In the third dimension of space, the intersection node (monopole) is the photon and the elastic collision of the matrix occurs at the speed of light. The speed of light suggests kinetic elastic collisions. Photons that collide in the matrix are photonic current, similar to electrical current. Current or kinetic motion is a perfect elastic collision of a space dimension, and at the speed of light is a phenomenon of the three dimensional space matrixes and perfect elastic collision.

The structure of space dimension per dimension has a mathematical construct. E=MC^2 is now D^5=MC^2, which explains matter in terms of space (D^3); and VT (D) is the constant string multiplier dimension per dimension. Hence we can talk about a periodic table of mathematical dimensional relationships and the dimensions start with D^1 or VT and progress to D^23.

The structure of what is unseen creates the particles (Quanta) that we see. Particles are the intersection patterns and superposition that occurs in the various dimensions of space. At dimension 23 there is singularity of a black hole and the matrix of space converges to a point.

By having these three concepts of:

and these working together in one theory, you have a trans-dimensional unified field theory which is the unification of physics and the unified field theory searched for. So you have new ether, and this theory explains all the problems of ether away. First space is made of strings that make the space matrix, second space is related dimension per dimension as a periodic table, and third particles are interference patterns of space superposition.

E=MC^2 is now D^5=MC^2. Mass is explained in terms of space, and the composing strings of velocity and time. The speed of light is an elastic collision (kinetic energy). Strings are trans-dimensional. The strings are three, distance, time, and velocity and compose space. Strings are mathematical in relationship.

Photons do not travel through space, like electrons, the elastic collision is the current and so photons also collide or vibrate as they are in the space matrix. What you get is on the receiving end like a wave crashing on the shore of a beach. The vibration of light is a perfect elastic collision. The photon is a node or monopole in the lattice matrix of space that explains the dilemma of the double slit experiment. The photon is the effect and not the object of the wave.

Super colliders are trying to find all particles, but all particles are created by more fundamental strings. Why is that distinction interesting? Because strings are mathematical in relationship, form the greater part of the universe, are the dark matter, and are the Higgs Field. Is the photon the effect of some other root causation? Yes, since particles are interference patterns. In electricity the wave or current electricity travels at the speed of light, not the electron which moves very slow. The same is for the photon in the D^3 space matrix. How can they interact causally then? They interact through the vibration of the space matrix. You see the photon on the wave receiving end. In light the same shadows or photons may not push each other around? They push through the vibration of the matrix. Imagine for simplicity, people with six arms with jump ropes. The ropes are strings with spin; the people are the photons or monopoles of the matrix. The vibration passes through the lattice of the space matrix at the speed of light. Now instead of people with six arms, imagine 27 strings (spheres or strings with spin in a spherical and rotating lattice) as in a geometric framework. D, T, and V in positive, negative and neutral, and also in three dimensions are 3x3x3=27. If these strings have spin and also the geometry is active and rotating, the resulting geometry is radial like a toroid, fractal geometry. It allows movement in all directions and now you have the simple space of D^3. As space moves into the atom, by superposition, it becomes more dense and complex; the geometry is also more complex. The strings and radial geometries slow down and interfere to create heavier particles that move slower than the speed of light. Interference and superposition of strings generates particles. Particles are like 2 rocks dropped in the water where the waves overlap, you get a particle at the interference pattern. By analogy an atom may be a 100 arms person. I say there are 23 dimensions, a black hole (D^23) being all the lines of force into a point. A black hole is the mega monopole of singularity.

In each dimension 2 strings are added, VT. Einstein’s something that relates energy to matter is VT. The strings are V, T and D; three in all in positive, negative, and neutral that are 9. And the dimensions are as in a periodic table increasing by the multiplier VT dimension per dimension; and the properties associated with each dimension change dimension per dimension. Just like atoms add electrons in the chemical periodic table additively, each space dimension has an increase, however the dimensions multiply strings. Strings are the mathematical basis of the universal construct. Dimension is the superposition of space and associated patterns of interference. With each dimension come monopoles and properties of space like gravity and magnetism. Each dimension is another form of space. We live in D^3. But atoms are in multiple dimensions that are higher such as 14 or 15; and black holes are in dimension 23. Higgs boson may very well be space itself and dark matter. And the smallest particle is the monopole of D^1. And dark matter is space. Higgs boson is a particle in space that (supposedly) accounts for inertia. That particle may be the monopole of the first dimension D or something undiscovered because D is itself a string. So, it is very likely, however, strings are more fundamental. Particles are the shadows of the larger string matrix. So you want dimensions to not be directions but just differently integrated strings. I think they are all correct, string theory, quantum, and relativity. Yes. However, I believe by rotation, different dimensions induce others. This rotation is the basis of induction as in electromagnetism. And I think induction has an effect three dimensions over.

Two dimensions would be (e.g.) a grid of strings in two dimensions, but you could add a third dimension by laying down more strings into the two D but just choosing how they connect to the original lattice. There are three strings, Distance, Time, and Velocity in positive negative and neutral and in D^3 that’s 27. All strings are superposed and as you add more, the geometry changes. That is the superposition of higher dimensions creates more complex geometries and hence the particle interactions change and I think the nature of time even changes in these configurations.

Particles are both the monopoles and interference by superposition and rotation of the space matrix. Particles are the interference patterns of dimensional space. A photon is a monopole or node. Space is highly geometric, and the particles follow the rotation of the space strings. Strings are transparent and are the medium of space. Some particles created at lower dimension are transparent. The strings are the medium of space and also transparent. If there are multiple dimensions, all particles must have a relationship to other dimensions. A particle is related through strings mathematically to all dimensions. Some particles created at lower dimension are transparent. But they are components or more dense particles at higher dimensions. All particles are separate, but are related mathematically by their behavior through dimension. Particles exist in relationship to all dimensions all at once. That’s what is meant. Well that's a motherhood claim. It’s true for all physics theories. Yes, but it makes the case here by unification. Space at a lower dimension would be strings and particles, and at higher dimension atomic. The continuum is space that generates particles; but I like the idea of intersecting strings. It’s like a graph, but with edges being the crucial thing. How about intersecting torus-shaped membranes? Well, for a matrix of spheres (strings with spin) which is active and in rotation, you are describing toroid or spherical geometries.

Every three dimensions that is a multiple of 3 represent a dimension of stability in the geometry of space. For example the third dimension (D^3) has characteristics of stability and has characteristics of induction with dimension D^6. A spherical geometry (fractal) based on three is stable and represents a toroid geometry. And there is a relationship of "induction" between stable dimensions and otherwise by a factor of 3.Via the rotation of one dimension, a rotated dimension will induce another three dimensions away. For example the relationships in electromagnetism reveal this. Now imagine, via a Trans-Dimensional Unified Field Theory, electricity is related to just about every dimension somehow mathematically through the sequence of D^1 to D^23. Now imagine that the vacuum of space is a spherical and radial geometry, where the monopoles of D^3 space are photons, and that the model described represents the potential for photonic current. When you see light, that light is photonic current. And so the light from the Sun represents a vast amount of photonic current ready to be harvested as free energy. It is conceivable to create a motor that induces electrical current in a wire from the vacuum of space. By rotating space, it may be possible to induce electric current in a wire and harness the vast amount of photonic current. How is it possible to rotate space? Well, if photons are the monopoles of the D^3 space matrix, then if you rotate light, you rotate the space. It is possible to rotate space using crystals or fiber optics and induce electrical current in a wire. Perhaps a Tesla coil in crystalline or fiber optic form could be able to do this. It is my belief that maybe in this single step, or an additional combined step, you can create a free energy generating device that harnesses the free energy from the sun in vast quantities.

There would be no cost to rotate light. If you rotate light, you rotate space, since light is the monopole of the space matrix composed of strings (D, T, and V). Imagine a crystal or fiber optics as in the shape of a Tesla coil to rotate light. Rotation means that light cannot be bounced (reflected) light, but rotated or turned light, meaning light turning as in a magnetic field. This rotation will induce a field of another dimension. By this process, in one or two steps, current may be induced in a wire. All dimensions of space are related by rotation via induction, similar to what Faraday discovered with electricity and magnetism. The idea of light or the photon as a monopole of the matrix of space strings actually resolves the dilemma of the double slit experiment. Space means elastic medium and elastic collision and a perfect elastic collision occurs at the speed of light, also a phenomenon of space. The MC^2 and its connection to light means elastic collision and space. E = MC^2 is an equation that concerns or describes space strings, and E is D^5, so energy is space, and when you have atomic explosion, you are creating space, unraveling the space from a higher dimension to lower. The strings are the same, hence the mass as we understand it measures up to MC^2, the total package MC^2 remains the same from a pencil to splitting matter. The energy lost is space.

So the cost of rotating space via crystals or fiber optics requires zero motion, since the current or photonic current is already there in the vacuum of space and light “can" be manipulated via optics, like current in a wire for electrical current. Light needs to be redirected to induce other forces and finally to electrical current. I believe it’s all there for the taking, free energy for the whole planet. Space is the Higgs Field and Dark Energy, and free or Zero Point energy can be harnessed from the vacuum. The sun is the generating source.

This theory maintains the principle of induction of one space dimension to another and in a relationship of rotation. Light is a current like electricity is a current and therefore must generate a rotational field of some kind. However, I maintain that the induction is from higher dimensions to lower dimensions and involves rotation. The induction from photonic current at D^3 may be restricted since three dimensions lower does not exist. Perhaps fields generated by induction are restricted to 1 or 2 dimensions. The electricity of a higher dimension induces magnetism three dimensions lower and the relationship is rotational. Photonic current will generate a field pattern also, but I often thought that because the dimension for photonic current is 3, that the current of light must be restricted to generating fields of one or 2 dimensions as said before and have other restrictive characteristics. Concentrated current (concentrated D^3 space) would be a laser, and we know that the field pattern of magnetism around a laser is radial from the laser and varies. This radial or vector pattern tells me that both electricity and magnetism are of a higher dimension and field patterns are restricted, changed, and altered here from what is induced in electrical current. If you can take these vectors and curve them by curving light (D^3 space), and hence curving space, you will have artificially created an effect of a higher dimension of space, which will induce the electromagnetic properties that you need to induce electrical current in a wire for generating power. So fiber optics or optics can be used to turn space, not reflect. But what I mean is that the path of light be near to a curve as possible, and that we understand that even though not perfect, what we are after is a circular path that will artificially create or simulate a higher dimension of space in a zero point free energy creating motor, and that will allow us to draw the current we desire, since we have reconfigured space to our use. Reconfiguration requires superposition, concentration, and rotation to give the new field patterns of space the semblance of a higher dimension compatible with generating electromagnetic force.

Light in a fiber optic　coil strand is similar to electrical current in a wire coil and should have the superposition that would be required. What I mean that light should not be reflected is that the line of the photon or space matrix be as far away from a linear path as possible. It would be like stirring coffee, the walls of the cup keep the motion rotational in a fiber optic cable as opposed to linear. I think I am right here. The linear path of the photonic elastic collision must already be inducing "a field" unknown. However we know that it is producing both radial electric and magnetic patterns. The vector quality of these fields have to do perhaps that photonic current is already at a low Dimension 3　(D^3) and inducing a rotational field becomes restrictive since　inducing the lower dimension would be dimension 1 or less, or singularity.　　I do not believe the induction works both up and down, but down from higher dimension to lower.

The inverse square law is proof of the elastic collision of space. All dimensions of space exhibit this characteristic of the inverse square law, whether it is spaces governed by electric, gravitational or photonic monopoles, where the monopoles of the space define the dimension. The key is that from a “point” source, the elastic field generates a spherical wave field that gets larger and larger; like throwing a rock in the water of a pond. And as the wave gets larger, the energy of the wave spreads laterally, since the geometry of space is spherical. The lateral motion of energy also compliments the 2^nd law of thermo dynamics or the universal law of increasing entropy. The lateral distribution or diffusion (inverse square law) of energy is apparent from a “point” source of light, but in the scenario of a flat or broad wave and the ideal situation of elastic space without encumbrances such as

you will detect the apparent inviolate motion of photonic current or light across the universe. Even in such a scenario, small lateral vibration due to spherical space will diminish the forward action. In addition, there is proportion of space field to generator, and hence limit to path of travel, and hence the universe appears black. But for the observation or generation object, space is always infinite since you are always at the center.

Space is also infinite by its connection to infinity via fractal arrangement and also by the source of this universe which is infinity. This universe is a particular qualification of infinity.

Science understands energy as E = MC^2, but in this theory E = D^5 = MC^2. The reinterpretation of energy or the fact thereof is Energy as a mathematical relationship of strings or described as various dimensions of space matrix. The component Strings of all universal mathematical and physics relationships that comprise space matrixes are V (velocity) and T (time) and D (distance), expressed together as VT. So matter and energy are manifestations of strings (V, T, and D), and manifestations of dimension. And we can also say that the strings or Space Matrixes or Dimensions (D) are manifestations of different dimensions of Energy. So to summarize:

The MC^2 derived from MV^2 means that space matrix is a perfect elastic medium, and the monopoles of space matrix are photons that collide elastically within the space matrix. Matter is neither converted to energy or vice versa, but I would like to use the term translated since the same elemental strings are still present.

Various dimensions are various forms of space, and the space of the Universe may have various and different characteristics. Space or the ether is not a homogenous vacuum, but constructed of different types of space matrixes. The extent of gravitational space is much further than three dimensional spaces. For example space of three dimensions extends to just beyond Neptune, while that of gravity extend to Sedna.

One dimension has relationship to another by induction, a relationship first explored by Faraday. A dimension coexists with another by induction, and then that to another and continually repeating as a fractal pattern to infinity. Yet there is a boundary at dimension 23 since infinite energy is not natural for natural mechanism, since the universe is bound by infinity, or a particular qualification of infinity, and has a mathematical relationship to infinity that actually exists. On one end of Dimension 23 it is a fractal move upward in dimension based on energy towards singularity or infinity, and in the other direction towards unity of the God particle D superstring. Between this dynamism is balance, a perpetual motion machine.

The universe is made up of or completed full of strings. These strings are transparent to atomic matter, yet they have mass. So strings are transparent matter and not the solid matter we associate with their interference patterns of strings that create particles. However, at lower dimensions, some particles are also transparent. You can say that dimension per dimension, space varies in:

Space dimension per dimension changes in properties. The matrix of space in each dimension (23 in all) is made of strings. What we see, the particles are the interference patterns of strings. The strings in lower dimension such as 3 are of lower density, superposition, number, magnitude, and mass. Space makes up everything, and the space is a perfect mathematical construct, a perfect equation. Particles are the shadows of the larger reality space, and that’s what we see. The atoms are shadows. We break up shadows in a super collider and we disturb the strings that we do not see. And some particles are transparent portions of these intersecting strings. The very smallest particle is unseen even by smashing in a collider and the larger portion of strings are also unseen. And even the mathematical hierarchy, the pure math of stings is not seen. Strings represent:

Dimension = Space = Energy

These are all interchangeable terminology.

Einstein was looking for one simple equation to explain an elegant universe; well there are 23 simple equations. And E=MC^2 is really D^5=MC^2. And E^2=Gravity. And E^4* D^3=Black Hole. The unification principle makes one equation impossible since “relationships” are established through the governing dimensions of the universal construct. One equation and its properties is the door to the next, and so on and so forth to infinity.

Humans are basically able to see everything since all this can be derived by intuitive logic. Everything can be known by each person truly by thinking about it.

Light is a monopole of the 3 dimensional matrix of space. The photon does not travel at the speed of light. Like the electron it is slow to move. The photon elastically collides with adjacent photons. And what you see is the photon near you. Space is "elastic", a perfect elastic medium. This is apparent with lights connection to mv^2 and mc^2. But space is not empty; it is transparent and full of strings that form a space matrix. So let’s get rid of the terminology “illusion”, and the word “nothing” about the universe and the vacuum of space respectively. I am that I am. Everything that is, is.

The elasticity of the space matrix and dimensional universe is the “perpetual motion” or conservation of all energy in motion.

The understanding of energy has evolved and been expanded.

The term: “Energy = Space = Dimension” refers to energy as a geometric space matrix and powers of dimension thereof. When you explode an atomic bomb you are generating space. Splitting the atom or fission involves a generation of space. In either a fission or fusion reaction, the generation of energy is the generation of space. There is a relationship to mass and space as there is a relationship to mass and energy. The units are the same.

Space means space dimension, and dimension is another name of powers thereof, and energy is how we define dimension and space currently. Each dimension of space is perfectly elastic, with elastic properties at the speed of light. MV^2 in the perfect elastic collision of each dimension of space and so becomes MC^2. MC^2 means or suggests elastic space and elastic collision.

The component or multiplier of difference dimension per dimension is VT. VT is the “thing” that relates energy to mass. A new way of understanding energy is by redefining it in a broad sense as space and dimension, but yet more specifically as the strings of the space matrix that constructs all that exists, and the strings are V, T, and D.

There is a matrix that forms all space in its various types and dimensions. When you explode an atomic bomb atomic, you create space. The energy is space, the mass is space, and the equivalency is that they are made of the same strings V, T, And D. MV^2 means elastic collision, its association to light in MC^2 means space is elastic. Elasticity requires a medium. And light and D^3 are one and the same. Light or the photon is the monopole of three dimensional spaces. There are no particles, only particle like relationships of the space matrix. Energy is space? Yes. Space is created in proportion exactly to energy released. The sun generates the space of this solar system. To make space I have to release energy. The galaxy generates the space of the galaxy. The release energy is to expand the space of the universe and to reduce space is to incorporate energy. More space means an enlarged universe. Each center of galaxy generates space and there are different types of space. Gravitation is one type of space, and there are others such as D^3, electrical, and photonic, so on and so forth, each representing a different dimension of space. Space is not something waiting to be filled; to the contrary space is full of strings or is the construct of strings, the dark energy of the universe. Space is a superstring matrix transparent superconductor.

Consider one photon as not being an “independent” particle in the ether of a vacuum space, but rather a monopole created by the space matrix (strings) interference patterns of space, and hence a photon is being a certain geometric position and state of the entire space matrix. A space matrix has a well-defined number of monopole particles in each state or dimension. The matrix of 3D space has photons as monopoles that are seen by oscillator excitation or elastic collision. It's not 1 wave that travels from photon emitter to detector; it’s an elastic collision of the space matrix that is perceived as a packet of waves. When the packet of "waves" or excitation hits the detector screen (phosphor), its effect is particle like, but what hits is an elastic collision of space. It's as though the packet makes up a clump of particle. Particles may not be localized, they are waves (elastic collision) of the monopoles of the space matrix, but they are called particles and the number of particles is fixed. So "particle" is really just a term used to help one imagine what's going on, but that depends on the context. Are photons considered real things? But then electrons are. It's an electromagnetic field that is moving; or better still, a space matrix that is moving, and it’s a perfect elastic medium that vibrates on collision allowing waves or “current”. Particles are the interference patterns of the matrix of space by geometry, superposition, and density that effect of this interference is the result in an effect we understand as “particle-like". So a photon isn't really a particle, it's just a phenomenon that can be compared to a particle and the interference patterns of a larger mechanism at work. This understanding can be extended to everything we see.

Time is a string, one of which everything is made, and the relationship of strings are "relative" and mathematically precise, and the relationship of strings in the universe are multiplicative in relationship, not additive and subtractive. The relationship of time in relativity is multiplicative. If time is a string, does that make space an associative array? Yes, time is a component of the space matrix along with strings V, and D. And they exist in positive, negative, and neutral. So for D^3 you have a matrix of 27 strings. Space is a geometric array of strings. Time is one of the strings; hence space has the quality of time. It also has the qualities of dimension and velocity, the other component strings.

Each dimension of space has certain properties and monopoles, such dimensions are as magnetism, gravity, photonic, and electric as examples. Gravity exists in a dimension of space; hence gravity and space gravity experience bending. Light is also in a dimension of space as the monopole photon, hence photonic space and space experience bending. Space has a quality of time since one of the strings is time. When these strings relate at a higher dimension, their multiplicative effect or property effect generates other properties such as gravity. In the equation D^5 = MC^2 = E; energy is really just a dimension of space on the list of dimensions of space. Yes, energy is dimension 5 in E = MC^2. D^5 is D to the 5th power and also a 5^th dimension of space. And so mass is a manifestation of space in dimension and time; M = D^3 * T^2, where T^2 is density. “Particles" are the interference patterns of space matrix in various dimensions of space. There are no particles per se, but “particle like” effects. Particles are not mass, mass includes everything, strings included. What an observer sees is “particle like”, but somewhat more space matrix components “in interference” as they move or rotate through each other; but actually there are no “particles”, only “particle like” effects. And there are waves that are

And momentum is just a dequeue (dynamically associated array of the space matrix) on the sorted associative array. The matrix or array is in three dimensions. You see the thing about Einstein, and relativity, is that he skimmed one of the equations for strings in E = MC^2. This equation has nothing to do directly with particles and our understanding of physics was backwards. Meaning, the relationship of particle to energy is backwards; dimensions of space interacting causes particles, not particles interacting causes energy. Energy creates particles, and not particles create energy. The universe is analogous to a hologram by such a matrix. When you explode an atomic bomb, you create space. The release of energy is the release of dimensional space. The universe enlarges. The matrix of space expands. Expansion happens at every point. Not just one. Also, gravity has different units and comprehension. The big generator of space gravity is the center of the galaxy and each galaxy. The current understanding of gravity is between 2 objects, but here presented singularly. This new concept is singular. Gravity effect is infinite with its effect decreasing infinitely as well as in a fractal subdivision. E^2 = Gravity; Well the gravitational field of any object "E^2" relating somehow to dimension and gravity is a new paradigm. (MC^2)^2 = Gravity and is a gravitational equation. The field of gravity has monopoles. Every dimension of space has monopoles. The elastic collision of the space matrix and monopoles occurs at the speed of light; space is elastic by association of light to MC^2 and MV^2. A photon is “particle like”, but really a wavelike clump that is “particle like”. Light is merely disturbance in electro-magnetic field. A photon is a monopole on the matrix of space. MC^2 means space is elastic, by association with light. What you see is the photon on the receiving end, like a wave on the shore or a clump of waves-strings. Just as in electric current where electrons don’t travel at the speed of light, photons do not travel at the speed of light, but elastically collide in their matrix to produce an elastic wave at the speed or light or current. No field, no monopole means any space. D^3 space is the field. Photonic current field is a spatial dimension.

Induction of one field of space happens to another field of space three dimensions over. So, if I move my cup, do I induce a field? Induction is the result of rotation at or near the speed of light. Rotational motion at near the speed of light induces; like magnetic and electric induction. Every space dimension induces a third down. All dimensions of space are all connected. Everything is related as in an atom, a multidimensional construct. For one, light needs only magnetic and electric fields and this simple perception is possible due to induction of dimensions close to D^3; because they are 3 dimension higher. A solid block of gold is a dimension of space. Atoms are the relationship of several dimensions of space. The matrix of space slows down as the interference increases of the matrix due to rotation and superposition. That’s why particles are sub light speed since their associative fields are slowing due to special interference patterns. The greater part is space, particles are the fringe. But you see the particles which are the smaller part and your physics is backwards. So, now I’m saying that we live in matrix. Yes, there is no vacuum. You know insects perhaps see radio waves; you see only a few things too and if you saw it all, it would be too much information. The particles are as shadows to the real structure of the space matrix that pervades the whole universe. Particles are the smaller part of the matrix and the analogy of the relation of an electron to the proton and the relative size of the intervening space matrix.

When certain materials get to very low temperatures, electric “current” keeps on going indefinitely with no power source. This is called superconductivity. “Current” has been classified as an elastic collision, although imperfections in the medium can affect the current. An example would be electric current. At certain states where the medium has no obstruction and the temperature is cold or at the right temperature for superconductivity, elastic collisions become perfectly elastic and there is no hindrance to the current once started.

The various dimensions of space have monopoles that collide elastically. Space is a perfectly elastic medium. These dimensions may or may not have obstructive constructs that affect the elasticity of space. The dimensions of space vary dimension per dimension such as photonic, electric, magnetic, gravity, and so on. The elastic collisions of space are called “current”.

Elements such as iron are condensed forms or higher dimensions of space. At temperatures approaching zero Kelvin or lower, some elements exhibit superconductivity. Superconductivity represents perfect elastic space. So outer or deep space (D^3) is both elastic and a superconductor. D^3 or three dimensional space has a temperature of 270 Celsius or -445 Fahrenheit or 2.75 Kelvin. D^3 space is a superconductor and photonic current is an effect of that superconductor.

By the above rules, temperature alters gravitational effect, and the possibility of an elastic collision in the various dimensions of space. Temperature and density affect gravity which is another dimension of space. Temperatures indeed affect gravity as it contributes to the total energy momentum density of space. When the temperature allows a dimension to be perfectly elastic or superconductive, the elastic collisions are infinite if there are no obstructions. The spherical and radial geometries would have the effect of 1/X^2 over the path of transmission, that is why the universe is black.

The conservation of energy through distance is an elastic collision and therefore the medium of the transfer of energy is elastic. All things are made from space, which is a matrix of superstring Velocity (V), Time (T), and Dimension (D). The properties of VT are multiplicative dimension per dimension, and form a periodic table of Dimensional Energy from D^1 to D^23. Everything is mass (particle and space matrix) and when you have motion, the result is a dimension of Energy.

Energy exists in various dimensions. Space is an Elastic medium and superconductor. There are no particles, only particle like effects caused by the supposition and interference patterns of the space matrix.

The monopoles of a matrix of space are particles like photons. When the matrix of space vibrates elastically, you have an electromagnetic wave. Light and its effect are the result of elastic collision. The conservation of energy in the matrix is elastic collision. MV^2 now MC^2 suggests elastic space or the conservation of elastic energy.

Space is a field of superstrings. The collision of the space field creates photonic current. If a crystal can bend light, then it can bend space. Everything we see is a manifestation of energy, even space, the lowest denominator. When you explode an atomic bomb, you create space.

E = MC^2 means mass and motion. The difference between MV and MV^2 conserved is elastic motion. Energy over distance when conserved is possible only in an elastic medium. Light suggests the matrix of space is elastic. E = MC^2 is a superstring equation giving a relationship of elastic space.

In each dimension of space the message carrier is the monopole of that space and the matrix of the space. Together we can refer to both as the space matrix. The transmission of message is by elastic collision of the space matrix, which is known as “current”. Hence dimension per dimension the transmission profile should be the same. And the various forces are indicative of various dimensions.

Each dimension of space matrix (D^n) has different monopoles or force carriers, For D^3 it is the photon which has a spin of 1 hbar. And we would expect the energy in higher dimensions to be greater, and perhaps the spin to be greater. The graviton monopole has a spin of 4 hbar. But the space matrix and monopoles have the quality of transparency. So it is possible for these monopoles to pass through each other as well as the matrix. The interference patterns created by superposition and interference of the space matrix are the creation of particles.

The conservation of energy is the result of an elastic space matrix; this also implies the conservation of mass and charge (spin). The change in the photon is the electromagnetic field, and is also the elastic collision of the space matrix. The photon is a monopole or stationary node in the superstring space matrix. What we see is the vibration of the photon within the matrix, which is elastic and allows elastic motion where energy is conserved. Both mass and spin^2 show conservation of energy in the matrix, and elastic vibration through the matrix. D=VT means that superstrings VT (V and T) are equivalent to D, a multiplicative relationship. In positive, negative and neutral or in relationship to spin, you have 3 more for a total of nine, and for D^3, multiplied by 3 again you have 27. This 27 represents a tetrahedral geometry that is also spherical and radial. Hence space is allowed motion is all directions. The strings are related via rotational motion, hence the qualification of something that exists is that it exhibits rotational motion of elemental parts and relative motion. Motion becomes Energy.

It is conceivable that C + V or C – V is possible for an object if within space that is either contracting or expanding respectively. Hence where there is a high gravity and the tendency is for space to compress, the actual elastic collision of light which is C under general space conditions might be altered to be C + V. The elastic collision of space that produces C can be altered slightly due to the fact that space is both a matrix and superconductor. And this measurement depends on the position of the observer. The speed of light depends on the matrix of elasticity, and how an impulse can be messaged through space. There are exceptions to C.

Every dimension of space has a monopole which defines the nodes of geometric space or the intersection – overlap of the string matrix. The monopoles define regular transitions between strings in each dimension of space according to the nature of that space. A monopole is not a particle, but has a “particle like” effect.

In the multi dimensional universe proposed, dimensions are from 1 to 23 or from what I call the exo-atomic or relativistic world to the sub atomic quantum world. And in such an arrangement of periodicity from one dimension to the next, the smallest building block or construct is the matrix of space dimension per dimension made from geometric space or space matrix consisting of elemental superstrings. Relativity and E=mc^2 is the discovery of a string equation in the exo- atomic world of large bodies.

We have said that each dimension varies to an adjacent dimension by multiplier of strings V and T or VT = D. VT is the multiplier dimension per dimension in an ascending periodic table from D^1 to D^23. The basic components of all dimensions are superstrings V, T, and D in positive, negative, and neutral. In each dimension the multiplication of superstrings are also different properties of that dimension. Strings are the mathematical construct relationship of the universe. E = MC^2 is just one string equation in the whole periodic table of string equations. The difference between E (energy) and F (force) is VT.

Where E = MV^2 and F = MA, let us describe the dimension of F.

Let us suppose that an unknown dimension D^n = MA = MD/T^2 which says that MA is a particular dimension of space.

D^1 = VT is the first dimension of space.

M = D^n *T^2/D and from this follows M = (D^n/d) T^2; which means mass is a certain dimension of space multiplied by T^2 (time squared).

Let us figure out D^n and determine the dimension of Force (F). So force is F = MA = (D^n/d) T^2*A

Density = Mass/D^3 = (D^n/d) T^2/D^3 = D^nT^2/D^4 = Density

D^nT^2/D^4 = Density

D^nT^2 = Density * D^4; by this equation time rate seems proportional to density and without further influences, D^n = D^4

We know that D^n = D^4 = MA

D^5 = MV^2 and applied to the matrix of space D^5 = Mc^2

There are no particles, only particle like effects. The particles we see are the intersection or interference patterns of string space matrix. We can think of the third dimension as a matrix of closely packed spheres of three strings V, T and D in positive, negative, and neutral. This matrix is the dark matter, and the spherical and radial geometry allows motion in all directions. The monopole of the D^3 matrix is the photon. The matrix is also a photonic superconductor.　 Mass includes all strings (dimensions of energy) or space, and interference patterns (particles). The definition of mass is a proportional relationship of volume or D^3 and time rate (T^2).

From above M = (D^n/d) T^2; a certain dimension of space (D^n/d) multiplied by T^2 is mass. Above we solved the unknown dimension for Force so that D^n = D^4 = Force = MA, so

Mass = D^3T^2; Volume and the Rate of Time are inversely proportional, in the same manner that Time and Velocity are inversely proportional in D^1 = VT.

Previously it was stated that time rate (T^2) is proportional to Density. This means that where space has greater density, the time experienced is relatively faster, and where the density is less, time experienced is relatively slower. But when comparing the densities of areas of D^3, the variations are there but not as significant as the density of a higher dimension. So the gravity of a larger planet will slow time more in the space around it perhaps due to the compression of space than would happen by gravity on the adjacent space of a smaller planet. But the ratio should be Density proportional to T^2. With this relationship all the time distortion of stars can be calculated because the density of space has an effect of time. And also in addition mass is made of superstrings that result in T^2.

Gravity has an effect on time. By the equation T^2 = Density we know that the rate of time is proportional to density. This means that the density of the space matrix in a dimension affects the rate of time. Hence by implication the density of gravity effects time since gravity is also a dimension of space and has a relationship to space, and also time is described as a component of mass by such an association. Mass = D^3T^2 redefines mass and describes Time as a component of Mass, and also justifies the influence of the density of space on time, since all mass is both space matrix and particle (interference of the space matrix).So finally in physics you have closure in elementary components to describe all phenomena, which a unified field theory requires, a description of all physical relationships by common denominators, which I will use the word superstrings D, T, and V.

The effect of time rate is related to the density of the gravitational field or the field of space. The relationship is T^2. The magnitude of time from ground to GPS satellite is the same as the difference in magnitude of gravity to satellite by 1/X^2. The effect of magnitude is reciprocal, meaning the magnitude of time increases to the satellite while gravity decreases by a similar magnitude. You get the same number for the difference in time by T^2 = Density as 1/X^2 which is the difference in gravity. By this solution we now can relate time to mass and it would not be possible if gravity had no effect on time. So the rate of Time with Volume, and Mass are interchangeable as Mass an Energy; M=D^3T^2 and T^2 = Density.

The difference in time from the earth to GPS satellite is about 45 microseconds per day or 4.5 X 10^-7. The T^2 for this difference between ground clock and satellite clock time would be near 2.025 x 10^-15. With less density of the space matrix which also includes gravity, less dense space allows time to move faster, while greater density allows time to move slower. Whereas as velocity is inversely proportional to time by D = VT, Gravity is inversely proportional to T^2 in the equation T^2 Gravity = Force D^3 M.

So if T^2 is the difference in time from ground to satellite, then the Density by proportion is different by the same amount; go back to the equation T^2 = Density mentioned before. If you calculate the difference in the force of gravity from center of the Earth to satellite, its decrease is by known ratio 1/X^2 from the distance to the center of the earth. This difference is at a degree of 10^-15 by proportion for gravity considering the orbit of GPS near 26400 km from the center of the earth. Hence, we can see that by ratio, the reduction in gravity is similar to the reduction in the Density and Time of space implied by the equation T^2 = Density. Gravity affects Time due to variation in the density of the space matrix. And for the first time, Mass is explained in components of Time and Volume, which is a necessity to explain the affect of gravity on Time.

Gravity affects Time implied in the equation T^2 = Density. For the first time, mass is described in terms of Time and dimension (D^3 or Volume) in M = D^3T^2; which gets us to D^5=MC^2.

Time is affected by the density of space. Current physics doesn’t explain “why” gravity effects time. By the equation T^2 = Density the Rate of Time is influenced by the density of space which also has a relationship to gravity. And that relationship establishes Mass as derived from components of Time and Volume; M=D^3T^2, otherwise gravity would not affect time as said before.

The gravity equations in this theory are singular. They are not as in Newton between objects but describe “why” gravity is by equations that include subcomponent superstrings. And the relationship of superstrings is purely mathematical. E = MC^2 is a superstring equation. But for gravity, Gravity = E^2. When you consider the gravity of Saturn and the Earth, they are the same by current measurements. But in reality Saturn’s gravity is much greater. Gravity is a three dimensional field; weight and associated force is a one dimensional vector. Gravity has components of line, area, and volume. Gravitational force is not Gravitation as a field of space. Saturn’s Gravity Field is much larger than that of the Earth and so Saturn has many more moons. In the experiment above we compared values between accepted measurements of current experiments and those that are predicted from this theory. By comparison of tested and predicted numbers we have determined the relationship between Time and Space Density that has been proved and relationship to gravity by magnitude and proportion.

Time dilation of the gravitational space matrix about the earth has been calculated and showed that the density of Space and Time dilation and gravitational dilation are all proportional by the equation T^2 = Density; density of space is proportional to gravity and time dilation. So those relationships justify M=D^3T^2 and D^5=MC^2. Time is related to the density of space and density of gravity, which is a dimension of space and so what of it? All things are connected.

The amount of superstrings in a given unit area refers to Density. Density is also a function of a dimension reinterpreted by volume (D^3). The qualities of density can be reveled through the dimensions that exist. Hence:

It is the superstring T that contributes the quality or property of Time. Hence Space with Superstrings V and T have or “experience” those VT properties. Space has properties, an unknown precept for current physics and space is an elastic medium. So Time, being related to Velocity, is really an Anti-Velocity, which means Time Superstring does not exist without reference to Velocity Superstring. So there is a polarity, or Anti-Velocity established in Time. Superstrings exist together and give the quality of Space (D^3), Time, and Velocity. Time, by establishing an inverse or polar relationship to Velocity, in a sense provides resistance to changes in velocity (like inertia). This implies elastic inertia, similar to the elastic motion of a perpetual motion machine. Mass (D^3T^2) is also defined by superstrings in a different order and combination, and mass also includes all strings with associated particles. But in the most basic sense, everything in the universe is a dimension of Time and Velocity or VT or D. D is the basic particle or the God particle.

When an atomic bomb explodes, you create space. You are releasing space compressed in a higher dimension of time and velocity to a lower dimension of same, like a compressed hologram unfolding like an accordion. There are no particles, only particle like effects created by the superposition of space superstrings. Particles are the result of the interference patterns of the space matrix. Space and mass have a ration, and space is created by black holes.

Universe as Perpetual Motion Machine

When 2 people fall in love, things heat up, and when love is lost, things cool down, but then a new window opens with another? And when you die, do you really die, or is there life elsewhere. So our notions about "the end" haunt us even to see it in the universe. I like Jim Morrison’s view. This is the end, my only friend, the end.

Now I’ll pose an idea. Let’s say the universe is made up of 23 equations or parts. And part 1 exists in relation to part 23. And 23 will always be 23, and one will always be 1, since unless this is not so the entire structure is lost. So then there is no end, since 1 reminds 23 who it is, and 23 remind 5 and 8 and 1 what they are and that they belong. The interdependency keeps it moving like a Calder sculpture. Ever seen one? One of those mobiles that keeps moving? The structure exists because all the parts are always there. One keeps the other present and moving, or else the absence of one is a failure of the entire system.

The universe is a perpetual motion machine. I　think of an atom as a perpetual motion machine. The electron moves around and around. This creates gravity; one form of motion translates to another. Does it ever die? I think not. The planet is a machine. The universe is a machine. Life is biological machines defined by a program, the genetic code, and perhaps in that code evolution is programmed, so death is a necessity for the cycle to progress. Hence all machines are progressive cycles that are from simplicity to complexity and vice versa.

The idea of the end speaks more about your humanity than the reality that is.

For the universe to die, motion would have to stop. I see the opposite; our universe is a perpetual motion machine. According to my theory, when 2 galaxies come together, the amount of space is cut in half, density increases, the clock begins again. To assume the death of particles means the space is always the static, but if the space is dynamic, then motion never stops, and temperatures are never flat. Conceptually the experiment has to be with natural machines, not manmade machines. As I said before, dimension 23 exists in balance with dimension 1, dimension 23 is high energy, and dimension 1 is space in 1 dimension. You cannot have one and not the other because one creates or is in balance with the other. And for the two to exist simultaneously in 23 steps means motion never stops, perpetual motion keeps the structure intact, and balanced. The existence of 23 dimensions demands the work of the other 22 dimensions. So when the order of the dimensions is in balance, it demands the imbalance of components such as the compression and contraction of matter and space, and the imbalance created brings entropic inertia which brings those imbalanced components of the order back to its balance and in imbalance once again with the order itself. Hence the function of the universal order is in disequilibrium with the mass/spatial components, and vice versa as a return to equilibrium of the same components, hence a perpetual motion machine, like a pendulum swinging back and forth, where one equilibrium of the order causes an imbalances (disequilibrium of another or mass/space) that brings about inertia and motion to a return equilibrium or mass/space offset by a shift from the order (disequilibrium as before). As a perpetual motion machine, the universe is granted eternal motion and eternal change always in a harmonious and dynamic machine. To explain another way, the universal order represents one state of balance where entropy of that universal order forces the compression of mass/space into disequilibrium with its own entropic inertia. So you have 2 entropic counter movements or multiple movements that shift balance away from equilibrium (of the order) to disequilibrium (of the components) and then back to center or equilibrium. The imbalance between the equilibrium and disequilibrium provides inertia for mass/space to return to equilibrium by entropic principle, and thus counter to the balance progressing by the entropic inertia of the order back from disequilibrium to equilibrium. This is followed by a counter movement once again as in a pendulum or more correctly, the universe as a perpetual motion machine. Order of one component forces disentropy of a second component, and the inertia of disentropy to entropy of the second component, becomes in disequilibrium with the first component and brings the first component back to disentropy which then by inertia moves to entropy. One level of organization in the matrix of space dimensions initiates an entropic inertia to begin another level of order. This vibration of perpetual motion is possible because of the perfect elastic medium of the universal space matrix and related dimensions.

There are in infinite number of dimensions possible, but due to the limitations of energy required for infinite energy, dimension 23 is the black hole which is a limit of natural physics. It is the contention of this theory that the finite is a projection of the infinite. The infinite is represented in a circle or sphere and the first dimension is a point or center of the circle or sphere.

D^Infinity = D^23 * D^N; which means that the boundary of this universe is infinite energy and infinite dimensions, since to the outside is infinity or the part of God beyond the math of our universe. So then the relationship of a trans-dimensional universe to infinity is in the following four concepts:

But what is infinity? It is that which is beyond the infinite of our universe and where God is creation.

All that we see in this universe is created from space, the apparent nothing. This universe is a specific qualification of the infinity of God that is beyond.

This Universe is a particular qualification of Infinity, which is also revealed in mathematics and the equations that represent the construct of dimensions and superstrings. Every “component” has infinite capacity, but then is qualified by other components, and constants represent unity or equilibrium. Hence:

In this equation we find a “definite” component X such as mass divided by or in relation to another component that varies. The limit or qualification of Infinity is in relationship of one component to another by a constant. X and Infinity are bound in relationship together by the relationship to the Constant Zero (Unity). Unity represents equilibrium and represented by a limiting constant. Hence our mathematics and physics represent the nature of the Universe, which is infinite, variable, and a particular manifestation of infinity. And this infinity is found in all of natural phenomenon. And God is an analogy of Creation, and hence qualities of God can be derived by observing creation. The order in the cosmos represents a God of order, which is infinite, both within and without this existence, even as suggested by mathematics.

The universe is an analogy of God. These analogies describe God. Duality, a philosophical construct is very human. The real nature of the universe is multiplicity, infinity, qualification, balance, proportion, and unity. Man has used myth to cope with what isn’t understood, and that was the truth for him in the absence of truth. God is truth and also includes physics. And a small part includes duality. The idea of nothing is a dualism, and if there is nothingness, I think only God knows it. Zero is far from being nothing, it is everything or better still “Unity” and 1 is balance-proportion. Everything that is, is. It's like with "dual nature of light", without dualism, one would say “how would you tell light from darkness”? Without dualism, “how would you tell goodness from bad”? But the real contradiction is that there's no "light" and "darkness", everything is LIGHT which we do not see because of the limiting nature of our eyes, or information; the duality is more about human nature than reality. And the good is everything and evil is deficit in various forms, and you can know both without experience intuitively. But in that also has certain truths about God and our limitations. There's just scale from 0 to Infinity, but somehow because of our human nature we break it into pairs and define a human existence.

Space is Light, since at the smallest scale of the space matrix and of the Universe, the monopole is the photon and to see each one, we would see a sea of light. We see the elastic collision of those points of space at the receiving end of our vision, which filters and distills much information. And so our physics sees the shadows rather than the light and cause our view to be backwards; since particles are the smaller part and the components of space are the larger. Our understanding of Physics is backwards and is based on a fraction of what is measured and seen. As a species our eyes see the smaller part of existence.

Before the Big Bang there was Infinity, and in this Infinity God created the Universe. And in the infinities where God dwells and the infinite number of possibilities that are God, God chose three concepts established through harmony or proportion to capture the whole Universe. These three ideas were:

Balance- Proportion (mathematical relationship or 1 or inertia), were connected to

Infinity (I), and

Unity (0) established;

Three concepts established through Proportion (1).

The three ideas were established in mathematics by 1, 0, and infinity. And as concepts for the universe Superstrings D, T, and V were created as an analogy. And as a structure of superstrings, they formed light at the smallest scale. All of space is light. Our eyes don’t detect the dark space which is exploding in light. So that gives meaning to “let there be light”, the relationship of three (tetrahedral geometry) that pervades the whole of mathematics, philosophy, and the universal structure. And God felt it was good. And the Big Bang was both the creation of this particular qualification of infinity, and also a grand unfolding of the space matrix hologram. So you had the large relationships of mass and space established, along with mathematical harmonies, and the various dimensions or space or energy.

Mass includes all the matrix of space which also includes all particles of the matrix along with the matrix. Hence the matrix has mass. When the matrix along with particles has “motion”, then you have a Dimension of Space or Dimension of Energy. In the relationship of superstrings in the equations or Laws in this periodic table, there appears to be a triad of relationship at the most basic level. This triad combines “quantity” with infinity and a stabilizing constant. Hence this universe is a particular qualification of infinity, defined along with quantity and universal constants. I prefer to call the constant Unity, Infinity is the variable, and quantity is the relative point of observation. Energy (D) = CT means that infinity (T) and Unity (0 or C) are inversely proportional or Infinity (E) is proportional to the sum of Unity and Quantity. The number 1 is the relationship of Polarity and Proportionality (Equilibrium). The relationship of infinity to unity is represented in the number 1. Equilibrium is established by mathematical relationship of the most mysterious questions that math proposes in numbers.

Dimensions increase periodically by VT (multiplied) dimension per dimension, but the additional properties are multiplied to those that remain the same. This property is known as symmetry. Symmetry allows repeating characteristics through the dimensions. For example, density = mass/volume; we can also talk about gravitational density which is E^2 (D^10) / D^3 (Volume). Hence the idea of density is relative to D^3 as it is applied through the dimensions. There are qualities and properties that repeat through the dimensions. You can follow Gravity all the way to E^4, from gravity as energy (D^10), then density (D^7), and then force (D^4). The principle of symmetry says that phenomena appear to act differently in different dimensions. And they are also measured differently in different dimensions

A tachyon is a theoretical particle that travels faster than the speed of light. This theory presents the concept that space matrixes existing in higher dimensions have spin that are higher than the speed of light to D^3 relatively speaking. Hence motion is relatively faster in a higher dimension, but never greater than C in the dimension that you are in. The slight variances above or below C (speed of light) in D^3 are due to the compression and expansion of the space matrix.

Particles have both higher and lower dimension characteristics. Any particle is cause by the interference patterns of the space matrix. When particles are created, the space matrix slows in motion and rotation to sub light speed. The electron is an example. Force carriers are the monopoles related to that dimension of space matrix. When interference of the space matrix occurs in a higher dimension, the interference creates particles, referred to in D^3 as tachyons. So tachyons are a relative twin to particle in another dimension. It is possible that this construction or tachyon also has a three dimensional effect or existence. So we may see a particle that is a three dimensional manifestation of a higher dimensional activity (tachyon), but can never witness the true nature of that particle tachyon unless in the corresponding dimension where it exists.

Do tachyons exist? Yes, and they are in harmony with the construct of the space matrix dimension per dimension, and we can refer to tachyons as particles that exist in other dimensions and have a three dimensional effect, and so are also three dimensional.

When physics evolves to be multidimensional, it may be possible to harness the effects of multi dimensions to facilitate effects in our dimension. This may also be possible via anomalies. Anomalies can be created artificially and capture tachyons for our use.

You do not need the Pythagorean law to derive E= MC^2. The realization of space as both an elastic medium and a matrix refers to the equation E = MV^2. The simple conversion of V^2 to C^2 for the space matrix because it is an elastic medium is a logical derivation. Hence E = MC^2 means space is an elastic medium bound by the speed of light C. However since space is elastic, you can get C-V and C+V relatively depending on the position of the observer and also effects due to the compression and dilation of space. So it is quite possible to experience this phenomenon in satellite communications to distant planets from the earth.

The Pythagorean law cannot be used to define exo-dimension since the properties of exo-dimensions (outside D^3) are multiplicative and not additive. The Pythagorean law can be used to view the dimension you are in, but deriving relationships across dimensions must be multiplicative. Hence this is a major fallacy in string theory. Superstrings form the matrix of space of which all particles are made by the interference patterns of the superstring space matrix. There are no particles per say, only particle like effects. And superstrings are not individual notes or packets, they are interconnected matrixes. The monopoles of these matrixes are message carriers. It may be that spin refers to the dimension the particular particle-matrix refers to and also the force carrier of that relationship. There are more force carriers to be discovered to account for the many dimensions.

As we referred to before, planets and masses seek out areas of balance in higher space densities. This phenomenon also includes particles. Let us review this concept from the subatomic world to the exo-atomic world.

There are no particles, only particle like effects. Particles are cause by the interference patterns of the space matrix. These areas of interference of superstrings are areas of higher density. Hence particles are associated with areas of higher density (Mass and volume) in the fabric of space.

Planets are associated with areas of higher density in the fabric of space. The stars are generators of space. As the stars spin they send waves that extend out and reflect back across the fabric of space. Bands of higher space density accumulate as standing waves and allow areas for planets to orbit in stable areas about the ecliptic. Exceptions occur with smaller bodies and orbits eccentric to the ecliptic that travels through various space densities.

Similarly the solar systems of galaxies are pulled into spirals of higher space density that orbit the center of the galaxies.

Space or Energy or Dimension contracts and advances by proportion to a relationship to infinity. Now where are different types of space? For example gravity is one type of space or energy or dimension. Certain dimensions have a larger size extension than others. For example gravity extends far out into space, to infinity, except the energy decreases with distance from the source. Hence the density of space varies. Other space extensions are photonic, magnetic, electric, so on and so forth. We can detect transitions in the matrix and density of space by planetary behavior. We notice the beyond Neptune, planets in their orbits vary from the ecliptic, are eccentric, and generally look different in behaviors, so I expect that there is a transition in the matrix of space through the orbit of Neptune. Transitions in the magnetic field of the sun and relationship to magnetic fields of the planets also affect the spin and angular position of the magnetic fields of planets. Shifts in the magnetic filed in the Sun may also have a harmonic effect affecting the shift of magnetic fields of planets by inducing complementary relationship and motion. 2012 shift in the Sun’s magnetic field may well induce a shift in the earth’s magnetic field. So as the dimensions of space vary and shift in polarity, this affects similar fields in other planets and relationships in motion that seek a point of equilibrium. Space matrix is not homogeneous. A similar analogy would be that the atmosphere is not homogeneous.

As the dimensions become higher, the energy fields are stronger. At lower dimensions you see fewer dimensional components of the three superstrings D, T, and V in combination. For example mass is M = D^3T^2 and at a higher dimension Gravity = D^10. So as you go up in dimensions, the addition of superstrings and superposition of space increases. Along with this, the binding forces increase. At higher dimensions the kinetic energy increases, and also the energy required bringing these superstrings together. So we can imagine a great unfolding of the various dimensions of space from higher dimension to lower dimensions. I like to use the analogy of the unfolding of space dimension in the explosion of an atomic bomb. In a black hole one would expect one large force combining everything into singularity.

The coupling constant becomes stronger with greater Gravity. E^2 = Gravity = D^10 = EMC^2; and the Strong Force similar to EM and Weak and Gravity as Gravity increases. As the dimensions that bind strings move to higher dimensions, the energy of that dimension approaches steps closer to infinity. Our universe is a qualification of infinity and the higher dimensions are closer to that infinite relationship. The string interaction comes down from infinite Energy (D^23 and beyond) through the lower dimensions (D^N). D is the lowest dimension and the particle from which everything is made. It may be that D has a fractal subdivision of itself, but D represents Unity in contrast to Infinity and the two are balanced within the outer infinity of God.

When discussing particles, we first must establish which dimension they are created in. It may be that spin refers to the dimension of corresponding space matrix superstrings of the particles in question. Particles and antiparticles behave in similar manner. But what are “natural” particles in a dimension is the natural behavior observed without manipulation, and what is occurs as an anomaly in experiment such as antiparticles refers to the existence of possible parallel antiparticle dimensions. The matrix of space has the capacity to induce other dimension by rotation of the matrix, rotation (spin) of the superstrings within the matrix, superposition, and interference.

Dimension refers to the matrix of superstrings, superposition, interference pattern, spin of associated particles, and space matrix topology. Every successive dimension higher has more superstrings, whereby you add VT for each dimension higher is the multiplier. So you have a periodic table of dimensions and properties. Each dimension has its own particles and antiparticles that behave similarly but reflect a mirror extant.

Mass = D^3T^2 means that mass has the properties of Density (density = t^2) and Volume (D^3). Hence mass includes the following:

The dilemma becomes, does space and photons have mass, well yes. However, mass have two areas and they are:

The present “definition of mass” is at fault for the understanding mass. The mass of a photon and the mass associated with particles of sub light speed is that they exist in different dimensions (D^N). So when they are qualified on the same observable dimension (D^N), then there is error. Can the mass of energy be measured? Energy = Space = Dimension; and so the energy of the monopole of space or energy or the photon can be measured. When the Sun burns, it releases energy and loses mass. Rest mass is a hypothetical case for the photon; the error is that photons do not move, but rather they elastically collide. There is a frame where the location of a photon and the observer are at rest, and hence a rest mass of near zero. But the dimension (energy) of the object and the photon are different and do not represent the same reference point. Energy releases is transformed through dimension, and hence the photon released is particle to one reference point and zero to another.

There is transparent mass and particle mass as mentioned before. For particle mass at sub light speed, Mass measures the amount of inertia an object has, with inertia defined as the resistance the object offers to a change in its state of motion. Transparent mass is a different dimension of mass and hence the laws of inertia are different. There is error to qualify that as the same as particle mass. However when calculating the total mass of a system, it includes both masses and the transparent mass is defined as energy. Mass ideally includes both space and particles. Space being energy of the space matrix and photons acting as monopoles of the space matrix can be viewed in current physics with a rest mass of zero. However everything in the matrix has mass if defined in terms of energy that is defined as mass. The minimum mass of an object is rest mass, space has mass and the rest mass or total mass can be defined as their accumulation of the matrix unto a point. Just as grouping photons unto a point will be affected by gravity since the point acquires mass.

The concept of inertia for a photon and a particle should not be viewed in the same manner, and I think that resolves the confusion about the rest mass of a photon zero which it isn’t really, and also the loss of mass when a photon is lost from or released from a system. Anything that has volume or density has mass. The question of a photon is that the density is at near zero and I don’t see it absolutely zero, and also that the "dimension" of that energy is not in the same level as that of a particle. I think the definition of mass and inertia require redefinition.

Energy and mass is everything that includes particles and the space matrix. Everything has motion; even the space matrix has superstrings in motion. Motion is associated with mass when we talk about energy. Space exhibits the qualities of the properties of the superstrings which are Distance, Time, and Velocity.

Particles are never at rest, they are always in motion whether traveling within a system of rotation or a part of larger systems of motion. There always a frame in which the atom is at rest relatively speaking but never in the Universe, and that frame is not the same for a photon which is mass as energy. The superposition of this energy is higher volume and density will be influenced by gravity and become more mass.

If a photon leaves an object, it takes energy away. And if we take energy as conserved, and the photon takes away energy, the resulting atom must have less energy, less mass and less volume. So to prove the loss in volume is to determine the volume of the photon. And thus the photon has mass, although near zero. Volume defines mass since it is a property of mass. So all of space has mass since space has volume, and thus space is the dark mass. The question is to a much smaller degree and also that the photon is a dimension of energy, transparent mass, with volume, as a monopole in the space matrix. But you need to redefine mass, and D^3 T^2 is the definition of mass. To include volume as a legitimate definition and what would you gain by such a redefinition? You would allow a photon to have mass since it occupies space and the ether of space would also have mass, even at rest, however so small, but transparent to higher dimensions of atomic mass at higher level of energy. A photon is energy since it is a component of the space matrix. What would it mean for a photon to have some volume? Specifically what experiment would verify the volume? It would mean the photon has mass, although a different type of mass, energy mass and not subatomic mass which includes energy mass and particles. Well, would angular velocity or spin imply volume? Yes. Would energy imply volume? Yes! An experimental way to measure your definition of volume would be a good next step. An experiment could be the change in energy and volume of a mass. Divide the change in energy by the energy of a photon, and then calculate the number of photons lost. And then by change in volume calculate the volume of a photon by proportion. The steps in the experiment itself suggest a volume for the photon, and hence photon has a property of mass and has mass energy, but very small so that in terms of small systems the rest mass is near zero. However, for large systems such as galaxies, this adds up. And having calculated the volume of a photon, you may be able to calculate the size of superstrings and the total energy of space itself per cubic light year.

When we say a photon has a rest mass of zero, you need to understand the “current” definition of Mass includes solid sub light speed particles, but not energy particles moving at the speed of light. So the definition of mass, when changed to D^3T^2 now allows for mass to exist in both terms of energy and particles by the same basis of volume and rate of time.

In current theory it’s the rest mass of the photon that's mass less; think of it as a photon at 0; unless you give it energy there is no mass as far as the photons mass goes if it doesn’t have momentum, and so it doesn’t have mass or thus the rest mass is 0. However, if the photon has volume it really does have mass and explains why objects losing photons lose mass.

Atomic objects are a frame of atomic mass. Energy in space or photon is a frame of energy mass. I would say an atom at rest will not lose energy unless acted upon; in some manner, internally or externally. An object photon in space is transferring through dimension such as energy coming out of an atomic object into space. Find an article on radioactive decay and if something decays, its being acted upon, that’s what radioactive decay is. It appears obvious that what is decaying is unnatural to its environment and yes energy is changing position so either it’s being acted upon externally, or by its relationship to surrounding environment. Consider something like the sun as it gives off light, so something is going inside the sun that causes photons to be given off so the sun is losing energy. Is the sun losing mass because of that? Yes! If the photons given off are mass less so where's the mass going? So let us redefine and say the sun gives off photons in the form of space since the photons are monopoles of the space matrix. The volume of photons and the supporting geometric matrix is space surrounding the sun. This volume has mass since volume is a property of mass. This energy mass we call energy, so space is a form of energy. Mass is converted into energy or space from fusion. Because mass includes both particles and space. Space and photons have mass by the new definition. Particles have solid mass and photons have energy mass. Mass is of several types. Such as particle mass, and superstring or energy mass but yes a photon is a class that become particle at higher density. The bounds on photon mass are rather strict, add it all up and you have mass, but of course still nonzero by current standards of understanding, zero would be impossible to guarantee. Energy is mass when compressed and exhibits affects from gravity. Since the whole universe has naturally momentum, even space, then all has mass.

There is solid mass and transparent mass; solid mass is sub light. Inertial mass and gravitational mass are pretty much what is currently called 'energy'. But by the new definition here, energy comes in different dimensions and levels of motion (spin). So there are also different levels of inertia since our understanding of inertia is related to motion. Photons have energy so photons have inertial mass. And also they have gravitational mass. If you put enough photons in one place, you'd feel the pull of gravity. Rest mass can be confusing since under current thinking a free photon has no rest mass, but since it has volume, it has an almost zero rest mass, but still it has a Mass. Stick a photon in a box, and the box has rest mass. If you fire a photon out of a gravitational well, the photons will red shift. But the same happens for a real mass too. Likewise if you put a photon in a box and lift it out of a gravitational well, it won't red shift. Same as "real mass” if you heat an object, for example, the particle inside move faster each particle gains relativistic mass but the object as a whole gains rest mass since each particle inside is now heavier. It may be that in this universe, nothing exists in a point observable from this dimension (D^3). So then the matrix of space has volume and mass both in structure and monopoles.

There is the idea that photons travel at the speed of light. This is incorrect. Photons are the monopoles of the space matrix that elastically collide. Hence the argument that at the speed of light photons has zero mass is incorrect. Photons have volume, hence they have mass, and as in this dimension volume is the general rule.

Inertia can be defined as the resistance the object offers to a change in its state of motion. By this rule, there are different ways of viewing inertia in this theory. For example:

Without understanding the variations of dimensional energies and also their effects on inertia, one may be lead to think that both classical and modern ideas of inertia are in conflict, but within this theory, the understanding of inertia is resolved and any conflicts are resolved.

I would classify inertia as motion toward balance of interacting constructs. How this balance is achieved describes the inertia.

The Universe is a particular qualification of infinity or infinite energy. Each dimension of space is a particular construct or dimension of energy. Energy then is a particular construct of superstrings or space matrix (D,T, and V) dimension per dimension. When we speak of Energy as in E=MC^2 we are talking about D^5 superstrings, which is a particular construct of superstring (energy) as D^5=D^3T^2C^2. Here Mass = D^3T^2, which means all volume (D^3) has mass (D^3T^2). Space has volume, has mass, and is energy.

The space surrounding an electric charge is an electric field by its influence and interaction. When the electric field moves it induces a magnetic field, and when the magnetic field changes it induces an electric field.

A charge such as an electric charge is a particular interference pattern in the matrix of space made of superstrings. The “effect” of that charge is infinite as it affects:

The understanding of energy varies in each dimension and its effect is understood differently in other dimensions. For example, Gravity in D^10 is Force in D^4, so is measured differently in different dimensions. Although its effect is infinite by its connection to infinite energy, and its affect are infinite trans-dimensionally.

Through this relationship of trans-dimensions, all points of space are related via inertia or balance to an infinite source and infinite construct. Hence although a charge may be seen as finite, its effect on the construction of trans-dimensional fields of energy is infinite since the source is infinite. There is finite interference alongside infinite effects. We can speak of a finite portion of energy or space matrix, and infinite relationship and transfer of energy trans-dimensionally to an infinite source.

Non-locality or action at a distance is incompatible with Relativity. Speaking about Relativity, an action such as gravity at a distance takes time to accomplish. In this theory this is explained by space being an elastic medium or communicator. So the elastic communication takes time. And what do I think about non-locality and Relativity? Well in non-locality there is a connection between objects that allows them to be affected to what is perceived to be instantaneous; this connection happens regardless of distance. So to resolve this disparity I will say that non-locality depends on your frame of reference. Since space is an elastic field matrix, then the communication is between objects is via the elastic collision of the space matrix. Sub atomically, the fields of space are much tighter and form geometric orbits, and so, there seems to be immediate communication because you are dealing with parts of the same construct, smaller distances, and faster velocities. I doubt anything is instantaneous because volume implies mass and time; time, no matter how small.

All space has mass and everything in space has volume; volume or space means mass. Hence a photon has mass and a photon is part of the structure of space. Photons elastically collide and what you see is on the receiving end of a wave. So photons are not traveling at the speed of light and the abstraction of zero mass does not exist. Space is not an abstraction and characteristic of all Energy and Mass in this universe. Energy is a dimension or construct of superstrings, and particles are their shadows. The type or construct or dimension of Energy is defined by the geometric arrangement of superstrings in that dimension. For example, MV^2 = D^5, which means that energy as we know it is a construct of 5 superstrings D^5. The actually construction is D, T, and V in 5 dimensions in positive negative and neutral can be expressed mathematically by 5 x 3 x 3 = 45 superstrings.

The structure of Space or Energy is symmetrical and acted upon will show the conservation of energy in accordance with the invariance of a Langrangian under time translation. So the most basic structure of space I can imagine is a tetrahedral one of D, T and V superstrings. This expanded into multiple dimensions leads us to spherical, radial, symmetrical, fractal, and tetrahedral geometries that allow for a Cartesian system to be perceived within them. So although space is spherical, radial, and geometric matrix of superstrings, our perception can also impose a Cartesian system within it. Time is a superstring of the matrix of space, hence space has that quality. The same is true for D and V. Energy is defined in various combinations of D, T, and V.

What does invariance of a Langrangrian under time translation mean? This is about conservation of energy. A system should evolve the same if begun at a different time. So the time does not affect the evolution of a system? Yes. Time translation invariance of the action implies energy conservation. Like a pendulum, I start it now or later and it’s the same. So if you take this as true, you get energy conservation.

Noether's theorem derives the conservation of energy from symmetrical systems. If a physical system behaves the same regardless of how it is oriented in space, its Lagrangian is rotationally symmetric. We can say that the matrix of space behaves in this way, and thus space is rotationally symmetric matrix of superstrings. The superstrings are in rotation and their effect is that space behaves the same no matter where you are. Space is an elastic and symmetrical superconductor and the angular momentum of the superstrings is conserved since the motion is symmetric. Symmetrical systems of motion account for the conservation of energy and momentum.

So in cases or systems of conservation of energy, the process is always the same no matter when started. It says that any continuous symmetry of the action results in a conserved quantity. Conserved quantity implies symmetry. So for the conservation of energy, the action or model has to exhibit symmetry, not necessarily continuous, though.

If space is a matrix and waves are transported by elastic collision, the conservation of energy implies a symmetric system. Space behaves the same regardless of it’s or the observers orientation. Its Langrangrian is rotationally symmetric; from this symmetry. From this we have angular momentum conservation. Well, the superstrings in the matrix of space have angular motion. And that matrix is also symmetric when acted on directionally. I define space with symmetric structure. By symmetry of the structure of the matrix of space you have conservation of energy. Space is a symmetric structure, and what more to give credence to the idea than Noehter’s theorem and the ideas brought out about symmetric systems and the conservation of energy. And really this space or energy makes up everything. The symmetry of the structure of geometric space leads us to the conservation of energy, that is also presented by mv^2, and the concept that space is elastic as well as a superconductor.

The symmetry of the action of a system leads to the conservation of energy. The function that summarizes the dynamics of a system is known as a Langrarian. Space behaves the same regardless of its orientation and position, hence space is rotationally symmetric. The matrix of space consists of rotating superstring at the speed of light. The structure is complex, symmetric, tetrahedral, fractal, spherical, radial, and alludes to a Cartesian interpretation as well. The monopoles of this structure are photons, and at such a small scale, the geometric grid seems as a sea of light. But this very structure contains the properties of the superstrings that comprise it, such as D, T, and V. And they are composed in more complex geometric arrangement called higher dimensions that result in other properties such as gravity and other forces and energies. The resultant energies or arrangements are emergent, meaning from basic principle building blocks or primary superstrings, more complex arrangement and properties evolve or develop. The structure of energy is the primary part of all existence while particles as the smaller “shadows” or “interferences”. The symmetrical structure allows for the conservation of energy and momentum. The very things physics measures are attribute properties of the space matrix. Both the system or geometric matrix and the motion therein are symmetric.

The elastic collisions of photons is nearly the same despite differences of place or time in deep space, hence the resultant action (Langrangian) is the same and account for conservation laws of linear momentum and energy. What are the conserved quantities from the observed symmetries of the physical system of symmetric space? The answer is the conservation of Momentum and Energy. What are the Langrangians that describe the conservation of energy in space? Definitely, it is the structure of space or super space and super-symmetry. The smallest space is a tetrahedral arrangement of D, T, and V; a symmetric structure.

Space is transparent because the space exists in a different dimension of energy than the atoms that comprise elements. Lower dimensions of energy pass through higher dimensions of energy.

D^5 = MC^2 means that the construct of energy as we know it is made of 5 primary superstrings D. D is manifest as dimension, however as superstrings combine in higher dimensions, the properties of D change. D^5 is energy E or 5 superstrings of D; a superstring is a part of the structure of Energy. Does it matter about the density of superstrings in space? Yes! In a dimension they are generally the same distance apart, but through different dimensions there is compression, superposition, and fractal relationship. The superstrings that combine to form the various structures for different dimensions of energy D^n are D, T, and V. Space is D^3; D, T, and V x 3 in positive negative and neutral (x3) = 27 superstrings. The structure of superstrings is the structure of space or energy. The nature and properties of a dimension of energy is felt or measured differently in another. For example, Gravity = E^2 = D^10 is measured as force as we know it or experience it.

How do D, T, and V differ?

D = VT; T and V are polar and related via D, and the model is a tetrahedral arrangement of three strings.

Why not two or four strings?

D^5 = MC^2?

Yes. That means space is an elastic superconductor. Photons propagate by elastic collision. The density of space in a dimension is relatively constant and changes through dimensions (such as an atom). There is a slight adjustment due to elasticity that can happen. For example near a large planet or star the speed of like may be C+V or C-V. At the center of the tetrahedral arrangement a photon is formed by overlapping superstring interference. The superstrings rotate. Space is any dimension of superstrings; particles are their shadows or interference patterns. The dimension refers to the configuration of superstrings that form a dimension of space. The symmetry of the space matrix implies the conservation of energy and is confirmed by MV^2.

Our universe is multi-dimensional, but we really don’t experience all the aspects of this multi-dimension. For example, in the third dimension Gravity is experienced as a force from the 10^th dimension, so to approach gravity by scientific observation alone will lead you to the abstraction of Newton’s conception, but not the truth of the mechanisms at work. This reality even plays with the units. The units or one dimension cannot be understood exactly the same from the measurements in another. So then this theory understands the properties of superstrings and the equations reflect the arrangement of superstrings dimension per dimension.

To summarize, multi dimensions affect several things dimension per dimension:

The space of the human existence is transparent to the higher constructions of atomic mass. These relationships are occurring between dimensions, but also have relationship.

In the theory I describe a photon as the monopole of the matrix of space. This particle is made of the superposition and interference of space superstrings, the things that make the matrix of space. The same superstrings combine differently to make space of higher dimension and density in an electron. So to answer your question, the elemental superstrings D, T, and V interact in a higher dimension of space or energy to create the particle electron. Electron has volume and photon has volume, and all volume has mass by the equation Mass = D^3T^2.

The difference between photon and electron is in the geometry of the dimension of space and energy where they exist, the superstrings that compose that dimension, and the interference patterns of the rotating superstrings that result in an electron. The spin of superstrings in different dimensions shows differences in associated particle (interference pattern) spin. These motions are associated with different frequency. But frequency is the effect and not the cause of the difference. Differences in all particles are the composition, superposition, and compression of the matrix of space and an arrangement is a dimension of space or energy.

Emergence and Transcendence

The expansion of the universe is entropic and the contraction disentropic. The balance between these is perpetual motion. The disentropic action includes structures that build up such as mechanisms associated with life; hence life is not an anomaly except for its transcendence or origin (a-priori) from outside this universe. Processes within this universe are emergent or show emergent behavior. Such examples are the evolutionary cycles of galaxies and the development of elements of the periodic chart from simple structure such as hydrogen and helium to the more complex elements. With regard to life there is no emergent behavior that leads to the beginning of life; emergent being processes observable as emergent within creation, from inanimate matter to the beginning of life. Hence it is designed and transcendent. Truths (God) are an analogy of life and universe and sciences will prove this. This universe is an analogy of God. The dependency of things in this universe is an analogy of the dependence of creation to an external source and transcendence of that dependency. Darwin did not define emergent processes that result in the beginning of life. And emergent processes of this universe will not prove the creation of the universe and also the beginning of life, both transcendent principles. However, by our transcendent nature, these truths can be perceived intuitively and described.

There is no difference between discovering science and God, they are the same. And it may seem that I use the word God quite liberally, but God is transcendent as life is, you will no more understand Creation than the beginning of life from emergent processes. Natural processes in this universe are emergent. Life is transcendental. I’m not talking religion, I’m talking science. Religion is historical. You think you have to be religious to understand God, that’s not true, you just have to think; God transcends this universe like your soul in that body of yours. The infinite is qualified here in this experience.

D/T = V means infinity, unity, and balance are expressed in relationship together.

God is that which the universe depends; dependence is a quality of all things, and this universe does not exist and or for itself and that dependency puts creation dependent on something, God.

That infinite beginning has no boundaries. Intuitively I would say that this universe is qualification of infinity and therefore in infinity the argument of beginning or end no longer exists. The wild card is infinity, but here that is controlled or qualified. And you call it science in this reality and here there is a beginning, and time.

We have all had the thought of God, and in that passing of your intuition may the greater truth lay, that transcendental experience.

Realizing that the universe is a particular qualification of infinity, and that in this universe it coexists with balance and unity and also represented in mathematical relationships of 3; the primary tetrahedral structure of the universe; questions as to the clarification of these follow. What are infinity, unity, and balance?

Infinity is expressed as God, the beyond containing this universe from which the creation of this universe proceeds. Many would ask then, what created God, however, that question is meaningless where there is no time in a framed work of infinite constructs. Hence the beginning and the end is really an emergent principle within this universe and not transcendental like infinity from outside the universe. The entire universe is an analogy of God. An experience that is infinity and also an analogy of God is conscious. The intuitive mind is infinite and without bounds, without beginning or end. It is the rational mind guided by emergent principle that particularly defines the conscious experience as limited, but the true source of the conscious mind is the transcendental infinite. And because the infinite is conscious, the infinite is also the infinite conscious of God and our experience shows connection to the same source and may even be a part of it. The whole universe may be a particular manifestation of God’s conscious of which we are participating and share. So the physics or science of truth is also a physics of faith and science can lead us to God as well. The connection to this source of infinite or God is by complete harmony of the conscious and subconscious mind to that source where conscious dwells, God. And hence the vehicle to this may very well be prayer, faith (biblical), meditation (Buddhist), and those things identified by various religions and spiritual groups, saying the same things, but in a different way. All express a harmony to the source and that union can enable just and transcendent events such as miracles, healing, and possibly a spiritual science yet to be discovered. Miracles are transcendent. These different ways whether it is religious or spiritual suggests a different scientific view in each case. All suggests a conscious harmonic connection to the infinite source or God, the conscious from which everything is made; from the infinite of consciousness, to the creation of this universe where that consciousness is qualified and then the transcendental of the infinite into this universe. The source of the universe and all life is in the conscious of God, the infinite; the conscious of life shares the conscious of god, hence intuitively we all have the question about god. Life is transcendental from the infinite matrix source.

To qualify this infinite, the universe has balance represented in the number one from which the perpetual motion of the universe is derived, and also unity or zero, the multiplier of quantity and fractal relationship. The structure of the three suggests a nature of God; conscious, unity, and balance. And these may be reinterpreted as a trinity metaphorically or philosophically as love, truth, and order; and in various forms it means that structure is the emergent rule of this creation and reflecting a nature of the source within the infinite.

Love is God’s conscious from which everything comes. This universe is God conscious. The infinite that God is, is like your mind. Your conscious is shared with God’s.

So is there an equation for God?

Equation is an emergent principle of this creation. God is transcendent. What value is transcendence? ; Infinity. It is that which is not emergent.

Transcendence has its origin outside the universe and here proposes transcendence as a possibility that can only be accessed intuitively. Intuitive concepts are seized through consciousness. Like a yoga, when you are in harmony with God or praying.

Can I prove that?

Yes, because that source created this emergent reality. Measured is an emergent principle. I didn’t say infinite is measurable, Explainable yes. Transcendent rules are different. The infinite conscious is defined in rational thinking of an emergent world. Love is transcendent and also the quality varies according to emergent reality. You think everything can be rationalized on the same playing field, not so. Even this universe, with multiple dimensions, scientific observation only sees a narrow band of dimensions. Gravity in dimension 10 is experienced as force in the fourth dimension, so what is gravity? You will never know by measurement, a great philosophical and scientific lesson here. Even for questions about love and God.

No, everything in the universe is ordered, a perpetual motion machine, it is also "connected to" infinity, chaos is a myth, human knowledge and semantics are full of myths, the early myths were real, like sea monsters, but today we still have logical and semantic myths, duality is a myth, it has its place sometimes; chaos and nothing are myths. I’m saying everything is consciousness and in this creation it has order; a particular order, and there is no chaos. As Einstein said, “God does no play dice with the universe”. The problem with current science is that the “math concepts” to current understanding are approximate abstractions, not really representing the true reality. For example, Newton’s gravity equations are observational and abstract approximations, where concepts of radius are included in gravity equations, but the true equations are about volume. Everything that has volume has mass, so photons have mass. Space has mass.

Infinity is consciousness like your mind and those things that are a part of it such as love. If infinity didn't exist, then we wouldn't have a consciousness. Everything is consciousness and always was. Beginning or end is an emergent rule only of this machine universe. You are transcendent since that is the rule of life. You are not here, only looking in, but you are everywhere, you body is your window into an emergent experience. God created this universe and said it was good.

Perfect. But you get all these questions like science and God are separate, who created God; mixing emergent and transcendent truths, that’s chaotic. We assume that a mathematical abstraction represents true science, not true; we observe from a point and the reality changes as we move through it. There is much to know and revise. When we can say about our science that it is exact, we will know that science leads us to God, but we are already there, because out conscious is infinite, our intuition speaks to us about the infinite, while our rational mind argues the difference, because its from a point and the point doesn’t know that reality changes through the creation. So you get approximations and myths.

There are no determinate processes that result in the beginning of life, life is transcendental. God created the universe, and then created the life in it. There’s no determinate process that we know of that directly results in creation of life. So there were 2 big bangs, the creation of the universe and the creation of life. God created life by imagining it as he did the universe. Just as yoga. You can see God and move mountains when you realize that your conscious is infinite. You see, a human or scientific observation only measures a very narrow band of reality or dimensions. Reality changes as you move through its dimensions of energy. You can call them fields for simplicity.

So those equations of Newton are scientific abstractions and approximations. Gravity in dimension 10 appears as force in dimension 4. Newton’s gravitational equations are inaccurate to describe the true nature of gravity, it shows but one effect. Hence science limited in its observation to a narrow band of dimension defines more the effects than the causes of physical interactions. Science needs a broader view; a unified theory will do that. And such a theory will ridge to a complete view of the true nature of physics and what properties are induced by a Trans-dimensional relationship. D^5=mc^2, density = T^2, Mass = D^3T^2 are equations that describe the true nature of physical relationships as we move through dimensions or reality of this universe. Where we live and measure via scientific observation will always possess an abstracted view from the source. Myths need to be dispelled such as a photon not having mass. Some dimensions are transparent to others, and hence hidden, even the mass. All volume has mass and a photon has volume has mass. What does that do to the concept of rest mass for a photon? There is no such thing. Major revisions of the myths are required. A photon has no mass, there is no god, and concepts like chaos and nothing are myths.

So many errors and myths exist in science, language, logical structures, and cultures. This theory is the key to uniting relativity and quantum and in that theory is also a metaphysical proof of God, without referring to scripture and it also suggests a future for physics that is far more fantastic than you ever imagined.

The idea that this reality is conscious is major, but there are rules, there is no chaos, another myth. The only chaos is when science mixes emergent principles with transcendent ones and when science comes to an understanding of a universe via the perception of one or 2 dimensions when there are multiple; the rules change through reality. So the idea that the supercollider is going to understand the universe via an experiment in one dimension is false. Only the intuitive mind making a quantum leap can understand the reality of a universe born from a transcendent structure. Science can go only so far with experiment grounded in what’s in front of you to construct a unified model. Models of multiple realities require a mind that assumes things change and are related by truths that are experienced differently depending on where you where you are; an intuitive approach. We experience gravity as force, but gravity exists in another dimension. Experiment from a narrow band of dimension and the results do not project to realities beyond and so many proposed models are wrong. And Newton’s equation for gravity is the shadow of the truth, just like a particle is the shadow of the matrix of space. You see only a percent of the whole reality. Your eyes don’t realize that space has a structure and that there it is a structure of photons which you only see when excited. The universe is a sea of light and only God sees that, you see darkness and the shadow particles. And say, well, I understand the universe, the first big band was when this universe was created in the conscious of gods mind and then he had another with the creation of life. Life is not an emergent principle like the evolution of matter from simple to complex. There are no emergent processes we can identify now that lead to the beginning of life, and so Darwin is wrong with regard to evolution being natural in its origin, everything shows dependence, even this reality to a transcendental source. When you pass away you will rejoin that source and it is prequalified again in another reality and all this physics will mean nothing. What you take with you is your character or conscious, and the idea that the infinite conscious is truth, love, and God. But in your quest to know truth, even in science, it will lead you to God once all the myths are dispelled.

In ancient times myths were sea monsters; today they are logical structures that are incorrect and outdated semantics. There is transcendental experience and emergent experience. Energy is only one qualification of infinity. This universe has access to infinity. Infinity is conscious; God’s mind is qualified in this creation. He is here. This universe is an analogy of God. Your mind is infinite, but qualified by determinate experience. That infinite conscious is shared with god and transcends this universe. Infinity and conscious are the same and God.

Every dimension of energy is referenced to a different spin of the monopoles of the space matrix associated with that dimension. Hence to say that an effect of a physical property or performance has to do with spin is partly correct, since objects having properties of different dimensions interact a certain way, and when these are altered or forced to relate in unnatural or different ways, they will cause associated effects or induced anomalies. So the effects can be said to be related to spin or changes in the relationship of spin, or altering the effect of adjacent fileds of energy or dimension. The issue with respect to gravity and its effect on attraction or antigravity has many inroads. And I suspect in a situation where antigravity is induced strongly or slightly, in some way positive flow is being induced, a reverse in polarity from the natural gravitational field. We also must consider other fields that are also present when experimenting on the earth since the earth has a magnetic field. Hence an experiment that produces a powerful effect rather than a weak one would be more conclusive. The Boyd bushman experiment requires further investigation, but appears encouraging.

From the proposition of this theory, is appears that the fabric of space is directly related to mass, therefore suggest that mass generates space and vice-versa. It is possible that the larger planets and galaxy centers are larger generators of space and photons are actually elastic collisions of the D particle space matrix. It could also mean that space varies as mountains or valleys depending on the capacity of the generators. Space travel via energy fields that disguise spacecraft in other dimensions might be shortcuts through space limited by factor C in all dimensions, but changing by a factor C relative from one dimension to the next higher dimension. So in dimension 4 (D^4) we are at C^2.

All dimensions exist in stability, and hence their effects are experienced as naturally occurring events. By the principle of induction this theory maintains that subatomic forces (higher dimensions of greater energy) generate exoatomic realities (such as mass) or lower dimensions of less energy. This also supports the concept of entropy or　energy moving from a high state to low state and back, and I believe there is a point of equilibrium by which the higher dimensions limit expansion of the lower dimensions by some kind of proportion or perpetual motion equilibrium. Perhaps there is a limit to motion by a proportional equilibrium. So space expands with the explosion of stars, and contracts with the collapse of stars and galaxies. Space is an elastic matrix that exists in proportion to trans-dimensional energies, and there is a definite proportion to mass. One does not exist without proportion to the other.

By having these three concepts working together, you have a trans-dimensional unified field theory which is the unification of physics and the unified field theory searched for.

The construction of space is an idea that results in reality. The order itself is the thing that results in being. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The answer is there is no chicken and no egg, but an idea.

Everything in this universe is moving and nothing is static. This is also true for Time and for Dimension. That's the beauty of the whole the universe; the relationships of a unified field bring everything into being. The structure or order of relationship of the unified field concept brings everything into existence. When God created, he did not create time, and then matter, but the entire structure as one statement. And each part of the order or statement depends on the other related parts for its existence, or more profoundly, the order or idea comes before and brings about the particles we see. The results can be observed, explained, and measured.

The process of manifestation is like an idea for humans, but for God this is creation or creative in the real sense. And with 23 dimensions, the big band is like unfolding a newspaper or tan gram. Dimension 23 unfolds to dimension 1 in equilibrium via other dimensions. Perhaps the Big Bang sets the motion in place. The differentiation is in the order that precedes the bang and what really moves it.

Yes, motion of space and time produces matter. And the differential variations of these such as time, dimensions, and velocities in 23 dimensions produce all the particles we see, and the order that defines 23　dimensions existed at the moment of the Big Bang caused the initial movement to what we see today. So there are　ratios in these equations that demand a distribution of mass, time, velocity, and whatever else there is, but that all these are also interchangeable.

When we think of matter, we think of different kinds like gold, oxygen, electrons. Now come down the food chain, and let’s say when we think of space, we think of different kinds such as matter, velocity, gravity, and so on, and so you see, its depends on the configuration. You haven't grasped what a unified field theory really means until you realize it means anything is equivalent to everything else by some equation. What did John Lennon say in a song? I as he you as me and we are all here together? The properties of one dimension are not the same as the properties in another.

A theory is a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas which are suggested to explain a fact or event or, more generally, an opinion or explanation. My theory proposes that a unified theory needs to incorporate laws that cover the vast spectrum of topics or issues and somehow recommend a discourse or answer to questions. That is scientific. I find the approach liberating since it is an attempt at a synergy. I am not convinced that an approach by small steps will achieve the goal, so an intuitive leap is required so that a large spectrum of possibilities is enabled from the start.