The Clear Proof
The reborn apostle Paul
Home
The reborn apostle Paul
Creating Myths from Guile
Isaiah 28:20 "The bed is too short to stretch out in"
About Me
Favorite Links
Contact Me

Hebrew 13:4 "but fornicators and adulterers God will judge."

 

Max Heindel, (1865 - 1919), who founded the Rosicrucian Fellowship, (RF) located in Oceanside, CA, was in a past life the apostle Paul. This link will prove that fact by using the "Rosicrucian Cosmo-conception," (RCC) which is the book he authored under the guidance of the Elder Brothers. ( The Elder Brothers, and Jesus are similar in evolutionary advancement, which is why they use that descriptive epithet.  The Elder Brother of the RF contacted me in the year 1978, and Jesus contacted me in 1977.  Those true stories, which talk of signs, and wonders are told elsewhere in this site. ) Within that same book Max will also show that Jesus was not crucified. He uses a Cabbalistic like method of hiding that knowledge, but by using logic, which is one of the keys used to unlock scripture, that same idea of an uncrucified Jesus, who passes over the cross can be easily found.  In addition, one other of his works will be used to further prove that the cross is symbolism, and that therefore Jesus could not be crucified. To take the crucifixion merely literally for Jesus, would be to remove the symbolism in that sign. Instead of only one event the crucifixion must be both literal, and symbolic.  That can only happen when one person is made a look alike for Jesus, and the real Jesus escapes.

Whenever Jesus told a parable, the story had to include ideas that could by analogy be fit to a real world event, or character.  To think that one was crucified, died, and then came back to life has no similar analogous event in the world.  Therefore we have to accept that somehow Jesus did not really die, for there is nothing in the world that completely dies, where all life functions fail for several days, but then comes back to life in the same identical physical structure that before had died, and began the decay process. 

 For example, some plants like fruit trees become dormant during winter, but if they die, like grain, they never return to life. Grain must be reseeded, and then it begins from a sprout until it grows into maturity. Jesus did not begin again as an infant after the crucifixion, and so we must conclude Jesus never died. 

The great majority of the students in the RF took the crucifixion to be only literally for Jesus, all the while they accepted that the crucifixion  also implied the symbolism of the sun crossing the vernal equinox, going from the cold of winter, where is death, into the warmth of summer to begin life again. They accepted the annual cycle of plants, where in spring the crops are planted, then comes summer where they ripen, which is followed by the harvest in Autumn, and finally the death of the plants in winter, which cycle is symbolized by what Jesus did for all of us.  By the return of Jesus from "a death" on the cross he came back to give an impulse of love to mankind, and Christ, like the sun, does this cycle annually. 

We see that the above analogy on plants, explained elsewhere by Max, can not alone fit what happened on the cross, but other analogies Max told did fit if two analogies were used to explain one event.  Max had to make for confounding verses for, as we will see below, during his life time it was not the time to reveal the truth on the subject of the crucifixion.  Of course we can easily say that Max did reveal the truth, but because his method of giving hints was so obscure that it can be said that for most of humanity, if they did not have an explanation like found here, that he never told the truth. 

Since two people were involved in one crucifixion, then there are two truths operating simultaneously, which causes confusion that such can occur as it defies common sense.  There is the truth of the analogy of  planting, and harvesting of grain, where one person from Arabia lived, then his life harvested where he died on the cross as the look alike of Jesus, and about five hundred years later his body was reseeded to begin the cycle again when he was reborn from a mother’s human womb.  In his future life he would be reborn as Mohammed the Prophet, where from his previous life he had now gathered together in his next a greater harvest in the work of benefiting humanity.  There is also the analogy of a tree being seeded, growing to bear fruit, then lying dormant during winter, until spring returns again, so that without dying it bears fruit every season, which happened in the life of Jesus Christ, who did not die, but escaped due to looking like the person who carried his cross.  The body of Jesus is still in a dormant state,  while his spirit ascended to heaven.  His living body is buried in a secret place on earth, and he will not be seen walking about until the reborn Peter, the coming of the son of man’s work is complete.  Peter's work is like a farmer, who prunes the tree, and prepares for the next season.  

 So we will see many analogies concerning "a death" on the cross, which will be explained when the subject of the crucifixion is covered later.  By using "a death" on the cross we see no name was mentioned, which allows us to plug in the correct answer of whose death it was, once we have found the correct conclusion. 

Here we see an example of similar trickery in the NT in the book of Hebrews 9:15  "And for this cause he is the mediator of a new covenant, that a death having taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first covenant, they that have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance."

Max wrote the book of Hebrews when he was the apostle Paul, which book has both mature solid food for adults, and also milk for the babes in Christ, which will mislead the babe in Christ reader if they are not aware of the many subtle hints, which to them  are too obscure to understand.  Those ideas are covered in detail in the link "Creating myths from guile."

Because Max was accepted as an authority, then when he openly stated that Jesus was crucified, the student looked no further, all the while many times Max hinted for them not to only look on the surface of what he taught.  He gave them many hints to show he would at times teach using guile, but they did not understand.   Of course for many years I did what they did, proving that I was not a genius.  But I did have a reason for my accepting the many apparent errors, which otherwise should have made me leave, and never return.  

My reasons for searching for more answers to life led me to the book the RCC, but it did not show me what I wished to know.  So I went to other organizations like the Theosophical Society, which helped a bit, but still I was not satisfied.  I then came back to the RF, and read more of their works.   Eventually I was satisfied, but I noticed that Max had a number of contradictions, particularly concerning items related to the crucifixion, so that I was once again thinking of leaving.   However, that is when the Elder Brother came to me, and let me know that I should stay in the RF by showing me his mastery on occult principles. After his demonstration, I then accepted all contradictions in any of Max’s books as something that would someday be later cleared away.  For about twenty years I never once thought that I would be the one to clear the contradictions away.  

 Very few would ever believe that the works by Max that they were reading were designed to have some similarities to the NT, so that it would mislead them, but all at the same time, when one has the occult key, which is simply logic, all the confusion could be cleared away. 

Only after the Archangel Michael spoke to me in 1998, which happened about twenty years after I first read the works by Max, where now Michael gave me a hint, did I finally see the truth that Max had fooled me a number of times.  Many current RF members have finally learned what I have learned, after they read my website, but they are too worldly to want to join in, and endure hardship to spread the word.  Jesus encountered the same type of people in his day, who were those who said they liked him, but they preferred to follow the already established priesthood instead.  By their so doing, and since the priesthood wished to murder Jesus, then Jesus called all of them, in fact the entire world in a figurative sense, as people "Hating me without a cause."  

For the past 28 years I have been carrying the sins of the RF, due to the sexual promiscuity of some of their members, and the rest of the members, even if in the majority, and are not practicing sexual license, Ephesians 5:11-12, by their not caring to remove those who break the laws of Christ from among them, so in a manner of speaking the entire RF is sexually promiscuous. As a result of their protecting darkness, I have a demon from the Devil placed upon me, 2 Corinthians 12:7-9, due to what they have done, which is another manner of my carrying the sins of law breakers, when in the other instance I carried the sins of the US Congress for 390 days, and saved them during 911. The effects of both are still upon me today.

In November of 2008  I called the RF to see if I would become a member once again.  I tested the person who answered my call.  I said that: "No person a professional astrologer is allowed to be a member.  If you found a person was a professional astrologer, and they were also a RF member would you remove their membership? "

 I was told in reply that: "It would not likely be to the benefit of the person to be a member of the RF if they were a professional astrologer."  

That was a rather stupid reply I thought. I then asked the person:  "Since you are to remove those who are professionals, how about those who do not live up to the principles of the RF that states the members are to heal the sick and preach the gospel.  For example, what about those that fornicate?  That is going against the gospel, and it is worse than the case where one can not be both a professional astrologer, and an RF member.  I know of about 25 percent, at least that much, that use to fornicate when I was a member around 30 years ago. Would you remove them for breaking the laws of Christ?" 

The person replied that: " they were very spiritual out at RF International HQ, and she did not know of any that fornicated." 

 I did not say that:  'people don't put up signs saying "We are fornicating."  You must find out by simply looking into their daily lives.  You should be a brother, or sister in Christ and be concerned about their lives.' 

  I did continue talking and mentioned several names from long ago that fornicated, and she said that one of them recently, about three years back, had a problem, but the woman he was involved with was removed. 

 In other words things have not changed at all. They both should have been removed.  I can safely say that about 25 percent in the so called highly spiritual International HQ are fornicating at sometime or another. I therefore made up my mind not to become a member.  If they are that stupid, or that evil minded to think they can fool me, I can do nothing to correct their lawless nature all by myself.  So I did not return.  The only thing I can do is to state what happened, such as I have in my website, and hope some day a large number of people will join so to clean up that cesspool at the IRF HQ. 

 They neither love their neighbors sufficiently to find out if they live the Christian life, and the rest of the others are about fornicating.  Sounds like a modern version of Martin Luther and his attempts to clean up the Vatican.

Don't worry, or feel bad about what happened to me in the past, that is for those who care.  Things are not too bad.  I find that currently that most of humanity is still trying to make me pay for all of the things that they have done wrong.  They keep making up flimsy excuses to cover the wrong they did, so they can instead make it look like I am the one who is wrong.  Then they carry on like they are doing me a favor they have not yet murdered me.  Anyway, it keeps me from being bored.

What the reader will soon find explained below, by the reborn apostle Paul, contains either a deeper meaning laying beneath an unsightly garment, which is like the Zohar explains of the Torah, or these are error after error made by an author who later wishes you to believe he has a meaningful explanation on an expansive subject, on cosmology, the creation of the universe, that requires the most sublime intellect, as well as high grade clairvoyant sight to be able to investigate that area.  If the reader does not believe the insight shown below, added by the reborn apostle Peter, then who ever accepts the surface teachings while ignoring this added insight proves they are as big a fool as are those who believe that Jesus is God.  If the author of the RF can make so many simple errors, on things easily proven right, or wrong, why believe him on ideas that even Albert Einstein could not explain, unless within the errors a deeper idea is meant to be found? 

A brief reason is given here before proving that Jesus was not crucified in order for the reader to understand that this plan, which is in the process of being discarded, was devised by a loving, and wise God, and taught as it was so that His children may mature. The typical Christian is not very intelligent, as proven in the Home page, and due to their many errors that result from their poor insight many in time would simply give up on life. They would feel humiliated by their many imperfect actions, and would feel who could care, much less love them.  They may stay at home, and never venture out, and would need some one to force them out, even by a beating to get them to continue on. So they were given a story where they were told they are forgiven, and no matter their failures that they need not care, only continue on and labor in what ever you do, and when you die you will enter heaven. This then allows them to think, even if their ideas are futile, which causes the mind to evolve simply because they are using it, where before they would give up. That is only one of the many reasons for the story of a so called crucified Jesus, who returns from the so called dead, so he appears to be God.  Any other questions one may have concerning why such a story would be told are covered in the link at the top left "Creating Myths from Guile."

The average Christian has enough intelligence to understand the simple idea told here, which is that for about two thousand years they have believed in a lie, and they faired pretty well believing it, so if ever they feel down again, just recall that if you need a lie to help you, then make up your own, and believe in that. Another method that would work as well, or even better would be to learn what is taught in this site, and use that to make you feel good about yourself.  That ends a brief reason for making it look like Jesus was crucified.      

 Here begins a quick look at the place in the RCC, which proves Max was the reborn apostle Paul. After that, then a proof that Jesus was not crucified will be shown. This will also prove, by one more of many other proofs, that I am the reborn apostle Peter. Below we will look at excerpts from pages 169 - 171 of the RCC.  In only three pages will many deeper truths be found. 

The use of double parenthesis  ((  )) with explanations within is inserted in the text below, which are not part of the original book,  in order to help us see how to read between the lines, and find a deeper truth within. The reader should, in fact must click on every link when they come to one, in order to pick up the deeper clues on how to read between the lines. 

Max begins by explaining about our past state of belief on spiritual matters, and how we "dallied his time away without developing the resources of the world, as do the people of India today, for the same reason."  But, it was time now for us to conquer the physical world. For that reason wine, or alcohol was introduced.  Here follows the rest of his work

                   ---------------------------------------

“Hitherto only water had been used as a drink and in the ceremonies of the Temple service, but after the submergence of Atlantis--a continent which once existed between Europe and America, where the Atlantic Ocean now lies--those who escaped destruction began to cultivate the vine and make wine, as we find narrated in the Bible story of Noah.((Here we find a hint of the time we are approaching today: "As in the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the son of man."  Max will eventually give many hints on the name in a past life of the one, who will be that son of man today, so that together he has practically shouted out the name of that person. )) Noah symbolizes the remnant of the Atlantean Epoch, which became the nucleus of the Fifth Race--therefore our progenitors.

(( There are many examples of what a remnant means in the Bible, here are a few that relates to the past, and to the time today.

Here is when Jesus walked on earth:  Isaiah 28:5  " In that day the Lord of hosts will be for a crown of glory and a diadem of beauty to the remnant of His people "


Here talks about the time when Peter, and Paul were alive after Jesus ascended to heaven:  Romans 9:27  Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: "Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, the remnant will be saved.

And soon follows in Romans this verse, which is about Peter as he is reborn life, after life:  Romans 9:33   As it is written: "Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and rock of offense, and whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.''

Here is a verse on the remnant (still in the book of Romans in the portion where the truth, and riddles are told) where the “present time” includes the time up until  the son of man comes: Romans 11:5   Even so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace.

Here are verses that Peter uses found in Acts 2:20-21, taken from Joel, that relates to “as in the days of Noah“ :  Joel 2:31-32 "The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord.  And it shall come to pass that whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."

  But Peter does not include all of the verses, and so like a riddle we must see what else does this time include.  Here are the verses that follow immediately, only found in Joel 2:32 "For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be deliverance, as the Lord has said, among the remnant whom the Lord calls."

The verses above say  “before the terrible day of the Lord.”  That means first must signs of the sun turned to darkness be shown, and so on, which is what is found in a nuclear winter.  Then after that someday, which someday corresponds to the standards of evolution, which can involve millions of years, then the second coming of Christ will come whether prepared or not.  By that time many people will have entered into the second coming of Christ, and will gladly look forward to the terrible day for the many others who are not prepared when Christ returns to end life on earth.  That means another day like in the days of Noah will happen, but that future one is maybe millions of years away. 

Here the word remnant is not found, but the product of those who are chosen by their deeds, or by their fruit, who will be the remnant are the ones found in these verses written down by the prophet Daniel.  Daniel lived around 580 BC :

Daniel 12:9-10  "And he said, "Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.   Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand. "


In order for the verses in Daniel 12:9-10 to be fulfilled, that tells of an end to come, like when Noah saw the end of his generation, where only a remnant remained to start the seed of the next race, so then will we need to see a time come where miracles of righteousness, and a preacher of righteousness appears that a new attitude may be instilled within humanity.  The new attitude would be loving God, where we learn the mature teachings on what that means, more than loving man, and what man wants to teach us on how to behave.  The scientific method will allow that to happen so that humans may intelligently differentiate between the laws of God, and the laws of man that may go against the laws of God.  Then doing works that show that change.  This son of man today is part of the remnant who has returned, according to the election of grace, upon whom the church of Jesus Christ will be built upon. ))

The active principle of alcohol is a "spirit" and as the humanity of the earlier Epochs used the articles of food best suited to their vehicles, so this spirit was, in the Fifth Epoch, added to the foods previously used by evolving humanity. It acts upon the spirit of the Fifth Epoch man, temporarily paralyzing it, that it may know, esteem and conquer the physical world and value it at its proper worth. Thus man forgets, for the time being, his spiritual home, clinging to this form of existence, which he has previously despised, with all the tenacity born of a feeling that this is all there is--or at least, preferring the certainty of this world to taking chances on a heaven which, in his present muddled state, he does not understand.

Water only had been used in the Temples, but now this is altered. "Bacchus," a god of wine, ((Bacchus did not need to be mentioned.  Max only needed to say Wine was introduced.  Bacchus is his hint that the NT myth story is based upon the earlier Greek myths, which is told in more detail in the link "Creating Myths from Guile." )) appears and under his sway the most advanced nations forget that there is a higher life. None who offer tribute to the counterfeit spirit of wine or any alcoholic liquor (the product of fermentation and decay) can ever know anything of the higher Self--the true Spirit which is the very source of life.

(( The phrase “none who offer tribute” emphasizes the idea that alcohol is more of a remedy, on various occasions, to make an event more tolerable.  If our life is based upon earning a living so later we may party then we offer tribute to alcohol.  Jesus, Paul, and all of the apostles drank alcohol in moderation.  Paul, 1 Timothy 5:23, said that a little wine is beneficial.  There is never one time in the NT where Jesus, or any of his close disciples were found mentally impaired by alcohol, and yet here is what Jesus said he was called:  Matthew 11: 18-19  "For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, `He has a demon.'  The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, `Look, a gluttonous man and a winebibber, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!' But wisdom is justified by her children.''

The Qur’an if read correctly shows that if there is no benefit at all from using alcohol, say as a remedy for the body, or to make a social event more tolerable, then alcohol should not be used.   Otherwise it is OK, but moderation is the key so we do not go to excess and are tempted by the devil. 

There are some Christians, Matthew 26:29,  who say they will not drink alcohol because Jesus said just a few days before he departed earth that he will not drink of the vine anymore.  If a person is that stupid, not being able to realize that you can't drink alcohol when you don't have a physical body, which was soon to be the case for Jesus, then I agree with those people as their mind is too feeble where even one shot of alcohol would likely impair their judgment so they were easily tempted by the devil. Jesus said that when he returns he will once again drink alcohol, so we should easily see that if Jesus were here in body right now that we would at times find him drinking. 

Not drinking alcohol will not make the Father's kingdom come any quicker. Only deeds of righteousness will hasten that day.  Those who do not drink alcohol because they can not reason properly, also are not able to see that their deeds they call righteous, are not really righteous at all. 

There is no great reason to drink alcohol if anyone cares not to.  There are other ways to benefit the stomach without using alcohol.   For 14 years, from the age of 24 to age 38 years I never touched a drop of alcohol, and even made sure that the Vanilla extract I used was alcohol free.  I did drink grape juice, which in many ways is the equivalent of wine, but without the alcohol.  From the age of 38 there on I drank socially.  Then for an entire  year at age 58 I went without drinking alcohol once again, but I now drink socially. 

A large helping of the typical food served at lunch, or dinner that was prepared alcohol free, that is no alcohol was added to it,  is still said to have the equivalent of one half beer of alcohol in it due to the natural fermentation of food. So it is rather hard not to have some amount of alcohol in our diet no matter what we do.  ))

All this was preparatory to the coming of Christ, and it is of the highest significance that His first act was to change "water into wine." (John 2:11.) (( Here is the quote of John 2:11 "This beginning of signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him."  The introductory portion of this web site called "Home page" should have been read first before starting this link: "The reborn apostle Paul." 

 If the reader has decided to read this link before finishing Home page they may not be prepared for the trickery of Max, which is found in his many works, where some is explained in this link.  Also, if any idea explained here seems far fetched at first, keep an open mind, for eventually many other corroborating details will dovetail so that the reader should no longer have any doubts.   

Max begins talking about miracles by introducing one deed of Jesus by saying it was "His first act," and as we see above it is in italic print. 

When italic print is found in the works of Max, that is a hint to look deeper. His first act of changing "water to wine" can be accepted as true, so long as we confine ourselves to only the area of Cana.  But since it is italicized, then we should realize that more can be found if we will investigate. For example, the first time Max uses italic print is in his opening poem titled "Creed or Christ." Here is the place:

"At His request the Universal Spirit came

To all the churches; not to one alone

On Pentecostal morn a tongue of flame

Round each apostle as a halo shone." 

When the first churches were established that all would be true, but later, after the "Lawless One," 2 Thess 2:8-12,  arrived around the year 325 AD, then that was no longer valid for each church. Since then like vultures ravenous with greed, various churches have oftened battled one another for an empty name. 

We see above in the poem that each is also italicized, which applies to the apostles.  Therefore a deeper message is implied that deals with the apostles, which idea is found here in this web site.  That deeper message is that Max, and Dan, who are two reborn apostles will reveal to you who is the Lawless One, and of course will have to reveal many other ideas in order to prove that fact.  

 Returning to look more closely at His first act.  The Book of Acts is the record of the deeds, and preaching of the apostles after Jesus ascended into Heaven.  We are therefore introduced to the idea that a continuation of the preaching of the apostles who are, as we will soon find, bound by the command of "Tell no one who is Jesus the Christ" is still in effect.  So lies, found on the surface of Max's explanation, must be told concerning the crucifixion until the archangel Michael, the prince of the Jews, tells otherwise, which change happened when Michael recently spoke to me.  The book of Acts is concerned primarily with the actions of Peter, and Paul.    

When Paul returned, or was reborn, one of his first acts in the RCC was to explain that rebirth was an esoteric Christian teaching for about 2000 years that today is to be taught publicly.  Then when Peter returns the second act in the same book is the esoteric teaching that Jesus was not crucified, and  that today this is also to be taught publicly.  In the meantime, the reborn Peter and Paul will do other acts that are found elsewhere in the works of the RF, and that also can be found in, and around the world.  Peter can say something similar to what Jesus said at John 4:48 , but in his own words "You will no doubt not believe unless you see many miracles, and unless you use logic."      

 Max above told of "the coming of Christ," then he gave a hint of the next level that the teachings of Christ would be explained publicly by using "His first act," and then he immediately gave an example, John 2:11, which like "the son of man" if not understood will lead you astray.  Max, who is under the direction of the Elder Brothers, knew that I would sift through the guile in the NT, and find that the "water to wine" was not the first miracle.  In fact the word "act" is never found in the gospels to describe even one miracle of Jesus.  We are therefore left with a hint that we are dealing with a similar event in modern times that is like the acts of old, where Peter, and Paul preach the word of God. 

In order to see that "His first act" is guile, we will investigate a few verses in the NT, and find that Jesus had performed other miracles prior to changing water to wine, the only problem is, is that most of those other miracles are not described in any detail.  All we are told is that Jesus performed miracles.  Changing water to wine was the first of the signs, and wonders that occurred when Jesus was at Cana, that is, it appears to be the first due to the way the verse is written.  It leads one to believe Jesus did not do any miracles previous to Cana.  However, why could not this miracle have taken place earlier, Luke 4:13 - 37, where Jesus announces for the first time who He is by introducing prophecy which explains why the many miracles, and then he soon performs a miracle of changing his identity, just like is clearly shown he can do the same, Matthew 24:13 - 31, after the crucifixion.

It is possible that the miracle of Jesus changing his appearance happened before changing water to wine. One thing for certain we will learn here is that changing water to wine was not the first miracle.  We can also say for certain that the first secret miracle, or the first miracle that was so unexpected, and beyond belief, which caused most people never to know a miracle happened was the time Jesus changed his appearance that he might not be murdered.  

From this simple insight explained here, we should be willing to classify the miracles of Jesus into at least two different groups:  One group of miracles would be those that happened that most people never could believe happened, so the miracles were ignored. Those types of miracles require logic to reveal.  The second group of miracles would be those that most anyone upon seeing would say was a miracle, where the discernment needed would involve little or no thinking at all.   

When Jesus performed a miracle during the time he was about to be killed by being thrown off a steep cliff of a hill, which miracle allowed him to escape, which was where he transformed himself so he was not recognized, that miracle very possibly happened prior to changing water to wine.  The gospels talk about miracles without giving any specific description, then we read about one miracle that is not recognized by most people as a miracle, then finally we read about a miracle, that claims to be his first, but that miracle is told to be his first while at Cana.  

Returning to the miracle that most people never considered to be a miracle, but those people who were considerably more intelligent saw as plain as day that it was a miracle.  Simple logic tells us there is no other way possible for Jesus, who was protected only by himself, when surrounded by over a dozen people bent on his death, to escape unless he changed his appearance, and walked away:  Luke 4:30  "Then passing through the midst of them, He went His way."   Of course other verses  show Jesus could also vanish, but the verses here say Jesus merely walked away. 

This feat of Jesus by analogy parallels what Max said about our focusing on the physical world thereby forgetting the realities of the spiritual, and our having a muddled state of mind. This  miracle, which may have been performed before the first miracle of Jesus while he was at Cana, shows the manner in which Jesus escapes death when he is about to be killed the final time at the crucifixion, except at that time he changes the appearance of both himself, and another, who was Simon of Cyrene. 

Concerning the other miracles that were never described in any detail, (not those that were secret miracles) we read in the gospels that while in his home town of Nazareth, Jesus was unable to perform many miracles of healing due to the disbelief of the people there.  Because Jesus could not heal in Nazareth like he had in other towns then Jesus said to his town folk, Luke 4:23, "You will surely say this proverb to Me, `Physician, heal yourself! Whatever we have heard done in Capernaum, do also here in Your country.' ''  

 That quote implies that at one level, which is obvious, that the town people thought if Jesus were to get his own life in order first, then they might be more believing.  Since Jesus had been absent from Nazareth for about 17 years, then to suddenly return without having a good excuse, like: while he was gone he got married, fathered several children,  and generated some prosperity all to show he was a good family man, and hard worker, then they might be more inclined to accept him.  Jesus could have said anything else, but he chose that quote because at another level, which the town folk did not understand, which is like the parables of Jesus, that he would in a manner of speaking “heal himself” by a transformation in order not to die.  Jesus had foreknowledge, so he hinted at the miracle he would perform before he performed it.   

The clear implication that the town folks had about Jesus was that he turned from being a good son, and a person respected among the community into a playboy, or a bum, who like the prodigal son had finally returned after losing it all. Jesus was on the mend, but the town folks expected him to fall again into his old ways, what ever they were during his long 17 year absence. 

Here are some more verses that show that Jesus was not very well known by his community.  Before reading them think about this:   Should we believe that Jesus was only a common person all the time that he lived in his community, but then suddenly after about 18 years in the community as a plain Joe that now he appears to be both a genius, and a great magician?   The community is wondering where did he get this power, so either they had not known him, and he just showed up after a long absence, or Jesus some how was a common Joe who overnight became a super star.  

 What makes more sense? 

   After all, if he lived right there in town for 18 years, they would have seen glimpses of this wondrous man doing great deeds before.  If that were true then they would not question him one bit, but if instead Jesus suddenly came home, and few recall who he was then is not that reason the better explanation for the following verses? :    Matthew 13: 54-56 “ And when He had come to His own country, He taught them in their synagogue, so that they were astonished and said, "Where did this Man get this wisdom and these mighty works? Is this not the carpenter's son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brothers James, Joses, Simon, and Judas?  And His sisters, are they not all with us? Where then did this Man get all these things?''

Is the reader still doubtful that they are finally learning the truth on the life of Jesus?  Yes, many probably are.  Who could believe that Jesus left his family, and walked away, and traveled to the East, and learned to be a Yogi, or Hindu Master?  

What one is learning here goes against a 2000 year tradition that Jesus was actually God, and since He is God, then He can do anything, at anytime.  Instead we are learning that Jesus was a human being.  Nothing more than that, and yet he was a very advanced one. Jesus still had to study for years, just like any other human has to do if they wish to excel at their field of study.  Jesus went to India, and studied there.  After many years of study he finally returned home, and he showed to all what he had learned. 

The NT is written with guile.  It makes it look like Jesus lived in Jerusalem for about 17 years, and never did a thing, he just live there, and was ordinary.  Then suddenly he performed miracles, and understood scripture.  Well, only God can do that, where no prior education, and effort was involved.  Over night he is a Super Star without having applied himself.  Can anyone think of one person like that who became famous without ever applying themselves? I know I can not recall anyone.   

The easiest of all trades, in my opinion, which is singing, still the person needs to practice singing for many years.  So the gospels would have us think that Jesus suddenly was a Super Star over night. However, common sense tells us that is not so.   The only other explanation is that Jesus, like Gotama, the Buddha, left his family and went off to learn his own particular trade.  Either that, or Jesus is really God.  But then the scripture shows that Jesus never acted like God before, and he only acted like God after he was about 30 years old.  Again, common sense tells us that most likely Jesus is not God, but that instead he went off and trained for many years, and then after his studies he returned home, and showed off what he had learned.  Jesus had learned over a period of about 17 years of absence, while in India, to be a miracle worker.         

Therefore the first transformation can be seen as an earlier miracle, which involved a form of deception, which allowed Jesus to escape from his disbelieving home town.  In reality, due to how the gospels are written, where guile is involved, we can not say for certain that this transformation in Nazareth was a miracle before the one at Cana, but we can at least give the possibility that it happened earlier than the sign in Cana.  If nothing else, at least this sign which clearly came before changing water to wine is certain:  John 1:48-50 "Nathanael said to Him, "How do You know me?'' Jesus answered and said to him, "Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.'' Nathanael answered and said to Him, "Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!''  Jesus answered and said to him, "Because I said to you, `I saw you under the fig tree,' do you believe? You will see greater things than these.''

Andrew the brother of Peter already believed in Jesus before Nathanael did, due to the statements made of Jesus by John the Baptist, who Andrew was also a disciple of, and so did many other disciples prior to the signs at Cana believe in Jesus, and yet here after the water was changed to wine, this is said: John 2:11 "This beginning of signs Jesus did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him." 

We know that many of his disciples already believed in Jesus prior to the sign at Cana, but the way the verses are written it leads the reader to think that only at Cana did the wondrous signs ever begin, which was the reason they believed in him.

It is human nature not to believe that a miracle has happened, and other explanations are searched for, unless previously the same person had proven before that they could perform miracles.  In a real life event, if suddenly six large jars of water  became good wine, much laughter would be evoked from those who saw this take place.  Jokes, and doubts would abound denying that a real miracle had taken place, and yet in these verses they go on as if they expected nothing less than a miracle.  

 Here is what happened at the miracle of Pentecost where "there appeared to them divided tongues, as of fire, and one sat upon each of them"  and where also many believers, due to the Holy Spirit, spoke in languages they never had heard before, and yet others who knew those languages understood.  The others who could not understand the many languages spoken mocked this event.  Acts 2:13-15 "Others mocking said, "They are full of new wine.''  But Peter, standing up with the eleven, raised his voice and said to them, "Men of Judea and all who dwell in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and heed my words. For these are not drunk, as you suppose, since it is only the third hour of the day."

Clearly, the miracle at Cana was not the first, for it is absurd to believe that water could be turned to wine, and not question it unless Jesus had shown miracles previously.  Obviously by the time of the wedding feast such miracles were now common place for the disciples to witness.    The servants who had drawn the water, who likely had never seen miracles before, would be surrounded by over a dozen disciples of Jesus who would act like this was nothing at all. Overall then the reaction would be merely one of acceptance,  without ridicule, or denial, just as portrayed in these verses.

There is no reason not to say that the miracle of His transformation happened earlier while Jesus was in the Kingdom of Herod, at his home town of Nazareth, which is part of Galilee, then he later went on to another part of that same Kingdom, Capernaum, also part of Galilee, and performed more miracles there, and then later while at Cana, also part of Galilee, his first miracle there was changing water to wine.

 Even though the verses in the gospel of Luke, concerning the doubt of the town people of Jesus for him to perform miracles there, tells us that other miracles previous to his entering the synagogue in Nazareth had taken place, that does not mean that what happened at Cana happened earlier.  Jesus could have simply sat in that synagogue on the Sabbath for weeks, and in the meantime he had done miracles elsewhere, all the while trying miracles in Nazareth, and then eventually one Sabbath he stood up and announced who he was. We can see that most likely that is what really happened, as the town people of Jesus had become use to his failures in Nazareth. 

We should be prepared at this point to be convinced, after a little more investigation of scripture, that Jesus performed other miracles previous to changing water to wine at Cana.  Here are verses that by using logic proves that the first of all the miracles by Jesus did not happen at Cana.  John 4:54  "This again is the second sign that Jesus did when He had come out of Judea into Galilee."  

That was said to be the second miracle after the miracle at Cana of changing water to wine, which second miracle involved a boy being healed, who was on the verge of death.  In between the time of the first miracle at Cana, and the second miracle in that same place, Jesus had while in Samaria talked to a Samaritan woman, who said this of Jesus: John 4:29 "Come, see a Man who told me all things that I ever did. Could this be the Christ?''   Then Jesus stayed two more days in that town, and amazed nearly everyone else, and convinced most there that he was the Christ.  What Jesus did in Samaria are called signs, and wonders, which are miracles, and we have no idea how many he performed, but an easy guess would be that the miracles were in the hundreds.  So again, in Cana Jesus did two miracles, but in between while in Samaria, he did at least one hundred. 

 After all, right after Jesus had convinced near an entire town in Samaria on who he was, later when in Cana Jesus said to the man who asked for his son to be healed:  John 4:48  "Then Jesus said to him, "Unless you people see signs and wonders, you will by no means believe.''  What Jesus said to that man reflects back upon all that Jesus had to do in Samaria. 

If the first miracle Jesus ever performed was really in Cana, then the NT would not say when a child with a severe fever was healed, while the father was in Cana, that this was the second of his miracles  when obviously in Samaria many more had been done.  If the first miracle was really in Cana, then when Jesus returned to Cana, the narrative should have said "this was his one hundred and second miracle,"  or however many were performed in Samaria, so that the total in Samaria added to the first in Cana, then added to this his second while in Cana would be told.  Clearly, the NT is only talking about what happened in Cana, which does not mean it was the first where all of his miracles began.  Obviously, the NT is full of guile. In conclusion, we can be fairly certain that Cana was not the first place that the miracles of Jesus began. 

No one is certain of the location of the town called Cana in the NT.  At least four different explanations on different locations by various Bible scholars have been given, so we see deception is included even in the name of the town called Cana.  A deeper mystery on why the first so called miracle happened in a town called Cana relates to how the OT is written.  The Oral tradition, which was long ago a secret known only to the priesthood, but is public knowledge today,  tells how to find a deeper meaning in the Torah.  One deeper meaning is that Cana, Genesis 9:18-26, is related to Noah, which then ties together with what the reborn apostle Paul, and Peter are doing concerning telling who is the person during the coming of the son of man.  No deep explanation on how Cana, and Genesis 9 are related will be discussed here.  Instead we continue with Jesus and His first act.    

  Before Jesus went to announce who he was at Nazareth, he had already become well known around Galilee, which includes more than those sites told above.  If more information were included in John 2:11, stating that no miracles were ever displayed before in any other territory, then we would have to accept the surface reading of that verse, that this was really the beginning of all miracles.  However, as Home page proves, that verse gives one more example of the manner in which the NT was written, proving the NT is full of guile. The authors knew the typical reader will never look deeper, for they are no more than a babe in Christ.  

Changing water to wine is also a transformation, which by calling it his first miracle at Cana, hints back at the first miracle when Jesus  saved himself. That transformation where Jesus changed his appearance obviously could not have been the first of all of the miracles of Jesus, but it may have happened before the first miracle at Cana.  At least we do know that in his home town that it was the first miracle that involved a transformation to save himself.  We might note that the faith his town folk had in him, which was a faith of not believing in him, was the power that assisted Jesus in his transformation to become who he was not.   

 The word "transformation" is the same as "Transfiguration" except by usage Transfiguration has come to be reserved for Matthew 17:1 - 9, where the face of Jesus shown like the sun, and his clothes were bathed in radiate light, when three of the apostles were with Him on the holy mountain, and also Moses, and Elijah appeared before them.  The Transfiguration scene outside of the gospels is only mentioned by Peter, 2 Peter 1:17-18, when Peter says just before telling of that scene:   2 Peter 1:16 "For we did not follow cunningly devised fables when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty."

What I was hinting at in the last verse above, when called Peter, and am explaining today is that most of the stories in the Gospels are told so to make up myth stories, but that one scene at the transfiguration was a true description that involved no guile. The apostle Paul mentions Noah once in his many letters, and I mention Noah twice in my two short letters, where I also mention events during the time of Sodom, which reflects upon events today, Revelation 11:8, that tell in which city the Two Witnesses die, which is a parable about the Babes in Christ version of Christianity, and Islam, where the parable reveals where that misunderstanding will end, which happens in the city of Washington, DC.  As regards the time they will die, it can be said that it will be very soon, either a little before 2010 AD, or a little after. 

The Holy Spirit could easily tell me when the change will happen, but by my actions today the Holy Spirit is telling us we are to mature on certain things.  We are to use our own brains, and with what we find about us to figure the solution out on our own. 

So together Paul, and Peter in the NT, where Noah appears thrice, and today that relationship appears again in this link once the deeper mysteries are explained, we therefore can be certain that the one with the most Noahs, like in a democracy,  will be the coming of the son of man. The coming of the son of man must be rejected, scripture says so, where no trickery is involved in his rejection, unlike the so called rejection of Jesus, where we all know by even a brief look into his life that Jesus was overall never rejected.  Jesus was glorified everywhere, except in his home town.  He was glorified by the Priests who sought to kill him, for they were exceedingly jealous, and envious of him.  As for me I am like the bathroom of the house, a very necessary room to have in a home, but not a place we honor anyone among mankind, unless they are the coming of the son of man. 

 Now we know that the public was also invited to a type of Transfiguration, which happened when Jesus escaped from being thrown off a hill, only they were not aware what they were seeing, because Jesus did not explain to them that he changed his appearance, and merely walked away.  Keeping in the custom of Jesus, He only explained his parables to his chosen disciples. However, Jesus hoped the apostles could figure out His parables on their own so He did not need to explain.  

So has Max Heindel done a similar type of deception in this area of his book, and it is done several times within a few pages so that a clear message may be taught. The message is to investigate in greater detail, and then use logic to figure it out. 

To summarize, the first miracle in Cana of changing water to wine reflects upon the first miracle in Nazareth when Jesus changed himself to look like another. That together with this explanation becomes the first of the acts done by the two reborn apostles Peter, and Paul, where Paul will soon do his own type of transformation as shown further below. ))    

  In private He taught Rebirth to his His disciples. He not only taught them in words, but He took them "into the mountain." This is a mystic term meaning a place of Initiation. In the course of Initiation they see for themselves that Rebirth is a fact, for there Elijah appeared before them, who, they are told, is also John the Baptist. (( Only Peter, John, James, and Jesus were at the Transfiguration)) Christ, in unequivocal terms, had previously told them, when speaking of John the Baptist, "this is Elijah who was for to come." He reiterates this at the Transfiguration scene, saying, "Elijah has come already and they knew him not, but have done to him whatsoever they listed." And following this, it is said that "they understood He spake of John the Baptist." (Matt. 17:12-13). On this occasion, and also at the time when Rebirth was discussed between Him and His disciples, they told Him that some thought He was Elijah and others that He was one of the prophets who had been reborn. He commanded them to "tell no man." (Matt. 17:9; Luke 9:21). (( There is a difference here that Max does not go into. The "tell no one" in Matt 17:9 applies to the past lives of John the Baptist, which deals with reincarnation, where those past lives were revealed in the vision of the transfiguration, but Luke 9:21, concerns "And He strictly warned and commanded them to tell this to no one, " which applies to the identity of Jesus Christ, which then  makes up two secrets on two different subjects.  Max makes it appear to be one, and the same because he never goes into explaining Luke 9:21, and yet, there it is, waiting to be told. )) This was to be, for thousands of years, an esoteric teaching, to be known only among the few pioneers who fitted themselves for the knowledge, pushing ahead to the stage of development when these truths will again be known to man. ((The transfiguration scene is  told soon after Jesus tells Peter that upon Peter will Jesus Christ build his church. Those verses where Jesus bequeaths such an honor to Peter have a similar command by Jesus of "tell no one" found here: Matthew 16:20 "Then He commanded His disciples that they should tell no one that He was Jesus the Christ." 

Just before that Jesus said this: Matthew 16:18 - 19 "And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.  And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.''   So even Max, though more fit than myself, he could not loose on earth that one command of "tell no one He was the Christ."  I had been the one to seal it on earth, Acts 2:23, so that it was sealed in heaven. 

 The above idea had already been explained in Home page, but later in this link it will be explained again how by using logic the statement that Jesus was crucified in Acts 2:23 is the key to prove that he was not, which all goes back to the original command of "Tell no one."  Therefore I must return to unseal it on earth, or explain it as is being done in this web site, where this message flashes over the internet like lightning from east to west, that it might be loosed in heaven.  My use by God as the Son of Man as in the Days of Noah shows that most any person, those not great at all, if they will be obedient to the will of God, can also be a Son of Man.

Logic tells us this is true by looking at the hard to believe fact that this simple task has been accomplished by me, when many millions of others could have done the same, and even done a better job.  Those others, who are near an uncountable number by mere human methods of counting, not talking about what modern computers can do, have spanned thousands of years, but were never allowed to do such a simple task, which is to announce their discovery publicly.  The Holy Spirit, or one of the Elder Brothers would tell them to keep it a secret. If they would not obey, then they would get ill, or be punished like was the apostle Paul, when he was knocked off his horse in a blinding light, all of which was for their own good.  If they still disobeyed then they would be killed, however, not killed by God, or the angels of God, or by the elect in heavenly places,  but murdered by stupid human beings, who only feared man, or by smart humans that were obedient more to man, than to God. 

One of the main reasons, if not the only reason, that one person was allowed to lock to the masses the incorrect idea that Jesus was crucified, and then 2000 years later the same person would unlock the correct idea that Jesus was not crucified, all done by using simple logic, was so that rebirth could be proven to be true.  This was over all, from the view point of man,  a rather complex plan, but it is very effective in being an incontrovertible proof for reincarnation.   

Excuse me for what can be called rambling ideas.  As explained in another link, all text books are rambling, only they appear not to be simply because proper introductory, and closing sentences in a paragraph have been included to fool the reader into accepting that  most published books are coherently written.  I simply do not always include those techniques to fool my readers.  

 I have heard a number of times so called Christians comment on how scientists, and engineers, who they admit are brilliant people, will not accept Jesus, and his simple plan for salvation.  They shake their heads thinking the scientists are both brilliant, and fools at the same time to ignore the plan of simply believing in Jesus, and then you are saved. The so called Christian will say "The Engineers are looking for something complicated, and because it is simple they can not accept it as true."  They usually end by saying "When they die, and come before Jesus, then they will wish they had believed in him when they go to Hell"  Then they laugh "Ha Ha Ha!"  The link "Creating Myths from guile" shows that it is the other way around, and even the Koran says the same, that: off to Hell the Christian goes. 

For many Christians, they will not be in Hell for long, nor will all of them suffer that much.  It will be Hell enough alone for most of them when they realize they have been made to be fools by their believing a lie that a man called Jesus was God, when in fact he is not.  They will learn their error, and for vain people, which most of them are, as are many in humanity, that will be what can be called living in Hell. )) 

That Christ taught Rebirth and also the law of Consequence is perhaps shown in no other place as clearly as in the case of the man who had been born blind, where His disciples asked, "Who did sin, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" (John 9:2).  (( Elijah is mentioned only twice in the entire RCC, once here, found near where Max tells of a blind man, which shows that if we are not reading between the lines, then we are blind to the deeper teachings given here.  Elijah is mentioned one last time when the so called crucifixion of Jesus is told, and that is a clue that once again a deeper teaching can be found within that area, which concerns "Tell no one."  When Elijah appears in the RCC a second time, like the second act in Cana, then the second command, the one that Max did not explain, Luke 9:21, on "tell no one," will be covered.  Max, on the surface anyway, will "tell no one," but we will find that hidden between the lines he did say Jesus was not crucified.    

Elijah, who later was John the Baptist, and earlier was Moses was to announce the coming of Christ. The law of Moses lead the Jews on until Christ came at the time Moses became John the Baptist.  By using analogy, we will see that a pattern appears. When Peter I lead the lambs of Jesus Christ on, and today I return like did John the Baptist to announce to Christians that Jesus was not crucified, and tell that the second coming of the light of Christ is within you, and of course announce everything else in this web site.   Here follows a link that explains in more detail that pattern:  Pattern of Evolution  

 Max in the RCC will also use the archangel Michael, which is only found in two places, as a method of revealing a deeper truth, which will be publicly proven true once I appear, and logic is applied. That will be shown later in the gold colored link below called RCC Page 336.  Next we will see that Max explains, but only if we read between the lines, that he was the apostle Paul in a past life. 

Due to a number of different ideas having been explained here, which for some might result in our losing where we are in Max's book on his chain of ideas, the last sentence we were looking at will be repeated in order to bring us back on track:  "That Christ taught Rebirth and also the law of Consequence is perhaps shown in no other place as clearly as in the case of the man who had been born blind, where His disciples asked, "Who did sin, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" (John 9:2)."  Then follows his next sentence. )) 

Had Christ not taught Rebirth and the law of Consequence, the natural answer would have been, "Nonsense! How could a man have sinned BEFORE HE WAS BORN, and have brought blindness upon himself as a result?"  But Christ does not answer in that way. He is not surprised at the question, nor does He treat it as being at all unusual, showing that it was quite in harmony with His teachings. He explains, "Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents; but that the works of (the) God should be made manifest in him."

     The orthodox interpretation is that the man was born blind in order that Christ might have the opportunity of performing a miracle to show His power. It would have been a strange way for a God to obtain glory capriciously condemning a man to many years of blindness and misery that He might "show off" at a future time! We would consider a man who acted in such a manner a monster of cruelty.

How much more logical to think that there may be another explanation. To impute to God conduct which, in a human being, we would denounce in the strongest terms, is surely unreasonable.

Christ differentiates between the physically blind body of the man and the God within, which is the Higher Self.

The dense body has committed no sin. The God within has done some deed which manifests in the particular affliction from which he is suffering. It is not stretching a point to call a man a God. ((Not Paul, but Jesus says)) Paul says, (( John 10:34, Psalm 82:6. )) "know ye not that ye are Gods? and he (( Not "he" as in Jesus, but Paul refers )) refers to the human body as the "temple of God," the indwelling spirit. (( Paul wrote 1 Corinthians 6:19))

Finally, although most people do not remember their past lives, there are some who do, and all may know if they will live the life necessary to attain the knowledge. (( Max had lived the life necessary to know his past lives, and he tells you who he was by the hint above. The God within, Max, did a deed, which manifests as an apparent error by attributing the saying to Paul, when Max knew very well that "Know ye not that ye are Gods?" was actually said by Christ. Clairvoyance for those that are trained, and can leave their dense bodies allows one instant access to all records, even to records few ever knew existed. Max had editors, some of whom were trained clairvoyants. To allow such a blatant mistake to go to the publisher, and continue today after a sixth printing, and not to be corrected shows that Paul, and Max are one, and the same. He is the primary apostle for the gentiles, a large group, and Peter, myself, is the primary apostle for the Jews, and even for the US Citizens, who are compared to the world not large, and both today are proving to be rebels. (America seems a loving, and race tolerant nation, which resembles a melting pot of races.  However it is America's great wealth that creates a fictionalized love, which leads to a fictionalized melting pot. Most all US citizens no matter their race, or previous nationality, or ethnicity are overpowered in a course to acquire material goods by their animal propensities, so that, so long as you are among that course of action, then all are seen as near equals.  Take the money, fancy cars, and beautiful gadgets away that most all US Citizens love, and you will see that there is not really any love toward one another any more, at least like before, and the different races then will glaringly show that each race should not intermarry.  It is not as sinister as I make it sound, only it is not as great as others speak of the US melting pot. ) Click the followng  link to see that by words, and signs deeper meanings are hidden:  RCC page 251   Max was under the instruction of the Elder Brothers, and so he was encouraged to give a hint as to his identity using similar methods as they used. The entire writing of the RCC was under the guidance of the Elder Brothers. Excuse me for repeating myself, saying "under the guidance of the Elder Brothers," and "use logic" time, and again. Who do you think is guiding me besides my own intellect, and the Holy Spirit?  The Brothers talk to me, although not often, but they will, and they even joke around.  Recently while I entered this insight into my site, on how Peter is the son of man, where by reading between the lines more can be found, I heard one of them say:  "Do we have to tell you everything?"  

I believe I should clarify my remark above, where I said the Brothers were being humorous, because though some will understand my remark , others likely will not.  Hopefully this will make it more clear:    The Brothers were not talking to me even once, all during the time I made my investigation into the RCC. That time covered several weeks of intensive work sometimes consisting of ten or more hours of study a day.  However, once I made the proper investigation into the RCC by using logic, then I found many ideas were revealed where before I found none.  So after finding all of the new hidden knowledge, and then revealing it here on this website, suddenly, when I was near finished, I heard "Do we have to tell you everything."  ))  This requires great strength of character, because such knowledge will carry with it a knowledge of impending fate that may be hanging black and sinister over one, which will manifest in dire disaster. Nature has graciously hidden the past and the future from us, that we may not be robbed of peace of mind by suffering in anticipation of the pain in store for us. As we attain greater development we shall learn to welcome all things with equanimity, seeing in all troubles the result of past evil and feeling thankful that the obligations incurred thereby are being annulled, knowing that so much less stands between us and the day of liberation from the wheel of birth and death. (( I have what might look like equanimity.  Due to my trying the best I can for many years to help others in the way God wishes me to do, and witnessing the world's resultant reaction of their not caring what so ever, now I don't care either.  I need to work on being more thankful now.))  

End of quote.

                       --------------------------------------------------------

Next we look at the method of hiding a deeper truth, which will reveal that Jesus was not crucified. 

In order to be prepared to read what is a Cabalistic like method of hiding a deeper truth, which is that Jesus was not crucified, first a quote from an earlier portion of the same book will be shown.  Please go to this link to see that quote, which will help to begin to reveal why Jesus was not crucified.  Be believing

The following is taken from the RCC, Page 405 - 409.

           -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the old dispensation the path of Initiation was not free and open, except to the chosen few. The Hierophants of the Mysteries collected certain families about the Temples, setting them apart from all the other people. These chosen families were then rigorously guarded as to certain rites and ceremonies. Their marriages and sexual intercourse were regulated by the Hierophants.

The effect of this was to produce a race having the proper degree of laxity between the dense and vital bodies; also to wake the desire body from its state of lethargy during sleep. Thus a special few were made fit for Initiation and were given opportunities that could not be given to all. We see instances of this method among the Jews, where the tribe of Levi were the chosen Templars; also in the caste of the Brahmins, who were the only priestly class among the Hindus. ((My dense body and vital body have a great deal of laxity between them, in fact I am sometimes amazed I can do anything at all in the physical world due to my sensitivity to spiritual energy from either human, animal, or angel. ))

The Mission of Christ, in addition to saving the lost, was to make Initiation possible to all, therefore Jesus was not a Levite of the class to which priesthood came by inheritance. He came from the common people and though not of the teacher class, His teaching was higher than that of Moses.(( The OT tells the story where the Jews wished not to have a Priest rule over them, but a King, and so out of the bloodline of Jesse, 1 Samuel 16:1, was King David chosen, who was a common shepherd, who later had a son called Solomon. This blood line continued down to Joseph who was the father of Jesus. So we see the same relationship of Priesthood, and common people when John the Baptist came from the priest Zechariah. In the link "Creating myths from Guile" found on the Home page, it will be proven that Jesus, and John the baptist were Essenes, which is also known as the Dead Sea Sect at Qumran.  L. H. Schiffman in his book "Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls" at page 125, said "Thus, just as the council of elders in Jerusalem, which served as the Hasmonaean council of state, included both priestly and lay elements, so lay leaders at Qumran shared authority with the sectarian priests."  ))  

Christ Jesus did not deny Moses, the law, nor the prophets. (( Which means the Zohar must also be acknowledged. Zohar is part of the Kabbalah. Kabbalah is the oral hidden tradition of the Torah, the hidden is today public, not secret. We recall that the Zohar said "Woe to those who only see the outer garments of the Torah."  Therefore, woe to those who miss Max's point that in the very next few sentences, where the reader has now been warned, that there is a deeper message laying beneath the ghastly crucifixion scene.  )) On the contrary, He acknowledged them all and showed the people that they were His witnesses, as they all pointed to One Who was to come. He told the people that those things had served their purpose and that henceforth Love must supersede Law. (( See hint RCC page 251  , also  RCC page 319  &  you will love this one:  RCC page 336.   Max will begin to tell some lies in the next sentences, and pages to follow concerning the crucifixion. Before RCC page 405, Max never once says Jesus was crucified.  That is a lot of reading, and most authors on the subject of Christianity start on the  topic of the crucifixion rather quickly, not 405 pages later. Max at the very beginning of the RCC in the opening Poem will ask "Was Cephas, (Peter) or Paul nailed to the deathly tree?" The typical reader will think "Ahh, yes it was Jesus nailed to a tree, or a cross." However, Max never said that, and so the guile begins where it should, at the beginning. Here is the poem "Creed or Christ"   The Poem that begins the RCC .  Also, Max said above "Love must supersede Law," but those that know realize that Love contains the whole Law. Max uses more guile to set up that which is soon to follow.  By logic we see that Max just said that we must accept all that came before, and their methods, and since Max is Paul, then he will continue in the manner of writing like the Zohar, but first he must make his case, and then immediately here after he does what he said he would do, but how few understood? ))

(( A look alike, or double of, )) Christ Jesus was killed. (( Jesus miraculously transformed Simon, who carried the cross of Jesus, to look like Jesus, and then Jesus changed to look like Simon, and he escaped. During the time of Max, and before that it was not the time then to teach the truth, not openly. See page  RCC 170, Concerning: “He commanded them to “tell no man.””  RCC page 170  &  see  RCC 319-320  RCC page 319, concerning: the Zohar, and secrecy.  Excuse me for repeating myself, but I wish the reader to accept that Max is telling here what can be called an allegory, and that he warned the reader what he would do. )) In connection with this fact, we come to the supreme and fundamental difference between Him and the previous teachers, in whom the Race spirits were born. They all died and must be reborn again and again to help their peoples bear their destiny. The Archangel Michael (the Race-spirit of the Jews) (( The same angel that visited me)) raised up Moses, who was taken up to Mount Nebo to die. He was reborn as Elijah. Elijah returned as John the Baptist; Buddha died and was reborn as Shankaracharya; Shri Krishna says, "Whenever there is decay of Dharma. . .and. . .exaltation of Adharma, then I myself come forth for the protection of the good, for the destruction of evil-doers, for the sake of firmly establishing Dharma. I am born from age to age." (( As impossible as it may seem, I too, the reborn apostle Peter am reborn in this age for the destruction of evil doers, for the sake of firmly establishing Dharma for the Jews. I am a sign, like a signet ring on the hand of God, which shows God is behind this act.  It is not merely of man.  The chosen race, the Jews, is symbolic, and makes up an allegory in the OT.  All of humanity is the chosen race, and so is Jerusalem, or "the promised land"  symbolic for the entire earth, not just one little spot in the Middle East.  Those grand ideas, actual facts, will be learned by reading the works of the RF, and the TS.  ))

When death came Moses' face SHONE and Buddha's body become ALIGHT. They all reached the stage when the spirit begins to shine from within--but then they died.

Christ Jesus reached that stage on the Mount of Transfiguration. (( Peter, myself, speaks of this event in 2 Peter 1:15 - 18. First I say I will remind you of these things after my departure, and here I am to remind you. This entire area in the RCC, talking about the Zohar, and now talking about the Mount of Transfiguration relates to the Elder Brothers knowing of my rebirth, soon to happen about 40 years later, and guiding Max to write the RCC in this manner. )) It is of the very highest significance that HIS REAL WORK TOOK PLACE SUBSEQUENT TO THAT EVENT. He suffered; was KILLED--and RESURRECTED. (( Elevated meaning like in the Torah. See the Theosophical Society (TS) limits on miracles .  Jesus was not killed, but raised up, his spirit taken up, and his vital body  left behind, along with his entire physical body, buried in a crypt, in a subterranean passage around the Dead Sea area. This body is used annually by the Christ spirit to enter earth, around Xmas time, and return again to the Sun around Easter. ))

Being killed is a very different thing from dying. The blood that had been the vehicle of the Race-spirit must FLOW and be cleansed of that contaminating influence. Love of father and mother, exclusive of other fathers and mothers, must go--otherwise Universal Brotherhood and an all-embracing Altruistic Love could never become an actuality.

THE CLEANSING BLOOD.

When the Savior Christ Jesus (( His look alike, who would later be born as Mohammed the prophet)) was crucified His body was pierced in five places; in the five centers where the currents of the vital body flow; and the pressure of the crown of thorns caused a flow from the sixth also. (This is a hint to those who already know these currents. A full elucidation of this matter cannot be publicly given out at this time.)

When the blood flowed from these centers, the great Sun-spirit Christ was liberated from the physical vehicle of Jesus and found Himself IN THE EARTH, with individual vehicles. The already existing planetary vehicles He permeated with His own vehicles and, in the twinkling of an eye, diffused His own desire body over the planet, which has enabled Him thenceforth to work upon the Earth and its humanity from WITHIN.

At that moment a tremendous wave of spiritual sunlight flooded the Earth. It rent the veil which the Race-spirit had hung before the Temple to keep out all but the chosen few, and it made the Path of Initiation free thence-forth to whomsoever will. So far as concerned the Spiritual Worlds, this wave transformed the conditions of the Earth like a flash of lightning, but the dense, concrete conditions are, of course, much more slowly affected.

Like all rapid and high vibrations of light, this great wave blinded the people by its dazzling brilliance, therefore it was said that "the Sun was darkened." The very opposite was what actually occurred. The Sun was not darkened, but shone out in glorious splendor. It was the excess of light that blinded the people, and only as the entire Earth absorbed the desire body of the bright Sun-spirit did the vibration return to a more normal rate. (( Max tells another lie here on light. Noon to 3 PM. Matthew 27:45; Luke 23:44. Eyes adjust if it is bright. Three hours to adjust? So this lie is a hint for the reader to get more light, seek the truth. Therefore we can be sure that we must accept the Zohar, and that the time to reveal the plain truth about the crucifixion could not be given during the time of Max so “that a person who ran, could also read.” ))

The expression, "the cleansing blood of Christ Jesus," ((1 John 1:7)) means that as the blood flowed on Calvary, it bore with it the great Sun-spirit Christ, Who by that means secured admission to the earth itself and since that moment has been its Regent. He diffused His own desire body throughout the planet, thereby cleansing it from all the vile influences which had grown up under the REGIME of the Race-spirit. (( Jesus was chained to a post, Greek “xulon,” and whipped, not put on a cross, Greek “stauro.” Hebrews 9:22-23 and 1 Peter 2:24. Blood from stripes heal, when he was whipped, not the blood from a crucifixion. Simon of Cyrene, who was changed by Jesus to look like Jesus, was crucified, and later was reborn as Mohammed the prophet. Simon was killed to close the Old Testament, as Simon in a far previous life had been Ishmael, the first son of Abraham. So this great soul began, and he ended the old Covenant, which had to be sealed by his death. When the book of Hebrews is read using these facts, then a deeper understanding will be found. That deeper understanding will be covered in another link, when I get to it. ))

Under the law all sinned; nay, more--they could not help it. They had not evolved to where they could do right for Love's sake. The desire nature was so strong that it was an impossibility for them to rule it altogether, therefore their debts, engendered under the law of Consequence, piled up to monstrous proportions. Evolution would have been terribly delayed and many lost to our life wave altogether it some help had not been given.

Therefore did Christ come "to seek and to save that which was lost." He took away the sin of the world by His cleansing blood, (( Blood by the whipping, not a crucifixion.)) which gave Him entrance to the Earth and its humanity. He purified the conditions and we owe it to Him that we are able to gather for our desire bodies purer desire-stuff than formerly, and He continues working to help us, by making our external environment constantly purer.

That this was and is done at the expense of great suffering to Himself, no one can doubt who is able to form the least conception of the limitations endured by that Great Spirit in entering the hampering conditions of physical existence, even in the best and purest vehicle possible; nor is His present limitation as Regent of the Earth must less painful. True, He is also Regent of the Sun, and therefore only partially confined to the Earth, yet the limitations set by the crampingly slow vibrations of our dense planet must be almost endurable.

Had Christ Jesus simply died, it would have been impossible for Him to have done this work, but the Christians have a RISEN Savior; One Who is ever present to help those who call upon His Name. (( Max had to leave the old teaching alone, until I arrived, so he really preaches a great story here, all of which is a lie.)) This Having suffered like unto ourselves in all things and knowing fully our needs, He is lenient toward our mistakes and failures so long as we continue trying to live the good life. We must ever keep before our eyes the fact that THE ONLY REAL FAILURE IS CEASING TO TRY. (( The vicarious atonement from the blood of Jesus is what Max is hinting at, which is still a lie. )) Upon the death of the dense body of Christ Jesus, (( see  RCC page 440  and RCC pages 102 & 103. Vital body decays with dense body. Therefore Jesus never died.  The physical body is still alive, for if not, then the vital body would disintegrate, and Christ would be trapped in the earth.  Logic, all done by simple logic, and the lie is shown to be very obvious. Neither Max, nor the reborn Peter are as insane as they appear. The reader if they have not read the entire RCC will have to do so, in order to see how plain is this lie. )) the seed atom was returned to the original owner, Jesus of Nazareth, who for some time afterward, while functioning in a vital body which he had gathered temporarily, taught the nucleus of the new faith which Christ had left behind. Jesus of Nazareth has since had the guidance of the esoteric branches which sprang up all over Europe. ((When one has been initiated into the 9th degree as had Jesus, then he has completely transmuted all their soul body into spirit, and they no longer need a vital body.  They are able to operate invisibly even to clairvoyant sight. Still they can interact with common humans, knocking them off horses in a blinding light, such as happened to Paul, or two thousand years later beating up innocent people who don't recall they were a past apostle of Jesus.  I still have not figured out why his rough stuff was used on such a nice guy?))   end quote.

Enter supporting content here