LEGAL EAGLE

by

Charles M. Finkel, Esq.


"WHY UFOs RARELY LAND IN THE USA"


There has been considerable speculation as to what recently caused concern to thousands of Arizonans. As reported by the media, a strange lighted object was seen to hover and float across the skies of practically the entire state. Even Arizona's Governor was calling for an investigation into this mass sighting, which clearly had to be classified as an Unidentified Flying Object. I conducted my own investigation into what caused this eerie occurrence, and am now able to report what really happened that night in Arizona (assuming my sources are to be trusted). This truly is something that will be swept into the X- Files. Because of the actions of a certain government employee, our destiny has been changed forever. Had it not been for my investigation, what you are about to read would never have made its way to the public's eyes.
That which was seen by so many was actually an alien craft visiting us from a far off universe. On board were emissaries of advanced civilizations, willing to meet with us earthlings, and share their valuable secrets. Had their mission gone as they had hoped, human beings would have benefitted from scientific advances I cannot even begin to describe. Unfortunately for the human race, the first person to board the alien ship when it touched down on the outskirts of Phoenix, was an inspector from the FAA's Phoenix Flight Standards District Office.
"Please come aboard - you are welcome," said the ship's commander, communicating through a voice translation computer, capable of interpreting over ten billion languages and dialects.
"Are you aware that you just violated Phoenix Class B airspace?" queried the FSDO inspector. "You apparently have no functioning transponder, no two-way voice communications, and certainly had no clearance to operate within Class B airspace. Further, you violated Class C and D airspace. Our office has received hundreds of calls from irate citizens complaining of your cruising over populated areas at less than 1,000' AGL. I, myself, witnessed your aircraft conduct an aerobatic flight maneuver, and I dare say that I see no parachutes on board. I am afraid you are in violation of numerous sections of the Federal Aviation Regulations!"
"Perhaps you don't understand," the alien tried to explain. "We are here to help you."
"I've heard that before," replied the inspector.
Another alien stepped forward and spoke. "Allow me to provide an explanation. We have come trillions of miles, traveled more light years than you can image, just to meet with earthlings. We come in peace, and want to share our scientific secrets with your people in an effort to prevent you from destroying your planet."
"Who are you, his attorney? I'm afraid that is no excuse for violating Class B airspace," said the inspector, as he thumbed through his copy of the FARs, trying to see what other regulations had been busted. "And don't bother filing a NASA report, I consider these violations intentional and reckless. I would like to see the pilot's medical certificate and license. I also want to see his log book. This aircraft looks unairworthy to me, and I'm going to ground it. And by the way," the inspector now was staring at the commander, "you don't look very well. Your skin is green and scaly. You have three eyes, and your brain appears to be bulging out of your skin. I'm going to have to write you up for operating an aircraft with a known medical deficiency."
The aliens were clearly upset, and counseled amongst themselves.
"Apparently you folks are not being very cooperative. You have yet to show me your license and log book, despite my having made a reasonable request. Nor have you provided a reasonable explanation for violating so many FARs. Therefore, I shall exercise my emergency revocation powers."
The aliens had heard enough. Clearly, the human race was not ready to benefit from the scientific advances the aliens had to offer. Perhaps it was better if the earthlings remained on their path of global destruction. The Commander politely ushered the FSDO inspector off the ship, closed its door, and charted a course far from the Milky Way.
"Well I'll be," uttered the stunned inspector to himself. "As long as I am with the FAA, that pilot will never get his license back, no matter how many times he re-applies."

Although I have yet to meet this particular FAA employee, I have had many encounters with inspectors and FAA attorneys while representing pilots in enforcement actions in the Los Angeles area. Both have considerable discretion on how to deal with infractions of the FARs, and both yield considerable power over airmen. While I do not condone violations of the law or poor flying habits, one would expect that our government employees exercise a modicum of civility and cooperation with the pilots they seek to punish. I find that to be all too often lacking in FAA inspectors and attorneys, who obviously have learned to relish the power they yield.
One need only recall the travesty that was thrust upon famed pilot Bob Hoover, when the FAA yanked his medical certificate without good cause. Fortunatley, after a 3-year battle, Mr. Hoover won his battle with the FAA, and regained his certification to fly. Now, pending in both the House and the Senate, is Senate Bill 842, aptly named the "Hoover Bill". It is aimed at preventing the aggressive, and too often, meritless use of the FAA's emergency authority to revoke certificates. As stated in the August 1997 issue of AOPA PILOT, "Since 1989, the percentage of emergency cases heard by the NTSB has more than quintupled."
The Bill, if passed, would give pilots 2 days to demand a hearing on the FAA's right to utilize emergency proceedings. The NTSB would have to decide within 7 days if the emergency order is justified. Emergency orders require immediate caseation of piloting privileges, as opposed to an ordinary order, which allows the pilot to use his or her license pending appeals. Thus, quick action as to whether or not an emergency order is justified, would be a welcome change to the rules of conduct in FAA enforcement matters.
I recently experienced an example of how arbitrary and unjust an FAA attorney's conduct can be with regard to emergency orders. A pilot was involved in an accident, and the FAA FSDO inspector wanted to see his logbook. An inspection can take place if there is a "reasonable" request. We replied that we would make the logbook available upon receipt of an explanation as to the grounds for review of the logbook. Despite the FAA inspector having received my letter, and despite the FAA attorney having reviewed my letter, neither I, nor my client, ever received a response to my letter. Rather than writing or calling to discuss the matter, and act reasonably and cooperatively, the attorney issued an Emergency Order of Suspension for failure to produce the logbook. A copy of the order was sent to my attention, confirming the fact that the attorney knew I was involved. I immediately called him to see why this drastic and unnecessary action was taken. His response was cavalier, and devoid of any shred of cooperation or decency.
There is much written about how attorneys should learn more about civility, and avoid unnecessary combative tactics. I attempt to treat adversaries with the respect and cooperation they are due. I counsel my clients to cooperate, as long as it does not interfere with their rights. I expect the same from other counsel. The conduct exhibited by this FAA attorney is a prime example of why the "Hoover Bill" is necessary.
I know of several local FSDO inspectors who could not make it as a pilot in the world of General Aviation. At least one was fired as a charter pilot. Sometimes, the move to the FAA is to become a self-perceived autocrat, who yields considerable power over the fates of those holding pilot or mechanic certificates. These authority figures expect us to cooperate with them, but often fail to cooperate with us. Pilots should obey the rules, and act responsibly. Yet, fear of action by the authorities should not be the compelling factor to engender compliance with the FARs. If FAA FSDO inspectors and attorneys learned more about relating with the people who pay their salaries, we all really could get along a lot better. Perhaps, we might even see a few more UFOs landing in our midst!


Back to main page

Charles M. Finkel is an attorney specializing in aviation law with offices in Beverly Hills, California. Owner of a Beechcraft Debonair and co-pilot on the B-25 Heavenly Body, Charles M. Finkel has been a licensed pilot for 30 years and has ATP, CFI, CFII, CFIMEL, and Glider licenses. He is a monthly contributor to Air Progress and Flying Career magazines. If you have any legal questions, please call 213.655.9989 or contact me at clfinkel@earthlink.net

 

for more information on the B-25 click here