|
By Philip Blattenberger
Doug and Sherman News Flash!
Over the
last few months, my comic has undergone several major changes.
For one, I
have changed the comic's size. Before, I drew them on a sheet of
eight-and-a-half by eleven paper. I separated the sheet into four
sections and drew regular four-panel comics, the first panel at the
upper left corner and the last at the lower right. I am now drawing them
on panels the size of regular newspaper comics. The second major change
is the method with which I draw them. Previously I used whatever pencil
happened to be laying around the room, usually a .07 mm. mechanical
pencil. I have now switched to the more common method of ink, using an
adjustable pen holder and different size nibs. The quality of the comic
skyrocketed when I started using the ink, although there is less room
for error.
The third major change is the comic's name. "Doug and
Sherman" was too...well, plain, to be honest. "Doug and Sherman" just
doesn't cut it. When a reader sees the name "Doug and Sherman" on a
website listing, or on the comics page of the newspaper, it isn't
something that makes you think, well, I'll have to look at that, it
sounds interesting. Nobody really knows what Doug and Sherman is unless
they've read the comics, so I've changed the name to Divide and Conquer.
The name fits the comic precisely, going by Doug's attitude towards
life. The website's address will remain the same, as Doug and Sherman
are still the comic's main characters, and the name is still applicable.
E-mail me to comment on the new comics and also, the new name.
Divide and Conquer:
A History
I started my comic strip, Doug and
Sherman, on May eighth, 1998. A long-time fan of Bill Watterson's
"Calvin and Hobbes" and Bill Amend's "Foxtrot", I
was inspired to begin.
My first job was to
come up with a main character. Being such a huge fan of "Calvin and
Hobbes", I chose a young boy, maybe six or seven. (It worked for
Watterson, didn't it?) I originally wrote down about ten characters, but
decided most were pretty lame. Finally, I settled on the right one.
He had several spikes of hair (unkempt, not punk) and a small,
ill-proportioned body. There was a great deal of similarity between my
character and Calvin. As a beginner in the wonderful world of
cartooning, I didn't really care about that. I was still feeling out the
comic strip's world. I struggled between two names for my character:
"Scott" and "Doug". I finally decided I liked the last name better.
The next addition to
my comic strip was even less of an original idea. I decided that since
Bill Watterson's Calvin had a talking tiger, Doug should have...a
talking turtle. More of that originality at work.
But, as I said
earlier, I didn't care about that at the time. I began creating Doug and
Sherman comics right away. The first one was a Sunday comic. Six panels
long, it explained how Doug met Sherman, out in a grassy field. I
thought it was pretty funny then, but now it looks awkward and forced. I
wrote the next one, also a Sunday comic. (All my Sunday comics were six
panels back then, by the way.) In the original comics, Doug's friend the
turtle was named "Herman". It was the only name I could think of at that
time. Then the name "Sherman" hit me. I thought, perfect! That's just
what I need! Then a stunning realization hit me. There was a Sherman
on the comic strip "Sherman's lagoon!" Hurriedly I blasted through the
morning paper, and found (to my great relief) that Sherman was the
shark. (I thought Sherman was the turtle at the time. The turtle's name
is Fillmore.) At any rate, after that fiasco, I finally had a working
comic strip. "Doug and Sherman" featured the misadventures of a
seven-year-old and his friend, a talking turtle. I began rattling comics
out a mile a minute. Though some of the ideas were clever, the drawings
were...well, hideous. I needed lots of work in that aspect. I wrote
about a week and a half worth of Doug and Sherman comics. Doug, like
Calvin, had a puny body and a large head. He struggled with the same
issues Calvin did: TV-watching rights, bath protests, runaway
imaginations, etc. I enjoyed doing the comics, but I quickly got bored
of the whole thing. After a week and a half, I quit the strip.
Sometime around the
beginning of August that same year, I realized I had to get something
for my Dad's birthday. I remembered him enjoying my comic strip, so I
decided to start it up again. It took a bit of practice to draw Doug
efficiently again, but I managed. Sherman, on the other hand, was no
problem. His large shell, teardrop head, and stubby fins were rather
simplistic. I drew several weeks worth of the comics, improving a great
deal. The drawing improved only slightly, but the humor of the comic
increased dramatically. The comics, overall, flowed much better. I also
added in a new feature for Doug and Sherman. Doug had three siblings who
were mysteriously absent from the household for about three months. (I
tried to explain the thing with a lame story about them being on a class
trip to another country). Richard was nine, two years older than Doug. Tom
was eight, and Doug's sister, Donna, was six. This, I decided, added a
lot more life and originality to the strip. Doug and Sherman was rolling
right along.
And then Doug
mutated.
JUST KIDDING!
He didn't mutate, but he looked a whole heck of a lot different. In
January-February of 1999, I bought a large sketchpad, and began drawing
large comics. Each panel was a quarter of the page. The 8 1/2- by 11-inch
paper provided for 4 1/4- by 5 1/2-inch panels. I could now draw in large
size, adding more detail. I changed Doug's appearance on the first strip
I drew in that book. The new Doug, compared the old one, was HUGE!
He had regular sized hands and feet, his arms no longer hung halfway up
his torso, and his legs were actually of this world. The new Doug,
though harder and more complicated to draw, was much more versatile. I
could express my ideas and jokes through Doug with much more ease.
Sherman, meanwhile, never really changed that much. His head rounded out
some, and his shell became larger and fuller.
I continued to draw
my comics. Slight changes were made here and there, but Doug still
looked like Doug, and Sherman like Sherman. I added the idea of Doug
being a black belt in martial arts, and I continued the use of his
brothers and sister. I drew probably one-hundred and fifty of them
total, over the next two years. These included full-length Sunday comics
(no longer wimpy six-panel ones, either). My dailies ranged from regular
four panel gags to long stories lasting more than a week. I was pleased
with my comic.
But slowly an issue
appeared - one I knew I'd have to confront sooner or later. I was aware
of it when I started the comic in '98. The problem loomed larger and
larger as I began exploring the possibility of publication. I knew
Sherman the turtle, a favorite character in my comic strip, would have
to leave. He just wasn't original enough. Canceling Sherman from the
strip was very hard to do, but I knew it was necessary for the strip to
survive and possibly be published. Following is the note I wrote
explaining the dismissal of Sherman from the strip.
IMPORTANT NOTICE
I began the comic "Doug and Sherman" over three
years ago in May of 1998.
From the very beginning, it was Doug and his
amphibious pal, that amazing talking turtle. In the years that followed,
I never really changed them much. Doug's appearance changed a little,
Sherman's shell got bigger, I added siblings for Doug, ect. The cartoon
was, in my opinion, successful.
However, it lacked one thing: originality. It
followed the same theme as Bill Watterson's "Calvin and Hobbes"; a
mischievous kid and his talking animal friend. Sherman, like Hobbes, was
witty, sensible, and usually quiet and sincere. Doug was like Calvin -
obnoxious to a degree, presumptuous, hyper, whiny, impatient, with
unlimited sarcasm. The themes of both comic strips were basically the
same. Now that "Calvin and Hobbes" has left the cartooning world, there
are no more comics with that type of theme. However, "Calvin and Hobbes"
was an irreplaceable work of art. Any attempt to copy the idea, and be
successful, would be completely futile. That is why Sherman, a
well-loved character in my strip, is leaving "Doug and Sherman" now.
Sherman has been a wonderful character to draw.
He has improved my drawing skills, greatly increased the level of
hilarity in the strip, and added, overall, a great level of personality
to the strip. It is with great regret that I discontinue drawing Sherman
the turtle in the strip. Sherman's namesake, however, will be
passed on - to a new character. The cartoon will be about Doug, a boy,
and Sherman - his brother. This will keep the humorous relationship in
the strip. Sherman the boy will have the same personality as Sherman the
turtle, so the humor and bond between Doug and Sherman will remain
relatively the same. Again, I regret dropping the character of Sherman.
However, the new change will make my work much more original, as well as
opening it up to a whole new range of possibilities.
The removal of Sherman from the strip, in my
opinion, takes a very large piece out of the strip - mainly because
Sherman was there from the beginning. However, it is a necessary measure
in ensuring the originality - and possible publication - of the strip. I
close with the promise that Sherman the turtle will still be in the
strip...as Doug's pet turtle, a normal one that doesn't speak. It is my
sincere hope that the strip continues successfully. I'm glad I started
the strip - but it wouldn't have been possible to keep my interest in it
without a certain turtle.
Thank-you, Sherman.
-Philip Blattenberger
6/8/01
Well, that's it. I definitely
have enjoyed drawing Sherman the turtle. I've already drawn over a
week's worth of new comics featuring Doug and his brother, Sherman. Doug
and Sherman are twin brothers, ten years old. I
hope the strip continues successfully. As soon as possible, I'll provide
you with some pictures of the new Sherman - and the first set of comics
featuring him.
Doug and Sherman
Archives
Below are examples of several comics
that I've already done.
This comic was one of my first Sunday
strips. It was definitely not very good: choppy
drawing, forced humor. However, I was an amateur
then. The comics I create now are far more sophisticated.
NOTE: These
comics were originally drawn with a regular pencil. The lines were
smooth, and everything looked a lot better. In order to successfully
place them on this website, I had to process them through Image Composer
and the Paint program - thus the choppy lines. The actual comics are
much, much better - more fun to read, and more fun to look at. Keep
reading the comics section of your newspaper - one day
Divide and Conquer may be in there. |