GISRDC

GIS Research &

   Development Consultants

       

            Contact Us:  gis_rdc@earthlink.net                    

 

(877) 221-6684 (toll-free)

(215) 243-8246  - fax

 

 

6501 Woodlake Dr.

Richfield, MN 55423

 

 

341 Jamaica Way

Niceville, FL  32578

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Firm Background, History and Experience

 

GISRDC is a consulting firm dedicated to developing cost-effective ways of bringing GIS to local government for improved decision making.  Cities and counties are our primary clients.

 

In 1987, Dr. Linda Tomaselli founded GISRDC under the name, Tomaselli and Associates.  A substantial grant from the National Science Foundation's Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, provided support for a new approach of using GIS for Fiscal Impact Analysis.

 

In 1994, the firm was supported by the University of Wisconsin at River Falls, under the Rural Development Institute's Small Business Incubator program, and the name GIS Research and Development Center was adopted.  The company held many workshops and seminars to train over 300 state and local government staff between 1994 and 1998. 

 

By 1997, the firm had become a recognized leader and innovator in County GIS development.  The name “GISRDC” has not changed, but it now stands for GIS Research and Development Consultants.  

 

GISRDC has a staff of 4 (2 professional), plus other professionals with which we subcontract.

 

 

Clients and Projects

 

Our  major clients are listed below.  Click on each of them to see a more detailed dscription of each project:

 

*  Wabasha County, MN

Þ    GIS Pilot Project

Þ    1992 DOQ Image Conversion to County Coordinates

Þ    DRG’s

Þ    Contours

Þ    PLSS

Þ    Parcels

Þ    Soils

Þ    Hydrography

Þ    Roads

Þ    Structures

Þ    Rural Addressing

Þ    Data Organization

Þ    2002 FSA Photography Conversion and Compression

Þ    Metadata

*  City of Lake City, MN

Þ    GIS Needs Analysis

*  McLeod County. MN

Þ         Ditch Map Inventory and Database

Þ         Rural Addressing

Þ         1992 DOQ Image Conversion to County Coordinates

Þ         Parcel Mapping Pilot Project

Þ         Public Land Survey System (PLSS)

Þ          Interim Parcel Mapping

Þ         Half-Section Parcel Mapping

Þ         1996 DOQ Update from NAPP Photography

Þ         Image File Compression

Þ         GIS Data Organization

Þ          Snow Plow Routing Model, Phase I

Þ         Snow Plow Routing II, ArcView Update Application

Þ         GIS Database Maintenance Plan

Þ         Metadata and Metadata Search Tool

*  Wright County, MN

Þ    1996 DOQ Update from NAPP Photography

*  City of Fond du Lac, WI

Þ    E911 Address Database Development

*  Green Lake County, WI

Þ    Sheriff’s Department Address Map Image Lookup System

*  River Falls Township, WI

Þ    Parcels and Soils Mapping and Database Development

*  Clifton Township, WI

Þ    Parcels and Soils Mapping and Database Development

*  National Science Foundation, Washington, DC

Þ    Using GIS To Evaluate the Fiscal Impact of Land Development

*  University of Wisconsin, River Falls, Rural Development Institute

Þ    Introduction to GIS and PC ArcInfo Workshop

Þ    Intermediate PC ArcInfo Workshop

Þ    Advanced PC ArcInfo Workshop

Þ    Introduction to ArcView Workshop

Þ    What is GIS? GIS for Managers and Decisionmakers

 

 

 

**********************************************************************

           

Wabasha County GIS Database Development (1996 to present)

 

GISRDC has been the consultant to Wabasha County since 1995.  During that time, we have been involved in several projects, listed below in chronological order.

 

 Wabasha County GIS Database Development Pilot Project

Keywords: Database, Pilot Project, database development

 

We developed several GIS layers for a pilot project area (Oakwood Township) to demonstrate the capabilities of GIS to the county staff and County Board of Commissioners.  These included: DOQ’s, DRG’s, contours (digitized from DRG’s), soils (digitized from soil maps), parcels, right-of-way, railroads, hydrography, NWI, and rural addressing.

 

Wabasha County 1992 DOQ Image Conversion to County Coordinates

Keywords: Images, hardware performance, “heads-up” digitizing

 

We converted the 1992 Digital Orthophoto Quad (DOQ’s) images to county coordinates by rotation and projection.  At the time (1996), prevailing hardware and software was such that each image took 30 seconds to redraw on the screen.  Since the objective was to be able to use the DOQ’s with “heads-up” digitizing , we had to develop a method to deal with this video performance issue.  The solution included splitting them into 16 smaller tiles and converting them to 16 levels of gray.  Redrawing time was reduced from 30 seconds to 1 second. Image catalogs were created for each township and city.

 

Wabasha County Digital Raster Graphics (DRG) Image files  

Keywords: Images, data conversion

 

We converted the DRG’s to county coordinates.

 

Wabasha County Contours

Keywords: data conversion, raster to vector, database, “heads-up” digitizing

 

We digitized the contours for the county, resolving many problem areas with discontinuous contours, to form complete contour lines.  We processed the DRG’s with EPPL7 to convert the rasters to vectors, and then edited the resulting file with the DRG in the background. A database was also prepared.

 

Wabasha County PLSS

Keywords: database, “heads-up” digitizing

 

We created a PLSS layers using available section corner information from MnDOT, and the DOQ’s.  This is a set of files that originate from a quarter-quarter section point file.  The points are used to generate quarter-quarter lines, and the lines are used to generate quarter-quarter polygons. The databases for each define the township, range, section, quarter and quarter-quarter section relevant to each. From this set, other files have been generated by dissolving the polygons or selecting from the line and point files: quarter-sections, sections, half-sections, and PLS townships. The quarter-quarter section polygon file forms the base framework for parcel mapping.

 

Wabasha County Parcels

Keywords: scanning and georeferencing, database, “heads-up” digitizing, quality control.

 

We digitized parcels on a township basis by scanning and georeferencing source maps provided by the County, and then digitizing the parcels by splitting and combining polygons in a copy of the PLSS quarter-quarter file (above).  Digitizing was done “heads-up” using the DOQ’s, the PLSS files, and the scanned source maps.  PIN numbers were added, parcels were joined to the Tax List to develop the database, and quality control measures were used to check the map.  Exceptions were corrected to the degree possible, and the remainder was reported to the County for additional research and resolution.  We also have prepared parcel maps for the three largest cities: Lake City, Kellogg and Wabasha.  This project is still in process: 8 townships are completed, one is in process, and 8 more remain. 

 

Wabasha County Soils

Keywords: scanning, raster to vector conversion, database development, topological analysis

 

We digitized the soil maps by scanning black and white soil maps by section, and converted the rasters to vectors using the EPPL7 software and topological analysis techniques.  The vectors were converted to DXF files, and then edited, transformed to county coordinates and edgematched.  Soil codes and attributes were also added, including the CER value for assessing cropland.

 

Wabasha County Hydrography 

Keywords: Images, “heads-up” digitizing

 

We corrected the TIGER hydrography file to the DOQ Images.

 

Wabasha County Roads

Keywords: Images, “heads-up” digitizing

 

We corrected the TIGER roads file to the DOQ Images.  We have also used the centerlines, created by another consultant using GPS technology, for the Rural Addressing Project (described below).

 

Wabasha County Structures 

Keywords: Images, “heads-up” digitizing

 

We digitized structures and driveways based on the features visible on the DOQ Images. 

 

Wabasha County Rural Addressing 

Keywords: Pilot Project,  modeling, database development, scanning and georectification, images, “heads-up” digitizing, ArcView Avenue Scripts, User Application, OCR, data parsing

 

We are currently conducting the Rural Addressing project for the County.  The base files for the project are a centerline file and driveway point file created with GPS.  We have successfully completed a Pilot Project, named all of the roads. 

 

We developed and implemented a model to create a Master Address Point database file based on an address grid that has been adapted to a county with many non-rectilinear road features, due to the county’s topography.  All possible address points have been created using ArcView Avenue scripts adapted from a downloaded ESRI script to add points along a line at specified intervals.  There are over 700,000 points, each with an address, none of which are duplicates. 

 

We are currently in the process of developing an User Application for assigning new addresses.  This set of points will make it very easy to assign new addresses, because the user will simply have to find the nearest point with the correct parity.  Unfortunately, the GPS contractor did not capture the fire numbers with the driveway points. 

 

The Sheriff’s Department cannot download a copy of its E911 Database, for data privacy reasons. Therefore, we had to create the database by scanning hard copy output from the system (over 500 pages), and then using OCR software to convert the image to text.  Using data parsing and standardization techniques, we have been able to separate the text into usable data fields, to create an E911 database.

 

At present, we are in the process of matching the old fire number maps that have been scanned and georeferenced , to the E911 database,  and the GPS point file. The next step will be to match the records to the telephone companies’ databases to complete the new rural addressing database and converting from the old fire number system to the new addressing system.  When that has been accomplished, we can link the old addresses to the new addresses, and complete the project.

 

Wabasha County GIS Data Organization 

Keywords: Data Organization, training

 

We are currently reorganizing all of Wabasha’s GIS data into a formal, non-redundant, and permanent data structure.  When complete, we will deliver it to the County, and train the newly-hired GIS coordinator. 

 

Wabasha County 2002 FSA Photo Conversion to County Coordinates

In 2003, we processed the 2002 Color FSA Photography to achieve the following objectives:

Þ    Create township Images by Mosaic-ing and clipping.

Þ    Convert to County Coordainates

Þ    Tile into six 50 MB sections for compression with MrSID

Þ    Also, compressed township images with the ECW File Compressor.

Each uncompressed township image is about 300 MB, and each ECW compressed image is about 5MB.

 

Wabasha County Metadata Grant, Preparation and Search Tool

 

In 2003, we assisted Wabasha County in developing a successful grant application to the federal government’s “Don’t Duck Metadata” grant program.  As of September, 2003. we are in the process of preparing the Metadata and a user-friendly metadata search tool.

 

**********************************************************************

 

Lake City GIS Needs Analysis and Plan (2001)

Keywords: Needs Analysis, User Group Meetings, training

 

We conducted a GIS Needs analysis for the City of Lake City, which included and training session on “What is GIS?”, departmental meetings, a data inventory, a needs and applications matrix, setting objective measures to establish priorities, and a final implementation plan.

 

**********************************************************************

 

McLeod County GIS Database Development (1997 to present)

 

Dr. Tomaselli has been the GIS consultant to McLeod County since 1997, first while at OSM and Associates, and then since 1999 as the owner of GISRDC.  The McLeod County work has encompassed several projects over the years, which are listed below in chronological order.

 

McLeod County Ditch Map Inventory and Database

Keywords: database development, scanning and georeferencing, images, “heads-up” digitizing, data conversion.

 

While at OSM, Dr. Tomaselli designed and implemented a Ditch Map Inventory and Database project that used GIS as the organizing tool.  It involved scanning and georeferencing nearly 100 ditch maps and digitizing a ditch map and an ditch watershed map. Databases for both were also developed. for the ditches were corrected to the ditch features visible on the DOQ’s.  The County Board and staff members were able to see the value of GIS technology. The project was originally produced in the UTM coordinate system, but was subsequently converted to the County Coordinate system by GISRDC in 2000.

 

McLeod County Rural Addressing

Keywords:  database development, scanning and georeferencing, images, “heads-up” digitizing, data conversion, quality control, standardization.

 

While at OSM, Dr. Tomaselli designed a project to digitize the hand-drawn rural address maps showing address points. The old maps were scanned and georeferenced.  The address points were corrected to the visible structures on the DOQ images, using “heads- up”  digitizing..  A TIGER centerline file was corrected to the DOQ’s as well, and the database was expanded to include address ranges, EMS, and other attributes. The project was implemented by others, however.  Under a subsequent GISRDC project, a quality control check of the database file was done, database errors were flagged, and street names were standardized.

 

McLeod County 1992 DOQ Image Conversion to County Coordinates

Keywords: Images, data conversion

 

This was done in conjunction with the Sheriff’s project, so that the Sheriff’s project would be in County Coordinates. See the description under Wabasha County.

 

McLeod County Parcel Mapping Pilot Project

Keywords: pilot project

 

While at OSM, Dr. Tomaselli designed and conducted a parcel mapping pilot project.  McLeod County decided to implement parcel mapping county-wide.

 

McLeod County Public Land Survey System (PLSS)

Keywords: database, “heads-up” digitizing

 

A set of PLS files and databases was developed, similar to Wabasha County’s, except that some GPS points were available for some section corners. (See Wabasha County description).  A GPS point database was also developed.

 

McLeod County Interim Parcel Mapping

Keywords: scanning and georeferencing, images, “heads-up” digitizing, database development, quality control, COGO, Avenue Programming.

 

 In 1999, McLeod County contracted with GISRDC to conduct the “interim” parcel mapping project to provide a moderately accurate parcel layer for GIS to be used until more accurate maps could be prepared with COGO. 

 

This project was very similar to the Wabasha County project, and involved preparing a PLSS layer, scanning, georeferencing and digitizing reference maps with the DOQ’s in the background, joining the map with the Tax List to create a parcel database, and reporting exceptions and mis-matches back to the County.  One township was prepared with COGO, but the approach was abandoned because the cost was too great and because GISRDC felt that this would be better done by an Engineering Technician, supervised by the County Surveyor. 

 

This project is still in process with 10 of 14 townships completed.

 

In conjunction with the parcel mapping project, we developed and Parcel Query Lookup System.

 

McLeod County Half Section Parcel Mapping

 

The Interim Parcel Mapping project also included preparing half-section maps in a PDF format, the process for which has been automated with Avenue Programming.  Preparing the maps meant that we had to show right-of-way and government lots.  A right-of-way was created by buffering centerlines or digitizing roadway plats. Scanning, georeferencing and digitizing photocopies of the original government lot map drawings produced a government lot layer. This project is still in process with 10 of 14 townships completed.

 

McLeod County 1996 DOQ Update from NAPP Photography

 

Keywords: scanning and georectification, images, quality control, clipping, mosaic, EPPL programming.

 

After successfully producing 1996-98 DOQ’s for Wright County (see below), a similar project was undertaken for McLeod.

 

McLeod County Image File Compression

Keywords: images, data compression, hardware performance

 

In 2000, all of the image files were compressed with the free ECW file compression program, which greatly improved the performance of ArcView.

 

McLeod County GIS Data Organization

Keywords: data organization

 

Until 2001, there was no one at the County assigned with the responsibility for applying GIS.  The GIS files were simply delivered to the County.  However, with the hiring of a GIS Coordinator, the data needed to be organized and installed on the County’s file server.  Rowekamp and Associates recommended a file structure, but GISRDC implemented the structure because we had the most direct knowledge of the file content.

 

McLeod County Snow Plow Routing Model, Phase I

Keywords: Modeling, routing, analysis, scanning and georeferencing

 

 In 2001, GISRDC conducted Phase 1 of a Snow Plow Route Modeling project.  We developed a routing base file as an extract of the centerline file, including attributes necessary for replicating the time delays for snow plowing, including the length, number of lanes, type of pavement, number of intersections, number of mailboxes and deadheading. 

 

The county has 14 plowing vehicles: 10 trucks and 4 motor graders.  Each vehicle has a paved route and a gravel route, with the paved route portion plowed first.  The operator returns to the shop after the paved route, takes a break and then plows the gravel portion.  In effect, there are 28 routes.

 

Each plow operator prepared 2 hand-drawn maps showing the path that they take from the start to the finish of the paved and gravel portions.  Route maps were scanned and georeferenced, and individual route maps were created for each route, in route sequence order, using PC ArcInfo 3.5.2 Network’s Route command. 

 

The total plow times and speeds were calibrated using the reported speeds and route times reported by the operators, and also taking into account the type of vehicle and drifting conditions in some parts of the County.  The final report showed the length and average speed of each route, along with color coded maps showing the elapsed time for the vehicle to plow each segment in both directions.

 

McLeod County Snow Plow Routing II,

ArcView Application Development

Keywords: Modeling, routing, analysis, User Application, Avenue Programming, training, documentation

 

 In 2002, at the request of County staff, GISRDC adapted the snowplow project so that it could be modified and updated by local staff using ArcView.  The Network Analyst extension was tested, but found to not be particularly helpful.  The ArcView Snow Plow Routing Application included customized tools to modify existing routes or even create new routes from scratch. 

 

The snow plow base file was modified to include both directions of travel.  This permits possible one-way plowing or deadheading as well. The tools contain safeguards to prevent any of the following: a road segment being plowed by more than one vehicle, being plowed twice by the same vehicle, gaps in the path (not being plowed at all), a paved segment from being plowed within a gravel route (and vice-versa), a city street or state/US highway from being plowed by a county plow (although the plow could use them for deadheading).  When a segment is swapped between two adjacent routes, the vehicle type is updated, since it makes a big difference in plow time whether a truck or a motor grader is plowing it.   When a route is changed, the user must also modify the route path to include the changes. 

 

The final result is a color coded map for each route showing the elapsed time, as well as a summary table of the entire route system.  This application was very complex because of the complexities of snow plow routing, but it has been tested extensively and could be used in other counties with a properly prepared set of base files.    User training and documentation was also prepared.

 

McLeod County GIS Database Maintenance Plan

Keywords: Data User Meetings, data quality control, user applications and specifications, images, COGO, Needs Analysis

 

 In 2001, the County Board decided that before new GIS layers were to be developed, a plan must be developed for maintaining the GIS System.  Data user meetings were held, and the following issues were addressed: how the data is used, how update information is received and processed, data quality, data needs, and potential applications.  In November, 2002, the plan was completed, and included a comprehensive analysis and recommendations as to what was needed to improve, update and maintain the major GIS projects: ditch mapping, address and centerline mapping, and the Interim Parcel Maps.  Data quality was assessed and specific improvement needs were identified.   Update applications and specifications were identified.  It also contained recommendations for how to proceed with developing a high accuracy parcel mapping project, using COGO.  The plan also recommends creating a new “DOQ” Image layer from 2002 FSA digital photos, which was successfully demonstrated by a pilot project conducted in conjunction with the plan.

 

McLeod County Metadata and Metadata Search Tool

Keywords: metadata, HTML

 

 In 2003, a complete set of metadata was completed for 113 data sets or data set categories.  The metadata was prepared using the State of Minnesota’s DataLogR software from the Land Management Information Center (LMIC).  In addition, a Metadata Search Tool was developed to help users to quickly view abbreviated versions of the Metadata by using the geographic entity and theme keywords. This was done by creating an HTML document with hyperlinks.

 

**********************************************************************

 

Wright County 1996-98 Digital Photo Image Update

Keywords: Images, scanning and georectification, clipping mosaic, hardware performance, EPPL7 programming, ArcView Extensions, Metadata

 

In 2000, GISRDC contracted with Wright County to try something new: create new “DOQ”-like photos from NAPP photography.  The new photos were created in the Wright county coordinate system. 

 

The photos from USGS ranged in date from 1996 to 1998.  Film positives were purchased from USGS, scanned with a high-resolution scanner, and then georectified to the 1992 DOQ’s and to the County’s high accuracy parcel and centerline maps (created with COGO).  The photos were georectified using EPPL7 and the ArcView extension created by Tim Loesch of MnDNR.  Eight control points per photo were used to “rubbersheet” it to match ground control points from the centerline and/or parcel file. 

 

Approximately 120 photos were involved.  Using quality control measures, the photos are equal to or better than the 1992 DOQ’s in terms of spatial accuracy.  The measure was that the photos had to match the centerline and/or parcel file, and that at the edges roads would match with not more than a 15 foot offset.  The best portion of each photo covering a township was clipped and the resulting photos were mosaicked into a township-wide photo. 

 

Wright County was also concerned with the video performance issues.  We created mini-doq’s, and reduced the levels of gray to 16, as we did with Wabasha and McLeod.  Each township photo was split into a 10 by 10 matrix, resulting in 100 “mini-doq’s” per township.  Image catalogs were created for each township to facilitate and simplify user access to the data.  Metadata was also prepared.

 

**********************************************************************

 

Fond Du Lac, WI – Police Department E-911 Address Database Development, 1995-1996

Keywords: database development, standardization.

 

The purpose of this project was to allow the city of Fond du Lac’s Police Department to map police call incidents using address points rather than points that were interpolated from address ranges.   In this project, we created an address point database from the parcel file.  The parcel addresses were matched to the addresses in the 911 file.  This included standardization of street names. 

 

**********************************************************************

 

Green Lake County, WI  - Sheriff's Address Map Image Lookup System, 1995

Keywords: Images, database development, “hotlink”, geocoding

 

The purpose of this project was to allow the Sheriff’s Department to enter an incident address and zoom to the appropriate section of the county address map on which the address point is located, using ArcView’s geocoding and “hotlinking” capabilities.  This was accomplished by scanning the address map that was tiled into page-sized images.  A database of road names, address ranges and map sheet numbers, and path names to the image files was developed to facilitate  address look-up and opening the hotlinked images.

 

**********************************************************************

 

River Falls Township - Parcel and Soils Mapping, and Database Development, 1994-1995

Keywords: database development, data conversion

 

See soil and parcel mapping projects for Wabasha and McLeod Counties.

 

**********************************************************************

 

 

Clifton Township - Parcel and Soils Mapping, and Database Development, 1992-1993

Keywords: database development, data conversion

 

See soil and parcel mapping projects for Wabasha and McLeod Counties.

 

**********************************************************************

 

National Science Foundation - Using GIS for Fiscal Impact Analysis, 1987-1990

Keywords: modeling, analysis, database development, data conversion

 

This was a grant to support the development of a model for simulating the fiscal impact of land development using GIS. 

 

The state of the art in the area of Fiscal Imapct Analysis modeling at that time was non-spatial and based on regression analysis that left much to be desired.  These methods did little to foster the understanding of the actual flows of revenues and expenditures.

 

The basic premise of the GIS model is that a city’s revenue is directly attributable to the types, values and intensities of land use development, which is spatially distributed and can be mapped.  For example, property taxes are based on value and use of land; grant or aid programs are distributed based on population, miles of road, etc. Expenditures, or city services, are also directly attributable to land use, and are spatially distributed, whether they be police call incident locations; police patrolling routes, snow plowing, road maintenance needs, which are related to roads; or parks and recreation, which are related to population distribution.

 

The model was successfully demonstrated with a project for the City of Anoka.  It involves developing an GIS Database of the factors that are indices of the distribution of revenues and expenditures: land parcels, land use, roads, police call incidents, and population.  Using these indices, revenues and expenditures were spatially distributed down to the parcel level.  Then, expenditures were subtracted from revenues to determine the fiscal impact of each parcel. The fiscal impact of land uses were determined by summarizing the revenues and expenditures by land use.

 

NSF and URISA endorsed this approach as an innovative and sound method to evaluate fiscal impact.  However, GIS was still in its infancy at the time, and cities would need to develop GIS in order to apply this approach.  Now that GIS has become much more widespread, this is an approach to fiscal impact analysis that is now more applicable. 

 

 

**********************************************************************

 

University of Wisconsin, River Falls, Rural Development Institute, workshops were conducted quarterly from 1994 to 1999, and were attended by more than 100 students from Minnesota and Wisconsin counties, cities and state and federal agencies.

 

Keywords: training

 

Þ    PC ArcInfo, Introduction, Intermediate and Advanced Training (1994-1998)

Þ    ArcView Training  (1996-1998)

Þ    “What is GIS?  For Managers and Decision Makers”  Training (1994-1999)