More Home Page

The above verse relates to the mission of John, who was Elijah in a past life, who was sent to bear witness, and prepare the way for the coming of Christ. Matthew 17:10 - 13, "The disciples asked Jesus ' Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?'... Then the disciples understood that Jesus spoke to them of John the Baptist."

The narrative above shows that Jesus told his disciples who John was in a past life. If the reader will investigate, which this web site does for them, they will find that the narrative was written so we see that Jesus did not teach reincarnation publicly, but he did teach it in private to his disciples. Therefore anyone reading the NT in the past would have either seen that rebirth was a fact, or that it was not by the degree of intelligence they were so endowed as will be explained below. Since today the NT is an "open book" that all may read on what were once considered mysteries, then intelligence does not have too much to do anymore with understanding the sacred scriptures.

What will be explained below after intelligence and logic has been applied to scripture, the resulting effect can now be called "reading between the lines."

The narrative in the gospels was written so that for those even with a little more than average intelligence that the gospel story became a delusion, where it looks like Jesus might be teaching reincarnation, but then elsewhere he appears to teach that he was not, so that overall everything related to reincarnation was instead not to be taken literally, but meant to be looked at figuratively.   However, with a bit more than a little above average intelligence, and also gathering together small morsels of particularly suited information, which is found all around us, that delusion will vanish.

Basically with only a little bit of knowledge applied to specific areas, such as, who was the audience to whom Jesus was speaking, then we may realize that in one instance secrets were told, which happened when only his close disciples were involved, and in other instances where the masses were involved, then secrets would not be told. Also, when Jesus spoke to the masses, to either a large crowd, or a very small one, and if the apostles were present, then Jesus would still be teaching what can be called parables, or ideas where secrets were not explained.

It's that simple: If in a crowd of disciples, even one person not a disciple can be found, then no secrets will be told. If only disciples are found, then secrets can be found.

By that simple use of a particular writing technique explained above the NT was sealed to the general public. Unless they were helped to understand, like Jesus helped his disciples, they would be no more enlightened than was the common Jew, who followed the Pharisees. The Pharisees had an oral tradition, which explained secrets in the OT, but the oral tradition was only known by those of the Priesthood. Jesus also taught an oral tradition, which explained the secrets in the NT, but he gave it only to his close disciples. A large portion of the oral tradition in the NT is today revealed here in this web site. The oral tradition can be rediscovered at anytime, and has been found by various people throughout the near, and distant past, all one needs to be able to do is read between the lines.

We will soon look at an example Jesus presents to the public, which conveniently included the Pharisees, which narration allowed for a deeper idea to be found, if one would only use reason, and have a little bit of information, all of which is given here. If this example we are soon to investigate included only his close disciples, rather than the public, they would be told that Solomon would later be reborn as Jesus, and become the Messiah, which title would mean he would be worthy of being called lord by any man, and even his own father would call him Lord. The Messiah is also translated to mean the Christ.

In the example we will look at several people, which are not disciples of Jesus, are included and so no clear explanation that Solomon was reborn, and called Jesus will be found like Jesus told only his disciples about John the Baptist, where he said that John was Elijah in a previous life.

Concerning the word: Lord. We must realize that over two thousand years ago, and up to until perhaps no more than two hundred years ago, that the title of "lord" did not mean that person was God, but instead was a title of respect given to a King, Prince or other person of nobility. If we consider that an angel should be immediately given by man that same title of respect, then we can see that "lord" still does not mean we are talking to God. Many Christians today make no distinction concerning "lord," just like they do not distinguish in the narrative between Jesus teaching the masses, or when Jesus is teaching the apostles, so that they misuse a title of respect.

What involves being the Messiah is more than simply being a man, who can heal, who also gives prophecy, and who delivers a message of forgiveness of sins. A deeper truth not revealed in the Bible unless one learns to read between the lines is that we are given hints that an archangel called the Christ, or more exactly called the Archangel Michael, entered the body of Jesus, which at that time then Jesus became the Messiah. Here is where that happens: Matthew 3:16-17 "Then Jesus, when He had been baptized, came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting upon Him. And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.'' "

Since Jesus was the same as a Hindu miracle worker, then his spirit was able to leave his body, so that the Christ archangel could inhabit it instead, and to most people it would appear that nothing happened at all.  This would not be the first, nor the last time that Jesus performed miracles which most of the general population did not understand, nor even knew a miracle had just taken place.  It does not matter if the man Jesus all alone could have given the same message as had the Christ inhabiting his body, still he could not give the message alone, for there are certain rules, and conventions that must be adhered to, even if one is as evolved as was Jesus.

The Koran says that an angel gives a message to a man, who then is called a prophet, or a messenger of God, and then that man gives the message to the masses. That same method of transmission as told by the Koran happened to Moses, when Jehovah spoke to him, and so to all the other prophets in the OT did this interaction occur. But now with Jesus we are faced with a problem: where is the angel in the NT?

On the surface it appears that no angel ever gave a message to Jesus, but what you are learning here is what Jesus Christ would have told his disciples. The man called Jesus did not pick me directly, for he was not in his body to choose any of the apostles. This of course is an unusual manner in which a man conveys to other men the message of an angel, but nonetheless, the body of a man does give the message, all the while an angel moves the mouth so the body of a man may speak. This type of dual role interaction helped to create more guile as we will see further on.

The following link will prove, with the aid of the Koran, that the Messiah is a dual role office of an archangel dwelling within the body of a human: Melchizedek

Although we now have this knowledge on rebirth given to us today, this same knowledge for a time was forbidden not only for Christians, and Muslims to know, but also the Jewish general public to know. The belief in rebirth, which is the second definition of being "born again," was for the Jews to be kept a secret for about three thousand years, beginning with Moses. When finally it was time to teach reincarnation around the twelfth century AD, then many Jews would not accept it.

For the gentiles, those who were Romans, and Greeks, who before believed in reincarnation when Jesus appeared, that was in a similar way like Moses for the Jews, and what the gentiles knew about rebirth was now to be forgotten, made into a lie, or superstition, so that they became like the common Jew. This eventually included doing the same for all of Western Civilization, or where ever Christianity was spread, so that reincarnation, or rebirth was made into a secret, held back from the public, as will be shown by the example below.

The verses about to be analyzed shows the narrative included the common masses, (Matthew 22:33 "And when the multitudes heard this, they were astonished at His teaching." ) along with the Pharisees, therefore a dialogue, like a "question, and answer game" would be involved from time to time, rather then His usual monologue style of teaching to the common Jews. This method of instruction would be called by some "the Socratic Method" because Socrates, who was a Greek philosopher lived 400 years earlier than Jesus. The results from both, either monologue, or dialogue will still be the same.

During the monologue Jesus taught in parables, where the masses understood little, if anything at all. This dialogue we are next to look at will add nothing new for the masses to learn starting from the time of Christ's appearance in Jerusalem, and continuing two thousand more years up to today. However the deeper mysteries will now be divulged, but only those who love the truth will accept that, which is logically obvious.

Here begins the example, only a few verses long, which if one knows the answer to the question that Jesus asks they may also reveal to others some of the deepest mysteries found in Christianity. Of course if one does not know how to read between-the-lines, nothing much will be revealed at all: Matthew 22:41-46 "While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, saying, "What do you think about the Christ? Whose Son is He?'' They said to Him, "The Son of David.'' He said to them, "How then does David in the Spirit call Him `Lord,' saying: The Lord said to my Lord, "Sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool'' ? If David then calls Him `Lord,' how is He his Son?'' And no one was able to answer Him a word, nor from that day on did anyone dare question Him anymore. "

The Pharisees were the teachers for the Jewish general public. At least some of the Pharisees knew the complete answer to the question Jesus asked, for later we will read about secret disciples of Jesus, who were Pharisees, but such information was related to the oral tradition of the Torah, which means only the priest craft could know of such things. Jesus would not help the masses, including those Pharisees not part of his group, to understand the answer completely like he did his disciples, anymore than the other Pharisees, those who knew what little secrets they did, would help those who were not part of the priesthood.

Therefore this verse showed that to the masses that the answer of "The Christ is the son of David" by the Pharisees, which shows the Pharisees understood reincarnation, would instead be taken by the masses in a figurative sense, or symbolically because the Pharisees would remain silent, not teaching deeper ideas. Jesus, and the Pharisees both understood it to be literal: that at one time the Messiah, whenever he comes, for those who did not know he had come, and that he was there as Jesus, for those who knew the full truth, that he would in either case be the reincarnated son once called Solomon, the son of David, but that relationship of father, and son happened a thousand years earlier, for those who knew that much.

A few Pharisees, those who we will later learn are secret disciples of Christ, also knew that an archangel was in the body of Jesus, so they were able to answer the entire question because they knew what made up a Messiah, which is that it is a dual role office, Hebrew 6:19-9:15, where an archangel dwells within a human body. (The death found told in those verses was the look alike, who was Simon of Cyrene, who earlier was Ishmael, the first son of Abraham, son of the first covenant, OT, who died on the cross that the old covenant would be abolished. The blood by the whipping of Jesus started the new covenant, the NT. Explained in detail elsewhere.) If the ignorant Pharisees knew that Jesus was the Messiah, they still would not know what made up that title of being the Messiah, which would prevent them from answering the question completely. They would look like the common masses concerning a fact, where they would take one idea symbolically: that the Messiah simply meant he was their redeemer.

Just knowing that the son of David literally was the Messiah, without knowing anything more could not adequately answer the question in the deeper sense that Jesus understood it. It required knowing two more facts, one other being what makes up a Messiah in order to explain the question, neither of which the public could be told.

So, we are seeing in this narrative that secrets are involved, and some pretty deep, and guileful ones indeed. Jesus has put the ignorant Pharisees into a predicament, one that would make them look foolish even if they knew all that the secret disciples of Jesus, who were Pharisees, understood. They can not tell any of the common people their secrets, that is their solemn vow. These Pharisees could have saved face by telling Jesus that they knew the answer, but that he would need to attend a private study session of theirs as it was a lengthy explanation. However, most likely the ignorant Pharisees, who were not secret disciples of Jesus, were not sure their answer was correct because after their many previous encounters, and failures in a match of wits with Jesus, they sensed they would fail again, so everyone would learn their emptiness soon enough, and then Jesus would go on to only make them look worse. These Pharisees were thinking all the time, and they saw no escape. These verses were written down, which described a factual encounter with Jesus, and the Pharisees in order to show both what happened back then, and that His question could be answered today.

Those Pharisees, who were secret disciples of Jesus, who knew more than the other ignorant Pharisees, knew three facts related to the question asked by Jesus. The three facts they knew were: 1.) Rebirth, or reincarnation; 2.) That Jesus was the reborn Solomon; 3.) The Messiah was a dual role office of an angel dwelling within the body of a human, and speaking as though only a human were present.

The ignorant Pharisees only knew the first fact. The secret disciples who were Pharisees did not need to reveal all that they knew, which would allow those ignorant Pharisees who only knew reincarnation was a fact to become very envious, which would mean there would be no restraint to hold them back from their desire to kill Jesus. Jesus had insulted the ignorant Pharisees numerous times before, usually for their hypocrisy, but now in front of hundreds, if not thousands they were this time made to look like fools.

This idea will be explained elsewhere, but some of it will be repeated here as well. Because those Pharisees, who were secret disciples of Jesus, knew everything that Christ needed them to know in order to fulfill prophecy, then even those Pharisees would assist the ignorant Pharisees to fulfill their envious desire to murder Jesus. Of course the secret disciples already knew they could never succeed in killing Jesus, but the ignorant ones never knew that. As we will learn eventually this relationship makes up for an operation like one sees on TV, or in the movies, where the CIA takes out another agent working in the NSA, which are both US Government teams, where it seems they should be working to protect each other, instead of killing each other. Of course since we are able to watch the entire operation unfold before our eyes on TV, or in the theater, we know there is a deeper reason for this murderous plot, so we know they are still working for the government, or at least we can hope so. The story concerning the secret Pharisees helping the ignorant Pharisees makes up for an entertaining story, which I call: a simple case of body snatching. That example will be found elsewhere.

Here is an example, already quoted earlier, where we see the Lord, God, said to my Lord, the Messiah, son of David: Matthew 3:17 "And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.'' " The Koran says that it is far beyond God to have a son. Such is an impossibility, and Christians should desist from saying such, as it is for their own good.

In the link "Creating Myths from Guile" it will be learned that the idea of God the father, and Jesus Christ, His son are literary terms, which makes for a technique that is used to show eventual human potential to evolve so that over billions, and more likely after trillion upon trillion of years that a human may become somewhat like God in creative ability. The final result could be compared to being a son of God, not that God creates in the fashion of a father siring a son by inseminating a woman with his sperm. That literal kind of interpretation, which the babes in Christ believe in, minus God impregnating Mary the mother of Jesus, is what should not be accepted by any person as it is childishness, and leads to committing childlike ignorant actions which very often harms your fellow human.

However, at the same time that simple idea also helped the babes to conquer the material world, making it heaven on earth, all at the expense of many of those people of other nations, and races who were less able to defend themselves from the babes in Christ. Eventually, since this site repeats this idea over, and over again, the reader should accept that though the Koran says what is best for the Christian, what is best for their soul, that in reality such advice has rarely been followed by the Christian, which denial by them was God's secret plan that such activity by Western Civilization would result in the outcome we witness today. The babes did this unwittingly, but still the outcome was as if the babes knew what they were doing. Those nations who are the most highly industrialized, and most advanced civilizations in the world even including Russia, accept a babes in Christ type of teaching. Even during the Communist years Russia always had an underground Catholic movement.

If a wise teaching is given, which desires a specific outcome, and even if followed by the ignorant, then the final physical outcome by those who know nothing much at all will appear as if they were wise themselves. When viewed from only the physical material level the babes will appear to be wise, but if viewed from the spiritual worlds, their great accomplishments look futile. The babes in Christ will, over a series of life times, have to pay off the debts they incurred for the many atrocities they committed on others, those who were either Muslim, or those of other beliefs. More of the details will be explained further below on why this strange teaching was given to the babes so that its questionable benefit, questionable from a mere mortal perspective, may be correctly understood, and appreciated.

The ideas explained here at this site, which before were held back as secret, are all part of the ancient oral tradition. As in any tradition, even if oral, there are different levels where greater secrets are not told to the uninitiated, who are those who have not fitted themselves to be told greater truths. So the many never before publicly told truths now revealed here are not all that the oral tradition has to offer. Excuse me for saying the obvious.

The above verse of God, the Father, and the Messiah, His Son relates back to 2 Samuel 7:12-17, which is a story where the prophet Nathan told King David that David's seed would be established forever, which began with his son Solomon. So without saying more, going only by the written tradition, and leaving out the oral tradition, one would naturally be lead to believe that these verses were symbolic for Solomon's son, then grandson, and so on, who would continue that Kingdom. Then some day many generations later of that same blood line a uniquely different person, being born for the first time, would be the Messiah, as any ordinary human believes at least that much. Since the Pharisees remained silent, and would not reveal the oral Torah tradition, then rebirth was neatly tossed in the trash can as far as the masses were concerned, where it remains as rubbish even today in the general teaching of both church, and mosque. Within that story about Nathan, and King David's seed we will find these verses 7:14. "I will be his Father, and he shall be My son."

Those verses above do not say exactly what King David said in the spirit about the Lord saying "Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool," but it does hint at the relationship of "the Lord said to my Lord," and then with other information, such as this, Matthew 1:1 "The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham,"  we can finally arrive at an intelligent answer.

If what follows here is hard to understand, that is because to figure out the answer to the question Jesus asked the Pharisees was not all that simple, so there will still be some difficulty even after it is explained.  In science the key to understanding the intricacies of matter have been explained, but still, few people want to work hard enough to understand the explanation. In the example here, many readers will likely have to read this place over a number of times, and also go to the Bible, and read the verses quoted here, and read before, and after the quotes found here so that this finally locks into place. But, the explanation here is not done yet, so for a few they may be able to follow my explanation without further study. There are some people like that, but unfortunately, most of us are not so gifted.

Because most people consider religion one place where anyone can get a degree, and most every idea is easy to understand, that means to them if something is not easily made sense of then the explanation is in error.

That is not the proper way to investigate religion. Instead when a hard to understand concept is explained, where afterwards it still may not make sense, that only means the reader must exert some thinking, and work of their own in order to finally grasp the concept. If a person will not do that, they will always be a babe in Christ, 1 Peter 2:1-2, who fight, are bitter, tell malicious lies, and are envious of one another.

So if we will think, and work on this problem, we can conclude that the Messiah was the son of King David, and that it was a literal fact. Knowing that the Messiah was an archangel within the body of Jesus, then we know he could also be could be called Lord, and as we will see that too is a literal fact. There is more to the status of the Christ, which should be read in the book "The Rosicrucian Cosmo Conception" found at the RF site, at my favorite links. For now, very quickly, Christ had evolved to be one with God, not the God, who created the entire universe, and more, but with what is called the God of our solar system. We humans can not comprehend our own God, so to get upset, or make a large commotion over the differences, when most never understood the Bible, or Koran is to return to becoming a fool once again. The Koran in the opening chapter says "All praise be to God the lord of all the worlds." So our God of our world still is not that God over all. However, for humans our lord is God enough, and we could not understand anything more. At our level, we see that "the Lord said to my Lord" is in fact also literal, but the ignorant Pharisees would have taken it symbolically.

Then with all of those facts together we have answered the question asked by Jesus. The verse at Matthew 1:1 will be investigated more thoroughly in the link called "you must be born again" found further below, which will prove that the first sentence in the NT tells us that we must be born again, and it is to be taken this time to mean being reincarnated.

The OT is a wonderful book if one will only read it like would a scientist. Jehovah working through the prophet Nathan told David that he would "set up your seed after you, who will come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever." That would mean Solomon would establish that promise, but if anyone should ever apply their mind to the scriptures as a scientist, they would then say "We must find the same said about the seed from Solomon, and then the same concerning the seed from his son like was said of David, and continue finding the same in order to extend that kingdom on to other descendants. IF such a promise can not be duplicated beyond Solomon, then only Solomon will be the one to establish that promise!"

It turns out if such an investigation is made that we will find it stops with King David, where only Solomon has that promise. Therefore we bring in Matthew 1:1, and find that Jesus was Solomon in a past life, which explains 2 Samuel 7:12 - 14, proving that Solomon when born as Jesus did establish his kingdom once again. Any other explanation leads to contradictions, which leads to the current nonsense preached in the church, which today is accepted by 2 billion people. All of this in the 21 century with humans on the way to soon put a permanent station on the moon. It is easier to imagine people on the moon than to imagine that Christians will ever use their mind to think.

The field of apologetics has arisen due to Christians not being able to defend their ideas in a satisfactory manner. Here is an example from Wikipedia.com of what apologetics is typically defined as leading up to: “Apologists have been characterized as being deceptive, or "whitewashing" their cause, primarily through omission of negative facts ( selective perception ) and exaggeration of positive ones, techniques of classical rhetoric. When used in this context, the term often has a pejorative meaning. The neutralized substitution of "spokesperson" for "apologist" in conversation conveys much the same sense of "partisan presenter with a weighted agenda," with less rhetorical freight.”

For example apologists make the contention that the promise given to David beginning with Solomon lasted right up until Christ. We must look at what the Kingdom of Solomon consisted of, and compare that to what followed to see if what the Christian apologists say is actually true. The kingdom promised David through Solomon during the time of Solomon was self autonomous, with the power to defend its self from invasion. It was a glorious period for Israel.

However, if we look at facts we will find that the everlasting kingdom that was promised Solomon, circa 1000 BC, when transferred to the Kings of the descendants of David, and Solomon that almost immediately the kingdom began to wane, as it broke up into two kingdoms, and both almost ended when Babylon, beginning around 800 BC, began to conquer the Kingdoms, only a few generations after Solomon’s death. They eventually disappeared altogether concerning self autonomy. During the time of Christ both kingdoms had been already completely abolished first by the Greeks, around 300 BC, from which later the Maccabees revolted, and then came the Romans who ruled over Israel until its destruction in 72 AD.

Being a territory under the control of another Kingdom so that Israel’s governance is dictated by another power, making it a vassal state, does not fit the definition of the promise given to Solomon, nor of the conditions during the time of Solomon. Therefore we must conclude that reincarnation is a fact, and that only to Solomon was the promise given, which was fulfilled another time when Jesus appeared, who was Solomon. However, when Jesus, the reborn Solomon came, he established another type of kingdom, one not of this world, which would remain the Kingdom of Christ only in heaven.  Jesus Christ would not establish his Kingdom on earth until the coming of the son of man made the enemies of Jesus to be His footstool.

The next Kingdom of His which continued since Jesus departed has been in submission up to today like it was between the death of Solomon, and his rebirth as Jesus. The enemies of Jesus will not be subdued until Jesus has the reborn Peter, and others allied with him establish the promise made that Solomon’s rule will cover the entire earth. That final conclusion can be deduced because any King will want to eventually conquer the entire world. Jesus Christ granted the fulfillment of His Kingdom on earth to be inaugurated under the direction of Peter, that power was delegated to Peter, and so that is how the promise will be established prior to the return of Jesus. That makes Peter the coming of the son of man, who is as in the Days of Noah.

The reader should accept that the power to fulfill the kingdom of Christ on earth was delegated to Peter, for after all Jesus Christ said He would build His church upon Peter, Matthew 16:19. The Catholics take building the church on Peter to be figurative, so they install a Pope. They do not believe the head of the church of Christ on earth will ever return in person. Clearly the Kingdom of Christ on earth has not happened yet, so facts prove that no Pope ever received what Christ delegated to me. The only thing now is for that day to happen while I am again alive on earth, more of a living death, but I am alive nonetheless, when on earth Christ's Kingdom comes, so that the final proof is shown.   Since most of humanity goes not by thinking, but by a beating, or being near exterminated, then that type of action will unfortunately have to be shown them, in order to complete the Clear Proof.

Since Jesus never killed anyone to defend, or spread his kingdom, then we can rest assured that anyone saying theirs is a Christian nation, and then they get revenge, and kill others to protect their nation, all the while they call themselves a Christian too, that they have completely misunderstood the mission of Jesus Christ, and do not understand anything about His kingdom. They have only a babe in Christ mentality, and will follow anything, even the Devil. The kingdom of Christ includes Islam, when the Prophet Mohammed comes, and he came, therefore only a nation accepting the Koran can kill to defend. President Bush does not accept the Koran to be on par with the Bible, therefore by his fruit he proves he does not understand.

No apologetics are required when the scientific method is applied. The scientific method allows one to make predictions, which will always come true once the proper theory has been found. To date, several predictions have been made by me, which have already come true, and we can be assured that the other predictions made by me will continue to be fulfilled. I rest my case upon scientific investigative methods, which I know will not abandon me like has much of humanity, who say they love Jesus, and add that they honor the apostle Peter. Their remarks on Jesus, and myself have been proven, John 15:18 - 19, to be false.

Many people think of the mad scientist in his laboratory preparing to destroy the world, but now all should see that it has always been near the opposite, where instead the sane scientists are surrounded by insane humans who take the inventions of the sane, and then will not think scientifically so that they near totally destroy the world.

I did not quote the first verses seen on my Home page, Matthew 24:1-51. Here is what we will find at 24:3 " Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, "Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?'' "

In those verses above, and the many that follow, only the apostles are present with Jesus. Therefore we know that deep secrets are being told, all of which can be figured out, if only we will apply ourselves in a scientific like investigation on this area of scripture.

Jesus Christ said that there would be signs of His coming. He did not say that he came during any of the signs he would describe, only that first many signs must be shown, one sign of which is the coming of the son of man. Elsewhere that idea is explained in more detail, and it will be obvious then that Jesus Christ will never appear like he did the first time. Jesus at times, even privately, will speak using guile with his apostles. He wants them to learn to think on their own. They are to try, and figure his sayings out, and if they can not, then he eventually will tell them, if they will only ask. Here is an example: Matthew 13:36 - 37 "Then Jesus sent the multitude away and went into the house. And His disciples came to Him, saying, "Explain to us the parable of the tares of the field." He answered and said to them: "He who sows the good seed is the Son of Man..."

However, they know he might give a mild insult. Here is an example of that: Matthew 15:15 - 16 "Then Peter answered and said to Him, "Explain this parable to us.'' So Jesus said, "Are you also still without understanding?"

For most of them such insults were enough to keep them silent at times, and kept them thinking, hoping they could figure it out. Here is an example: Mark 9:9-10 "Now as they came down from the mountain, He commanded them that they should tell no one the things they had seen, till the Son of Man had risen from the dead. So they kept this word to themselves, questioning what the rising from the dead meant."

After working on the problem for days, and still not knowing the answer, they were at times afraid to ask even when they knew he would tell them everything, because they were too embarrassed to show their failure. So, they would keep on trying to solve the problem among themselves. The link on the top left called "Isaiah 28:20 "The bed is too short.." will give you an idea on how long it might take one apostle to figure one simple idea out. When you read that link recall that Christ was only with us for three years. Two thousand years ago, with the time available for the apostles to figure out some problems presented by Jesus it appears they did not have enough time. They never correctly figured out Mark 9:9 - 10, quoted above, concerning rising from the dead until after the crucifixion, for even then they were only guessing. Jesus had to explain it in detail by telepathically projecting into their mind the knowledge they needed to know.

I can tell you that the method of telepathy was used 2000 years ago, as the archangel Michael telepathically explained to me in this life what I needed to do, but his message today was only a hint to get me to begin my own studies to figure out what Jesus Christ explained to me when called Peter via His telepathic transmission. That previous event 2000 years ago, now being explained here is not specifically shown in the NT, but there are hints as shown below that by reading between the lines we may arrive at the proper conclusion. That telepathic transmission, and the contents therein could not be explained openly in the NT, or it would give the secret away, which secret has lead to the wars, and divisions we have today. As hard as it sounds, such was intended for our evolutionary growth. Many people if not prodded into action will do very little to move ahead. Having the Fallen Angels within the babes in Christ helped to prod them along, and induced mental activity.

Today you are learning what Jesus taught me two thousand years ago, but that same answer can be found anyway by anyone intelligent enough if they would only do as I have done here. Of course having an actual angel telepathically transmit their message into one's mind can not be found by entering a public library. So even if one were to read in a book that such is possible, they may still be too skeptical to accept the process as true. Still, by logic, we can understand that such a process must be valid, as seen below, by the simple fact that the answer has not been communicated to the reader of the NT, but it was understood by the apostles without any verbal explanation involved.

Here are the verses that show Jesus did explain the answer to the apostles, but as will be seen by the narrative the answer remains only within the mind of the apostles: Luke 24:45 - 46 " And He opened their mind to understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures. Then He said to them, "Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day."

Therefore by guile were we apostles taken in, learning the details only near the end when Jesus soon departs. For 2000 years has the same happened again to me, the other apostles, and to most of humanity as we were "born again," and again. ( Each time we are reborn, almost our entire memory of our past is wiped clean. Only the very highly evolved are able to recall anything at all.) The "Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary" tells us absolutely nothing unless Jesus projects that knowledge into your mind, like he did mine.

The above statement "He opened their mind to understanding" leads most everyone to believe Jesus spoke another long sermon, explaining everything the apostles needed to know, but where does the verses use the word spoke, or said, or so on, except after He opened their mind. So first, by telepathy Jesus inwardly spoke to them, and even showed them by scenes, where as we know, "a picture is worth a thousand words," so that every little detail that could be imagined was shown, that mere spoken words could never convey.

We see the narrative leads by guile those who did not have that telepathic transmission to become like the typical apostles before the transmission, who guessed that they knew what it meant, but in fact it turns out you knew close to nothing, like did they until their mind was opened. Therefore without searching the entire Bible, and Koran, and thinking this all out in a scientific like manner, the reader of the NT has no genuine idea what is the "thus" Jesus Christ is speaking about. After reading this entire web site, then you will know what the "thus" was.

We see that in many ways the apostles were not much different than anyone of the blind masses. Therefore we should accept that there must have been some other reason, or a few reasons they were chosen. Most of them must have had at least one special gift that made them unique, and that was about all. At least one of the apostles, not Judas, had very little talent, and he was chosen only because his brother, John, was chosen. That idea is explained in the link "Creating myths from guile." So as we will find later, Jesus chose them to show to the world how they acted like almost everyone else in other worldly matters, but as regards God, most of them were willing to look like fools: 1 Corinthians 4:9, "for we have been made a spectacle to the world, both to angels and to men."

As will be shown elsewhere that verse is in the milk section, which shows they are fools at their level, but so too are those who believe in the milk teachings. The word mystery is found nearby so even if in the milk, then we know a deeper meaning is to be found which is meat. Here is that nearby place: 1 Corinthians 4:1 "Let a man so consider us, as servants of Christ and stewards of the mysteries of God."

As will be seen time, and again throughout this site, the archangel Michael visited me, which visit began my examining the scriptures so that I finally arrived at the results found here, which repeats what Jesus did for us two thousand years ago, where we did little more than behave like a sponge, and absorbed that information. Today I had to extract that same information by my own efforts. That is how evolution works, showing us we must work to save ourselves. That as we will find is the Masonic method, whereas letting others do the work for us, and thinking we are saved by the blood of Jesus is the Catholic method.

The Catholic method, which is a perversion of the original "babes in Christ" teachings, will not save many at all, especially if we enter a nuclear war that destroys all of life. Given enough time, after many millions of years, even the Catholic method can save us, but we do not have the time. SO, even a lie, that is altered from the original lie, which will easily happen to anyone who only goes by faith, even if the faith is based upon truth, can if under God's control lead to life. That lie, which a few ideas on that lie were briefly mentioned before, the details are explained in the link "Creating myths from guile" found in the links on the upper left. It is a long explanation, so learn the details later.

Here is scripture which relates to the Archangel Michael, and me, and all other past prophets: Daniel 10:13 - 21 "But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; and behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left alone there with the kings of Persia. Now I have come to make you understand what will happen to your people in the latter days, for the vision refers to many days yet to come... ...But I will tell you what is noted in the Scripture of Truth. (No one upholds me against these, except Michael your prince.)" Here is a verse that is found after a mighty angel appears, Rev 10:1 - 6, which was the archangel Michael, (The prince of the Jews) who appeared before me: Revelation 10: 7 " but in the days of the sounding of the seventh angel, when he is about to sound, the mystery of God would be finished, as He declared to His servants the prophets."

If we are intelligent enough to accept that we must read between the lines, then the narrative shows that when the son of man arrives that he will, among many other things, publicly teach reincarnation. We will learn a little further below that before Jesus will return from heaven, that first all the things spoken of by God's Holy prophets must be fulfilled. So this son of man can not be Jesus, because there are yet things to be fulfilled. Since Jesus is in heaven while things are being fulfilled, then he is not suffering, and he is not on earth. To repeat myself, we recall that scripture, Matthew 17:25, said the son of man will suffer much, and be rejected, neither of which can occur in heaven. So God is working through someone else on earth to bring about making the enemies of Jesus his footstool. Making the enemies of Jesus his footstool is a sign, and then Jesus will return sometime after. My educated guess is he will return around 2150 AD, and most will not know he is here, anymore than most believe right now the reborn Peter is the son of man today. Jesus will not publicly announce he is here, you will need to learn to read between the lines. The conclusions here are clear, and obvious once the verses are aligned logically, as would be done by either a scientist, or engineer.

The narrative concerning the Pharisees says that no one dared to question Jesus, and so for two thousand years the teaching on rebirth was to be considered symbolism, rather than literal fact, and like the Pharisees, no one would question it because it was still to be kept secret. A sampling of so called Christians say that about one quarter of them believe in reincarnation, but in church they are usually silent about that one belief. If they did say it once, or twice in church most would not care, but do not bring the idea up trying to reform the church, or you will be removed. I know that to be true from personal experiences related to it. I never even brought up reincarnation in the church I once attended, but I did bring up other ideas that tried to reconcile Christianity with Islam. That was going too far. That church denomination says "Open mind, open heart, open door. All faiths are welcome," which is the Methodist church. I now call them "closed everything, no true faiths welcome."

By guile the NT was written, and by simply applying logic the deeper teachings given to his trusted disciples can be found. By reading the OT, the common Jew, or anyone if they were intelligent enough could discover some of the oral tradition without being told. So the same pattern found in the OT, was applied to the NT. After all, Holy men were involved in the construction of both books, and so their books would be of similar design.

One pattern designed in the OT, which we find repeated in the NT, is that when each religion began that the common people, who followed the faith were taught that where before they accepted rebirth, that now it was no longer to be accepted as true. Moses lead the Jews out of Egypt, where among the Egyptians it was commonly believed that rebirth was a fact. The Jewish priesthood retained this, and other secret knowledge that was taught in Egypt, but everyone else in Judaism soon believed they had only one life to live. Most of the people in the regions where early Christianity would be spread believed in rebirth. The Greek, and Roman myth stories taught rebirth, or reincarnation.

Early Christianity, once it was taught to the Gentiles, began the same pattern. There were people known as Gnostics, who understood all that you are reading at my site, but the rest of the Christians, who made up the majority were taught that what the Gnostics knew was not true. After the Catholic Church arrived, then even the Gnostics were removed, so that most all of western civilization, including the future Muslim empires all believed we had but one life to live. Still, in the background secret Christian, and Muslim organizations existed, which preserved the wisdom of the past. If evolution was allowed to continue without having this web site announce what you are reading, then eventually most of humanity would find the Christ within, and they would be able to reveal to themselves the knowledge you are reading here. That might be millions of years from now before it happened to many humans, but still it would happen, and it happens even today to some, who may never have believed it, until they found the Christ within.

There are other patterns found in the OT, and repeated in the NT. Another of the designs of the OT was that it would delude the Jews to think they were chosen as regards being better than others, and similarly the NT was so designed that if you believed in a crucified Jesus, who was God, then you instead were the chosen ones, being better than the others. Both of those designs created a delusion for the ignorant adherent of their faith.

When the Qur'an came, then the pattern repeated again on who was the chosen ones. Now in Islam the idea was erroneously held that only those who were Muslims were the chosen people. That happened when Mohammed gave his final sermon, and common humanity misunderstood his saying that the Qur'an was the seal of the prophets, and no new prophet giving more scripture would come. That idea was covered earlier in Home page, where by Boolean logic we found how to properly interpret Mohammed's final sermon. Now that we are learning about reincarnation then we have another way to look at the final sermon. As we know I am not a new prophet. I am the same old one of long ago who has returned, or has been born again. Therefore, to say the obvious, I have not broken the tenets of Mohammed's final sermon. I can do as is found in my website, and I violate no Holy Scripture. In fact I would violate the Holy Scriptures if I did not reveal what is shown in this site.

The reader will learn that overall the Jews constantly frustrated the plans of God, and they were "Chosen" not because we were to emulate them, but chosen to serve as an example of what not to do. When that concept is first heard it seems hard to believe, but all the proof one needs to believe it will be shown here. After all, just one example for now, who is protecting who constantly? So certainly God is not with them.

As will be explained in detail later, and has already been told to a small degree, Israel is symbolism about this planet, and the gentile races, whose great civilizations are actually the chosen ones we are to follow. Enter the following link to continue: more home page 1