Background
The idea that people learn differently is venerable
and probably had its origin with the ancient Greeks (Wratcher,
Morrison, Riley & Scheirton, 1997). Educators have, for many
years, noticed that some students prefer certain methods of learning
more than others. These dispositions, referred to as learning
styles, form a student's unique learning preference and aid
teachers in the planning of small-group and individualized instruction
(Kemp, Morrison & Ross, 1998, p. 40). Grasha (1996), has
defined learning styles as, "personal qualities that influence
a student's ability to acquire information, to interact with
peers and the teacher, and otherwise participate in learning
experiences" (p. 41).
The Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style
Scales (GRSLSS), an instrument developed in the early 1970s,
has been used to identify the preferences learners have for interacting
with peers and the instructor in the classroom setting (Grasha,
1996).
Description of Styles
The six social learning styles identified
by this model are the Independent, Dependent, Competitive, Collaborative,
Avoidant, and Participant. The Independent learner prefers independent
study, self-paced instruction and would prefer to work alone
on course projects than with other students. Dependent learners
look to the teacher and to peers as a source of structure and
guidance and prefer an authority figure to tell them what to
do. Competitive learners learn in order to perform better than
their peers and to receive recognition for their academic accomplishments.
Collaborative learners learn by sharing and by cooperation with
teacher and peers. They prefer lectures with small group discussions
and group projects. Avoidant learners are not enthused about
attending class or learning class content. They are typically
uninterested and are often overwhelmed by class activities. The
Participants enjoy class and make good class citizens. They are
interested in class activities and discussion and eager to do
class work.
The styles described by the GRSLSS refer to a blend of characteristics
that apply to all students (Grasha, 1996, p. 127). Each person
possesses a bit of each of the learning styles. Ideally, one
would have a balance of all the learning styles; however, most
people gravitate toward one or two of the learning style preferences.
Learning preferences are likely to change as one encounters new
life and educational experiences. In fact, Grasha (1996) has
suggested that particular teaching styles might encourage students
to adopt certain learning styles (p. 177).
Using the GRSLSS for Online Research
Of the different learning style instruments
available the GRSLSS seems ideal for assessing student learning
preferences in a college-level distance education setting. First,
the GRSLSS is one of the few instruments designed specifically
to be used with senior high school and college/university students
(Hruska-Riechmann & Grasha, 1982). Second, the GRSLSS is
a relevant scale to use for distance research since it addresses
the social dynamic that serves as the main difference between
the distance and traditional groups. The scales focus on how
students interact with the instructor, other students, and with
learning in general; thus, the scales address one of the key
distinguishing features of a distance class: the relative absence
of social interaction between instructor/student and student/student.
Third, the GRSLSS promotes an optimal teaching/learning environment
by helping faculty design courses and develop sensitivity to
student/learner needs. Fourth, the GRSLSS promotes understanding
of learning styles in a broad context by spanning six categories.
Since students possess all of six learning styles to a greater
or lesser extent, this system of classification prevents learning
style stereotyping and provides incentive for growth in underused
learning style areas.
Riechmann and Grasha (1974) described the process
for collection of construct validity data on the initial versions of
the GRSLSS. Test-retest reliabilities (seven-day interval between testings)
ranged (across scales) from .76 for the Dependent scale to .83 for the
Independent scales (N = 269, Males = 119, Females = 150).
To learn more about this learning style instrument
contact: Tony Grasha, Ph.D,
Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH 454221.