Get paid on 100%
of your website traffic, no clicks necessary! How is this possible? <<CLICK HERE>>
(A great ad program
Dr.Quack suggests to all visitors who run websites and
blogs. For carrying content-related audio ads on your
site which does not require click-thru and loss of
readership, you're paid 25% of whatever advertisers pay +
5% of ad revenues on all referrals ever sent. The major
search engines are starting to catch on.
We get paid here
from just anyone's visit + the more time you spend here
reading. Thus, Dr. Quack's long-winded nature actually
pays. When we put you to sleep, a 5 second audio ad wakes
you up every 3 minutes! We're paid regardless of what you
think of the site. If you like our Google ads and
products listed enough to click on, we earn a little. If
you don't, that's fine, too. If you run a site or blog
and want to see revenues,by telling you about it, we make
5% on what your site ads generate. Simple as that. No
money taken from you; Just paid if you have the content
people like to read.)
In
exchange for double-opting in to our Biosecurity mail
list, we give you Basic Membership status which entitles
you to some information non-subscribers don't receive.
It's fast, easy, and free. We do not sell or
distribute your email address outside of MDYNE. For
starters, we give you access to the Bird Flu defense
files. Whenever there are major site revisions or news
releases, we tell you.
I am a big fan and also a critic of
a great homeopathic physician abroad who has tended to over 5,000
cancer patients using mostly homeopathy. Below is a chart
of his best homeopathic cure rates per cancer type using almost
no Conventional Medicine, dietary protocols, or Natural Medicine
as of 2001. He's very, very good. His scores against
cancer are better than any doctor in the world I know about at
the moment, but I continue to suspect his methods very lethal in
the weaker cancer cases. If his best methodology were
further improved, I believe all of these statistics would be
improved -- particularly in the weak cases. If more
attention were paid to a suitable mixture of Natural Medicine and
Orthomolecular foundation with his methods while utilizing more
appropriate methods of Advanced Classical Homeopathy....then,
we'd actually improve these numbers!
* It should be noted to my
readers that these statistics most certainly do not
apply to the majority of the world's homeopathic
prescribers. If you have cancer and are looking to a
homeopath for help, do not deal with anyone who does not
fully disclose their victories and failures. Most don't
even keep score. The better ones do. It is not a
scientific method if you don't. This chart I've
compiled below represents about what is the best in the world
and latest, pure homeopathic power against various
cancer forms. That curative power can be amplified or
degraded by integration with Conventional, Natural, and other
styles of Medicine. The trick is to apply our
methodology properly from the start while properly
integrating with the best of what presently exists.
Whatever system the reader be under,
make sure to compare these stats with those of your other medical
options. In some easier forms of cancer, Conventional
Medicine is the most horrible course to take.
When dealing with a more complex and entrenched case -- such
as Multiple Myeloma, Leukemia, or Liver Cancer -- sometimes it
helps to cheat a bit at times with Conventional drugs and
therapies, and then back off while cleaning up those damages
done. Whatever it takes to get the job done!
Radiation, Surgery, Bone Marrow transplant (using your own cells,
non-embryonic stem cell cultivation, etc) and cytotoxic
drugs can be of great benefit and ought not be written off
by the Alternative Medicine fan so soon. While these
methods do much damage, they are in keeping with the philosophy
that sometimes, in homeopathy, you are best to attack at the
pathology first and then clean up the case over time. More
important than any of that, it always just depends upon what the
patient wants to do.
The scores of mostly pure
homeopathy:
Cancer
form
No.
of Patients after 1993
%
Success
Notes
Brain
250
70
Oral Cavity
150
86
Larynx/Vocal
100
70
Thyroid/Parotid
40
71
Esophagus
210
80
Mediastinal
40
73
Breast
380
80
Lung
90
58
Weakened patient, usually; Vitality
core.
Stomach
130
55
Weakened patient,usually; Vitality
core.
Pancreas
98
75
Liver
312
32
Very weakened patients; Vitality
core.
Colon
290
40
Weakend patients; Vitality core.
Rectum
170
82
Bladder
94
72
Prostate
150
80
Ovary
95
69
Unknown reasons, to this
author, why it is a tougher cancer.
Uterus
120
45
Unknown reasons. Hormonal
feeding of metastasis?
Cervix
104
68
Bone
114
74
Leukemia
205
54
Weakened
patients; Vitality core.
Hodgkin's Lymphoma
85
77
Melanoma
52
71
Skin
45
80
WHERE ARE WE FAILING TO
RENDER PERFECT CURE?!
The lowest statistical cures for
cancer tend to be in those pathologies where the patient is
stricken at the core of vitality -- blood,
digestion/nutrition/absorption, breathing (not to mention
smoking's overall vitality assault and systemic wear-down,
particularly upon the liver and other negative lifestyle/
mental factors common to the smoker). While these patients
respond well to high potency remedies, it takes years and decades
for cancer to reach at such a deep level -- therefore, aggressive
medicine in trying to produce a rapid cure will tend to break the
patient where lower potency remedies, nutritional support, and
return to a normal lifestyle slowly will not. As is
typical of all curative actions upon chronic disease, once the
medicine makes the patient feel better, they are all the more
likely to go out and overexert themselves -- feeling completely
fine the whole time under artificial sensations. Here,
homeopathy has cured the symptoms expressed but not dealt with
the underlying, subtle disease picture and full symptom set --
often due to over-reliance upon the Kentian prescribing
models.
One cannot take in a
serious cancer case among a 1 to 2 hour office interview
with 30 minute follow-ups thereafter. It takes about a week
of near full-time analysis and library research just to
begin such cases. You have to start the curative ball
rolling gently so as not to lose control of the case in the early
stages. Once a remission trend is established, it does not
matter about the speed of cure. The case is under control
and ought not be sped to cure because it takes the body time to
adjust and rebuild.
If the medicinal action upon the
Vital Force too far exceeds the body's restorative time and
capacity to rebuild, the patient will always develop new disease
patterns, symptom spikes, and breakdown somewhere -- often with
lethal consequences as a direct function of the medicinal
aggression.
What is being performed among these
patient losses is essentially Aggravation at high
potency under not exactly matched remedies because no remedy is
ever an exact fit. As the case changes, the
spin upon the potter's wheel induced has too much angular
momentum and the physician is not given enough time to adapt to
patient needs and properly shape the "clay" due to the
rapidity in which he attempts to invoke cure. One does not
assemble a masterpiece in pottery by being quick, harsh, and
sloppy. There is no rush. The slower and more gentle
the approach -- particularly in the worst, deepest-reaching,
and longest in previous pathologic course -- to
chronic disease, the less we damage or kill the patient.
With these weak patients, it is a very simple matter to cause
aggravation in them of such severity that lethality is induced
near instantly. Such can be done with homeopathic remedies
even among the very strong and healthy patients.
It is a complete myth and most naive
view of pharmacology that homeopathy "does no
harm" and can only do good wonders. If such were the
truth, the old masters would not have lectured on it, argued over
methodology, and Hahnemann would never have told us it is our
duty to anti-dote when we botch a case.
Homeopaths: do not lie to yourselves or the patient.
