COMPARISON OF SALARIES OF COUNTY LIBRARY "CHAIN-OF-COMMAND"
REGARDING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MANAGEMENT POLICY
It is important to understand the difficulty of criticizing the official policy of the County Library
department's "chain-of-command" regarding my many grievance
actions of "annual" Performance Evaluations and appeals of Appraisal of
Promotability examinations. My "chain-of-command" consists of four "top" Library
administrators, two "regional" administrators, and one "Librarian IV" who
supervises a "B-sized" community library.
Together, they make a total of $578,212 annually at their "maximum" salary levels (or
more than one-half million dollars), whereas, I make only approximately $43,000 annually.
They think their bureaucratic positions and "high" salary levels
make them "right" regarding the administration of annual performance evaluations
and appraisal of promotability examinations. I know my knowledge, skills, abilities, and
personal characteristics make me "right" regarding the issues! My professional perspective
has grown out of my 31 years of professional employment with the County Library
Department serving the public ("customers") in two community libraries which have experienced
vast social and technological changes.
In 1996 during my appeal of an Appraisal of Promotability Examination,
the Library department attached one of my previous Performance Evaluations to the
official moving papers. The Performance Evaluation form had been administered
(signed) nine months late and had been properly grieved
because of the violations of Civil Service Commission Rules and Regulations
made by my building supervisor and the two regional administrators. The mistakes and
irregularities of the performance evaluation process conducted by the Library department
seemed self-evident to me but were not investigated by the Civil Service Commission
at that time.
Nevertheless, top Library administrators and County of Los Angeles Department of Human
Resources (DHR) analysts attempted to discourage my appeal efforts by attacking my
professional character and reputation instead of changing their outdated
employee evaluation policy.
My main amended appraisal appeal point was that County Library administrators
had not implemented the CSC's "Rules-and-Regulations" properly.
In my case, they had not done "timely and complete" annual evaluations
based upon "fixed" rating standards as required by the Civil Service Code
regarding the proper conduct of performance evaluations. In addition, I argued that the
specific 1996 appraisal of promotability examination procedures were based upon faulty
assumptions and, therefore, unfair and discriminatory because they were excessively
subjective!
I have specific examples ("evidence") of the lack of understanding of my "chain-of-command"
regarding their responsibility to implement the CSC Rules and Regulations concerned with
annual performance evaluations and appraisals of promotability. Also, they failed to follow the
DHR requirements in the OLd Performance Evaluation
Rater's Handbook and also the requirements in the NEW
training materials from March 1998. Therefore, I maintain that they are deliberately violating
existing official policy, or the essential "Rules and Regulations," which are supposed to
protect County employees from the abuse of administrative authority.
They do it every day when Library administrators and supervisors in the "chain-of-command"
sign false evaluation forms, which were not administered in the way sanctioned
by the CSC Rules and Regulations. Those violations do great harm to their subordinates since
they jeopardize the careers of hundreds of professional and para-professional library employees.
TABLE 1. COMPARISON OF SALARIES OF LIBRARY "CHAIN-OF-COMMAND"
|
POSITION |
SALARIES |
RANGE |
| County Librarian |
$95,354 - $143,031 |
$47,687 |
| Chief, Public Services |
$66,419 - $99,629 |
$33,210 |
| Head, Human Resources |
$61,785 - $92,677 |
$30,892 |
| Assistant, Human Resources |
$50,501 - $62,748 |
$12,247 |
| Regional Administrator |
$61,785 - $92,677 |
$30,892 |
| Assistant Regional Aministrator |
$53,464 - $80,196 |
$26,732 |
| Community Library Manager IV * |
$40,546 - $50,254 |
$9,708 |
| Librarian I** |
$34,536 - $42,772 |
$8,236 |
* Community Library Managers ("CLMs") are building supervisors designated as
"Librarian IIs, IIIs, IVs & Vs" depending on the size of the libraries.
** The "Librarian I" position is the "lowest" salary level Classification. They do reference
and children's work but never do "line" supervision, except under emergency conditions.
TABLE 2. COMPARISON OF TOP SALARIES
OF ADMINISTRATORS AND MY "CLASS IV" SUPERVISOR
|
ADMINISTRATORS |
--- MINIMUM --- |
---RANGE --- |
--- MAXIMUM --- |
|
County Librarian |
$95,354 |
$47,687 |
$143,031 |
|
Chief, Public Services |
$66,419 |
$33,210 |
$99,629 |
|
Head, Human Resources |
$61,785 |
$30,892 |
$92,677 |
|
Asst, Head Human Resources |
$50,501 |
$12,247 |
$62,748 |
|
Regional Administrator |
$61,785 |
$30,892 |
$92,677 |
|
Regional Area Manager |
$53,464 |
$26,732 |
$80,196 |
|
Supervisor (Librarian IV) |
$40,546 |
$9,708 |
$50,254 |
|
TOTAL |
- |
- |
$621,212 |
May 1998 (Updated/May 1, 2000)
TABLE 2. The data compares the annual salaries of County Library
administrators in the "chain-of-command" regarding the implementation
of "annual" Performance Evaluations.
Library administrators and building supervisors control the professional destinies of hundreds of
librarians in the "lower-income" salary levels , as in my case, which is shown in Table 2.
The "bureaucratic" habits of administrators dominate the "annual"
Performance Evaluation Management Policy and Appraisal of Promotability rating
procedures of the County Library department. The dysfunctional habits
jeopardize the need of subordinate librarians in the "lower
income" salary levels , which is maximum "objectivity" and "fairness" .
The problem is that those subordinate librarians at the "lower-income" salary
levels do not get sufficient respect , (recognition and appeciation) for
their "Outstanding" (or excellent) professional work performance, which is providing
information services to the public. That is because their supervisors are not accountable
for implementing the official County Performance Evaluation rating procedures and developing
and using written uniform objective "Work Standards" and "Rating Standards!"
Table 3. VISUAL COMPARISON OF TOP SALARIES
OF "CHAIN-OF-COMMAND" LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS
(Based on Data in Table 2)
| County Librarian |
Salary Classification Level at maximum salary |
$143,031 |
| Chief, Public Services |
Salary Classification Level at maximum salary |
$ 99,629 |
| Head, Human Resources |
Salary Classification Level at maximum salary |
$ 92,677 |
| Asst., Human Resources |
Salary Classification Level at maximum salary |
$ 62,748 |
| Regional Adminstrator |
Salary Classification Level at maximum salary |
$ 92,677 |
| Regional Area Mngr. |
Salary Classification Level at maximum salary |
$ 80,196
|
| Bldg. Supervisor |
Salary Classification Level at maximum salary |
$ 50,254 |
| TOTAL "CHAIN-OF-COMMAND" SUPERVISORS AND ADMINISTRATORS |
$621,212 |
TABLE 4. VISUAL COMPARISON OF CAREER LADDER FOR LIBRARY
ADMINISTRATORS AND SUPERVISORS REGARDING TOP SALARIES
(Based on Data in Table 2)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Libn. |
| |
|
|
|
|
Public. Serv. |
$143,000 |
| |
|
|
|
Pers. Head |
$99,600 |
|
| |
|
|
Pers. Asst. |
$92,700 |
|
|
| |
|
Reg. Adm. |
$62,700 |
|
|
|
| |
Area Mgr. |
$92,7000 |
|
|
|
|
| Bldg. Sup. |
$80,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
| $50,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|