It might be humorous to read one of my original explanations that has been at this website for now the past two years, and so I left the original in as will be found not far below. 

I came across my original edition during one of my numerous edits, but saw this time that in our "Wild West" kind of thinking in the USA, that my innocent remarks would be seen to the common breed of people populating this nation as rather hilarious.   

Here is the corrected version so "Wild West" people can continue on without being greatly disturbed:  In the gospel of Luke 1:15  we are told that the baby John had the Holy Spirit come upon him while he was still in the womb of Elizabeth, and that a man named Zacharias was the one who had impregnated her nine months earlier.  

Here is the version I wrote earlier, before this latest edit:  In the gospel of Luke 1:15 the baby John had the Holy Spirit come upon him while still in the womb of Elizabeth, and a man, Zacharias, impregnated her. 

If we were innocent, nothing would be read into that, but who is innocent?  Well I am for the most part innocent, but then I also know how many other people see all things with sexual overtones.  This website was originally General Audiences rated, but now it is likely PG13. 

Likely a better background for the above original poor explanation on the birth of baby John would be that if I had not been made addlebrained by the drugs, then  I would have written it correctly the first time.  I would perceive the connection sooner in my mind on how many "Wild West" people would read another idea into the original explanation. 

Here follows the verse that the explanation above was directed, so that the reader may know there is more to this simple statement:  Luke 1:15 " For he (John) shall be great in the sight of the Lord, and he shall drink no wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother's womb. " 

Actually, I could edit the entire previous explanation out, and simply continue on from here, but I will include the above because it shows how humanity places preconceived ideas into places that are innocent, where nothing more should be added to it.  We will find below how that type of typical human thinking process was taken advantage of by the authors of the NT so that a delusion was created in the mind of the everyday reader. 

I will also leave the above original explanation in  my website, which sat uncorrected for about two years, because that helps show how if the temple of the body is healthy, and the human spirit is pure, and righteous, that the Holy Spirit may easily dwell within.  If the temple has been harmed by drugs, then even if the human spirit is pure, and righteous, then like in Isaiah 63 the Holy Spirit will be grieved.   

 SO we continue on with what I hope is a good explanation on how a myth was created by trickery.   

 Here is why the angel Gabriel called Jesus the Son of God. John 10:34 “Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your law, `I said, "You are gods'' ' That comes from Psalms 82:6 “I said, "You are gods, And all of you are children (sons and daughters) of the Most High.”

The Bible is hinting at the idea that due to evolution, that in time, maybe billions of years from now for some, less for others, that if we today could some how encounter ourselves after we had evolved over that length of time, that we would think God had dropped in to chat with us. Clearly, We would be talking to ourself, but could never recognize, nor believe how wonderful we finally became. Jesus is one of those highly evolved people who was evolved just enough to be able to work with those beings that were billions of years further along, so that the delusion of Marias could be written. We return again to the creation of that  delusion.   

Later when the same angel made an announcement of the upcoming birth of Jesus to Mary, the Virgin Mary said to the angel Gabriel " no man has touched me." However, the angel never said in reply that she did not need to have intercourse with a man later, but only said, found in Luke 1:35-37, "And the angel answered and said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God. Now indeed, Elizabeth your relative has also conceived a son in her old age; and this is now the sixth month for her who was called barren. For with God nothing will be impossible.''

As we read above, the angel said that Elizabeth had received a miracle, but the angel never said that the Virgin Mary had one too.  The narration could have just as easily been written where the angel made the annunciation to the mother of John, and included the fact that it was a miracle due to her old age.  Then the narration would not align the story of the up coming birth of Jesus with the soon to be born John. 

The manner in which the author portrays the facts in these verses amounts to what might be called "Planted evidence."   The facts in Luke 1:35 - 37 should have been grouped into separate categories that would allow the reader to easily see that one item in one spot has no relation to an item in another spot.  As the reader will find time, and again, the way the gospels are written makes certain events to become like planted evidence, which misleads the reader, and they make the wrong conclusions.  

 One of the purposes of planted evidence is to bring a quick solution, even if wrong, to what might otherwise be a very hard to solve mystery, so that, for example, in today's world  the officers may go to the donut shop, and not have to use their mind to think.

So we see guile was used, which the authors knew would lead most people to believe a falsehood was true, which was that the birth of Jesus was miraculous, when in fact it was not.  No where does any other gospel say that the birth of Jesus was a miracle. Why then do most people believe it was a miracle? Because they did not explore these versus written by using guile in the same manner as a geologist, or as a CSI team, or as would any scientist who was willing to treat the Bible as nothing more than another work of God.  More simply, they did not apply logic. 

Any person who sees everything as nothing more than a work of God may have the greatest admiration, and wonder that can be imagined for all those “nothing more thans.” You may never know who they are, and stranger still : They are actually out there walking around with us on this planet.

Let's look at the birth story of Jesus from another angle, using another book. We will use a book that tells things straight out, without using guile. We will find this book mentioned in one of my letters in the NT where today it turns out to be the Koran, for it was so prophesied. That book, which is another word of God, and future book to come, we were to desire, or yearn that it would come. Now that it has come, most so called Christians are not yearning to have it, but wishing to burn it; keeping only one copy of it in a museum in the Vatican. The Koran is a book maligned by both the famous, and infamous so called Christians for over a thousand years, but spoken by me as a glorious book of salvation, without deception, or guile.

Finally, the Bible, through its prophecy, is telling us that we will have a book to read that is not full of myths we don't understand, and in fact, that most never even knew were there. Sounds like a book the Babes in Christ should finally understand, but instead they are burning it. Here is that verse: American Standard Bible, (ASB) 1 Peter 2:2 “as newborn babes, long for the spiritual milk which is without guile, that ye may grow thereby unto salvation;”

The next stage of Christianity is accepting the Koran so that you may grow further in your salvation.

Please note that most every Bible, except the ASB, has mistranslated the Greek word ADOLON, which means “without guile,” and instead they have substituted the word “Pure,” which is the Greek word KATHAROI. The root word KATHAR for pure, or clean is not found at 1 Peter 2:2, but ADOLON is found. Most all translators walk in the darkness, or symbolically we might say that: they have vanished beneath the sea. A long list of verses from various Bible translators will not be made here just to prove my assertion. That should be easy enough for anyone to verify on their own. We are soon to look at the so called miraculous birth of Jesus found in the Koran, and after that we will return to investigate more of that birth story in the NT.  Before doing that, we will go off on a tangent only briefly, and then return to unraveling the guile.

The Koran says that Jesus is just a man, although a very great man, perhaps the greatest ever known, and a great miracle worker too, but still he is only a man. The Koran also has the annunciation story for Mary, and because Muslims wish to convince Christians that there are similarities between Islam, and Christianity, so that they may convert Christians to Islam, they have forced the Koran to be interpreted so that it appears Jesus was conceived by a woman, without the aid of a man. (We will see that even the Muslims have also vanished beneath the sea.) However, all laws are inviolable, and no one, not even God would dare break one of them, for if one was broken the entire universe would crumble, and disappear.

Humans break the smaller laws, however these laws man deals with have a reactive component, like Newton’s law of “for every action, there is an equal, and opposite reaction,” which is a law that keeps man’s physical world in balance. Newton’s law has its counter part for man in the spiritual world, where man must face the consequences, and is called “the law of cause, and effect.” That same law is called Karma by the Buddhists, Hindus, and Confucians. Many in the west say “As you sow, so shall you reap,” which is the same spiritual law that will show its effect in the physical world eventually. The Jews had broken the laws of God so often, and for so long that they were destroyed time, and time again. Therefore we should learn what are the laws, and then follow them to our benefit.

As we can see then, the laws should not be broken, for if they are some dire results will come to haunt us. Having a birth without a biological father is breaking a grand law, for that is the very basis for the procreation of our species. Even if that were possible, the effects would be catastrophic. Yet here earth remains, still orbiting the sun with us silly creatures running around, and now going off into outer space, and soon to colonize other planets. We would have to say that there never has been such a birth without sperm joining with an egg on earth, obviously making it a so called "miraculous" birth due to guile.

Why then do we have invisible people beating some of us up, or talking out of thin air, and so on? That is because there are deeper laws that when once learned, real miracles can take place. We should realize that nothing really is a miracle. It is nothing more than ignorance of those deeper laws that makes them appear to be miraculous. If a man from the time of Jesus could suddenly live for one day in our modern world, he would think all of as the greatest magicians ever seen.  We return now to unraveling the guile.

Here is the annunciation story where Mary addresses the angel Gabriel, this time taken from the Koran 3:47 “She (Mary) said: My Lord! How can I have a child when no mortal has touched me? He said: So (it will be.) Allah creates what He will. If He decrees a thing, He says unto it only: Be! And it is.”

If a person will investigate the Koran, they will see that God always creates in pairs, and never is there a time when one person is created without a male joining with a female. Nor is there any verse in the Koran that says, or even remotely implies: “except in the instance of Jesus, all are created by pairs.” Logically, we must conclude that Jesus had a biological father. The Koran is referring to the higher orders of the animal kingdom, when it says all are created by pairs. There is parthenogenesis for some lower life creatures. There are a few species of snakes that are able to reproduce without fertilizing the egg. The same goes for some snails. There is said to be one species of turkeys that can do it as well, but never has any proof been found for higher species being able to do the same.      

In the quote above we saw “If He decrees a thing, He says unto it only: Be! And it is.”

Here is the only logical explanation that reconciles those verses with reality. God, by such angels of God like Gabriel, Michael, Raphael, and so on, will decree to a man of God like Moses, Samuel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and on and on, even down to the apostles where Christ said to them “come follow me,” that they do what they decree, and the human servants will obey; come Hell, or high water, they will obey. So Joseph, a man of God, the future husband of Mary heard the voice of an angel of God, and he obeyed. (We will see that same action in an example from the Koran quote below.) Mohammed also obeyed when Gabriel spoke to him. In this life when an angel of God, the angel Michael, the angel for the nation of the Jews decreed what I was to do, I obeyed. (Most people considered me insane, or a fool, or following the Devil when I obeyed. )

Here is another chapter from the Quran that helps to support my interpretation above.  What we will soon read shows that even when it is clearly stated that a man's sperm must unite with a women's egg that a clot may develop, which clot is the embryonic stage of life, that still God will say: Be, and it is!

Chapter 40, Believers, verses 67-68:  He it is Who created you from dust, then from a sperm-drop, then from a clot, then brings you forth as a child, then (ordains) that you attain full strength and afterward that you become old men - though some among you die before - and that you reach an appointed term, that happily you may understand. He it is Who quickens and gives death. When He ordains a thing, He says unto it only: Be! and it is.

Here is another this time from: Chapter 19, Mary, verse 6:   He (Zachariah) said 'Oh my Lord, how shall I have a son, seeing my wife (Elizabeth) is barren, and I have attained to the declining of old age?'  Said He, 'So it shall be; your Lord says, "Easy is that for Me, seeing that I created you before, when you were nothing."  '

Here again is the same verse that was quoted earlier, so we might now realize that maybe we should think a little more on how to interpret this verse:  Chapter 3, House of Imran, verse 47:  “She (Mary) said: My Lord! How can I have a child when no mortal has touched me? He said: So (it will be.) Allah creates what He will. If He decrees a thing, He says unto it only: Be! And it is.”

In practically ever moral nation where the laws of the Holy Books are followed, there have been over the centuries billions of women who could say the same before they were married, just like Mary did: No man has touched me.  Are we to believe then that billions of virgin births have taken place like happened to Jesus, where common tradition says Jesus had no father?  Since the scriptures of the Koran never once say that, for example, "Mary never married after the angel talked to her," leaving the strong possibility open that she did get married later, why then does nearly the entire population of this planet conclude that the impossible happened? 

 It is better to conclude that most humans can not reason logically rather than conclude that billions of births where a child had no biological father has happened for centuries, and continues even today.  As for me, I would rather conclude that most of humanity is stupid, and go to my death, if I must, for my simply saying that Jesus did have a biological father.  A few hundred years ago I would be murdered for saying that, but today I am merely ignored, or thrown out of church, or threatened with an arrest if I do not leave, or some other discourteous event happens to me. Many other examples too long to mention have happened to me all because I make logical remarks to stupid people.  

In the next paragraph below is quoted the annunciation story from a different chapter found in the Koran. As we will see, some of the same ideas found in the previous Koran annunciation story such as “Be, and it is,” are found in this next narrative where it is now “Thus will it be,” and other similarities are found. The double parenthesis (( )) found below includes my research so that these verses can be understood for the deeper material they offer which links this story from the Koran with the NT birth story.

Koran 19:16-21. Commemorate Mary in the Book. When she withdrew from her family to a place in the East (( Note Aid: Elizabeth’s home when Mary withdrew from her family for three months was East of Mary’s home. Here is that same idea found in the gospel of Luke 1:39-40 "And Mary arose in these days and went into the hill country with haste, into a town of Judah; and entered into the house of Zacharias and saluted Elisabeth." Those verses come immediately after the angel Gabriel told Mary she would have a child. Such hasty action is how high members of the Essene Council work within their community once they are given a directive by an angel.  Since Joseph, and Mary were Essenes, as will be proven later, we can accept that so were their relatives, for what better, and more Holy place to carry out their secret Essene practice of conception than at a fellow member's home.  Joseph could enter that home without any fear of being chased away. That would mean Elizabeth's home is near the Essene community of Qumran, which is also part of the Hill country of Judah. Look at a map, and you will find that this place is east of Mary's home near Jerusalem, and it is only a four day journey by donkey, or a one day ride by horse. )) And took cover from them, We sent a Spirit of ours ((Aid: meaning a man of God as his spirit is directed by God. )) to her who appeared before her in the concrete form of a man. ((Aid: If he is in concrete form then he was flesh, and blood just like you and me. )) “I seek refuge in the merciful from you, if you fear him” She said. ((Aid: Clearly, Mary sees this messenger as a human.  Mary, and Joseph being of the Essene order, to be proven later, will begin a series of spoken oaths, which in our modern world may be compared to a Masonic oath with the deeper meaning implied here that “only in purity may you enter in.”)) He replied: “I am only a messenger from your Lord (sent) to bestow a good son on you.” ((Aid: He begins his series of counter oaths to show he is ready to join together to give a pure body to be the vehicle of Jesus.)) “How can I have a son,” she said, “when no man has touched me, nor am I sinful?” ((Her last oath before they commence the pure conception of a Holy body for Jesus.)) He said: “Thus will it be. Your Lord said “It is easy for me,” and that: “We shall make him a sign for men and a blessing from Us.” This is a thing already decreed.” (( Aid: This narrative when supplemented by the details in the NT shows the person in concrete form is Joseph, and here he gives his final oath. Then does coition begin, which is as chaste as bees pollinating flowers. ))

myths from guile continued